Bigkoko's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Bigkoko's Profile › Bigkoko's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (of 209 pages)
He faces deportation as well! This one fit become governor and president one day! US should keep him for US na... |
BREAKING: Dapo Abiodun ally Bidemi Rufai released from U.S. prison, faces deportation after multimillion-dollar fraud conviction! ~ People's Gazette. Will him contest for Reps or senate in 2027?
|
Make he go cash the cheque for bulablu bank Bourdilion branch...... ![]() |
He probably forgot roman Catholic popes killed more people that terrorists would ever killed...and maybe he should go read about the Inquisition.... danvon: |
Make una look aunt Remi face...shame dey catch am. Imagine say na runway she carry her legs leave Aso Rock or Bourdilion come commission.... I swear these people no get shame at all. |
I sometimes wonder if this Asiwaju has shame at all..... This was how that Daura fool cried...on stage that he wants to be president..after 8 years, the idiot can not even move freely outside his house. This emiloka fool promptly step in..now see! Bebigiby1: |
Person wey no get work, shop or hand work dey think over people wey get shop, store, handwork and decided to close it on a particular...no be improved foolishness be this so? If the OP spend much time thinking how to learn carpenter and get a job or open a shop in Ogbomosho, rather than thinking about people better oof, he wont be this a nuisance on nairaland. |
These are the people's enemy: 1. The police...as presently constituented. 2. The civil service as presently constituted.. 3. The Judiciary as presently constituted.. Total overhaul of these will put Nigeria on the path to growth! |
![]() HAhahahahahahahha.... this one na old age abi mammon don stone this one madness! You can not serve mammon all the days of your life and not end mad! Even mammon go dey shock for this kind talk... Well, wetin concern an Okoro with message wey dem design for foolish people? |
They have no life outside politics... OGD don dey find which mumu button to pull! Their region, their problem...nothing suppose concern a well trained Okoro with what goes on in SW |
.... Wetin I talk wey no be true?Mama still dey feed you. Make her proud for once. na born she born, she no kee person! all these sheleya online, and still go back to collect food from a poor innocent woman no make sense at all. Sorry if I rattle you, but your tears is more important to me, cos I like it gushing out .... ![]() Go and get a life and a job! You are getting old like hallinus and stressing an old woman too much DomPerignon: |
Na the reason why I say adults wey mama still dey run streets to feed, wont have problem with these information because na mama dey feel the frustrations. Anyway....I hope your mama continue dey feed you sha DomPerignon: |
Drop any leader you know, and approach a US court to enforce FOIA on CIA, so long that person has not worked for CIA, or the work isn't that would compromise the identities of Americans or national Security, they will release it sharp sharp........ you don't even need to go court sef. For instance, some of the Diplomatic exchanges has El Rufai statement about certain individuals in Nigeria. For people like El Rufai who have not worked for CIA as an asset, they will will release whatever they have on him, but for Asiwaju ? Hahahahahahahaha........ ![]() But as for Asiwaju, we know he is connected to drug cartels, and probably ratted on them. Many of them were jailed, maimed or worse due to snitches.... So you have absolutely nothing to say! DomPerignon: |
You have no idea the mess CIA counter affidavit did to Asiwaju! He is now officially and diplomatically parrid..... Even in Nigeria, he will be avoided like a plague by other leaders, and they will be mindful what they say in his presence, and even prominent Muslims like the Sultan will rethink his support for a man that secretly give information to the CIA.... Wait till election near naim you go understand wetin David drop. This matter fit even reach US supreme court. this is US, not Canada. Special interests will take over... anti-drug leagues, anti-govt people for US go see reason to shine with Asiwaju. To save Nigeria all these shames, he just need to swallow the bitter truth, and jejely leave. [quote author=emkz post=132869115][/quote] |
. Just cant simply let those clowns get away with their foolishness jareForumites: |
If someone like her who have at least been on freeallocations can complain, I can imagine the kind of foolishness bulabarians is cursed with to continue supporting the CiA asset in Aso Rock ![]() Their problem won't be that she is telling lies about the election, which is not...but for the fact that the truth she told resonated badly with their foolishness... |
As a CIA Asset on the loose...now you know why most foreign leaders treats him like a leper! They know he will rat on them with the next govt. So they simply avoid him Now, I am sure former presidents in Nigeria will avoid him now too...because all their secret discussions will end up in CIA databases..lol ![]() |
This mumu think say today na vawulence day..... No, today na CIA asset in so Rock day. Time for online vawulence dey come not today jor Wisdomites: |
Written by a good observer! US intelligence agency's response to the FOIA requests was a damning one that I believe no sane sovereign African country will treat with lavity. The reaction of many Nigerians and the Nigerian government to this issue led to me to my final conclusion that Nigeria is indeed not a sane country because if Nigeria is a sane country, the fact that Tinubu was implicated in a drug related case and has a damning file in the possession of a foreign government should be enough reason to impeach and remove him immediately.... Seeing Nigerians insulting and fighting each other instead of calling for his impeachment today was a shameful sight to behold.... |
The mere fact that a foreign intelligience agency CIA, known to go rogue sometimes having a file on a president is reasons...alone to IMPEACH ASIWAJU |
There should be a prime time program whence these legends are allowed to talk and bare it all on what actually happened in the sectors they served and their insights regarding the failed 3-Rs of Gowon! With a monetization angle for them off course! descarado: |
This thing tire person ohh! See how he don turn many online and offline urchins into beggers! No shame, no integrity, no nothing. Yet thewerey still dey force himself on Nigerians! He might even be partially mad, the way he thinks presidency na achievement! ![]() Olokolobo: |
Sweet heart... its my problem because I know how rogue govt agencies like CIA operates. How they can blackmail sitting presidents to go against the wish of their people. I am damn sure you too stewpid to understand that the suffering you are going through is as a result of this possible manipulations by a Western rogue Intelligience Agency who operate outside norm govt ethics Now, I don't really give a fvck if Nigerians elects a drug bagman or worse so long he didn't steal himself to power. Like I earlier posted, this thread isa bout a possible CIA ASSET in Aso Rock You think former presidents or even northerners will be comfortable with Asiwaju again, now that they know he secretly works for CIA? Well, you should be more concerned why the Northerners are going the Russian route! ![]() Thiefobi1: |
BPasta Reno position before he ate rotten corns! |
Brief summary about the cases mentioned by pasta Reno! 1. The case of Connell v. CIA involved journalist John Connell suing the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to gain access to certain CIA records. Connell, an investigative journalist, requested records related to CIA operations and personnel, believing that these documents held significant public interest. However, the CIA resisted, citing national security concerns and various FOIA exemptions that allow withholding information to protect classified materials and intelligence sources and methods. The legal proceedings focused on balancing the government’s need to protect sensitive information with the public's right to access government records under FOIA. Courts often upheld the CIA's use of exemptions in such cases, recognizing the need to safeguard national security. The case underscored the tension between transparency and security, a recurring issue in FOIA litigation involving intelligence agencies. 2. The case of ACLU v. CIA revolved around the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) suing the CIA under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to obtain information about the CIA’s involvement in drone strike programs. The ACLU argued that the public had a right to know about the scope, legal basis, and civilian impact of the drone strikes, especially given the program's controversial nature and potential implications on international law and human rights. The CIA initially refused to confirm or deny the existence of relevant records, citing national security concerns. This response, often called a "Glomar response," led the ACLU to challenge the CIA's withholding of information in court. While the CIA argued that acknowledging any details about the drone program would jeopardize national security, the ACLU contended that such secrecy undermined democratic accountability and public oversight of government actions. The court eventually ruled in favor of the CIA, allowing the agency to withhold the information under FOIA exemptions. This case highlighted the tension between government transparency and national security and sparked broader debates on the legality and ethical implications of covert drone warfare. 3. In National Security Archive v. CIA , the National Security Archive, a research institution focused on promoting transparency, filed a lawsuit against the CIA under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The case sought the release of documents related to past CIA operations and policies, particularly regarding historical events and intelligence activities that held substantial public interest. The Archive argued that the CIA was not meeting its obligations to release information that was no longer sensitive. The CIA resisted, citing FOIA exemptions for protecting classified information and sources, even in cases where the documents pertained to decades-old events. The lawsuit raised critical questions about the CIA’s practices in declassifying historical records, and the Archive argued that the agency was overly restrictive. While the outcome varied based on specific document requests, the case underscored ongoing issues in accessing historical government information and highlighted the challenges in balancing transparency with national security concerns, especially in intelligence-related cases. 4. In Federation of American Scientists v. CIA, the Federation of American Scientists (FAS), a nonprofit organization focused on national security and transparency, sued the CIA under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The FAS requested records concerning intelligence budgets and policies, seeking to make information about CIA funding and operations more accessible to the public. The FAS argued that disclosure of this data was crucial for democratic oversight and informed public debate on national security spending. The CIA denied the request, citing FOIA exemptions related to national security, arguing that the release of budgetary and policy details could harm intelligence operations and reveal sensitive information. The court sided with the CIA, allowing the agency to withhold the information under FOIA’s national security exemptions. This case highlighted the complex balance between public transparency in government spending and the need to protect intelligence operations from potentially compromising disclosures. 5. In Freedom Watch, Inc. v. CIA, the conservative watchdog group Freedom Watch sued the CIA under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), seeking documents related to covert operations and alleged intelligence activities involving government officials and foreign entities. Freedom Watch argued that public disclosure of these documents was essential for government accountability and to shed light on potential misconduct within the intelligence community. The CIA denied the FOIA request, invoking national security exemptions and arguing that disclosing such information could compromise ongoing operations and jeopardize intelligence sources and methods. The case raised questions about the extent to which intelligence agencies can use FOIA exemptions to withhold information in the interest of national security. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the CIA, supporting its stance on withholding the information due to potential risks to national security. This case underscored the ongoing tension between government transparency advocates and the CIA over access to classified information, especially in matters that are potentially sensitive or controversial. |
This mumu don carry Igbo come here! The thread is about a possible CIA Asset in Aso Rock...this should give you serious concerns because recently a newspaper in Nigeria highly how asiwaju is taking instructions from Bretton Woods Institutions and thus subjecting Nigerians to sufferings unimaginable which made African's wealthiest man; Dangote to cry out in finacial pains.... yet these means nothing to you because of the rotten corn you chop! Face your CIA Asset in Aso Rock..no be Igbos say make he dey snitch on former presidents and every other person! You should be praising David for doing a great job! And the priviledges I get as an individual currently, I am not sure any person in your family had anything close to it. As for you...no be 30K be the highest you fit get! ![]() Thiefobi1: |
Thanks for the compliment! These online bulabarians are detached from the full working capacity of their brains. Bobloco: |
I tell my friend... Asiwaju data with the CIA including his real names, the ones he left Nigeria with is easy to lay hold off. With the right resources. It will prove difficult through normal, right channels like the court. But getting hold of CIA assessment of their ASSET...na money passing to the right fella go bring am out! As long as he is, was or even still a drug person, there is a worker whose child is suffering the consequences of a drug addiction...in revenge against all persons working for drug business, they will help you nail that drug person! As long as humans have access to that file a leak is possible. Just know the worker. That's all. Tetrahedron: |
Quick Facts about the CIA. 1. It works with foreigners to protect Americans & the American govt.... this could including making sure they got information about officials in their own countries working with foreign govts and drug cartels. 2. CIA keeping your data secrets means you have snitched on a lot of people...really dangerous people, which had leed to jail terms or outright assasinations..yes, the CIA carries out assasinations too. Forget the beautiful name..they are a lso a rogue agency, working with rogues from other countries. Quick Facts about the cases pasta Reno mentioned. They simply proved people who worked for the CIA are protected, no because they are loved, but because revealing their identity will also make the identity of others known. Imagine how long it took Micheal & his drug family (in Mario Puzo Classic, the godfather) to find out who was the snitch in their drug empire was...this was immediately after the godfather died, and the same secret he told Micheal is still available to other crime family...that immediately you see a court case involving XYZ...follow it diligently for it will reveal who snitched on us and got PQR jailed, maimed or worse! Brief summary about the cases mentioned by pasta Reno! 1. The case of Connell v. CIA involved journalist John Connell suing the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to gain access to certain CIA records. Connell, an investigative journalist, requested records related to CIA operations and personnel, believing that these documents held significant public interest. However, the CIA resisted, citing national security concerns and various FOIA exemptions that allow withholding information to protect classified materials and intelligence sources and methods. The legal proceedings focused on balancing the government’s need to protect sensitive information with the public's right to access government records under FOIA. Courts often upheld the CIA's use of exemptions in such cases, recognizing the need to safeguard national security. The case underscored the tension between transparency and security, a recurring issue in FOIA litigation involving intelligence agencies. 2. The case of ACLU v. CIA revolved around the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) suing the CIA under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to obtain information about the CIA’s involvement in drone strike programs. The ACLU argued that the public had a right to know about the scope, legal basis, and civilian impact of the drone strikes, especially given the program's controversial nature and potential implications on international law and human rights. The CIA initially refused to confirm or deny the existence of relevant records, citing national security concerns. This response, often called a "Glomar response," led the ACLU to challenge the CIA's withholding of information in court. While the CIA argued that acknowledging any details about the drone program would jeopardize national security, the ACLU contended that such secrecy undermined democratic accountability and public oversight of government actions. The court eventually ruled in favor of the CIA, allowing the agency to withhold the information under FOIA exemptions. This case highlighted the tension between government transparency and national security and sparked broader debates on the legality and ethical implications of covert drone warfare. 3. In National Security Archive v. CIA, the National Security Archive, a research institution focused on promoting transparency, filed a lawsuit against the CIA under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The case sought the release of documents related to past CIA operations and policies, particularly regarding historical events and intelligence activities that held substantial public interest. The Archive argued that the CIA was not meeting its obligations to release information that was no longer sensitive. The CIA resisted, citing FOIA exemptions for protecting classified information and sources, even in cases where the documents pertained to decades-old events. The lawsuit raised critical questions about the CIA’s practices in declassifying historical records, and the Archive argued that the agency was overly restrictive. While the outcome varied based on specific document requests, the case underscored ongoing issues in accessing historical government information and highlighted the challenges in balancing transparency with national security concerns, especially in intelligence-related cases. 4. In Federation of American Scientists v. CIA, the Federation of American Scientists (FAS), a nonprofit organization focused on national security and transparency, sued the CIA under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The FAS requested records concerning intelligence budgets and policies, seeking to make information about CIA funding and operations more accessible to the public. The FAS argued that disclosure of this data was crucial for democratic oversight and informed public debate on national security spending. The CIA denied the request, citing FOIA exemptions related to national security, arguing that the release of budgetary and policy details could harm intelligence operations and reveal sensitive information. The court sided with the CIA, allowing the agency to withhold the information under FOIA’s national security exemptions. This case highlighted the complex balance between public transparency in government spending and the need to protect intelligence operations from potentially compromising disclosures. 5. In Freedom Watch, Inc. v. CIA, the conservative watchdog group Freedom Watch sued the CIA under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), seeking documents related to covert operations and alleged intelligence activities involving government officials and foreign entities. Freedom Watch argued that public disclosure of these documents was essential for government accountability and to shed light on potential misconduct within the intelligence community. The CIA denied the FOIA request, invoking national security exemptions and arguing that disclosing such information could compromise ongoing operations and jeopardize intelligence sources and methods. The case raised questions about the extent to which intelligence agencies can use FOIA exemptions to withhold information in the interest of national security. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the CIA, supporting its stance on withholding the information due to potential risks to national security. This case underscored the ongoing tension between government transparency advocates and the CIA over access to classified information, especially in matters that are potentially sensitive or controversial. Now, I know pasta reno knows the urchins who supports him are clearly detached from the working abilities of their brain, hence he dropped cases he knew they wont even go check. What I saw involves deep workings of the CIA, how they protect the identity of their ASSET. If you are not their ASSET, they wont spend a dime asking their lawyers to file counter motions. Notice something, The CIA were clearly involved. The CIA do not lie to the court. If they must open up, they usually open up fully. Notice something. The CIA are more concerned about foreigners helping the US, not Americans helping the US. In this case it involves a lot of snitching which might harm Americans who worked on the case. Here is a brief of such. Sometime ago, there was a data leaked at the CIA which exposes the identity of an Iraqi foreign Asset who helped the Israeli get access to information regarding Iranaian nuclear scientists. well, those scientists, a lot of them got assasinated...while travelling, while in Tehran..etc... That information is invaluable to the Israelis...note Iran is still paying dearly for that leak. that is not the cruise of the matter. Guess what? Foreign actors paid for by Iran promptly got hold of that CIA asset while he was enjoying the money he got snitching in Spain... interrogations promptly made him confess those in the UN Nuclear Watch dog IAEA, working for the Americans ditto Israelis, leading to the Iranians expelling the UN Nuclear Inspectors. Note that, the Iranians submitted documents naming those scientists, and somehow he names of the Scientists ended up with the Israelis. If the CIA reveals all they know about ASiwaju...as much as fifty Americans...old retired former employees of different American agencies might end up with a bullet on their head. Drug business is brutal..no matter how long it takes to avenge the matter. And this here man, by American court documents forfeited more $400,000 to the US govt. Imagine that money was almost 6 years salaries of highly educated, highly paid Americans back then.Asiwaju is not the issues here...but other assets he worked with, pass information to, people who might be called to take the stand and identity the name(s) BOLA AHMED TINUBU and any other aliases he goes with such as Yekini, Amoda, Ogulere, T-pain. You guys have no clue what the Amercan court is...she's damn too power to the point that jperjury is a serious crime. The CIA would rather keep your crime secret if it will affect hundreds of sources who knows you are a criminal, and in the process of proving your crimes, reveal the identities of other important or etired assets. Now, imagine this. Through snitching, a drug boss associated with the forfeited $490,000 was jailed for 30 years. he is now in his seventies and retired, but his son more brutal than him has assumed position as a capo and years later as Nigerians tries to prove the identity of Asiwaju, the names he worked with were revealed, and this happened to be the drug boss personal chef enjoying retirement in Cicinnati..guess what? that chef will end up with a bullet on his or her head. THIS IS WHAT THE CIA is trying to prevent. Nigeria is not that an important people who deserve accountability, if not how the fvck will they even allow a man without identity to come this far! They can go to blaze for all they care! The court will understand. And that is what is playing out right now! The ONLY option left is an anonymous leak which is not unheard off. but this will involve a lot of lobbying and good friends within the CIA establishment! Look, with USd, you can buy anything in Washington DC..there is always one disgruntled half crazy fellow who will be sympathetic to your cause, and willing to take money and hand you the documents you want! siwaju can feel safe now, until Trump gets in, and who knows more hardliners might do a leak! The court has spoke. keep the Appeal till Trump gets in! |
What I have since come to understand with people with your kind of brain....is that they troll people online, real big and better off people..and when they got responses, they cry out fast. Though, It's a friendly advice..... If you focus more on getting a real job, trust me your mom would be proud of you, might even sacrifice a chicken to Ogun! She's passing through a lot feeding you. Make her proud....na born she born you, she no do bad! DomPerignon: |
One crazy thing I realized about the worship of Mammon is that as time goes on, it actually makes its worshippers mad! Certainly almost all of the prosperity gospel pastors are mad, suffering from mad or a closely related madness. Check that one in Effurun....he is the lastest mad prophet in town. selling anything sellable.... So this pasta fit double USD, naim ASiwaju dey find USD up & down? ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (of 209 pages)
? Hahahahahahahaha........