Alchemist13's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Alchemist13's Profile › Alchemist13's Posts
BraveGuy: EVERYTHING!The SPOKEN WORD of God seems to be many things these days. |
BraveGuy:Show me their proof and I will show you my proof. |
BraveGuy: She is no more 8. I think she's now 20.Yesterday I swear I saw a pig breathe fire. |
UyiIredia: I do. I usually note that evolutionists typically paint skeptics of the theory as not understanding it. This is naive. I might as well say you dont understand the Bible just for being skeptical of it.Where was I skeptical about the Bible? Anyway what you describe is probably anarchy, not evolution. |
UyiIredia: You want to do good because you have a conscience God has put in you. it is naive and ignorant to_well!_ignore that. I must always wonder of what evolutionary value doing good is. It will be better for me, for example, to kill you and steal your things from an evolutionary standpoint. But i won't do that. i have a conscience and a purposeless and dead universe cant make a pool of DNA talkless of conscious human being even in a zillion years.You, my friend, have no idea what evolution is. You think you do, but you don't. |
FrancisTony: Was the activity of early fathers programs, recorded in the bible?If by 'early fathers' you mean early apostles, then yes. It was recorded in the a book aptly named The Acts of the Apostles. |
MrOlai: MIRACLE OF THE HOLY QURAN:Oh dear! The level for your ignorance is only rivalled by the level of your arrogance. |
I'm looking for the schadenfreude; I'm told I can find it here #BRAvsGER #WorldCup |
cococandy: Here are some frequently asked questions for atheists. 1. Are you absolutely sure there is no God? If not, then is it not possible that there is a God? And if it is possible that God exists, then can you think of any reason that would keep you from wanting to look at the evidence?Nothing without evidence of its existence is certainly or absolutely non-existent. However we do make certain decisions based on the lack of evidence of existence of some things (e.g evidence (or lack of it) in a murder trial). Therefore I would conclude (as at the moment) that there is no God due to a lack of evidence. And even if there is a God, he/she has done nothing to revel his/her existence or to intervene in situations in a manner that leaves very little doubt that he/she exists. So for every intent and purposes, God does not exist. 2. Would you agree that intelligently designed things call for an intelligent designer of them? If so, then would you agree that evidence for intelligent design in the universe would be evidence for a designer of the universe?This is a fallacy. There is no evidence of intelligent design. However, as someone else pointed out, we could be the product of some alien experiment . But like the Intelligent designer, this is just a fragment of my imagination.3. Would you agree that nothing cannot produce something? If so, then if the universe did not exist but then came to exist, wouldn’t this be evidence of a cause beyond the universe?Maybe. Maybe not. We do not have enough information about the origin of the universe except the fraction of a second it began expanding. Anything on this matter is just a matter of philosophy and speculation. 4. Would you agree with me that just because we cannot see something with our eyes—such as our mind, gravity, magnetism, the wind—that does not mean it doesn’t exist?Yes. 5. Would you also agree that just because we cannot see God with our eyes does not necessarily mean He doesn’t exist?No. Because unlike gravity and magnetism, we cant observe God's effect, we cant study God, make theories based on him/her and therefore make predictions. 6. In the light of the big bang evidence for the origin of the universe, is it more reasonable to believe that no one created something out of nothing or someone created something out of nothing?The big bang evidence only tells us about the 'explosive' expansion of a 'primordial atom', as Georges Lemaître called it, but not its origin. As I said before, claiming any knowledge of the origin of this 'atom' is mere speculation as science as not provided any evidence. 7. Would you agree that something presently exists? If something presently exists, and something cannot come from nothing, then would you also agree that something must have always existed?Makes sense. By the way have you heard some of the so called multiverse theories? 8. If it takes an intelligent being to produce an encyclopedia, then would it not also take an intelligent being to produce the equivalent of 1000 sets of an encyclopedia full of information in the first one-celled animal? (Even atheists such as Richard Dawkins acknowledges that “amoebas have as much information in their DNA as 1000 Encyclopaedia Britannicas.” Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker (New York: WW. Norton and Co., 1996), 116.)Not necessarily, given enough time nature can produce billions of 'encyclopaedias'. You probably need to study more on evolution and natural selection. 9. If an effect cannot be greater than its cause (since you can’t give what you do not have to give), then does it not make more sense that mind produced matter than that matter produced mind, as atheists say?What makes you think that mind is greater than matter? 10. Is there anything wrong anywhere? If so, how can we know unless there is a moral law?This has to be one of the poorest question you've asked. I presume you are asking about a universal moral law. A law valid for all time and places, right? Sorry to disappoint you there isn't anything as a moral law that binds everybody. Today, due to globalisation, modernisation, and the effect of surviving two world wars, we have basic human rights and a generally similar moral code but even these rights and codes are not respected by every government or authority. In history, the difference in moral code is as obvious as the difference in the geographical locations of different cultures. Most ancient near-east society practised polygamy for instance but in Nepal, parts of China and part of northern India, polyandry was practised. Now I'm sure you are not planning on keeping you husbands at the same time. Oh the moral outrage! 11. If every law needs a lawgiver, does it not make sense to say a moral law needs a Moral Lawgiver?Based on my preceding answer, there would have to be several law givers. All of them human. 12. Would you agree that if it took intelligence to make a model universe in a science lab, then it took super-intelligence to make the real universe?No. 13. Would you agree that it takes a cause to make a small glass ball found in the woods? And would you agree that making the ball larger does not eliminate the need for a cause? If so, then doesn’t the biggest ball of all (the whole universe) need a cause?Where did you hear the universe is a giant ball? (where did you here the universe has any shape?) 14. If there is a cause beyond the whole finite (limited) universe, would not this cause have to be beyond the finite, namely, non-finite or infinite?The anthropic principle is a philosophical consideration not real science. Not everybody agrees with it. |
cococandy: Thanks for your quick response.When: Early last year. Why: I began to realise we may just be replacing our own myths with the myths and legends of the ancient near-east. I hope that helps. |
tdcministry: The Disciples' Commission MinistryNice format. |
@Seun Guy u no get backup? Thank God Nairaland is back but some of my followed topics are gone ![]() |
About the login issue. It may be they have a database problem. The site seemed down not too long ago |

, confirmed that the painting is the face the Jesus Christ he saw when he visited heaven?
#BRAvsGER #WorldCup
