₦airaland Forum

nateevs:
Madueke scored 3 of those 7 goals in one game. That's 4 goals in 31 games.

Keep things in perspective.

But you didn't keep things in perspective when Jackson scored 3 goals against 9-man Tottenham last season, before hailing him for scoring 15. Hypocrite.

nihilistjnr:
The 'strong defence and OK attack' of Napoli generated goal difference of +32. That is not just poorest attack for the last 20 scudetto winners, the goal difference itself is the lowest of any Serie A champions in the last 20 years.

Even in years where Scudetto champions had far better defence than Napoli, they still scored far more than Napoli, e.g Juve GA of 20 in 15/16 still managed to score 75.

Napoli's achievement was a fluke. 1/20 is not a pass mark to hang any argument on for any knowledgeable person. Then again, you were the same person that argued that Arrdee is a bigger artiste than Burnaboy so...

I pointed out major leagues won this season and Serie A was the odd one out.

I don't know where Raumdeuter recruited them olodos like Timbros, Kimbeast. Lordfalcao and co from. It's tough handling such large contingent of illiterates.

nihilistjnr:
Napoli won the league with a single point on the final day of the season in a game they had to win, not a game they had to keep a clean sheet.

If Napoli had drawn 0-0, they would have lost the title. This was also a season where they won because everybody else under performed.

That's why Napoli's 59 goals are the lowest scored by a serie A champion in the last 20 years. Napoli had the 5th highest goal scored this season Meanwhile 8 of the last 10 serie A winners finished in top 3 from Goals scored.

Napoli were lucky this season. It was a one-off in the same ilk of the likes of Atletico Madrid. Historically even in the league that gave us Cattenacio, what Napoli did this year is far from the norm.

You think you cooked, but you really just showed yourself to be an ironman illiterate - it's Stark.

It's nauseating.

raumdeuter:
Huge regards for what? Everyone on that TV won the CL Hargreaves, Gerrard and Rio. Did Okocha even make knockouts

We are talking about their reaction to him, which shows they are his fans. They wouldn't have reacted that way to your calamitous Boathand. They wouldn't have called him to grace their screen not to talk of posing for picture with him.

Shame on you and your wack judgement.

raumdeuter:
When they get a treble and win 5-0 in the final with a striker. Let me know

If they meet a team that parade tired legs in the midfield and an old/cancer survivor as defender, it is more than possible.

StarchAndBanga:
Noni Madueke has been at Chelsea as a first team player for three years now. He scored 5 goals the season before and 7 goals this just concluded season( with 3 of his 7 goals coming in the 6 goals trashing of Wolves earlier in the season).

He is currently on a run of 12 games without a goal or an assist, that's the player u want to remain at Chelsea. Even as bench fodder he simply isn't good enough. So much for calling yourself a True Blue

Gordon has 6 league goals in 34 matches

Leao has 8 league goals in 34 matches

Yamal has 9 league goals in 35 matches.

Gakpo has 10 league goals in 35 matches

Madueke has 7 league goals in 32 matches.

I will give him one more season to improve in his decision making, maybe he will have more league goals than Gakpo, Yamal and Leao.

StarchAndBanga:
At least something dey my own. Sadly, can't say same for u Air headdd

So in ur own opinion Gyokeres (that's farming Portuguese league) is slightly better than Lautaro, what of Osimehn and how does Gyokeres being slightly better than Lautaro affect my initial statement?

Simple statement, read and understand before u switch off ur brain u say no. Na wa

It seems you failed logic in school.

You stated that Lautaro >= Gyokeres/Osimhen as quoted below:

StarchAndBanga:
Lautaro Martinez way better pass or same level as Osimehn and Gyokeres na 2 for 5 naira striker?

Then, how the fvck is Gyokeres now slightly better than Lautaro? Na olodo i just dey engage on a daily here.

Remove the starch and banga in your brain, then come back.

A40:
You be certified m0ron. What special award did Man City get for going unbeaten?

They won treble, so did PSG. What did City win that PSG did not win? Okrimo

Only a crazeman like you will claim they beat Liverpool by luck, they are the only team that comprehensively dominated Liverpool in Europe this season.

You are the crazeman here if you think they comprehensively dominated Liverpool with the stats below. Liverpool will be foolish if they don't buy a reliable striker for next season.

Unlimited22, your Zabarnyi may join.

MorataFC:
Luckily ?how?
The statement should be reversed, Liverpool luckily won the first leg.
If PSG have striker in the first leg, Liverpool will chop nothing less than 3 to 4 goals.

But Raumdeuter, A40, Kimbeast and their group members said PSG don't need a potent striker to make the attack more lethal.

lordfalcao:
You always dy gbaa. Na coins dem spend on kolo muani and Ramos?.

Abi is it not part of spending heavy on striker?

You will need to point at where i asked Chelsea to spend heavy on Kolo Muani, to make the sense that you never made on this board.

lordfalcao:
psg signed kolo muani 90M euros, goncalo Ramos 75M euros.

What is there combined league goals this season?

Let them sign Gyokeres or Osimhen and ask me this question after the season. By then it will be sensible.

Caicedobets:
PSG luckily won Liverpool
If that tie is replayed again PSG won't win
I wonder why a lot of people are worshipping them

You will notice they have little football knowledge led by Raumdeuter and his boy, A40.

Aston Villa beat the same PSG they now twerking for and nearly sent them out o.

raumdeuter:
He is telling us about Madrid Back to Back when they had a Benzema he hated and spent year blasting

If a Benzema i hated for not scoring well could do back to back, what do you think Osimhen or Gyokeres will do with this PSG team?

Ibime:
They have a striker you hate, Kolo Muani who they had to send away before they could win UCL. Funny enough he went to Juventus and immediately outperformed and benched your favourite striker Dusan Vlahovic

I don't hate Muani, he has apologized for the missed chance in that World cup final. He is not up there but still better than your jakujaku Jackson. Juve were smart to get him to help with Vlahovic struggling with injuries and fitness. They clinched UCL ticket which is important.

Later some people would say modern football don't need traditional striker because we are parading jakujaku Jackson and impotent Hojlund. Fraudiola was smart with Haaland, which fetched him his only Ucl without his benefactor, Messi. Arteta is about to get Sesko after being stupid for years thinking he didn't need a 9.

Let that team without a 9, go 26 Ucl matches unbeaten before we have the conversation again.

Enzo5:
that's after spending more than 200m for Ramos, dembele, barcola and desire

I remember mentioning Enrique when i mentioned coaches that concentrated more on his attack, during the argument. They are now pointing at PSG winning the UCL, but not talking about how much they spent on the attack.

StarchAndBanga:
U omitted Noni Madueke!!!

I will give him the last chance to improve. He is a squad player.

A40:
You're a doofus. Did PSG win treble or them no win treble? Dispatching every PL team in their midst. The rest you're chatting is your usual noise

BoaTANK in his prime won 2 CLs and a World Cup. Pedro is the only player in Chelsea history that can boast of that so put some respect on his name

The same striker less Arsenal that flogged Madrid home and away?

Where's the Man City and their Haaland today? Remind me what they won this season. Okrimo

They do not need no unproven Gyokeres that has done nothing outside a poverty Portuguese league. League Darwin Nunez was shining in till we saw his true colors

You be mumu.

Man City went unbeaten for 26 matches and along the line won the Ucl, with their striker being the highest goal scorer. That's impact. That's what i expect PSG to do without a striker before putting them up there. Not luckily pipping Liverpool on PK and got roasted by Aston Villa with their hearts in their mouths in the dying minutes, and only saved by the clock.

Any smart analyst will not be twerking for a team that was beaten and nearly knocked out by Aston Villa. i know Enrique will not be stupid not to replace Ramos with a potent finisher to upgrade the attack for next UCL.

StarchAndBanga:
If u had a brainn u would notice in the statement below I wasn't picking one player from the other. Also, like how ur partial blindness caused u to omit Osimehn from the convo

Na starch and bang full your brain.

Gyokeres is not same level as Lautaro as we speak. If you are the Sporting sports director and you swap Lautaro with Gyokeres without any fund on it, you will be stoned with pebbles the next matchday for being foolish.

Whizlight:
We are getting back on Top

What's this list about?

Enzo5:
I don't understand these people or posts, it's not like we have a Salah and Diaz in our flanks

Timbros is always confused, he needs help.

Kvara was bought for 80m but when I asked us to spend more on attack last year, he was against it.

raumdeuter:
When they replace him with a striker and achieve better than they did without a striker this season where they won a treble demolishing all epl sides and Inter Milan

Plus, we can compare their win rates and unbeaten stats, and you will collect your L as usual.

raumdeuter:
What is not to like about it

Legends showing huge regard for the one you always maligned. You won't claim you understand the game better than Gerrard, Rio and your club legend, Hargreaves.

A40:
You're yarning dust as usual. Them dey give bonus trophy for unbeaten run or what?

They don't need no damn Gyokeres or Osimhen. They won the treble without them. What did Gyokeres or Osimhen achieve with their respective teams?

This PSG with Doue, Barcola, Kvara have not even peaked yet. Their style of play makes a striker just a bonus and not a must have

Man City were a more complete and impressive team, that's why they pull that record. This PSG haven't done anything monstrous to deserve you twerking massively for them. But if calamitous Boathand could excite you, ofcourse you would do a backflip for the Parisiens.

Do you think every season they will be lucky to play a 'striker-less' Arsenal and a jaded Inter? PSG will not be stupid to keep faith in the same team when they can obviously replace a redundant Ramos with a more potent striker.

A striker in MSN flourished, why won't a Gyokeres shine with Dembele and Kvara? Make una no dey chat shIt.

drisham:
You forgot to add Pedro Neto sir

I will give him one more year to prove himself, with a better striker to play with.

raumdeuter:
My team didnt play the final. When it got to the final, they put the traditional striker where he belongs

The same way PSG put Goncalo Ramos on the bench

When they replace him with a better striker, will you still insist that they are not interested in using a striker?

A40:
Argentina lost to Saudi at the World Cup so what gives.

Teams peak in tournaments all the time. The same Arsenal that beat them in the group stage collect home and away.

The koko is sky is the limit with PSG and they can win another CL in the nearest future. Their style of play makes a striker absolutely redundant. They have a striker. Goncalo Ramos, he can't even get into the team

I prefer to go for a team with 26 unbeaten runs, led by a traditional striker in Haaland. Let PSG break this legendary record without a striker before twerking for them.

Goncalo Ramos is not Gyokeres or Osimhen. The highest number of league goals he scored in Portugal, was 19. You can't compare him to a Gyokeres scoring 39 league goals in a season in the same league.

Osimhen or Gyokeres will make this team more lethal. Rest.

lusid:
Airmark, who and who should leave this summer cos this Chelsea squad is congested?

Jackson
Sterling
Badiashile
Disasi
Nkunku
Felix
Mudryk

With quality replacements we can challenge strongly for titles.

timbros:
Why didn't you point out Liverpool among those teams that won the league with traditional striker? Or Liverpool don't have traditional striker?

Another stupid question that deserves no answer.

raumdeuter:
When it was time for the final, where was this traditional striker

The traditional striker flogged your team out in the Semis. Yes or No?

StarchAndBanga:
Are u partially blindd or u just choose to act that way sometimes?

Based on form, only a fool will not pick Gyokeres ahead of Lautaro.

timbros:
These are the champions you claim use traditional strikers to win their leagues.

The selected champion above isn't the highest scoring team in the league, not the second, not even the third.... With their traditional striker.

What then helped them to win the league with their meagre goals scored?

I guess the question is irrelevant because you don't have answer for it.

Context, obviously you don't know what that means.

They claimed modern football doesn't use traditional strikers and i pointed out teams that won the leagues with traditional striker, this season. How does your stupid question about number of goals scored by the striker, relate with what we were talking about?

Must you always disgrace yourself as someone who didn't see the 4 walls of a University?