Livelystone01:

Your statement underrates Fury.
He is technically gifted, he knows how to dodge punches and he is the master of jabs. How you expect Wilder to win Fury without knocking him out is still a mystery to me.
None of the heavyweight boxers as at today can out punch Fury, none! He's fast with his jabs and very skillful in his dodges.

Wilder knows that his only hope of winning Fury is by knocking him out, that's why he was always throwing power punches and hooks when there were opening for jabs. Besides, Fury knows how to create an opening for a jab so he can get you closer for his own fast jabs.

The only person who has given Fury a run for his money on technical ability has been Klitschko, the others of today are fighting like women in an heavyweight division that was usually known for either power or skills.

Try watch Fury's fights and you will see that he fights like the gypsy that he is.

His father is also another bloody street fighter too, though he's not a boxer.

seanjy4konji:
So what happeed to that neighbor after you left?

In my case,it was the girlfriend that was always rude after i set some boundaries due to being taken for granted by this same girlfriend after she started coming around....I went back to the house after 1 year,i cut of the girls left ear, and three fingers from her hand...The guy had his whole left hand cut off and left no traces...

TheFacelessMan:


Too late to adjust for him now.

Elite fighters like Canelo constantly evolve and adapt.

Unfortunately Deontay is a hype job. Just not at that level.

ThEGodFaThEr106:

Wilder is not a technical boxer. He lacks skills and boxing prowess because he doesn't have a good amateur background but what he lacks in skills he makes up in strength and his straight right hand punch.

seunmsg:


Wilder is done as far as I am concerned. He’s a lousy boxer with only a powerful right jab.

hammer3x:



WILDER SHOULD HAVE GOT THE DEFENCE MASTER TO TRAIN HIM.


MAYWEATHER.

Drogunov:


Keep quiet there. If I catch you one on one I will beat ghe hell out of you. Wetin? I will knock you out asap! You wan try me?

Sorry! Was just tripping

salford:

Fury can get punished alot if he tries the leaning of weight method against a boxer good with uppercuts.

SavageResponse:


So you know more than his current trainer abi?

ThEGodFaThEr106:

You don't understand boxing. Boxing is an art and also a science. Boxing is like international trade; every boxer has a comparative advantage over other. You go into a fight to make good use of your advantage. Fury is bigger and taller and so a jab from wilder will be less effective. In this fight, fury' advantage will be his jab and body weight while wilder will look towards body shots.

wink2015:


You seem to have a good knowledge of boxing from your explanation.

You talk about throwing in jab, left hook.

salford:

The guy is not skillful and relies too much on his KO punches. Still throws his windmill punches and hoping to land a lucky one. I got tired of his side shouting uppercut several times during the fight. They shout uppercuts almost everytime Fury throws his weight on wilder, but It seems he was deaf or something.

GrammarNazi1:

He got a new trainer for the fight.

paulolee:

he so much believe on bis heavy jabs n dts wat gave him an edge in their first fight..
u cnt keep planning to throw jabs without thinking of dodging or receiving them....
na d same tin dey worry our own ajaba wey lose yesterday

WBA (super), IBF, WBO and IBO heavyweight champion Anthony Joshua and former unified cruiserweight champion Oleksandr Usyk will face off in one of the biggest fights of the year on Sept. 25. The bout will have significant ramifications, as the winner could face Tyson Fury, the WBC and The Ring champion, or Deontay Wilder.

But how about the intrigue for this fight? According to InsiderSport, Joshua vs. Usyk will air across 170 countries and territories on DAZN, and Joshua’s promoter, Eddie Hearn, predicted the bout would draw a capacity crowd in excess of 60,000 at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium in London.

Joshua and Usyk are the second- and fourth-ranked fighters in the heavyweight division, according to ESPN, and established champions, so the pay day for each competitor is also expected to be substantial. Here are the figures that Sporting News was able to compile before Saturday’s bout.

How much money will Anthony Joshua earn vs. Oleksandr Usyk?

Per TotalSportal, Joshua is set to earn £10 million ($13,832,700) against Usyk. The site also predicted that if the fight sells around 450,000 pay-per-view buys in the United Kingdom, Joshua could make £15 million ($20,751,180) in total.

The U.S. Sun reported Joshua earned £10 million from his fight against Kubrat Pulev but missed out on £8 million since the bout was postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It was a much less significant sum than what he earned in his rematch against Andy Ruiz Jr. in December of 2019 (a guaranteed £46 million or $63,639,160, per Chris McKenna of Daily Star Sports).

It is unclear what the split of the pay-per-view percentage will be for this bout, but Sporting Free reported the total could be 60 percent for Joshua and 40 percent for Usyk.

According to a report from WealthyGorilla in June, Joshua’s net worth is currently $80 million.

How much money will Oleksandr Usyk earn vs. Anthony Joshua?

TotalSportal also reported Usyk will make £3 million ($4,150,380) for Saturday’s bout, which is the biggest payday of his career according to Sportekz.

If the pay-per-view target (reportedly 450,000 buys) is met, Usyk could make another £1-£2 million ($1,383,465 to $2,766,930). Usyk’s previous best payday was a reported $2.5 million for his unanimous decision victory over Derek Chisora in Oct. of 2020.

Usyk’s net worth is $4 million, so this will be a significant upgrade in his career earnings.

Derby have been docked 12 points by the English Football League, sending them to the foot of the Championship, after confirming the appointment of administrators. Wayne Rooney’s side had 10 points from eight games but are now six points adrift of second-bottom Nottingham Forest.

A Derby statement said Andrew Hosking, Carl Jackson and Andrew Andronikou of the business advisory firm Quantuma would serve as joint administrators. Derby had signalled their intention to appoint administrators last week, citing a failure to identify new owners and the continued impact of Covid-19 on revenue streams.

Hosking said: “We are in the early stages of assessing the options available to the club and would invite any interested parties to come forward. Our immediate objectives are to ensure the club completes all its fixtures in the Championship this season and finding interested parties to safeguard the club and its employees.”

The EFL said it had held talks with the administrators and talks were planned with the fans’ group Rams Trust, the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, and local MPs.

The EFL’s chief executive, Trevor Birch, said: “I appreciate this is a challenging and concerning period for everyone associated with the club, particularly the staff and supporters, and it is our intention to work proactively with the administrators and all relevant parties with the objective of securing a long-term and viable future for Derby County.”

Derby stand to be deducted a further nine points, and given a suspended three-point deduction, for a separate breach of the EFL rules. Derby were ordered to resubmit their 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18 accounts after being found to have broken accounting regulations.

A Federal High Court in Abuja has ruled that magistrate courts do not have the powers to issue orders freezing bank accounts.

Delivering judgment in a suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1635/2019, Justice Inyang Ekwo also declared that banks should not act on "bankers order" served on them by the police to freeze or place a post-no-debit on personal accounts.

Five children of one late Edward Akponovwe Esiso had taken their brother, Yoma Esiso, four banks, the Inspector-General of Police (IG) and the Commissioner of Police in charge of the IG Monitoring Unit to court for freezing their bank accounts in 2019.

The plaintiffs -- Eunice Oddiri, Beauty Ogbodu, Sunny Esiso, Edirin Esiso, and Emuobosa Consin -- said in September 2019, one of the landed properties of their late father situated in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, was sold and the proceeds shared among them, including Yoma.

According to them, they were later arrested and detained after Yoma petitioned the police.

Upon their release, the plaintiffs said they realised that their accounts were frozen following authorisation by the office of the IG and the Commissioner of the Police in charge of the IG monitoring unit.

The banks in their defence said the letters from the IG office were accompanied with a document called a "bankers order" from a magistrate court, ordering the freezing of the accounts.

The banks are Zenith Bank Plc, Stanbic IBTC Bank, GuarantyTrust Bank and First Bank Plc.

Only GTBank filed processes in response to the suit.

In the judgment, Ekwo held that there was no existing Nigerian law or relevant foreign law empowering magistrates to make such an order for the freezing of personal accounts.

"The bankers' order/order freezing and/or enabling the post-no-debit cannot be validly issued pursuant to a non-existent/repealed Bankers Order Act 1847 and any other irrelevant foreign law," he ruled.

"A magistrate lacks the powers to make bankers orders and/or order freezing or enabling a post no debit on bank accounts pursuant to non-existent/repealed section 7 of the Banker's Order Act 1847."

Consequently, the judge ordered the four banks "to unfreeze the accounts of the plaintiffs and desist from further giving effect to the non-existent bankers order served on the prompting of the 5th and 6th defendants (IG and the IG monitoring unit)".