Afriifa: You didn't lie about that. The truth is Nigerians get their own for head. If a Nigerian can manufacture fake products to harm their fellow countrymen, tribe just to make money, then imagine what a Nigerian would manufacture in another country?
fake drugs, advance fee fraud and scam , one of many of our exports I must say
FreeStuffsNG: Separately, Russia’s Defense Ministry published a list of sites it claims are involved in manufacturing drones and related equipment for Ukraine. The list includes facilities in major cities such as London, Munich, Prague and Riga, with components also produced in Madrid and at several locations in Italy, including Venice.
They want to defeat Putin through the back door and using Iran as a decoy.
Trump blew up factories that Iran use to produce and supply drones to Russia, now it is the turn of Russia to blow up factories used to produce drones supplied to Trump.
Welcome to the world of tit for tat elemi lo ma last.
when do you come to the place where you're gainfully employed?
Fake news doesn't sell well in Africa, especially fake geopolitical news
Emeskhalifa: You don't fight someone who has nothing left to loose.
You sanctioned them for 47yrs, still they thrived above that.
Except America is willing to kill civilians without guns or any form of weapons tonight, the world is watching.
hypocrisy will not work this time. Iran has been using cluster bombs and targeting civilians and public infrastructure across the middle east since the military campaign started.
Since they have been reduced to Hezbollah, they will be treated as such
Brownlumi: Does a very sexually experienced person have a higher chance of cheating in marriage than a sexually restrained/inexperienced person?
Short answer:
Yes — but not automatically, and not for the simplistic reason many people think. Because the real issue is not merely: “How many people has this person slept with?”
The deeper issue is: “What kind of habits, beliefs, appetites, and emotional wiring has that sexual history built into the person?”
That’s the real question.
And this is where the conversation becomes very interesting.
---
Let’s break it down properly, the theory basically says: “If someone has been highly sexually active with many people before marriage, won’t that make it harder for them to suddenly become sexually exclusive after marriage?” That is a very reasonable thought because human beings are not robots.
You don’t spend years training one pattern of living and then expect marriage ring to suddenly perform miracle surgery on your instincts.
That’s not how people work.
If someone has spent years in a lifestyle of: novelty, multiple partners, casual access, secret meetings, emotional detachment, thrill-based intimacy, low restraint, high sensual stimulation …then yes: that person may carry those grooves into marriage.
That’s not “judgment.” That’s just how conditioning works.
Why past sexual behaviour can increase cheating risk
There are several reasons.
1) Habit formation: This is the biggest one. When someone repeatedly lives a certain way, it becomes normal to them. So if a person has lived by: “follow chemistry”, “if I feel like it, I do it” “I can separate body from commitment”, “private pleasure is not a big deal”…then marriage does not automatically erase those mental grooves. This is why I believe: Marriage does not create character. It reveals and tests it. A wedding can give: structure, legitimacy, companionship, accountability. But it does not magically produce: discipline, integrity, restraint, self-governance. Those things must already be growing in the person.
2) Sexual novelty can become part of their appetite: This one is huge and people don’t talk about it honestly enough. Some people are not just attracted to sex itself, they become attached to: newness, variety, the chase, the forbidden, being desired by different people etc. That is a different beast entirely because now the issue is not: “I need sex.” It becomes: “I need stimulation, novelty, validation, conquest, or excitement.”
And marriage, by design, is stable but novelty addiction feeds on: unpredictability, secrecy, new bodies, fresh emotional chemistry, ego validation. So yes: someone heavily trained on novelty may struggle more with exclusivity. That’s very real.
3) The person may have weakened their “internal brakes”: This one is psychological and spiritual. Every time someone crosses a line and keeps crossing it, one of two things happens. Either: they feel conviction and turn back Or they normalize it. And once something becomes normalized, it stops feeling “serious.” So if someone has repeatedly done: sneaky relationships, cheating, casual intimacy, emotionally overlapping relationships, …then over time their conscience can become less alarmed by those behaviours. So yes, repeated sensual looseness can reduce moral sensitivity. That is a real thing. And that matters more than people admit.
4) They may confuse desire with destiny : Some people are trained by life to believe: “If I feel strongly, it must be meaningful.” That’s dangerous. Because in marriage, you will still meet very attractive people, emotionally interesting people, people who “get you,” people who spark chemistry. If your whole pre-marital life trained you to treat chemistry as a green light, then yes, you may be more vulnerable to cheating. Why? Because marriage requires the ability to say: “This feeling is real… but it is not a command.”
That is maturity. And not everyone has built it. But now let me balance it, because this is where many people become too simplistic. MEANWHILE...
Sexual history does NOT automatically mean the person will cheat And this is very important because some people hear: “Body count matters” …and then jump to: “Ah! Once she has a past, she can never be faithful.” That’s nonsense. Too simplistic. Too online, and of course Too Nairaland 😄
Because some very sexually active people genuinely change deeply.
And some sexually inexperienced or “innocent-looking” people still become terrible cheaters.
So the real issue is not merely: “How much have they done?” but “Who have they become?” That’s the deeper thing. A low sexual past does not automatically mean faithfulness. This is the part many men miss badly. A person can be “novice” and still cheat later if they are: emotionally hungry, validation-starved, immature, entitled, resentful, easily influenced, thrill-seeking, conflict-avoidant, lacking self-control. So a low sexual history can lower certain risks… but it does not guarantee fidelity. Why? Because cheating is often not just about sex. It is often about: ego, loneliness, fantasy, revenge, attention, resentment, boredom, emotional hunger, poor boundaries. That’s why some people with “clean” histories still derail. So What predicts cheating better than “body count” alone? If you want to estimate whether someone is more likely to cheat, these are more useful questions than just: “How many people have they slept with?”
1) How do they talk about boundaries? Do they think: “Nothing is wrong with harmless flirting”, “I can handle myself”, “It’s not cheating unless sex happens”, “My partner is insecure." That’s a red flag because cheating often starts long before physical action. It starts in permission structures. 2) How do they handle desire? Can they say: “Yes, I’m attracted, but no.” Or do they live by: “If I feel it strongly enough, I should explore it.” That difference is massive. 3) Do they have a history of secrecy? This one matters a lot. If someone is comfortable with hidden chats, backup lovers, coded communication, emotional double lives, …that is a much stronger warning sign than “number of partners” alone. 4) Do they crave external validation? Some people are dangerously powered by being desired.If a person needs to constantly feel wanted, admired, chased, chosen,pursued, …then marriage can feel “too normal” after a while and that person may become vulnerable to outside attention. 5) Have they actually repented / matured / changed? This is the big one. It's not: “They said they’ve changed.” but have they actually become different? Signs of real change include: stronger boundaries, honesty, accountability, less appetite for chaos, less need for attention, more self-respect, more respect for covenant, less secretive behavior, more discipline. That is what matters not just “She said she’s not that person again.” Words are cheap. Patterns are expensive. To conclude, Yes, a person with a long pattern of sexual looseness, multiple partners, and thrill-based intimacy may have a higher statistical and practical risk of cheating later in marriage but the reason is not mystical. It is because they may have developed: habits of novelty weak restraint normalized boundary crossing high stimulation appetite Comfort with secrecy chemistry-driven decision making That is what raises the risk. But there’s a spiritual dimension too. From a spiritual and moral lens, repeated sensual disorder can do more than create habits. It can also create: desensitization, appetite disorder, attachment confusion, weakened conscience and what some would call bonding fragmentation. Meaning: the person’s inner world becomes trained to separate body from covenant, pleasure from responsibility, and desire from discipline. That’s not a small thing.
So yes: there can be a moral-spiritual dulling effect if someone repeatedly lives in unrestrained sensuality. That is very real. But again — and this is important — it is not irreversible. Some people genuinely turn around. But they must actually do the inner work. Marriage alone won’t do it for them. I rest my keyboard.
All these long article just to defend olosho?
Whatever your excuses and logic is, a woman with high body counts is broken, damaged and unfit for purpose.
Late last night, The Pilot was Rescued alive and sound.
Lots of Iranian casualties including military generals who tried go condone the area were killed .
ISRAEL was a Huge part of the rescue
both helicopters were blown by the US team as they were stuck in a makeshift runaway.
The US rescue team had to wait for over 3 hours for new planes to come airlift them away while condoning the area. This is to show the level of dominance the rescue team had in the operation.
The Iranian regime posted pictures of the burnt helicopters to salvage the shame.
Writerng is a sadistic teenage propaganda who manufactures fiction for news as he seeks nairalands help to get attention for an otherwise uneventful life.
Druss: You think life is cause and effect always. Some people just want to make others fall. They need no reason other than the thrill of it.
you're part of the folks who blindly take anything a pastor/priest dishes out without applying any independent or objective thinking.
* Why is the priest laying curses on the woman's generation and family?
* What kind of vile and gutter language was he saying telling the congregation that her laps wasn't even smooth or fine and it was filled with gallops and eczema?
* Since when do Women send nudes to a wrong target not just ones but multiple times!?
* Even the church members were not impressed because it is clear the man is just blowing hot air .
* Men who act in exactly same fashion as this man are often guilty and they bring the matter up in public themselves to deflect and manipulate the crowd.
madridguy: The Iranian government have said since the US government is not telling the truth about the first pilot they would rather remain silent about the second pilot.
Let just wait and see the drama going.
'Still need to exfiltrate' F-15 airman from Iran after rescue — US govt sources to Al Jazeera
since you left sports commentary and ventured into geopolitics, your opinion and comments are still those resembling the assertions of one with no idea, no thought and no ability to analyse objectively. One given to sentiments and prepubescent emotional outbursts.
Emmanuel Macron , the strongest voice in the EU but the weakest in the world.
The EU now is a continent of handbags and designer clothes , no major industries or AI companies but seek to regukate global companies and firms while producing none.
A coward organisation overtaken by Russia and abroad of Iran but very strong on LGBTQ and mass migration while enabling terrorists and radical Islamists.
Emmanuel Macron s wife is old enough to be his grandmother who slapped him publicly and is it this fool who can defend the world or face a nuclear-determined Iran who had towce planned to asssisnate Trump and obliterate Israel and hated by other Arab Nations?
SmartPolician: This comment makes no sense. Oga Reverend, any married woman sending you her nude pix most likely needs deliverance or counselling.
Unfortunately, he doesn't see things from that perspective because the orthodox church just accepts anyone to become their pastors, even those who have no calling
People don't really get it, if the story is true, the priest is complicit.
No matter the level of demon possession in a woman , she just doesn't send her nudes to her priest without feeling the man is into that kind of stuffz either through utterances or rumours.
The priest also said she wasn't the only one. From that kind of deflective talk , he's into that kind of stuff.
“I Dare You to Discontinue the Case” — VeryDarkMan Fires Back at Omoyele Sowore Over BLord Detention
Nigerian social media activist VeryDarkMan has issued a strong warning to human rights activist Omoyele Sowore over his pledge to secure the release of businessman BLord, who is reportedly being held at the Kuje Correctional Centre.
The controversy stems from allegations of defamation leveled against BLord, which reportedly led to his remand.
Earlier, Sowore had taken to social media to promise that he would intervene and ensure BLord’s release. His statement quickly drew attention online, prompting a sharp response from VeryDarkMan (VDM). Eyes Of Lagos reports,
Reacting publicly, VDM challenged Sowore’s involvement in the case, questioning his authority and warning him against interfering.
In his response, VeryDarkMan outlined a series of allegations against BLord, claiming the businessman used his identity without consent for promotional purposes.
According to VDM, the issue began in January when BLord allegedly used his image to advertise business ventures without approval.
He further claimed that BLord falsely presented him as an ambassador for certain services, including travel-related promotions, and circulated misleading content suggesting a business relationship between them.
VDM also alleged that fabricated materials, including a purported payment claim running into hundreds of millions of naira, were used to convince the public of a non-existent endorsement deal.
The activist maintained that these actions not only misrepresented his public image but also misled unsuspecting individuals who believed the endorsements were genuine.
He stressed that he never authorized any such promotions or received payments tied to the claims being circulated.
Amid the controversy, VDM issued a direct warning to Sowore, urging him not to interfere in the legal matter.
His comments have since intensified online discussions, with supporters and critics debating the roles of activism, legal accountability, and personal disputes in the case.
The situation continues to generate mixed reactions across social media, as many Nigerians weigh in on the allegations, the legal process, and Sowore’s involvement.
Observers note that the case underscores the growing intersection between social media influence, personal branding, and legal disputes in Nigeria’s digital space.
As the situation unfolds, all eyes remain on how the legal process will proceed and whether external interventions will have any impact. The controversy highlights the importance of consent, credibility, and accountability in the age of digital influence.
Wallade: What has the age of Macron's wife got to do with an unnecessary and senseless war and aggression that USA🇺🇸 and Israel🇮🇱 started against 🇮🇷Iran.?
No one is begging USA🇺🇸 to associate with EU. If USA🇺🇸 wants out of UN, no one really cares. USA🇺🇸 can stay isolated, if they so wish, that is not an issue to disturb everyones peace.
Your strength or spine isn't effectively measured by your level of aggression, stupidity, dishonesty, showboating, bravado or talk on social media or truth(lie) social. The EU aren't coward because they chose to respect international laws and engage diplomacy rather than war and silly, spoilt, entitled and supremacist behavior exhibited by Donald Trump and Israel.
spoken like a true liberal overtaken with emotion; zero sense of time, place or space.
Even the BBC and CNN, all pro EU, liberal nonsense have all publicly admitted US put of NATO is a gist to Iran and Russia, never mention North Korea and Cuba.
Stick to getting your next partner next pride month. That's the only reality you know about unfortunately.
You support full term abortion too? We know the answer.
Yes, the EU, UN and other bunch of liberats will find their voices on LGBTQ issues but will be missing in action on Iran, Russia Vs Ukraine and bolo haram.
These liberats live in an imaginary world where men and women have no differences and the world is just one place without any conflict.
France, UK (under the present PM)and a host of other EU countries are a bunch of spineless liberals who can't defend Europe against even Russia or Iran
The EU is a fraudulent establishment established to task firms and companies and mainly to promote LGBTQ and abortions and mass migration. They are largely cowards.
Macron and his wife have an age difference of a midlife and that says a lot.
Time for the US to uncouple from the EU and NATO and let them channel their stolen task money to military budget and lets see how it goes.
FSBoperator: So in the name of Voter IDs that have never been a requirement in the entire US history, Trump wants to truncate the democratic process.
Do you know that if he is able to make due his threat (which he can't), every serving federal legislator automatically loses his or her seats on expiration of their tenure.
So no Legislative branch.
With no Legislative branch, then Trump can not even run his presidency since the Presidency needs Congressional approval for every dime they spend.
That means Trump will have to rule without the constitution and transform himself to a tyrant.
I read the first line and stopped. You're not a very bright person.
Romance › Re: Odogwu Asaba Slept With Me & Refused To Give Me The ₦100k We Agreed On - Lady by BadBradley: 5:00pm On Jul 17
