Jodera: I will never use price to judge any team. Richarlison costs more than Haaland but everyone knows he's no near Haaland right foot how much more his left.
Man u front 3 costs over twice my front 3 but God knows I'll never swap them even with a gun in the head
You are a joke if you believe the amount announced was all they spent on Haaland. Stick to City and leave Arsenal, known for long as a feeder team.
donstan18: But wait first, you’re slandering Sterling to hype Maximin? Or slandering him because he’s been out of form?
Not slandering, fact is fact.
Maximin, since the beginning of this season was well ahead of Sterling in individual performance but you guys thought I was hating on Sterling. But now it has blown into your faces that he is not ready to be the leader in our attack and Pulisic deserves to be starting ahead of him if we want to compete well by effective attack, to win matches.
Sterling would never torment a big team like Man city like this.
If Potter starts Sterling in our next match, then he won't last and should return to his mid table team before he turns us to one. I don't understand why he started him ahead of Pulisic today.
I was also of the opinion of Broja starting too, so that Auba could come in when tempo is down. Broja was fouled after Pulisic got a corner kick.
Thunder will fire him if he starts Sterling in our next match. Bench was good for Havertz and must be good for Sterling too.
Fraudiola no cover anything, people with sound football knowledge knew he was average in his last years at Ettihad. Very annoying, wasteful and unserious attacker masquerading as a great one.
BikeMan: I agree that Sterling has been poor recently. Maybe that’s because he has been playing in different positions.
However, only a drunk person will compare him to a winger that drops only about 6 goals every season.
Only a drunkard will not see sharp improvement in Maximin's finishing this season compared to previous seasons and still be hyping the finished and useless Sterling.
StarchAndBanga: Any attacker that averages 1 to 3 league goals a season in his full career despite playing in the French farmers league also is not good enough to be mentioned in a conversation about Chelsea players...
24 matches vs Man utd - 0 goal, when not a goal keeper.
StarchAndBanga: He has been very poor recently, that does not mean he is not a good player.
Beginning of the season, he was the only attacker making an effort to try and make something happen. Getting played everywhere on the pitch from RWB one match to LWB another to Striker abi false 9 another match all in the name of tactical flexibility is also not helping..
He is bang average and we needed a better winger not him. Our attack has been bang average that was why many of you saw something in him. He is a City reject for a reason.
andrewbaba44: I watched the game and Sterling was poor today
But what does that change ?
Not only Airmark saw it coming, but most of you get eyes but have sworn not to see.
This poster below said it all. Make Barca come buy am as he is still good in your eyes.
Realguyman1: We complain that complain tire when Chelsea buy Sterling, say Chelsea nor supposed buy Sterling. But some people begin talk say who Chelsea get wey better pass Sterling.
Realguyman1: We complain that complain tire when Chelsea buy Sterling, say Chelsea nor supposed buy Sterling. But some people begin talk say who Chelsea get wey better pass Sterling.
See the result now
We got many of our fans here who loves mediocrity and echoed the same thing.