₦airaland Forum

shadeyinka:
I pray that our obedience to loving others will increase day by day!

Ameen, my brother.

EMILO2STAY:
why do you waste time arguing with these people I have shamed times without number. they have no thinking faculty and live a life of too much pretence.

Emily, your explanations are more consistent with reality but the spinning ball earth explanations rely too much on theories, which is my main problem with it. How can something so physical require so many theoretical innuendos to grasp its basic concept.

budaatum:
You too lie, aadozia, lol, or you just can not read!

I had already modified it, it was not your master but kant.

budaatum:
Please stop lying. Especially when your lying can very easily be proven.

Though, even with evidence placed in front of you I bet you'd continue insisting you are right!

Martian never called Heidegger a racist!

He did not call your master heidegger racist. Na kant

budaatum:
For your eyes, the atmosphere of the earth no dey touch the earth. Lol.

For your eyes the atmosphere is bottled in a vessel like your coke. SMH

shadeyinka:
We are ALL guilty of not loving enough. We love by convenience but love is all about giving the other person sacrificially. We love only when it serves our interest to do so!

Love is NOT selectively giving our ward with marginal qualifications job over a "stranger" who is better qualified

Love is NOT selectively favouring Christians over Muslims just for the sake of religion.

Love is NOT using my political power to favour Christians over Muslims.

Luk 6:32:
"For if you love them which love you, what thank have you? for sinners also love those that love them."

It takes humility to love!
It takes sacrifice to love!

Ok now.

budaatum:
How are the cocacola bottle and and the cocacola inside the cocacola bottle connected, aadozia!?!

Sorry, but if I need to answer that for you I would need to have my head checked for mental deficiencies that I know I definitely do not have.

I suggest you go and buy cocacola and study it and you will understand the relationship between the earth and its atmosphere. You just stare at the cococola in the bottle and the relationship will
eventually be revealed to you. I promise.

For your own eyes the coke in a bottle no dey touch the bottle. SHM

budaatum:
Martian did not say Heidegger was a known racist. I told Martian about Heidegger being a card carrying nazi, which Martian thanked me for informing him of.

But this proves my point, I guess. You do not read anything before you jump to false opinions about that which you know nothing about!

Go back and read all his comments, he called your heidegger a racist.

LordReed:
What makes inherent racism not a flaw but others are flaws?

If anyone could be described as an embodiment of racism, then then the racism in them should not be seen as s flaw but rather their own very nature.

LordReed:
It is called thermodynamically closed because there is no copious amounts of matter exchange. As long as the masses leaving or entering the system do not affect the thermodynamic stability then it is closed. These are not my definitions these are scientific definitions and they differ from how we generally think of open and close.

Ok. Can you give other examples of such thermodynamically closed system?

shadeyinka:
My friend is quite sane, he only has an adversion for "Jews" because he had always know them to be UNCLEAN!

Probably, he will change his mind when a Jew saves his life when he has a heart attack through a mouth-to-mouth resuscitation! LOL!

Love transcends even our religious beliefs and disposition. I will appreciate God for any help from a Sango worshipper if I was stranded at night in a lonely highway.



Probably that's why Jesus replaced all the commandments of the Jews with this
Mar 12:30-31:
30. "And you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength: this is the first commandment.
31. And the second is like, namely this, You shall love your neighbor as yourself. There is none other commandment greater than these."

But they still refused to follow those commandments.

SegFault:
Calm down no one is insulting you, now are you a Christian?

I'm not saying she's insulting me but rather attributing what I never said to me. Why the faith question?

LordReed:
I told you it's closed but not like a door. It is just a description of the earth's physical system with respect to the in flow of matter and energy. It does not prevent matter or energy from departing the earth.

Why do then call it a closed system if does not stop matter from escaping?

LordReed:
You don't understand that it is already moving before it dropped. It looks stationary to you because you also have the same speed so it looks stationary. If you are in a vehicle with other passengers, the other passengers look stationary to you because you are all moving at the same speed but someone outside the vehicle will see all of the passengers moving. If someone outside the earth's gravity well was looking at you and the object you'd both be moving even before you threw the object. This is what is demonstrated by the experiments I was describing.

This would make sense if and only if earth is a closed system and it's moving. However; your definition of a closed system still doesn't make sense.

No it is not.

The system and the surroundings together make up the universe. There are three types of systems in thermodynamics: open, closed, and isolated. An open system can exchange both energy and matter with its surroundings. ... A closed system, on the other hand, can exchange only energy with its surroundings, not matter.

SOURCE

A closed system is a system in which only energy is transferred with its surroundings. An open system, however, is a system in which both energy and matter can transfer. The earth is a closed system because only energy is naturally transferred outside the atmosphere.

SOURCE

These are the definitions I have always understood. But your AC example got everything muddled up.

On open and closed doors, I said similar.

budaatum:
You have not read the book referred to in this thread, aadozia, we both know you haven't, and you never read any book by Heidegger, that is glaringly obvious!

Also, how can you "have read the book" and "simply don't know about the book" at the same time? Are you doing atheist dead found Christ live like buda wrote to have done, lol.

How can you claim, "My presupposition about the 'messenger /message' relative importance was based on the whole not an individual", when you have not read the book?

Is the person "the whole", as far as you are concerned?

What is this again now? Did I tell you anywhere that I have read the book ni? The only time I ever read anything about your heidegger was in GST102. Must I read his books? Abi must I read the books you read.
Person dey talk on a general level, this one dey limit am to one book. Martiann said your guy was a known racist and you said it doesn't matter, and that his message is more important. I came in at this point to say the messenger is more important than his message.
Abeg I no fit dey repeat myself like a primary school pupil. I no get that time.

LordReed:
So anything you are born with is not a flaw?

I would not go that far. Besides, it was more figurative than literal.
Look at this way: if you brought an ice block outside of refrigeration for some time, Would you call this ice block water if only about 5% of its volume has thawed away? No. It's still an ice block.

budaatum:
Yes, of course the drink does make contact with the vessel, the same way the earth and its atmosphere are connectedly in contact, which is why I struck out the absurdity of disconnectivity you tagged on to your question.

Thank you for the 'yes'. How are they connectedly in contact?

shadeyinka:
I do not approve of the treachery of the Jews. That was why I mentioned it as a cause of the negative reaction. My take was on the gravity of the punishment to people who are monotheistic like you- serving the same "God"!


But the truth is that this negative sentiments of Muslims against the Jews is still on-going till today.

A Muslim friend nearly brought a US international airport down because a Jew almost touched his Qur'an while searching his baggage. He referred to the Jew as "Unclean"!

I referenced the battles among the Muslims for the emboldened line. They still carry on those age-long asinine squabbles to this day in what i call sunni-shiaa stupidity.
I presume that Muslim friend of yours was sent for psychiatric evaluation.

budaatum:
How can you know if "the author is fond of not practicing what he preaches" if you have not read the book he preached it in?

That after all is what you have done here, not read the book then claim the author is not practising what he wrote in his book that you never read!

I might have read a book of his before, or I might have heard of his "not practising what he preaches" inclinations.

I have read the book not because the author does not practice what he preaches but I simply don't know about the book. My presupposition about the 'messenger /message' relative importance was based on the whole not an individual.

budaatum:
Lol!

The same way a CocaCola bottle drags the CocaCola inside it along in its movement..

You should be Loling at your own example. Doe the drink make contact with vessel?
WARNING ⚠
Anything but a yes or no answer for now will be stricken out.

budaatum:
But you will read that counsel or you will not be able to shitt, right?

Can you now see why one may read certain things?

Would it be intelligent to shitt on that which one is ignorant of, for instance, to denigrate a book one has not read even if one knows negative things about the author?

You need to get my point clearly before anything else. 8 would not shitt on a book I have not read but would do so if knew beforehand that the author is fond of not practicing what he preaches.

LordReed:
So inherent racism is not a flaw?

It is not. This means one is a born racist. This means one is well known for committing the act. But if one only gets caught up in racism in the heat of the moment and not known for it, then you can call it their flaw.

LordReed:
There are but you need to understand a lot of mathematics to truly appreciate the breath and depth of the explanations. For us here we are merely scratching the surface at layman levels.

OK

LordReed:
Basically gravity. Everything in the earth's gravity well will be dragged by it. Thats why meteors get sucked in.



The aspect of meteors is why I said practically. Meteors are matter but compared to the volume of the earth itself meteors are a negligible addition. Energy on the other hand enters the earth in massive volumes as witnessed by our experience of sunlight.

Being open or closed does not affect inertial reference frames. Being open or closed does not mean open or closed like the way a door or lid is open or closed, in physical systems it is used to describe if the system receives or gives out copious amounts of matter or energy. Your AC for example is a closed system with respect to matter but open with respect to energy.

Also, if the earth is a closed system, how does all those rockets escape into the outer space?

LordReed:
Basically gravity. Everything in the earth's gravity well will be dragged by it. Thats why meteors get sucked in.

The rabbit hole just got deeper. If this is so, why does gravity not spin an object thrown down from a very high elevation, like the highest point of the world's tallest building, as it does the atmosphere but would attract it to the earth's surface?

The aspect of meteors is why I said practically. Meteors are matter but compared to the volume of the earth itself meteors are a negligible addition. Energy on the other hand enters the earth in massive volumes as witnessed by our experience of sunlight.

Being open or closed does not affect inertial reference frames. Being open or closed does not mean open or closed like the way a door or lid is open or closed, in physical systems it is used to describe if the system receives or gives out copious amounts of matter or energy. Your AC for example is a closed system with respect to matter but open with respect to energy.

Actually, an open or a closed system is similar to open and closed doors.
Your AC example here does not make any sense. A system cannot be open and closed at the same.

shadeyinka:
It didn't start like that though.

Initially, Prophet Mohammed claimed that he is the promised prophet from the scripture of the Jews hence it started with friendship with them. At that time, even Muslims were praying towards Jerusalem.

Unfortunately, the Jews did not receive Mohammed and sometimes were even hostile to him.

This is all I needed. But in your earlier submission you made it sound as though the holy prophet went about hating the Jews the very first moment he made contact with them. I still find it funny that you approve of the dishonesty of the bloody jews in all their dealings with the prophet, whose actions towards were merely reactionary.

Before you argue that Mohammad responded militarily against his opponent. You should look at the determination to exterminate the male who has reached puberty. All the children, women and girls were sold off.

Would this be done to a believer in the oneness of God?

It is war for crying out loud. You do whatever is necessary to subdue your enemies. The caucasians understand this and they've been doing it for centuries to this very moment. Besides, the prophet wasn't going to allow them to do him what they did to previous prophets. I know I wouldn't.

I'm sure you also know how the Muslims, after the prophet had left them, mercilessly killed one another in battles amongst themselves. THAT is why we shouldn't drum the beat of war over frivolities. Shite happens in war, man.

budaatum:
"But their ideas to appeal to me", is exactly what many have been saying here all along!

But that is not the point I am raising here. Let us consider those that their ideas do not appeal to you, and that you don't need to stamp them. Though I do not share this view, and will stamp them just so they know they are stamped, and as you stamped buda a bully.

So, lets take buda, as our example. I think your general opinion of buda is negative, yet you still converse with buda. Why?

This is what I mean, if your idea or counsel appeals to me—but I don't know if you, the proponent, act contrary to it or not I might make use you of it if the need arises. However; if I know you act contrary to your counsel, I will shitt on you, shiit on your counsel, and seek it elsewhere.

LordReed:
Why is inherent racism not wrong?

I didn't say it's not wrong. I meant it is the real you as your flaws are not.

Emusan:
@underlined is the reason of my question.

Yet no straight answer!

There are never precise explanations to these theories.

LordReed:
I am using my own words to express scientific theories so it's not my wild theory. Inertial reference frames are used to describe how classical mechanics work with respect to the general theory of relativity. You can find more technical descriptions of what I am talking about if you are not satisfied with my layman descriptions.

Ok

Yes the atmosphere is moving with the earth. Everything on earth is moving with the earth, we would not survive if it were otherwise.

How does the the earth drag the atmosphere along in its movement when there are no connecting between the two?

For practical reasons the earth is considered a closed system with respect to matter but not with respect to energy. Though I don't see what that has to do with inertial reference frames.

That emboldened idiom connotes wuruwuru to the answer, but I'm gonna hold it against you since it's not your theory.
I asked the question because if the earth is an open system it will not be dragging the atmosphere along.

What do you mean by "with respect to matter but not with respect to energy."

LordReed:
And why is it not wrong?

I don't get this.

budaatum:
Do you realise you discuss with a lot of individuals on NL that you have determined are hypocrites and dishonest?

Why do you continue to read what they write and discuss with them?

I can't go about stamping the the "hypocrite" label on just about anyone or any advocate I come across. I have to know them or know of them to do that, and if I don’t but their ideas to appeal to me, I might just imbibe them.