bisqit:
if jackson is terrible in front of goal, why is respective coaches starting him? Is there sth you are not telling us

lordfalcao:
who was giving dovbyk and guirassy sumptuous pass when you were calling them to replace Jackson.

You dy yarn opata

lordfalcao:
airmark citadel of football knowledge.

lordfalcao:
who was now giving them sumptuous passes on a plate in their previous clubs

OasisX:


.....absolutely, before December we will all be feeling it and dropping testimonies instead of usual wailings on this board.

Jodera:

Havertz getting this little praise is because is no longer in Chelsea. I assure you, if both Havertz and Jackson were in Chelsea, you might have preferred Jackson.

nateevs:


Address the issue baba. If we had bought Dovbyk and Guirassy like you opined, there is a possibility they have not scored a goal or had an assist in 3 games, but you are talking about Jackson with 3GA already costing us points.

Airmark Citadel.

EmmanuelScott1:
So after all the gra gra, Osimhen later accept Loan offer

His agent don hawk am go Galatasaray 😆

Wishing him the best, he don learn now.

raumdeuter:


If Chelsea had bought them won't Chelsea be a new club to them too?

And what new club did Sesko join

Jodera:
Boss, as for the bolded, I can't say.

When Havertz was playing at Chelsea, he was one of the players I normally troll here— from his style of play to his finishing— it was so worst cos I knew how many chances this guy misses on per basis. The only thing I knew he was good at was heading balls.
I knew how I wailed endless when we bought him. He's someone I wouldn't touch with a 6 foot pole normally even if given for free

I'm shocked he started giving returns in terms of goalscoring (for us). If Havertz can do it for us and I can calm down a bit, I don't think I would really say no to Jackson.

Tbh, with a straight swap between Havertz and Jackson, I won't outrightly say no

nateevs:


Alhaji we don't care about the difference. Nobody mentioned that if we got Dovbyk or Guirassy, we should excuse them for the first 7 seven games, whilst they found their feet.

The narrative was that they will hit the ground running, because they are immediately better than Jackson seeing as Jackson is the worst choice there can be.

He who giveth must taketh. You want us to jolly with you, as you rain abuses on Jackson every week, stretching the truth sometimes as you post many gifs, but you want us to cut Dovbyk some slack?

Me wey I mention to you many times that that there's no knowing that the guys you are mentioning can actually cut it in the PL with the faster pace, bigger defenders and tighter spaces.

But y'all want to be petty yet apply for exemptions at the same time. Nobody has monopoly of pettiness. There will be Dovbyk watch on this thread, until he shuts us up. God help him and he does a 007, then there will be dragging.

nateevs:


Sir, on a good day, you won't find me with fukefuke points. And certainly will not catch me referencing Halaand at all times, as nothing else but generational talent, regardless of the season he's having.

The central point I am making is that, if we want to go silly analysis on a striker that plays for us because they missed chances, then all those who have been recommended previously as better output strikers be subject to the same fukefuke analysis.

We have devolved into a cult where Jackson's every touch is scrutinised for days, even when he's got 3 G/A already in the season. Meanwhile the others that were recommended to be better have not scored a goal in 4 days but we can make excuses for them, yet call others names for supporting our own?

This is analysis?

Jodera:

Worst part is that in that same match, Havertz have same or even better chance than Jackson to put us 2-1 ahead but he missed it. Come to our thread and see how most of us were complaining about that missed chance in our thread

But Airmark won't see that one. It doesn't fit his agenda

nateevs:
Meanwhile today on Dovbyk and Guirassy watch.

These are the strikers that were recommended to us to be bought about 200 times

raumdeuter:


How many goals did Kai Harvetz score this season and last season in the league and how many did Nicholas Jackson score

raumdeuter:


When Harvetz was in your team na daily complaints too until he left you are now using him as example

Shows how confused you are

lordfalcao:
you did not tell us that the havertz who has now become one of your reference point missed this

drisham:
Goals scored this season
City-9
L'pool-7
Chelsea-7


They are 1 and 2 on the table

We are 11th

popizaino:


It gave us our 2nd UCL but real madrid is on record 14th UCL with outscore your opponent mentality.


That is what you should aim for.

popizaino:


That you had to go back to the era Mourinho when was still the special one tells me all i need to know.

diggz:


Please forgive him. Lilbros aka timbros problem is comprehension

timbros:


Airmark is terrible.

In a bid to discredit Jackson, this is the Havertz goal he is comparing to Jackson.

Is there any way in this world that the two sequence is remotely similar? Look at the distance to goal the keeper came out that made it possible for Havertz to lob him. Look at the angle. Havertz came in centrally so he can pick a spot to lob. How can Jackson do the same from that tight angle? Havertz had no one marking him, literally. Look at the defender breathing down Jackson's neck, making life difficult for him.

But no, Airmark must come and disgrace himself because it's Jackson matter.

diggz:


Please forgive him. Lilbros aka timbros problem is comprehension

lordfalcao:
Jackson was not the reason you lost two points


Anyone who claimed to play football will know that this was a tight angle finish with a weaker foot. With the defender heavily on him.

The keeper made the difference with his arms

airmark:
Jackson wouldn't have scored that Havertz goal. Na to dey give am tap in.

lordfalcao:
so na Jackson make you loose two points .

You no serious.


Your other attackers were busy missing chance.


And your defense conceded as sure banker

Rest

lordfalcao:
Chelsea to conceed two per match looking like a banker.

WhoDeyHause:

That's why I would never blame Osimhen for not accepting the pay cut offered to him, he knows he won't consistently miss sitters presented to him, go to most Chelsea groups online and see Jackson, Jackson, Jackson before it's as if it's only here we want to run "agenda" against him, the defense is not great coupled with the injury of lavia and the jogging ability of Enzo which has made caicedo to be running like buffalo, no Gallagher to protect that middle anymore, so as it stands now all hope had to be on the attack but then again when you have an average poacher leading your line nko?

Bimffo:


I feel he would have complained, but the management was saying they didn't want to stall Jackson's development.

Is that one developing at all?


I see fans on X (Formerly Twitter) that the 90 minute chance was a hard one.

Imagine Diego Costa in that position. . Fvvvcking hell.

WhoDeyHause:

Yes you right, we shouldn't have even attempted to score, just camp in our box 18 at home against crystal freaking palace like all those eastern European teams till referee blow whistle, clean sheet for you, clean sheet for me everybody goes home happy.

timbros:


3 matches, 3 goal contributions. Contract renewal secured.

Airmark and Mikel should shut up!

diggz:


Please forgive him. Lilbros aka timbros problem is comprehension