BERNIMOORE's Posts
Nairaland Forum › BERNIMOORE's Profile › BERNIMOORE's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 (of 162 pages)
kenonze:give him the money for more edifying structure and he will surprise you, people like you can't do poo but then discouraged others with potential we call people like you "Abinu eni and keni-mani" ![]() |
yarimo:have you conquer Fani kayode after 2 arrest By EFCC Fani even became more vociferous than before. Only A COWARD DIES SEVERALLY B4 HIS DEATH, FAYOSE can't be conquered. "Oshokomole the irumale ton nje jjollof" carry go oga nla gbogbo Ekiti ![]() |
Gombs:Here we are, it was you modern-tithe-Advocates that are Making a a case out of a mere phrase 'After the order' by twisting it to fit-into your pre-determined Modern-tithe-heresy for example you said 'jesus belongs to a priesthood order' relying on hebrews 7:17 But Hebrew 7, ‘DID NOT’ TREAT ‘‘AFTER’’ SEPARATELY, AND ‘‘ORDER’’ SEPARATELY (but as a phrase), ............. So (the phrase) ‘’AFTER THE ORDER’’ WAS ACTUALLY RENDERED USING (H1700), (using a strong lexicon); Heb 7:15, 17 Psa 110:4 The LORD hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order (H1700) of Melchizedek. That is JESUS WOULD BE A PRIEST “AFTER THE MANNER” OF MELCHIZEDEK; OR, Hebrews 7:15 And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another priest (KJV), And what we have said is even more clear if another priest like Melchizedek appears, THE MANNER OF WHICH CHRIST 'WAS APPOINTED' A PRIEST 'SIMILAR' OR 'LIKE' OR 'IN RESEMBLANCE' OF MELCHIZEDECK THE ACIENT PRIEST, AS A ;PRIEST-KING, COMBINING IN HIMSELF THE TWO FUNCTIONS OF PRIEST AND KING, SUCH A PRIEST AS HE WAS. HE WOULD NOT BE OF THE TRIBE OF LEVI; HE WOULD NOT BE IN THE REGULAR LINE OF THE PRIESTHOOD, BUT HE WOULD RESEMBLE, IN THE CHARACTERISTICS OF HIS OFFICE, THIS ANCIENT PRIEST-KING, COMBINING IN HIMSELF THE TWO FUNCTIONS OF PRIEST AND KING; AS A PRIEST, STANDING ALONE; NOT DERIVING HIS AUTHORITY FROM ANY LINE OF PREDECESSORS; AND HAVING NO SUCCESSORS.............. 4 YRS AGO ZIKKY REFFERED YOU TO MY POST THAT I AM REPEATING NOW HERE; https://www.nairaland.com/1456343/tithes-offerings-eternal-principles/17#18549521 |
Gombs:Nothing like ''priesthood order'' of melchizedeck but rather ''order of Melchizedeck'' order here means 'likeness' or 'similar'/ 'similitude' Hebrew 7:15 15 And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another priest 17 For he testifieth, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec |
Gombs:nobody is stopping you and dont even make yourself so important as if you are the main topic of discussion, but rather tell us ''the order of priesthood that you claim that jesus belong'' that you relied on in teaching tithing and not voluntary giving |
Gombs:on page 15 this is what you said below; Gombs:You earlier claimed in your post that "Jesus belong to an order of priesthood" but failed to tell us "the order of priesthood" it is very important to this discussion because of the The strange claim that Abraham paid tithe"through that strange priesthood order" so tell us the"priesthood order" that Jesus belong Are you happy now! |
Candour:Nothing to hold on, they are hell bent on cherry-picking selected tithe law, they are bent on misleading, but objective readers can easily discern their lustful greedy motives, kudos to All on this page standing by the truth, no one is saying that you shouldn't donate to the church but don't call it tithe because we are not under curse but grace |
Gombs:don't run away oga! You earlier claimed in your post that "Jesus belong to an order of priesthood" but failed to tell us "the order of priesthood" it is very important to this discussion because of the The strange claim that Abraham paid tithe"through that strange priesthood order" so tell us the"priesthood order" that Jesus belong or we assume that your heresies about pre law tithes superseding the law are mere ruse which you are not very sure of. |
Gombs:please tell us what you mean by 'order of priesthood' of jesus and support it with bible verses if you are very sure of yourself! |
Peacefullove:As you can see he is waiting for his Colleagues;joeagbaje Wordtalk, Snowwy and Co to come in, then he will be playing with words 'to wear down the discussion and eventually claimed that he won the thread' not neccesarilly interested in a decent discussion Anyway kudos to you guys for standing for the truth! |
Junia:you think you are talking to a reasonable person, No! its not personal but These people have chosen a different way of life, you think he doesnt know what you are talking about? He actually Knew but Hell Bent Determined like those termed by paul as 'superfine' to ''present a lie persistently to such an extent that it will begin to look like a True'' Thats hitler's philosophy pls note that, stop treating people like Gombs as a normal christian No. i have engaged him and joeagbaje and snowwy for 4-5yrs now, even joeagbaje and co are tired because the last time joeagbaje featured on this thread was i think ten pages away, he simply left it for Gombs because they have all ran out of ideas but rather 'they will be making you turn round tables repeating the same thing to get you upset, just keep-up spilling the truth on their faces ![]() |
lovat:Fayose said it, they say he is loudmouthed ![]() |
NA GOD SAVE OBY EZEKWEZILI, SHE MIGHT ACTUALLY BE THE TARGET OF THE SO CALLED MISTAKEN BOMBING |
Gombs:you are irredeemable as a confusionist, Abraham gave a tenth of stollen war spoils, Jacob vowed 'on his own to give a tenth part not because there is any compulsion but rather his own volition.That does NOT JUSTIFY THAT IT WAS A PRACTICE BEFORE THE LAW BUT RATHER IT IS A ONE-OFF SITUATION Now bringing prayer issue as comparison is a Huge joke, because you twist anything to suite your heresies because i have been engaging you joeagbaje, snowwy, since 2012. many people have been liberated. I was waiting for you to expanciate on"order of priesthood" that you said Jesus belong but you sense that you will be exposed |
Peacefullove:you just deflated his Ego and caught him like a craddle robber, his best way to treat issues is to make wild and irrelevance comparison to distract you, but. If you are stubborn he ignore you for a while then tag you with bad name, don't defend that but keep your focus then he will be defeated. Congrats ![]() |
Junia: you actually sustained your points throughout, kudos bro! |
kolaish:you simply ignored the last part of the verse where Paul says: 15 But I have used none of these things, nor have I written these things that it should be done so to me; for it would be better for me to die than that anyone should make my boasting void. 18 What is my reward then? That when I preach the gospel, I may present the gospel of Christ[b] without charge, that I may not abuse my authority in the gospel. |
So you can't be. Catholic than the pope! Simple |
kolaish:If jesus the high priest and head of church came from a tribe not worthy to officiate as priests that is "tribe of judah" There is no justification for pastors to claim that they are priest entitled to receiving TITHE. Remember That high priest Aaron was a levite so also all other priests then are all Levites. So you think that you can force anything as a precedence on the scriptures? Where did the bible says today pastors replaces the Levites, at least the Levites do not just act on their own volition but rather they acted on "a written Authority that authorized them in form of commandment "to receive tithe". Read below; HEBREW 7: 5. AND INDEED THOSE WHO ARE OF THE SONS OF LEVI, WHO RECEIVE THE PRIESTHOOD, [size=14pt]HAVE A COMMANDMENT TO RECEIVE TITHES[/size] FROM THE PEOPLE ACCORDING TO THE LAW, THAT IS, FROM THEIR BRETHREN, THOUGH THEY HAVE COME FROM THE LOINS OF ABRAHAM; 14 FOR IT IS EVIDENT THAT ]OUR LORD AROSE FROM JUDAH, OF WHICH TRIBE MOSES SPOKE NOTHING CONCERNING PRIESTHOOD] |
petra1:but why don't you quote from one of the oldest bible you claim were b4 kjv, challenge you to do that and show me where Jesus says"yes you should tithe" or forever remain silent! |
Junia: |
Gombs:meybe you need big lenses to show us that Jesus never said verbatim"yes you must tithe" so you need a dictionary to make a forceful statement, you be real fraudster |
Junia:sorry for that pls I mistake you for this swindlers. One love |
Gombs:forceful statement, again why are you running away from telling us the "Fabricated ORDER OF PRIESTHOOD THAT JESUS BELONG" May be you fear being exposed again that is why you want to ignore it, all your abracadabra formula used to propagate swindling of hard earned money will be laid bare on this thread, so instead of telling me to go and study my. Bible why not show us the Order of priesthood and shed more light on the "order" |
Junia:tell that to your gullible members! Freewill giving is the acceptable practice of the apostles |
Gombs:going round the tables again, 42But woe unto you, Pharisees! for ye tithe mint and rue and all manner of herbs, and pass over judgment and the love of God: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone. DO YOU SEE "YES You Should TITHE" in this passage of the oldest bible? It was only smuggled recently by controversial scholars who wrote WEB AND NLT TRANSLATION |
Junia:King jalmes version sais he gave "a tenth part. Even though tithe defined 'tenth part' but that of Abraham never fit's into The Main Definition of tithing as instituted with Israelite law that God actually gave as order to his people to follow |
Gombs:was Abraham tenth% to Melchizedek"an increase from his farm or income or a recovery of stolen goods by by pagans" AGAIN KINDLY TELL US"THE ORDER OF PRIESTHOOD JESUS IS OF" as you claim oya |
petra1:the pagans do offerings true or false? But God chose the Israelites as his own special peoples a gave laws specifying a honorable way to make offering different from those that were offered to deities like baal, Ashtoreth etc, so hanging on sacrifices before the law which glorify other gods as basis to continue tithe is not only fraudulent but DEROGATORY |
petra1:Christ never ever said we should tithes its funny how you ignored oldest bible translation of King James version 1611 and choose The charismatic translation of NLT that was produced in revised in the '90s by controversial scholars who deliberately change the Greek meanings of mathew 23:23 i challenge you to quote from oldest bible King James version whether the smuggled word "yes you must tithe" was never in The oldest bible what a shame. See the length you swindlers could go to justify fraud by changing original Greek words used in the passage chai |
petra1:when you cannot differentiate tax from tithes na wah for una just holding on anything to justify fraud sha! ![]() |
petra1:Three forms of tithe SOLELY BASED ON INCREASE ON THEIR OWN POSSESION. so which Tithe predates Law? Even pagan Tithed before christ era, Tax were paid in Tenth % to the government then, jesus paid ten% of Tax to Ceacar, This is what Our Oversabi pastors 'phrased as Tithe predates Law' To Milk people Dry ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 (of 162 pages)


