Abemy's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Abemy's Profile › Abemy's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 37 pages)
@Seun, kindly moe ro front page.🙏🙏🙏 |
Nigeria’s swift intervention in the attempted coup in the Republic of Benin has attracted widespread commendation within and outside the country. Acting with remarkable speed and precision, Nigerian security forces reportedly identified and neutralized the plotters within a matter of hours. This decisive response projects Nigeria as a regional power capable of defending democracy and maintaining stability in West Africa. However, while this intervention deserves credit, it also raises troubling questions when placed side by side with Nigeria’s prolonged internal security challenges. During his screening appearance at the Senate, the Minister of Defence, General Christopher Musa (rtd), emphasized the need for a unified national database to enable quick identification and tracking of criminals. This position is logical and forward-looking. Yet it also invites a critical question: what data and intelligence tools were deployed in uncovering and foiling the Benin coup with such speed and accuracy? If Nigeria could rely on effective intelligence, surveillance, and coordination to act decisively in a foreign country within less than ten hours, why has it taken over a decade, with no decisive end in sight, to dismantle Boko Haram, banditry, and other violent groups operating within Nigeria’s own borders? Why? This contrast is deeply unsettling. Nigerians have watched communities repeatedly come under attack despite reported intelligence warnings. In many cases, security forces are said to withdraw shortly before attacks occur, only to return afterward, sometimes harassing traumatized survivors. Official narratives often shift blame to local communities, accusing them of sheltering attackers or providing women and logistical support to the invaders. But such explanations raise further questions, if the military had credible intelligence that criminals were being housed in particular communities and even given women to have food time with, what preventive action was taken? Why were those locations not secured before tragedy struck? As at the time of composing this post, Islamic terrorists have killed, displaced and are occupying people's communities, is the military not yet aware to act decisively?🤔🤔🤔🤔 The Benin intervention further complicates this narrative. Within a few hours, Nigeria was able to cross borders, identify targets, and “do the needful.” By contrast, within Nigeria, criminal groups have terrorized citizens for years, occupying forests, highways, and even villages. This disparity naturally breeds suspicion among the populace. To me personally, and to many Nigerians, it appears either as an admission of complicity or a demonstration of selective will, suggesting that internal insecurity persists not for lack of capacity, but for lack of genuine commitment. More troubling is the perception that political and religious considerations may influence how security threats are confronted. When foreign democratic order is threatened, action is swift and firm. When Nigerian lives are at stake daily in Zamfara, Borno, Benue, Kaduna, or Niger States, responses appear slow, reactive, and sometimes indifferent. Nigeria’s role in stabilizing the sub-region is important and laudable. But charity, as the saying goes, must begin at home. A government that proves it has the intelligence, capacity, and speed to neutralize threats abroad must explain why the same resolve is not consistently applied within its own territory. Until this contradiction is addressed transparently, myself and indeed Nigerians will continue to question whether the prolonged insecurity they face is a failure of ability, a failure of will, or a sign of government's involvement. This writer writes from Porto-Novo, the capital of Benin Republic. |
Sonnobax15:Initially I didn't like it, but by my wife, I can now eat it, but it must be a well riped one |
Mods, kindly move this to the front page. Thank you. @Seun. |
In My Own Opinion. The recent security meeting convened in Kaduna by Northern governors and the forum of traditional rulers, which reportedly resolved that each Northern state should contribute ₦1 billion monthly to a regional security trust fund, raises serious questions that cannot be ignored. While insecurity in the North is real and devastating, the sincerity and direction of this initiative deserve honest scrutiny. In my own opinion, many core-Northern political and traditional leaders have not demonstrated genuine commitment to ending insecurity. Over the years, words have been louder than action, and promises have often failed to translate into safety for ordinary citizens. Even more troubling are repeated images and reports of government officials fraternizing with armed bandits. Some openly posing with men who brandish deadly weapons. Such scenes erode my, and I think, public confidence and suggest a dangerous level of tolerance, if not complicity. Banditry, as it exists today,is a religious creation and no longer exists as random criminality alone. It has taken on ideological and religious dimensions with a well-known agenda. Communities in the Middle Belt and other vulnerable regions have borne the brunt of this violence, burned villages, displaced families, mass killings, and entire populations forced into IDP camps. Against this backdrop, asking oppressed and traumatized states to contribute large sums of money into a centrally controlled fund is deeply problematic. There is a legitimate fear that such funds, rather than neutralizing insecurity, may end up empowering the same structures that sustain it. Without transparency, accountability, and a clear break from the politics of appeasement, these contributions could inadvertently fuel further violence and mass slaughter of innocent Middle Belt citizens. I am personally afraid, that this may be among the initial strategies of those who created the banditry in the first place. Security cannot be achieved through coercion or imposed financial contributions. It requires honesty, political will, justice, and a clear identification of perpetrators without ethnic, religious, or political bias. Until Northern leadership confronts insecurity with sincerity and courage, initiatives like compulsory trust fund donations will remain suspect and unacceptable, especially to those who have suffered the most. This, in my own opinion, is a moment for truth, not symbolism; action, not photo opportunities; and justice, not policies that risk deepening the wounds of already oppressed communities. This author writes from Nzaav, Turan, the now occupied ancestral land of the Tiv people. |
No iwaeda:The Iman must be of Hausa extraction and not a fulani |
miracle002:Gambling is motivated by greed, and the Bible is against greediness. All this long sermon still returns to that. |
No OKOATA:Atiku is not a fulani man perse, but a fulani slave. He is actually a Mumuye man. |
O Switruth:This is not their first time. They occasionally issue travel advisory to their citizens, not to Nigerians, if you don't know, you just know now. |
datola:Musa talks before reasoning. Was he a spoke person or a defense chief? |
Hankim:How in earth do you believe this hogwash? |
No helinues:Stop lieing against the dead. Ghana said some people want to kill, displace and occupy Benue, Taraba, Nasarawa, etc, he didn't say Benue people pay Fulani to attack themselves. |
OLAADEGBU:Hypocrisy of the highest order. If the said kidnappers or bandits were accused of blasphemy, the police would have handed them over to the mob with a stupid claim that they (the police) were overpowered, now it is the untouchables of the Northern kidnapping and banditary conglomerate, they were not overpowered. |
REJOICE REJOINDER To General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (IBB) On His Bold Call for Tinubu to Arrest Bandit Sympathizers—Including Sheikh Gumi FROM THE SONS AND DAUGHTERS OF HAUSA LAND We, the Sons and Daughters of Hausa Land, issue this powerful rejoinder in solidarity with General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (IBB), whose recent statement calling on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to be ruthless, uncompromising, and decisive against Fulani-led bandits and their sympathizers has shaken the entire nation. For over a decade, the North has bled. Our villages have burned. Our children have been kidnapped. Our women have been violated. Our farms have become graveyards. And many leaders kept silent. But today, a former head of state A man who understands war, security, command, strategy Has told the truth without fear or favour. 1. WE STAND WITH IBB: “NO BANDITS, NO TERRORISTS, NO NEGOTIATORS, NO SYMPATHIZERS SHOULD BE SPARED” IBB said clearly: > “No bandits, no terrorists, no terrorists negotiators or terrorists sympathizers should be spared for disrupting the peace of Nigerians.” This is the boldness the North has been waiting for. This is the leadership our people were denied for years. This is the truth our elites refused to speak. IBB’s words expose the hypocrisy of those who: Defended bandits Negotiated for bandits Carried money to forests Blamed “foreign Fulani” And misled the nation with propaganda IBB has cut through all their lies. 2. IBB HAS OPENLY WARNED PRESIDENT TINUBU: DO NOT NEGOTIATE WITH BANDITS IBB stated: > “If I were the President, I would NEVER negotiate with bandits and kidnappers.” “Negotiating with criminals funds your enemies against your own citizens.” He exposed: The dangers of ransom payments The foolishness of negotiation The betrayal of paying terrorists The weakness of using clerics as ‘middlemen’ This is a direct challenge to the culture of appeasement that allowed terrorism to grow. 3. IBB’s WORDS EXPOSE SHEIKH GUMI AND ALL OTHER BANDIT “NEGOTIATORS” IBB said: > “Those who sympathize with bandits or pose as bandits’ negotiators must face the law.” This statement clearly aligns with what Nigerians have been demanding for years that Sheikh Ahmad Gumi should be investigated and held accountable for: Defending bandits Blaming government instead of criminals Going from forest to forest acting as their ambassador Praising them on national TV Undermining the Nigerian Army Protecting the reputation of killers Justifying kidnappers Claiming they “deserve amnesty” IBB’s message has confirmed what the victims always knew: Negotiators are part of the system enabling terror. 4. IBB’s POSITION DESTROYS THE FALSE MYTH: “BANDITS ARE FOREIGNERS” For years, certain Fulani elites argued that bandits are foreigners from: Sudan Mali Senegal Chad Guinea But IBB said: > “Nigeria must take action against those enabling and protecting bandits within.” This statement confirms: The criminals are here. Their sympathizers are here. Their protectors are here. Their negotiators are here. And they are not foreigners. Every top bandit commander is a Nigerian Fulani, well-known by name and village. IBB is telling the truth the Sultan of Sokoto refused to tell. 5. IBB’s MESSAGE TO THE MILITARY IS WHAT OUR VICTIMS HAVE BEEN PRAYING FOR He said: > “If I was the President… We can go band for band… We are NOT negotiating!” This is the military doctrine that should have been used from 2010. Because: You do not negotiate with child kidnappers. You do not negotiate with rapists. You do not negotiate with arsonists. You do not negotiate with mass murderers. You do not negotiate with terrorists. Negotiation only breeds more terror. IBB has finally confirmed that truth. 6. IBB HAS GIVEN TINUBU THE POLITICAL COVER TO ACT DECISIVELY For years, every president was afraid: “What will northern elites say?” “What will clerics say?” “What will Fulani associations say?” But now: IBB has spoken for the oppressed, not the oppressors. He has created a historic opportunity for Tinubu: Arrest the sympathizers Crush their networks Shut down their supply chains Neutralize their commanders Investigate their clerical allies Stop the culture of appeasement A former president has given the green light. Now the current president must act. 7. WE REJOICE BECAUSE FOR THE FIRST TIME, A NORTHERN GENERAL IS SPEAKING THE TRUTH IBB’s courage stands in contrast to: Politicians who lied Traditional rulers who defended criminals Clerics who justified killers Elites who blamed “foreigners” Sympathizers who sabotaged security Opinion leaders who misled the public For once, the truth is no longer whispered It is shouted from the top. And for that, we rejoice. CONCLUSION We, the Sons and Daughters of Hausa Land, completely stand with IBB’s position. His message is: Clear Fearless Patriotic Long overdue Aligned with the will of the people IBB has spoken for justice. He has spoken for the victims. He has spoken for the truth. Now President Tinubu must act. Arrest the bandits. Arrest the negotiators. Arrest the sympathizers. Peace has no price. Terror has no tribe. Nigeria has bled enough. SIGNED: Sons and Daughters of Hausa Land Via: Hausa Activism Network Source👇 #hausaactivist |
They can neither change nor pretend for long. |
She will walk away not me. Maybe to the person who gave her. |
You edited the part where he said, "If I were the president? What a hypocrisy? |
Why are 90% of Igbos sentimental? Illiterate or literate, 90% Igbos are sentimental. I was following his logic, believing in what I thought was a sound legal reasoning, he urged for calm as the law will be used to free Kanu, and I believed him. Suddenly, he started asking Tinubu to pardon Kanu and he said it should be immediately. I have three questions for the said lawyer. 1; If you believe his conviction did not follow the law, why then are you not appealing the judgment but asking for perogative of mercy. 2: If Tinubu pardon Kanu now, I hope you will not become emotional, wh n bandits are arrested, charged, convicted and pardoned immediately? 3; are you aware Mr. Seasoned lawyer, that when Tinubu pardoned some high profile criminals and there was outcry, he reversed it? Don't you think people will do same if Kanu is pardoned? And what will you have Tinubu do in that case? I hope this meet you well. |
abc115:We will, we will, when? When will you secure it. |
The husband may be imptent and be hiding something too. |
How else do you want to be told, that Islam is a religion of violence? Zulum has been swallowed. |
Bobloco:I don't trust such questions from northern leaders. He may be playing innocent, but may be strategically involved. |
For years, ordinary Nigerians have been burying loved ones, while powerful voices in Abuja and the northern states have been busy massaging the egos of killers and sympathizing with them. Let me refresh your memories. In 2013, Muhammadu Buhari said that “the military offensive against Boko Haram is anti-North,” attacking Jonathan’s state of emergency in Borno, Yobe and Adamawa. Many families who lost loved ones in the North have never forgotten those words. The terrorists even went on to elect him as their spokesman. This same man went on to become a president of Nigeria. In Kaduna, Nasir El-Rufai openly admitted that his government traced violent Fulani herdsmen outside Nigeria and paid them to stop killing people in Southern Kaduna, saying as a Fulani governor he had “no problem paying compensations” to them. This was a governor proudly saying that there was nothing wrong in paying bandits compensations. In an old sermon, Isa Pantami, who later became Minister of Communications, described Boko Haram fighters as “our Muslim brothers” and complained that they were being killed “like pigs” instead of being pampered like Niger Delta militants. For saying this and openly sympathizing with these terrorists, he was placed in charge of a strategic position as the minister of communication. Most of you don’t know how powerful the ministry of communications, Innovation, and digital economy is. Let me try to summarize its power in either aiding or impeding the fight against terrorism. This ministry oversees the entire digital backbone of and structure of the country. That includes: -NCC (Nigerian Communications Commission) -NITDA -Galaxy Backbone -National Identity database (NIN) -Cybersecurity policy and digital surveillance systems -Telecom regulation through MTN, Airtel, Glo, 9mobile -Internet monitoring, interception frameworks, SIM registration systems All of these tools matter directly to national security. You cannot fight terrorism without: -Tracking phone calls -Intercepting communications -Tracing ransom calls -Mapping bandit networks -Identifying sleeper cells This entire power sits under the Ministry’s regulatory supervision. If the ministry is strong, coordinated and loyal to national security, terrorists lose their anonymity. If the ministry is weak, compromised, or misaligned, terrorists operate freely. This is why countries treat digital and communication ministries as security ministries, not just “internet ministries.” The ministry leads Nigeria’s entire cybersecurity ecosystem, including: -National Cybersecurity Policy -Inter-agency cyber response teams -Protection of critical digital infrastructure -Collaboration with security agencies on intelligence Of course, we know that terrorists now use: -Encrypted platforms -Digital fundraising -Social media networks -Online propaganda -Cross-border WhatsApp coordination The ministry is crucial in shutting these down or letting terrorists do as they please. To avoid making this post too long, I won’t be able to tell you other importance of this ministry, but you can Subscribe to KaaTruths You/Tube channel and watch a documentary when I discussed this. Now, let us continue. In 2021, Lai Mohammed went on live TV and said that if granting amnesty to a warlord would make others surrender, he would “take that decision” and threw his weight behind governors who offered amnesty instead of confrontation to bandits. Lai Mohammed was the minister of Information under President Buhari. Former Zamfara governor Ahmad Sani Yerima went to see President Tinubu in 2023 and came out publicly urging him to consider amnesty for bandits, arguing that they “deserve amnesty and not death” and should be negotiated with like Niger Delta militants. For him, these terrorists and bandits should not be killed. Zamfara’s then governor, Bello Matawalle, even told Nigerians that “not all bandits are criminals”, insisting that some picked up guns because vigilantes wronged them, while his government pushed amnesty and cash deals with these same gangs.  Former Katsina governor Aminu Masari launched an amnesty programme and promoted dialogue with bandits in Buhari’s home state, before later admitting the whole arrangement failed and that he regretted trusting them at all.  And here’s the big one. Our current Vice President, Kashim Shettima, once said in 2011 that “the Boko Haram people are human beings who deserve fair hearing” and called them “our brothers”, calling for dialogue instead of a hard crackdown. Please, read that again gently. And how many of you still remembered whose house Kabiru Sokoto the Boko Haram prominent leader who bombed Nyanya was caught after escaping from police custody? Ali Modu Sheriff, on the other hand, is surrounded by thick smoke andd reports linking his time as Borno governor to the rise of Boko Haram, yet he loudly denies everything but said something that most people have really not paid attention to. He said, “it’s not me, it’s Shettima who created Boko Haram.” Dave Umahi who’s now a minister. At an event in Abakaliki in May 2021, where he presented vehicles to security agencies during his time as governor said: “Bandits are our children, we should empower them.” I hope you are still following. Outside formal politics, Sheikh Ahmad Gumi built a full ministry of sympathy around bandits, insisting they are “not criminals”, demanding amnesty and rehabilitation, and scolding the media for calling them what they are.  While thousands of villagers, farmers, churchgoers and travellers were being slaughtered, kidnapped and raped, you had powerful men debating the “feelings” of bandits and proposing salaries and amnesty for them. Let this sink in: there are more powerful voices fighting to launder the image of bandits than there are voices fighting for the widows and orphans they left behind. One day, Nigeria will have to ask herself: who really created this monster and who kept feeding it with soft words, cash settlements and political protection? And the most chilling question would probably be: “Can we confidently separate our government from those we are asking the government to protect us from?” |
sofeo:Tinubu can't do that, the North will protest at the ballot |
Mrexcell:Yeah, you got that right |
Abemy:Top sources within the Presidency told SaharaReporters on Friday that the ongoing wave of defections from opposition parties to the APC is being powered by jaw-dropping financial packages, coordinated directly from the Presidency and supervised by senior government officials around Tinubu. According to the sources, each state governor who has recently defected to the APC got a total package of N250billion. "This money is released in two tranches; there is a N100 billion “grant” upfront once commitment is shown, and a balance of N150 billion after the formal defection ceremony," one of the sources revealed. “So, the state governors defecting to APC get a total N250billion, senators N1billion, and members of the House of Representatives N500million,” he said. |
SmartyPants:Congress (APC). Top sources within the Presidency told SaharaReporters on Friday that the ongoing wave of defections from opposition parties to the APC is being powered by jaw-dropping financial packages, coordinated directly from the Presidency and supervised by senior government officials around Tinubu. According to the sources, each state governor who has recently defected to the APC got a total package of N250billion. "This money is released in two tranches; there is a N100 billion “grant” upfront once commitment is shown, and a balance of N150 billion after the formal defection ceremony," one of the sources revealed. “So, the state governors defecting to APC get a total N250billion, senators N1billion, and members of the House of Representatives N500million,” he said. |
SmartyPants:Politicians alleged. Who else would? |
It is alleged that each defecting governor is given N5BN and automatic ticket for second term governors, N1bn for senators and N500m for house of reps defectors. Allegedly. |

. Joshua cast lots to determine the allotment of land to the various tribes, and the results were accepted as God’s will (Joshua 18:10). Nehemiah cast lots to determine who would live inside the walls of Jerusalem (Nehemiah 11:1). The apostles cast lots to determine the replacement for Judas (Acts 1:26). Each of these occasions proved the truth of Proverbs 16:33, which says, “The lot is cast in the lap, but its every decision is from the Lord.” None of these instances of casting lots have to do with betting or the transfer of goods. The apostles’ casting lots in Acts 1 is no justification for playing craps in Vegas.