Atheistconverta's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Atheistconverta's Profile › Atheistconverta's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 10 pages)
Veecruz:I don't need to waste any more truth on a women-hating antichrist parading himself as Christian. The devil surely used women to get your souls locked down in depths of hell because he knows if you don't forgive them and be delivered of your bitterness, you're definitely not escaping hell as Jesus said. So there are no 2 ways about it, but if you like, continue deceiving yourselves, all the those of you who think they can continue with unforgiveness and bitterness against the female gender and vice versa and still think they can make heaven. |
Veecruz:The mad see the sane as mad and vice versa so it makes perfect sense. Women have made you go completely gaga, you are too blind to see it but you're spreading your insanity everywhere. "Women always kill potential chosen of God", "Eve slept with the serpent", "forbidden fruit is sex", "women are the devil's seed" women this, women that, and you think you're okay? You need serious deliverance. |
Veecruz:Why not define what an image means to prove those demons have not infested your brain with stupidity? Someone who shamelessly keeps opening utterly stupid antiwomen threads as, "Eve slept with the serpent", "all women are Satan's seed" to name but a few, yet you're worried about the person behind most spiritually sound threads in the religious section, who God also used to remove shame from the eyes of NL Christians before the NL atheists. You obviously want everyone to become as spiritually blind and useless as you are here, so that your father the devil whose lies you're spreading here would be proud of you. You have failed woefully if so!
|
Veecruz:You've proven beyond any reasonable doubt to be a barefaced liar even when the truth stares you right in your face. I am not surprised at all though. A woman-hating antichrist that shamelessly keep spreading embarrassing lies here about women. See how you see the glaring Truth but still reject it to your own peril because it goes against your anti-women sentiments. The devil has surely got you on lockdown in hell with all your bitterness and unforgiveness against the female gender. But whether antichrists like you like it or not, God would not stop using women to speak and preach His Gospel to men in the church and elsewhere as Christ did shortly before His departure. Now be gone Satan! |
Veecruz:Which header? You must be utterly stupid and ignorant to believe such a thing except you don't know what an image is. Makes sense for someone who could shamelessly fall for the demonic lie about Eve sleeping with the serpent in the beginning, yet you think you qualify to talk to someone else about being an embarrassment here? At least you're not denying the fact you believe such a lie sent from the pit of hell, so kudos your shameless self. |
Veecruz:A mouth piece of the old serpent posing as a speaker of the truth is nothing new. Your father/master did the same in the beginning but Jesus called him not just a liar but the father of all liars. You must think saying God uses the foolish things of this world to confound the wise, is a lie, right? It makes sense coming from someone who was so spiritually daft to fall for the demonic lie of Eve sleeping with the serpent in the beginning. It's utter foolishness to think that's shifting of argument when it's also applicable to your lame reasoning also in this case. |
Veecruz:Let me quote what Luke himself says here about what Anna did in the temple so it would by itself confirm your already exposed status as a women-hating antichrist, that makes you to still boldly deny the Truth even though you could clearly see it. Luke 2:38 "And she coming in that instant gave thanks likewise unto the Lord, and spake of him to all them that looked for redemption in Jerusalem." You can't say you didn't see this verse which proves women were permitted to speak/preach in the Temple. You did! Yet you kept clutching hard to the false and erroneous teaching of Paul about women not being permitted to speak in the church because it suits your antiwomen agenda. If you like though, continue with your utter stupidity of attacking those who chose to follow and preach Christ teachings instead of such false and antichrist teachings of men about women like that of Paul of women not being permitted to speak in the church... even though it goes against the teachings and example of Christ Himself, which was also confirmed by that instance of Anna in the temple. On the day of judgment, those same Words of Jesus you reject, you must answer to if you don't repent. |
Veecruz:This is more foolish to you than falling for the obviously demonic lie that Eve slept with the serpent, right? If you think so, then you must be the most gullible human on planet Earth because there's nothing as appalling as that. Just incase this confounds you also, you should know that God uses the foolish things of this world to confound the wise. |
Veecruz:For an agent of the serpent spreading the demonic heretic gospel of the serpent having sex with the woman, and also making numerous anti-women threads here, including calling all women, which includes his own mother, the serpent's seed, what else should I expect from you? You must be blind to the fact that women like prophetess Anna were allowed to preach and prophesy in the temple. Moreover Deborah was appointed by God to be both the spiritual and political leader of His people Israel. She was the only woman of 15 to 17 judges chosen by God to lead His people Israel, the rest were men, which isn't different from Jesus not choosing any women of His first 12 as that doesn't mean no woman is among the 72 He also chose. So instead of talking amiss, why not show me one place God told women not to speak in His House, the Jewish temple, or the church built by Christ, if not the heretic saying of Paul about women not speaking in the church, despite Christ Himself having given women that permission? |
Jokerman:Please kindly stop calling me bro. I am not a brother of antichrists who claim to be Christians but would be attacking those who uphold the teachings of Christ instead of those which go against them. You haven't still shown us where God stopped women from speaking in His House, either in the temple in Jerusalem or in the church Christ built that would warrant such a heretic saying by Paul that women were not supposed to speak in churches because it's a thing of shame which you blindly embraced as the Word of God. This thread which you claim God was very harsh before the coming of Christ exposes your ignorance, hypocrisy and also confirm your anti-women sentiments. God was very harsh before Christ came yet He allowed women to speak in the Jewish temple, but you will still blindly accept a heretic anti-women teaching by Paul that women were not meant to speak in Christ church which was supposed to be less harsh, because it's a thing of shame, even though it clearly goes against the teachings of Christ. |
Jokerman:Why did Jesus make women speak in His church if he doesn't respect women, yet you chose to accept the heretic antichrist/anti-women teaching of Paul that a woman shouldn't speak in the church over what Jesus taught? |
You say He's very strict but He permitted woman to speak in His temple and even to lead His people Israel, yet you antichrists say after the coming of Jesus, His Word stopped women from speaking in the church because it's a shame for them to do so. Continue deceiving yourselves women-hating antichrists! |
Jokerman:If up til now you still don't know where he did that despite having shown you numerous times, it means the depth of your spiritual blindness is beyond my comprehension, so you will never be able to see it despite how glaring it is even if I show you again. It's only God that could help you at this point so humble yourself in prayer to God and sincerely ask Him to show you where it is Himself. |
GreatAchiever1:Ya'll are the swine and dogs Jesus warned us not to cast our pearls and holy things before. Imagine how you've thrashed Christ's teaching and example about women speaking in the church, that would have helped you stop ignorantly preaching such heresies about women if you really wanted to learn. Next time keep your antichrist beliefs in the thrash can where they belong. |
Jokerman:Where did you learn to reject Jesus teachings and example concerning women speaking in the church? From Paul right? |
GreatAchiever1:You keep saying you're done but keep coming back to spill your antichrist thrash on this thread. It's utter foolishness to think, receiving someone Jesus sends also means making them take place of Jesus in one's life. Being called, sent or chosen never makes them masters or lord but just servants, hence Jesus telling them not to let themselves to be called masters or rabbi, because only Christ is Master, every one of them is a mere servant and brother regardless, and that is in the respect of Christ Word! But here you are exalting Paul not just a your master but also your lord and your god just because he was called, that you possibly believe he has the right to overrule Christ's commandments and example concerning women speaking in the church. It's so shameful you can't see that you have made an idol of Paul and are bowing down and worshipping him as the Catholics do of Mary just because she was chosen of God,, but you're too spiritually blind to see it also. What you should know though is that the same teachings and example of Christ which you knowingly reject today so you would embrace the ideas, doctrines and traditions of men which suit your beliefs, would be used against you on the day of judgement if you don't repent. |
Image123:Coming from those who could possibly believe the glaring heresy that Eve slept with the serpent in the beginning, could it get any shallower than that? Yet you're worried about people possibly coming to repentance as a result of this? Trust me, they'd be fine if they're not as spiritually shallow as you. God is able to use anything to draw men unto Himself, even the things you consider foolish. |
For you to quote all the versions and still not realize the gravity of your error and heresy is astonishing. Is the church not the disciples of Christ and wherever they are gathered? Is it now evangelism to deliver a message from Christ to His disciples? The depth of your ignorance and spiritual blindness is mind-boggling. Even in the temple women were speaking what God revealed to them before Christ came, how much more in His church after He had emancipated them from the curse of sin? Luke 2:36-38. The idea of women not speaking in the temple or church did not come from God, Christ, or even anyone else in the Bible but Paul. You can prove me wrong by stating anywhere else in the Bible where such a thing was written. You even had to resort to lies that it had to do with pastoral office despite knowing fully well it had nothing to do that to show how far you would go to defend this heretic, anti-women, antichrist teaching of Paul. I mean, how could someone not see how glaring it it, when he specifically stated that if women want to learn anything, they should ask their husband at home for it's a shame for women to speak in the church. Is it people now with pastoral offices that want to learn things and ask others questions in church instead of giving answers and teaching others? Imagine writing off Deborah's exemplary leadership of Israel just because it goes against Paul's erroneous teachings. How about Mariam who was third in command when Moses was in charge. I feel deep pity for you allowing your deeply-rooted blind sentiments for apostle Paul to completely becloud your good sense of judgement. Is Paul now your God that principles ordained by God Himself, you now think Paul can just singlehandedly overrule? God strategically chose Deborah to lead His own people to establish the fact that a woman can also lead His people, but you rubbished what God did because of Paul. Jesus Himself set an example and a precedent for His church to follow by sending a woman to preach His resurrection message in the church but you thrash it just because of the blunder concerning women made by apostle Paul in his writings. You willfully reject Christ's teachings and example, yet you think you can correct those who abide by them? You need special deliverance if you could ever think such a thing. My mentor is obviously Christ as you should have already seen by now except for spiritual blindness from how I place His teachings above those of anyone else, including Paul. I don't follow man like you. GreatAchiever1: |
GreatAchiever1:You can't see even the most glaring error as this because you're spiritually blinded by your blind sentiments for Paul's teachings, which you place above that of Christ. otherwise it should be easy for you to see that Paul teaching was about merely speaking in the church, as in, Mary delivering the message which Jesus sent her to the church, and not even pastoring or leading a church. If you've not totally blocked out your mind from things which disprove your erroneous beliefs about women which are totally driven by male chauvinism, you would have realized that the practice of women speaking to men even in the temple (House of God) delivering the message God gave to them is Biblical. That's why you'd also be completely blind to the fact God Himself appointed a woman as judge over His people Israel even if it's just one. It's the same reason you hastily came to the conclusion no woman was called a disciple in the Bible without first verifying your claims. It's also no surprise you can't see even the error in Paul's teaching about woman despite how glaring it becomes when placed alongside that of Christ. The fact remains that God hardly chooses women to lead His people even in the old testament, which was also reflected in the instance of Christ with His choosing of first twelve disciples, but it's heretic to claim He never does as you're doing just because He hardly does so. You seem not to realize being heretical in the respect of Christ's church is going contrary to the teachings of Christ not those of Paul or someone else. That's exactly what you're doing and trust me, even if you don't end up in hell for that if you don't repent, there were still many things you stand to lose here on this earth. As for your claims of Kathryn Kulman making errors, I wouldn't dispute that because I also believe Paul made errors in his theology, but that doesn't negate the fact that regardless they were both true servants of God. |
GreatAchiever1:You should never have bothered coming to a thread which upholds the teachings and example of Christ concerning women, to spew out contradictions out of the abundance of your spiritual ignorance and antichrist beliefs concerning women if you're not an antichrist. You don't want to learn from Christ so what do you know that you want to teach someone else? You are now talking about elevating women to divinity status when you never remembered that of yourself when you're attributing such things to men, including Paul whose erroneous and denigrating teachings about women you have elevated above that of Christ. Your hypocrisy stinks to the high heavens though is now nothing new so no surprises there. |
GreatAchiever1:No need for the epistles really because it wouldn't change the fact that your hypocrisy and heresy have been exposed. It's your choice though to continue adhering to your false and antichrist beliefs. |
GreatAchiever1:It takes the height of spiritually blindness not to realize that it's not up to Paul but Christ to determine how His church ought to be conducted, hence the need for the second which is an instruction and example of Christ Himself to prove how the erroneous teaching of apostle Paul goes against that commandment and example of Christ. Are you too blind to see that it is antichrist and demeaning of women? Christ Himself gave women the right to speak in His church by that instruction and example, but Paul says women ought not speak in the church and it is shameful for a woman speak in the church, and you're here still saying nonsense about pastoral offices despite clearly see this is about merely speaking in the church and not even pastoring a church. Who gave Paul the right overrule the authority of Christ He gave for women to speak in His church? The same you would later call someone who abides by the teachings and example of Christ, heretic, but here you are rejecting the authority and teaching of Christ knowingly and proving to be the real heretic and antichrist. What you must also know is that these same Words you reject so you may hold on to those antichrist teachings that appease your male chauvinistic tendencies would be used against you on the day of judgement if you don't repent. Regardless, no matter how you male chauvinistic antichrists try to suppress women from doing what Christ sent them to do, not just to speak but also pastor churches whenever He chooses, God would keep putting ya'll to shame just as He did with Kathryn Kulman. Wouldn't be surprised though if you claim that such a woman both mighty in the Word and in Works, that God used to raise world renowned evangelists as Benny Jinn and Julio Cesar Ruibal, was not appointed by God. |
GreatAchiever1:If his was based on assumptions why not show us where it was stated in the Bible that there was no woman among the 72 disciples appointed by Jesus to prove yours is not and you're not being a hypocrite? Btw, Acts 9:36 proves the bolded is false and only based on assumptions ironically, so you're the one being heretical here. Cc.Chikel20000 |
Jokerman:For you to make such a blunderous statement about her, it must be bourne out of ignorance or anti-women sentiments. Did you know what God used her to do and the gravity of power that accompanied her despite being a woman? Go and read about her so you would stop making such ridiculous comments if you don't really know about her. As for respecting women, you obviously don't otherwise you wouldn't be making and supporting such demeaning and false claims and teachings about them as this of Paul, especially when you had been shown that it goes against the teaching and example of Christ. Just in case though you mistakenly did that, here's what Paul said again and compare with what Christ Himself said so that you can correct yourself, otherwise prove me right about your hatred for women and that your lord is indeed Paul and not Christ. 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 34 "Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. 35And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church." - Paul "I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God." - Jesus |
Jokerman:Continue deceiving yourselves, you Paul-worshipping and women-hating antichrists in the order of the Pharisees. You haven't compared Lazarus Mouka to men as Julio Cesar Ruibal that God used to bring revival to Bolivia, who emerged from her ministry. I'm not even going to talk of Benny Hinn, who kept mentioning her name in his teachings and books, it's Kathryn Kulman the woman widely regarded as a God's general because of the rare degree of mighty works God used her to accomplish more than most men, that you want to compare to a man that is still yet to convince even Nigerian to be anything special in the respect of mighty works, despite all the loud noise being made by his members everyday about the testimonies shared in his church. God would continue using women as Kathryn Kulman to confound you women-haters who reject the teachings and examples of Jesus, so that you may embrace erroneous and denigrating teachings of men as apostle Paul about women that suit your women-hating tendencies. |
Maynthemayn:Kudos for not liking your post with your other monikers though.
|
atheistconverta: |
The fear of God is the beginning of wisdom. |
Say no to foolishness today. |
Any atheist wanna be wise today? |
Hi everyone. |