₦airaland Forum

subsidywise18:
Lol...the mask comes off.



Well, I think that there is life outside earth. The thing is, is it life like we know it here, or completely different. Plus we don't have proof yet. Till we do.....



Most scientists knew the earth was round by the time of Columbus. That's why they disagreed with him when he set off on his expedition...they knew his calculations were wrong, and that India which he was trying to reach was further away.

As people have said, if there was no American continent, Columbus would have perished at sea along with his crew.

Galaxies were defined in the 19th century, and the universe around the same time. No one knew about other galaxies before then.





1.Most of the tales from other beings came from 'ancient alien theorists who twist evidence to meet their requeirements (including misdientifing ancient paintings as alien spacecraft).

2.Cosmonauts did not go to the moon. Astronauts went. They saw nothing on the moon...no advanced civilisaitons (Oga, I think you have been watching too many films and conspiracy documentaries).

3.Many of the 'photos on Mars' have been debunked. (You may want to look at the Martian moons , Phobos and Demios, tho).




Ha, I knew it...ancient alien ...


NASA has been searching for alien life since...ah well the 1960's. The problem is, the vast distances in the universe make such searches difficult.

DeusMagnus:
Maynma

subsidywise18:
I didn't take you serious when you said

1.Toth, an Egyptian god, was a king in Atlantis (a fictional kingdom). Atlantis is only taken seriously by conspiracists and UFO hunters....not serious scholars.

2.Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics was a source of the bible(nonsense). Egyptian hieroglyphics are a writing system used to write Ancient Egyptian, just as there is a writing system for Greek, Latin , Arabic, and Chinese, and even English.

3.The Tibetan book of the dead , Egyptian book of the dead, and so forth have no relation to the bible. The Bhagvad Gita was complied long after Deuteronomy, and even has no relation to it.

4.The disciples were not illiterates...especially as they were Jews , whose law required them to know how to read their scripture. Plus Matthew was a tax collector, Nathaniel was introduced in the NT reading the Tanakh, Phillip was seen reading the Tanakh with the Ethopian in Acts, and also was approached by Greeks wanting to meet Jesus (which indicates some literacy in Greek as well as Hebrew and Aramaic), and even Jesus himself on returning to Nazareth entered the Synagogue, and read the Scriptures. Even Judas Iscariot was the treasurer of the twelve, which requires some numeracy and literacy skills. Peter demonstrated some familiarity with scripture in Acts, which indicates some literacy.

5.There is no link between the Emerald tablet of Toth and the teachings of Jesus...plus it is dated to the 8th century CE...long after the canon of the New testament was set, and long after any late dates for the gospels. And it is completely different from the gospels.

Most of what you wrote is typical conspiracy theory yazoo. Or assumptions that cannot be proven. (except the Enuma elish bit.)

subsidywise18:
LOL...I am not taking OP's writeup serious.

1.Toth the Atlantean king.

Toth is first and foremost the name of an EGYPTIAN GOD, and Atlantis is supposed to be Greek at best. Plus Plato, the ancient Greek philosopher, who was the first to mention Atlantis specifically said it was fiction.

As far as we know, Atlantis was a myth. Never existed, never happened. Searches for the place have turned up empty.(Some people theorise that a volcanic explosion in the neighborhood of Crete which supposedly wrecked the Minoan civilisation is the sauce of many tales of Atlantis)

2.Egyptian Hieroglyphics are just basically a system of writing/ how the ancient Egyptians wrote their language. Not a 'source of ancient knowledge, or a source for the bible.' It is like me saying that the source of my maths textbook is Arabic writing.

3.There is no proof that Proverbs, the ten commandments came from the Egyptian book of the dead...which is as different from the bible as orange is different from yam.

4.Hammurabi....well, he was a king in ancient Babylon, he did write down one of the earliest legal systems, there is some argument as to whether his writeup influenced the Decalouge, but the argument is inconclusive. Plus, Hammurabi was a polytheist, not a monotheist anyways.

5Enumaelish..maybe some truth, but then again, creation myths have similarites across all tribes and races.

6.Tibetan book of the dead..has no relationship to the bible. Proverbs did not come from the book of the dead.

7Bhagvad Gita and deuteronomy....lol. Someone is making me have a good laugh. Besides Deuteronomy came before the Gita.

8.Book of Enoch does not mention aliens...no more than book of Ezikiel mentions spaceships. Plus, most people did not know of aliens, including the people compliling the canon.

9.No, the disciples were not illiterates. Matthew was a tax collector, which requires some form of literacy. Nathaniel, another of Jesus' followers was introduced reading the Torah, which indicates literacy. Paul was clearly literate. And even if they were, there were early followers of Jesus who could read and write (Luke who wrote the Gospel of Luke and Acts was a doctor, and could read and write.)

Also, many Jewish men of the time had to know how to read their scriptures.(Infact ability to know the Tanakh is commanded in the Tanakh itself...) So...they learned to read and write. Jesus is a good example.

OP is just talking jargon.

odysey:
can you do a more detailed summary of Aliens, earth from space that Enoch spoke about?

Abovebest:
The OP just came up with so many assumptions and emotional blackmail

RAZOR619:
you are a fool.

crows2ravens:
Certainly yes.
But Jesus did not come to create a new religion, He came to create a new way of life, spirituality and truthfulness.

crows2ravens:
It won't change your point of view since you've made up my mind already. It's not history or origins that'd make you change it, but the Holy Ghost himself when He ministers to you.

kollinskollins:
The Jesus you know will define who you are.
The Jesus I know, is The GOD MAN, who is not higher or lower than GOD, but the anointed one who took away the Sin of the world & now sitting at the right hand of GOD(seat of authority).

OLEADTIPS:
Op need to read more objective texts about Jesus not some conspiracy theories.

Samuelkirk:
My question is that why una no dey attack Islam ,na only Christianity you guys dey masturbate to. Oga go sleep jare go find work

oz4real83:
The name of Jesus has healed, raised the dead, heal the blind, deaf, dumb and done many miracles and still keeps doing miracles, I wonder why the names of many powerful magicians, pharoahs, Buhda, Hindui, Mohammed and many others are not able to do the same thing, that tells you that there must be something special which humans and science have not been able to explain and understand about the personality of Jesus

crows2ravens:
About Jesus having no records between the age of 12 and 30. Some people even believe he went to India (not Egypt) to learn their mystics, the reason why Buddhism is the most similar religion to Christianity.
But it is important to note that Jesus performed miracles steadily, records till date credits him with the greatest number of miracles and wonders anyone ever performed on earth. So even if he went to India or Egypt to learn mystics and religion, it is certain that Jesus mastered them more than what any other person or being.

If you took time to study a bit about other religions, you will confirm that they all refer to a personality called "The Master" or "The Son", or "The Prince", or "The Prophet" (a person of different order), described in the religion's primary language, to describe one who mastered all the powers of this world, and who is the way of light. Even in Yoruba divination, He was mentioned.

crows2ravens:
That's a lot of assertions there. But seriously I was expecting more precise and accurate proof of your claims.
First, it is important to note that the books in the Bible were not all written at the same time, and they have numerous authors. As a matter of fact, some ancient texts were lost forever, some lost texts had duplicates (some inaccurate), some had unknown and unverified authors, many things. What the early church did was to compile as much as possible texts that agreed with their doctrinal beliefs.
But one thing is important in all - the teachings of Jesus, which were about love and compassion for humanity, and respect for the creator of all that exists.
If we all follow these principles, we would have solved all the problems of this world.
Forget about all those mysteries, we can never understand or prove them scientifically.

crows2ravens:
The Bible will have contradictions if you don't use a holistic approach to reading it.

The universe is too organized for it not to be made by intelligent design. The scientific branch of Astronomy sheds light on this.
All religions believe in a supreme being, though some worship multiple deities, even African reli

To make logical sense out of the Bible, we need to carefully divide the word of truth.
First we must understand that the Romans made Christianity a state religion, and it was through them that the gospel spread into the western world, and then to Africa. Being a state religion means political agenda infiltrated some teachings and practices.
The Eastern orthodox Christians (in Eastern Europe, Asia and even Ethiopia) have some opposing doctrinal beliefs (even the books in their bibles too) compared to we western Christians.
Now there's a clear distinction between the old testament and the new testament. Most of today's Christians fail to recognize this difference, hence, making other people think there are contradictions!

bigwig071:
Islam will soon die.