₦airaland Forum

Zulus see the world upside down

shortgun:
If you've been to any morgue before you'll know it can't be true. No corpse already in the morgue can come back to life.

no. I know someone who was deposited at the floor of the morgue after an accident but he survived

The home and birthplace of agbero, political thuggery and violence

KiNg0G:
Why is it that everyone outside of delta state thinks the whole place is warri, meanwhile warri doesn't even cover up to 25% in delta state. I used to think I was a warri boy myself not until in my teenage years I realised warri I have been claiming I really wasn't from there in fact I barely even go there..okere,igbudu and the rest. I was born and bred in "EFFURUN" Uvwie the major entry point of delta state and yet for years I thought I was a warri boy and you wouldnt blame me. You'd blame our fore fathers (urhobos) who really didn't care that much because they were so accommodating that they accepted anything be thrown at them even to the point of accepting names that isnt geographically correct in the first place.

Realwarripickin cancelled show saga made alot of people realise that warri they have been calling they haven't even been there. When travelling to delta, you'd see the park writing warri but where they actually drop you is EFFURUN ROUNDABOUT or PTI JUNCTION in Uvwie local government area. that is not even close to warri at all, to get to warri you'd have to take a cab or keke that Wil drive close 40min plus passing all the neighboring Uvwie communities before you finally enter warri.

Now this isn't tribal war or discrimination is just awareness that Lot of people didn't know and that's how history got lost and children to come wouldn't even know their identity. This matter has been on ground for years now that people should stop generalising everywhere in delta state as warri.. you'd see someone travelling from Lagos and the destination is ughelli.. ask him he will say he is going to warri.. like come on does that make sense? Do you know the distance from ughelli to warri?

You'd see someone staying in SAPELE, you'd ask him where he stays he will say WARRI. all this have been going on for years and we've tried and tried to make several corrections, either we get insulted or people keeps saying it doesn't matter like they just don't want to know.


So my people to end it all this ongoing saga really sweet my belly very well atleast the whole Nigeria is getting to know that where they've claimed to been to or even stayed for years is not actually warri.

Ekpan and Effurun have always been Warri spelled with a hyphen.

The reason you guys don't have a national city like Benin, Calabar, Enugu, Kaduna, Lagos and Port Harcourt is because of envy and laziness.

Also Effurun is not the major point of entry to Delta state. You have to type when you're sober and enrol to a geography class and not speak form tribal blinders.

Warri is a s*****h now with great under elopment Effurun too has witness the mass exodus of multinationals because of laziness and entitlement mentality.

Learn to see the bigger picture.

Society has given hoes and runs girls platform to air their shamelessness.

Society has made it easy for today's women to be honest with no consequences.

BlackViper:
https://www.euractiv.com/news/france-rebukes-ex-spanish-pm-over-no-french-players-claim/

The Spanish former PM is right

Jayhome24:
Mr man keep quiet.

If you know you are innocent come home and proof your innocent.

Sowore who could have fight for you you already fought him so come here if you are sure you are innocent..

you sound like Onanuga. Power without sense or legitimacy and authority.

Mumu post from genz who thinks they know or understand life through addiction on their phones and social media

Afriifa:
You didn't lie about that. The truth is Nigerians get their own for head. If a Nigerian can manufacture fake products to harm their fellow countrymen, tribe just to make money, then imagine what a Nigerian would manufacture in another country?

fake drugs, advance fee fraud and scam , one of many of our exports I must say

FreeStuffsNG:
Separately, Russia’s Defense Ministry published a list of sites it claims are involved in manufacturing drones and related equipment for Ukraine. The list includes facilities in major cities such as London, Munich, Prague and Riga, with components also produced in Madrid and at several locations in Italy, including Venice.

They want to defeat Putin through the back door and using Iran as a decoy.

Trump blew up factories that Iran use to produce and supply drones to Russia, now it is the turn of Russia to blow up factories used to produce drones supplied to Trump.

Welcome to the world of tit for tat elemi lo ma last.

when do you come to the place where you're gainfully employed?

Fake news doesn't sell well in Africa, especially fake geopolitical news

Emeskhalifa:
You don't fight someone who has nothing left to loose.

You sanctioned them for 47yrs, still they thrived above that.

Except America is willing to kill civilians without guns or any form of weapons tonight, the world is watching.

hypocrisy will not work this time. Iran has been using cluster bombs and targeting civilians and public infrastructure across the middle east since the military campaign started.

Since they have been reduced to Hezbollah, they will be treated as such

Brownlumi:
Does a very sexually experienced person have a higher chance of cheating in marriage than a sexually restrained/inexperienced person?

Short answer:

Yes — but not automatically, and not for the simplistic reason many people think.
Because the real issue is not merely:
“How many people has this person slept with?”

The deeper issue is:
“What kind of habits, beliefs, appetites, and emotional wiring has that sexual history built into the person?”

That’s the real question.

And this is where the conversation becomes very interesting.


---

Let’s break it down properly, the theory basically says:
“If someone has been highly sexually active with many people before marriage, won’t that make it harder for them to suddenly become sexually exclusive after marriage?”
That is a very reasonable thought because human beings are not robots.

You don’t spend years training one pattern of living and then expect marriage ring to suddenly perform miracle surgery on your instincts.

That’s not how people work.

If someone has spent years in a lifestyle of:
novelty, multiple partners, casual access, secret meetings, emotional detachment, thrill-based intimacy, low restraint, high sensual stimulation
…then yes: that person may carry those grooves into marriage.

That’s not “judgment.” That’s just how conditioning works.

Why past sexual behaviour can increase cheating risk

There are several reasons.

1) Habit formation: This is the biggest one. When someone repeatedly lives a certain way, it becomes normal to them. So if a person has lived by: “follow chemistry”, “if I feel like it, I do it” “I can separate body from commitment”, “private pleasure is not a big deal”…then marriage does not automatically erase those mental grooves.
This is why I believe:
Marriage does not create character. It reveals and tests it.
A wedding can give: structure, legitimacy, companionship, accountability. But it does not magically produce: discipline, integrity, restraint, self-governance. Those things must already be growing in the person.

2) Sexual novelty can become part of their appetite: This one is huge and people don’t talk about it honestly enough. Some people are not just attracted to sex itself, they become attached to: newness, variety, the chase, the forbidden, being desired by different people etc. That is a different beast entirely because now the issue is not:
“I need sex.”
It becomes:
“I need stimulation, novelty, validation, conquest, or excitement.”

And marriage, by design, is stable but novelty addiction feeds on: unpredictability, secrecy, new bodies, fresh emotional chemistry, ego validation. So yes:
someone heavily trained on novelty may struggle more with exclusivity.
That’s very real.

3) The person may have weakened their “internal brakes”: This one is psychological and spiritual. Every time someone crosses a line and keeps crossing it, one of two things happens. Either:
they feel conviction and turn back
Or
they normalize it. And once something becomes normalized, it stops feeling “serious.”
So if someone has repeatedly done: sneaky relationships, cheating, casual intimacy,
emotionally overlapping relationships,
…then over time their conscience can become less alarmed by those behaviours.
So yes, repeated sensual looseness can reduce moral sensitivity. That is a real thing.
And that matters more than people admit.

4) They may confuse desire with destiny
: Some people are trained by life to believe:
“If I feel strongly, it must be meaningful.”
That’s dangerous. Because in marriage, you will still meet very attractive people, emotionally interesting people, people who “get you,” people who spark chemistry.
If your whole pre-marital life trained you to treat chemistry as a green light, then yes, you may be more vulnerable to cheating.
Why?
Because marriage requires the ability to say:
“This feeling is real… but it is not a command.”

That is maturity. And not everyone has built it.
But now let me balance it, because this is where many people become too simplistic.
MEANWHILE...

Sexual history does NOT automatically mean the person will cheat
And this is very important because some people hear:
“Body count matters”
…and then jump to:
“Ah! Once she has a past, she can never be faithful.”
That’s nonsense.
Too simplistic.
Too online, and of course
Too Nairaland 😄

Because some very sexually active people genuinely change deeply.

And some sexually inexperienced or “innocent-looking” people still become terrible cheaters.

So the real issue is not merely:
“How much have they done?”
but
“Who have they become?”
That’s the deeper thing. A low sexual past does not automatically mean faithfulness. This is the part many men miss badly.
A person can be “novice” and still cheat later if they are: emotionally hungry, validation-starved, immature, entitled, resentful, easily influenced, thrill-seeking, conflict-avoidant, lacking self-control. So a low sexual history can lower certain risks… but it does not guarantee fidelity.
Why?
Because cheating is often not just about sex.
It is often about: ego, loneliness, fantasy, revenge, attention, resentment, boredom, emotional hunger, poor boundaries.
That’s why some people with “clean” histories still derail.
So What predicts cheating better than “body count” alone?
If you want to estimate whether someone is more likely to cheat, these are more useful questions than just:
“How many people have they slept with?”

1) How do they talk about boundaries? Do they think: “Nothing is wrong with harmless flirting”, “I can handle myself”, “It’s not cheating unless sex happens”, “My partner is insecure." That’s a red flag because cheating often starts long before physical action. It starts in permission structures.
2) How do they handle desire? Can they say:
“Yes, I’m attracted, but no.”
Or do they live by:
“If I feel it strongly enough, I should explore it.”
That difference is massive.
3) Do they have a history of secrecy? This one matters a lot. If someone is comfortable with hidden chats, backup lovers, coded communication, emotional double lives,
…that is a much stronger warning sign than “number of partners” alone.
4) Do they crave external validation? Some people are dangerously powered by being desired.If a person needs to constantly feel wanted, admired, chased, chosen,pursued,
…then marriage can feel “too normal” after a while and that person may become vulnerable to outside attention.
5) Have they actually repented / matured / changed? This is the big one. It's not: “They said they’ve changed.” but have they actually become different?
Signs of real change include: stronger boundaries, honesty, accountability, less appetite for chaos, less need for attention, more self-respect, more respect for covenant, less secretive behavior, more discipline. That is what matters not just “She said she’s not that person again.”
Words are cheap. Patterns are expensive.
To conclude,
Yes, a person with a long pattern of sexual looseness, multiple partners, and thrill-based intimacy may have a higher statistical and practical risk of cheating later in marriage but the reason is not mystical.
It is because they may have developed:
habits of novelty
weak restraint
normalized boundary crossing
high stimulation appetite
Comfort with secrecy
chemistry-driven decision making
That is what raises the risk.
But there’s a spiritual dimension too. From a spiritual and moral lens, repeated sensual disorder can do more than create habits.
It can also create:
desensitization, appetite disorder, attachment confusion, weakened conscience and what some would call bonding fragmentation.
Meaning: the person’s inner world becomes trained to separate body from covenant, pleasure from responsibility, and desire from discipline.
That’s not a small thing.

So yes:
there can be a moral-spiritual dulling effect if someone repeatedly lives in unrestrained sensuality.
That is very real.
But again — and this is important —
it is not irreversible.
Some people genuinely turn around.
But they must actually do the inner work. Marriage alone won’t do it for them. I rest my keyboard.

All these long article just to defend olosho?

Whatever your excuses and logic is, a woman with high body counts is broken, damaged and unfit for purpose.

Sex with women and men are not the same.

Let her go to Iran and dress like that. Hijab loading

Who still takes Reno seriously after his shameless effort to get a political job

At least we all know he has no standards or redlines or a particular belief system or any moral codes.

He switches allegiance and ethics as fast as a whirlwind in a harmattan season.

Righteousness2:
Nonsense baseless propaganda news.

What to know about the rescue.

Late last night, The Pilot was Rescued alive and sound.

Lots of Iranian casualties including military generals who tried go condone the area were killed .

ISRAEL was a Huge part of the rescue

both helicopters were blown by the US team as they were stuck in a makeshift runaway.

The US rescue team had to wait for over 3 hours for new planes to come airlift them away while condoning the area. This is to show the level of dominance the rescue team had in the operation.

The Iranian regime posted pictures of the burnt helicopters to salvage the shame.

Writerng is a sadistic teenage propaganda who manufactures fiction for news as he seeks nairalands help to get attention for an otherwise uneventful life.

WriterNig:
https://x.com/AryJeay/status/2040692635464090062?s=20

---

China Daily

you will destroy nairaland before its dated lifespan.

Of course and even Syria and Iran in the face of war have more stable electricity than Nigeria.

Time for Nigeria to hold the regions responsible for our cursed fate

Druss:
You think life is cause and effect always. Some people just want to make others fall. They need no reason other than the thrill of it.

you're part of the folks who blindly take anything a pastor/priest dishes out without applying any independent or objective thinking.

* Why is the priest laying curses on the woman's generation and family?

* What kind of vile and gutter language was he saying telling the congregation that her laps wasn't even smooth or fine and it was filled with gallops and eczema?

* Since when do Women send nudes to a wrong target not just ones but multiple times!?

* Even the church members were not impressed because it is clear the man is just blowing hot air .

* Men who act in exactly same fashion as this man are often guilty and they bring the matter up in public themselves to deflect and manipulate the crowd.

madridguy:
The Iranian government have said since the US government is not telling the truth about the first pilot they would rather remain silent about the second pilot.

Let just wait and see the drama going.

'Still need to exfiltrate' F-15 airman from Iran after rescue — US govt sources to Al Jazeera

since you left sports commentary and ventured into geopolitics, your opinion and comments are still those resembling the assertions of one with no idea, no thought and no ability to analyse objectively. One given to sentiments and prepubescent emotional outbursts.

How old are you really?

Emmanuel Macron , the strongest voice in the EU but the weakest in the world.

The EU now is a continent of handbags and designer clothes , no major industries or AI companies but seek to regukate global companies and firms while producing none.

A coward organisation overtaken by Russia and abroad of Iran but very strong on LGBTQ and mass migration while enabling terrorists and radical Islamists.

Emmanuel Macron s wife is old enough to be his grandmother who slapped him publicly and is it this fool who can defend the world or face a nuclear-determined Iran who had towce planned to asssisnate Trump and obliterate Israel and hated by other Arab Nations?

SmartPolician:
This comment makes no sense. Oga Reverend, any married woman sending you her nude pix most likely needs deliverance or counselling.

Unfortunately, he doesn't see things from that perspective because the orthodox church just accepts anyone to become their pastors, even those who have no calling

People don't really get it, if the story is true, the priest is complicit.

No matter the level of demon possession in a woman , she just doesn't send her nudes to her priest without feeling the man is into that kind of stuffz either through utterances or rumours.

The priest also said she wasn't the only one. From that kind of deflective talk , he's into that kind of stuff.

Lovelink1991:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAUYjcuRmRA?si=wqm7gTWgKwWKzcDa

this one is a comedian and a charlatan. A man chased by hunger into being a preacher.

And yes the Anglican church is rife with sexual immorality and scandals.

Fani kayode, the only reason he ever was popular was for domestic abuse, wife battery and the famous jollof rice placation

Wallade:
It is often funny when d.af.t people refer to others as d.a.ft

the above statement does not reflect the opinions of those with brain cells.