₦airaland Forum

chris365: honestly. even an !diot will put up a better argument than you.

are we talking about foreign policy failures or military combat effectiveness and experience? any f00l would know there's a difference.
you are just mumbling from on angle to another like a parrot without an objective.

i'm not sure you are equipped to argue foreign policy with me cos you'll end up running in circles like a confused dog as you are doing right now.

Your arguments have become shorter. Gone is the bravado. Something about facts complicating your life somewhat?

Now - focus. I'll happily ignore all the idïotic fluff.

Put your your cap on, assuming that's even remotely possible.

Now, thread laggard, go back on this thread and happily read why Naai-gerians have been arguing that they are a great military. Foreign policy!

"Oh, we were in Liberia!"

"Oh, we were in Somalia"

"Oh this and that in Africa"

Foreign policy. The argument is certainly not equipment, now is it? We all know your equipment is "dark ages" stuff. So, spare us the circus on this particular issue.

Now, focus, my little primate. What happened to your military foreign policy? Oh, that? It fell apart in Mali and Darfur and will in that state of failure for the next 10 years, at least.

You are stuck with Boko haram because you lack the brains to solve that issue. You also have no military wherewithal to solve that issue. You are failing. Failing at home and failing abroad. Your military couldn't even invade Benin today. Not if you tried!

And there's a reason why nations are called barbarians. Senseless wars. What will your Boko haram wars bring you? Nothing but backwardness. South Africa's being in the DRC has brought us the Inga deal. Tanzania will be getting a deal of their own soon. Foreign policy and war go hand in hand, unless you are from Naai-geria, I guess .

Now, tell us - why should we not rank you below Lesotho?

No fluff now...

Give it your best shot, IQ slightly less than average being acceptable in your case.