Salam alaikum,

Is there any car dealer who can help me check for the price of Peugeot 5008 with the below specification?

§ Millage = 65000 Km.
§ Tires = All 4 tires Brand new and less than a month
§ Make : PEUGEOT 5008
§ Model: 2013 Model
§ 1.6 E-HDI 115 ACTIVE BMP
§ Automatic

Regards

OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT MUHAMMADU BUHARI :
Your Excellency sir,
Permit me to cut to the chase and make my point without the usual lengthy often flowery words writers use when writing high profile personalities; pardon me also for attempting to send you an unsolicited advice via an open mail through the social media sir.
Mr President sir I am compelled to write you in regard of the N5000 pledged to unemployed Nigerian graduates during the campaign days and the issues surrounding it now of the inability keep that promise as well as "that agriculture is the priority". Mr President sir I will attempt to condense the 18 paged agricultural based solution i have scripted that will not only boost food security and create massive youth employment but a hurricane of wealth creating opportunities that will accelerate the " patronize made in Nigeria " vision for evolvement of youth driven industrialization.
The FOOD BASKET REVOLUTION (FBR) as I tagged it is an agricultural based initiative and the reason for adopting the sector isn't unconnected with the fact that "70% of the labor force" is engaged in that sector" and "small holder farmers and small farms produce about 80% of the total food, 36.7 million hacters or 33% of Nigeria's landmass.
WHO ARE FBR's TARGET?
The FBR idea basically seeks to target three classes of people along program duration of short, medium and long term and these include ..
1. Smallholder farmers (SHORT TERM: strengthening and repositioning of present state to boost food security and poverty alleviation)
2. Youths and women (SHORT AND MEDIUM TERM: New entrants to address youth unemployment and boost local industrialization; create wealth and poverty alleviation)
3. The young ( LONG TERM: Introduce entrepreneurship as key competence into our secondary school curricula, this has a different report of its own and has been discussed at such levels that include office of the UN Secretary envoy on youth)
HOW DOES THE CONCEPT OF FBR APPLIES?
The approach to a succcessful implementation of FBR will see the concept divided into Categorization, Organization/Cooperatives, Training, Funding, Monitoring and Annual/Harvest exhibition and competition.
Briefly " Categorization" as the first stage is where the concept seek to introduce the " 1-2" strayegy, this is where the country is categorised into agro-ecological zones or regions and each region and or zone engages in 2 indigenous cash crops. It is worthy to note that the concept doesn't end at just farming and harvesting but shall extend to every single bit of the value addition stages.
For example, Borno is known for the production of Ground-nuts. This when taken up as a crop for production should see it go through all value chains, thus, oil and feed mill industries can evolve from this, various snacks such as peanuts and other related products can be made from such. Since time immemorial to date the famous "kolji mandawa" of Borno, sesame/Ridi and grated coconut/cocometi are still packaged in unattractive plain nylon. The packaging industry in this country should be repositioned to give our youths the opportunity to bring their ideas to market (Mr President the difference between popcorn and gurguru is packaging it was said).
WHAT ARE NOBEL FEATURES OF FBR?
One of the most important feature of this concept is the inclusion of "conditions" into the eligibility for participation, a modified approach of the Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) model of the world bank where vulnerable households are given stipends to access basic Social amenities, however in this, I tagged it "SCHOOpreneurship... This is where a youth as a beneficiary will be given AGRICULTURAL sector based entrepreneurship establishing opportunity while in turn the beneficiary brings forth a child (be it from their household and or community) to be enrolled in school. In this times we need to not only boost school enrollment but boost cohesion and sense of responsibility among Nigerian youths.
Other features include the " paperless loan scheme " this is where at the initial project start up beneficiaries come in contact with less cash to avoid and or check one of the major problems facing youths and loan schemes- squandering of funds made to be revolved. However after the first cycle all funds are managed by beneficiaries as it is now believed they have worked for and own every bit of it (seriousness, determination and integrity check).
CONCLUSION
FBR as an idea and concept will not only boost food security and youth employment, but will alleviate poverty and create opportunities for local industries to spring up.
Thank you for your time Mr President sir.

Babazannah Abdulkarim
Maiduguri, Borno State
2nd March, 2016

Hi friends,

I intend to start a medium/small recording (audio) studio. I am sure we have experienced guys here who can advise and also link me with who will supply/installation/training of the equipments.

my email:- busuguma@yahoo.com
Whatsapp:- 08126284246

Thank you.

freegaza:
Am right now in Maiduguri.... And I don't know what you are talking about

I am waiting for you to at least confirm my story since it is now public.

theV0ice:


Pls stop the joke

GEJ will not step foot in that place

His flight is touching ground right now.

[b]I don't know if it is a coincidence, I watched the Malema video yesterday night and this morning woke up with the rumour that the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Goodluck Ebele Azikiwe Jonathan is planning a secret visit to MAIDUGURI.

The worst is that the sitting Governor of the State has not been informed nor his coming publicized which will greatly put the people of Maiduguri under a difficult situation because definitely roads will be blocked as soon as his plane lands.

By the way, what will he do in Maiduguri? If the President will not visit Konduga where our gallant soldiers have been fighting the insurgents for the past 4 four months, then let the PResident forget about coming to Maiduguri.

If the President will not visit Damboa, Chibok, Gwoza and Bama LGAs, then he is not welcome to Maiduguri at all because those in the ID Camps are been taken care of by the people of Maiduguri and well wishers from other STates - thanks to the brave Governors Wife who brought relief materials in aid.[/b]

dignity806: ...Very funny, hw sure ar we dat dis people askn 4 weapons ar not BH Membes.....

We are not Boko Haram, because a Boko Haram member never say he aint one. Infact, a Boko Haram member is proud to announce he is one of them. We are innocent souls, proudly Nigerian law abiding citizens.

We have just received intel that Boko Haram is planning to launch a fresh attack on Kareto Town in Damasak Local Govt Area - a town bordering Difa, a State in Niger. The attack will be coming from Kanamma Town in Yobe State.

Our concern is that the army, the Police and the SSS are all aware of every impending attack but no pro-active measures are been taken to stop the attack.

If air surveillance is carried correctly, their camps is visible and scattered all over the State.

Divepen: I just hope these people would not be going into the hand of death himself. I bless them from here- Go and Succeed in Jesus name.

Thank you for the prayers. It is just that we are tired of been suffocated.
We just received a message from the Army General in Maiduguri that we
should stand down, he will be addressing us shortly.

Divepen: I just hope these people would not be going into the hand of death himself. I bless them from here- Go and Succeed in Jesus name.

Thanks for the prayers,

idee91: The government has failed these innocent people....... They are but confused. ... hmmmmm

We are indeed confused in Borno and Maiduguri in particular. To us the masses, we are caught up between two stories. It is either Boko Haram or the Army.

You need to see the angry and exhausted youth yesterday, their voices and faces said it all - WE ARE TIRED. We have no where to go and even if you have somewhere to go, you might be a potential mocking subject by either the police or the host community, hence the reason we are requesting Government to approve the use of arms so that we can assist the army.

Hey gentlemen, I am looking for an expert in the field of traffic light installations in cities.
Preferably the one that will use solar lights.

Kindly inbox me for further discussion @ busuguma@gmail.com

Thanks.

Can it go for N450k after inspection?

INTRODUCTION
My attention was drawn to this write up, with the aforementioned caption by a law student of the University of Lagos on the 1st day of May, 2012. I found the heading very interesting and indeed topical, hence developed the interest to read it.

Unfortunately, ended up embraced and humiliated as a result of misleading comments and unguarded utterances, and submissions consistently maintained by the anonymous authors of the write up tagged “Friends of Steve”. I then deem it fit and indeed imperative to respond to the authors of this write up with a view to put the record. Straight to avoid misleading the average right thinking Nigerian. Existing sub headings of the authors are maintained with reactions.

Just like the authors of the write up submitted Section 6 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as (Amended) vested judicial powers on all courts in Nigeria. However from my little knowledge of the amended 1999 Constitution the sub Sections under Section 6 of the Constitution were only 6 and not 16 as claimed by Steve and his friends (See line 6 of the introductory part of the write up).

I decided not to join issues with them on their entire submissions, but rather chose to respond to them on the relevant part which is also the central issue of the write up i.e the “Borno Case”.

The Interpretation of the 180 Days.
The framers of the 1999 Constitution specifically inserted in the constitution in clear wordings that the life span of an election petition shall be 180 days from the date of filling (See Section 285(6)) of the 1999 Constitution as (Amended) without any proviso for extension of time in that section or any other section of the constitution. The operative word “Shall” has been interpreted by the Supreme Court in plethora of authorities to mean “Mandatory” compulsory “must be complied with” without any discretion. See Onochie Vs Odogwu (2006) All FWLR Part (317) Page 569 – 570 Paras F-G.

The Borno Case Proper.
The Borno case which became the locus classicus that settled all lingering disputes pending before various tribunals and Court of Appeal of the various divisions in Nigeria was between The All Nigeria Peoples Party, Governor Kashim Shettima, Zanna Umar Mustapha and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Vs Alhaji Mohammed Goni and The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Appeal No. SC/1/2012 and SC/2/2012 (Consolidated) emanating from the decision of the Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja handed down on the 23rd day of December 2011. Ordering a re-trial to commence hearing denovo before a different panel to be constituted by the Acting President of the Court of Appeal. The Appellant in SC/1/2012 and SC/2/2012 (consolidated) approached the Supreme Court on several grounds of errors and misdirections by the lower court (The Court of Appeal) in the decision it handed down on the 23rd day of December, 2011. Appeal No. SC/1/2012 and SC/2/2012 succeeded wholly.

The issue of 180 days is only an issue out of the many grounds of appeal that succeeded in the Supreme Court. Assuming the grounds upon which the applicant’s i.e Mohammed Goni and The PDP predicated their reliefs are valid in the eyes of the law. The judgment of the Supreme Court handed down by Honourable Justice S. W. N. Onnonghen on the 17th day of February, 2012 cannot still be set aside, as same can still be sustained by the Appellants other grounds of Appeal, which were decided in favour of the Appellants by the Honourable Court in the said judgment.

The Way out for the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court has discharged its duties as provided for by Section 6 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria by handing down a very sound judgment which has led to rest many lingering cases thereby enhancing peace and stability in our nascent democracy in Nigeria.

I found it very embracing the long chain of judicial authorities cited by erudite friends of Steve on jurisdiction of court. For instance, the case of MADOKOULU Vs NKENDLEM (Supra) strengthens the position of the Supreme Court on the Borno Case rather than operating against it. The Borno case was initiated by due process of law in the Supreme Court and it was a matter that came to the Supreme Court in its appellate jurisdiction from the decision of the Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja and not in its original jurisdiction of constitutional interpretation that requires seven (7) justices of the court. It is worthy to note that the Appellants in both SC/1/2012 and SC/2/2012 did not ask to court to interpret the 180 days, because it was clear from the wordings of the constitution that mentioned shall i.e there is no ambiguity to warrant any interpretation. Furthermore, it is settled principle of law that the issue of jurisdiction of court can be raised at any time of the proceedings before judgment, even on Appeal for the very first time. Friends of Steve and co were adamant until well after three (3) months of resting the case were introducing trivial issues to cause mischief for a simple political goal. No way, the law is sacrosanct and the Supreme Court is firm and consistent.

Disgracefully, friends of Steve, the authors of this write up wasted their precious time citing long chain of cases where the Supreme Court had overruled it self in the past and authorities that touches on fair hearing. I submit with respect, that this is a misconception and a complete departure from the real facts and circumstances of the Borno case and the authorities were based on the provision of the Old Constitution before the amendment of the 1999 Constitution and on different subject matters with the case instanta which I strongly submit that it do not support or favour any of their so called arguments. It is misleading and calculated to deceive the public and ridicule the integrity of the five (5) wise men led by Hon. Justice S. W. N. Onnonghen JSC and the judiciary as a whole.


The Status of the Borno Case.
By the combine effect of Sections 233 (2) (a) and (b) and Section 234 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The Borno Case SC/1/2012 and SC/2/2012 (Consolidated) is a valid and subsisting judgment in the eyes of the law. Section 234 of the 1999 Constitution provides.

For the purpose of exercising any jurisdiction conferred upon it by the constitution or any law the Supreme Court shall be dully constituted if it consists of not less than five (5) Justices of The Supreme Court.

Provided that where the Supreme Court is sitting to consider an appeal brought under Section 233 (2) (b) and (c) of the constitution the court shall be constituted by seven (7) justices.

As earlier submitted the Borno Case reached the apex court (Supreme Court) to exercise its appellate jurisdiction of entertaining appeals from the Court of Appeal and not in the exercise of its original jurisdiction of interpreting the constitution.

Following, the General Elections of April, 2011 by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and pursuant to inauguration of Election Petition Tribunals by the then President of the Court of Appeal Hon. Justice Isa Ayo Salami Appeals from tribunals lay to the Court of Appeal and in the case of Governorship and Presidential Election Appeals terminates at the Supreme Court of Nigeria. All Appeals in respect of Election Petition that emanated from the various divisions of Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court were adjudicated by five (5) justices of the Court.

The heavily relied Benue Case was completely different from the Borno Case, in the sense that Appeal No. SC/381/2011 and SC/383/2011 (Consolidated) in respect of the Benue Case was for the interpretation of Section 182 (j) of the 1999 Constitution dealing with the educational qualification and presentation of forged certificate by Governor Gabriel Suswan of Benue State handed down on 28th day of November, 2011.

Also Appeal No SC/360/2011 filed by Prof. Steve also inrespect of Benue State was heard and determined by a panel of five (5) justices of the Supreme Court.

The Akwa Ibom case was Appeal No. SC/336/2011 heard and determined by a penal of 5 justices of the Supreme Court.
Also See the following cases.
SILVER Vs DICKSON, The heavily relied cases of Akwa Ibom and Benue States earlier decided by the Supreme Court presided over by the Chief Justice of Nigeria CJN. Appeals No. SC/157/2011 and SC/334/2011 (consolidated) Between Senator Yakubu Garba Lado & 43 Ors Vs C.P.C & 16 Ors and Dr Yusuf Armiyau Vs C.P.C & 48 Ors handed down by Hon. Justice S. W. N. Onnonghen on the 16th day of December, 2011.

SC/332/2011, SC/333/2011 (consolidated) Between Alhaji Kashim Shettima & 3 Ors Vs Alhaji Mohammed Goni & 1 Or also handed down by Hon. Justice S. W. N. Onnonghen on the 31st day of October, 2011 to mention but a few cases.

The authority of SOKOTO STATE GOVERNMENT Vs KAMDEX NIG. LTD. (2007) ALL FWLR Pt. 365 – 669 at 490 per NIKI TOBI JSC heavily relied by Steve and friends is completely irrelevant, hence cannot apply to the case instanta. MADOKOULU Vs NKENDILEM (1962) ALL NLR Locus classics on jurisdiction cannot also apply to this case because, the Supreme Court adjudicated upon the matter in its appellate jurisdiction and the court is dully constituted by five (5) wise men having initiated the appeal through due process of law.

Finally on this issue, Steve and his friend, the authors of this write up happily romanced their mouth by misleading the public that the court was not properly constituted hence lacked the jurisdiction to entertain the matter. However, a reasonable man with a little knowledge of constitutional law may conclude by saying they are entitled to their opinion.

The imperativeness of upholding the sanctity of S. 36 of the 1999 Constitution.
The issue of fair hearing was not an issue before the Supreme Court in the Borno Case, therefore reacting to this issue amounts to wastage of the precious time of the readers.

By way of emphasis, in Appeal No. SC/1/2012 and SC/2/2012 Alhaji Mohammed Goni and the PDP filed their brief of argument with a preliminary objection incorporated into it on the ground that, the judgment of the Court of Appeal was not part of the record of proceedings transmitted to the Supreme Court.

It is rather unfortunate and indeed tantalising for Steve and his so called friends to cite laws and judicial authorities on fair hearing. It is elementary principle of law that parties are bound by their pleadings and fair hearing is not an issue before the Supreme Court.

The need for the Supreme Court to upheld the Constitutional Right of Appeal.
It is very disturbing to read the judgment of a competent court up side down (inside out) by in quote “enlighten” people like Steve and his friends simply because the judgment was not favourable to their interest.

Alhaji Mohammed Goni and the PDP dragged Alhaji Kashim Shettima & Ors to the Supreme Court in Appeal No. SC/352/2011 which was heard by the Supreme and judgment delivered on the 31st October, 2011.

The question that readily comes to mind is why did Alhaji Mohammed Goni and the PDP went to the Supreme Court? The answer to this question is simply Alhaji Mohammed Goni was at the Supreme Court to uphold his Right of Appeal which was obliged by the Supreme Court. The mere fact that the outcome of a judgment was not favourable to a litigant does not render the court indolent. The court is not a Father Christmas to grant baseless relief to console aggrieved litigants like Alhaji Mohammed Goni, the PDP and Steve and his friends.

Therefore, the judicial decisions cited cannot help this case in anyway it is an exercise of futility.

The need for the Supreme Court to be consistent in Benue and Akwa Ibom Governorship Case.

I am very delighted that the authors of this write up answered themselves in the affirmative on this issue (See line 7 of the sub heading) in effect the application was not argued before the Supreme Court and rulling delivered. Therefore, the court cannot act in vacuum. It would have been different if the Supreme Court had taken the application alongside the provisions of Section 36 (1) Sections 233 (6) Section 6 (6) (a) and (b) Section 285 (6) Section 22 of the Supreme Court Order 8 Rules 12 (2) and (5) of the Supreme Court Rules the Case of ROSSEK Vs ACB (1993) 10 SCNJ 20 at 39 – 43 Aladegbemi Vs Fasamande (1988) 3 NWLR Pt. 81 (129) Ladoja Vs INEC (2007) ALL FWLR Pt. 377 – 934, Falaye Vs Otapo (1995) 3 NWLR Pt. 381, Makoju Vs FWLR Pt. 373. 81 Ameachi Vs INEC (2007) 18 NWLR Pt. (1665) 42 and Malumfashi Vs NAL Merchant Bank Ltd. (1999) 4 NWLR Pt. 144 283 at 317 SC. and yet gave a contrary decision in the Borno Case.

Cases are decided by the courts on a peculiar set of facts and circumstances. The Supreme Court has always maintained consistency based on available facts and applicable laws.

Finally, it is my humble submission that the Borno Case is a locus classicus that finally settled many disputes and a land mark decision of the Supreme Court for the year 2012 and a tremendous achievement to our young democracy.

Rather than beating about the bush, cheap blackmail, shameless sycophancy, mockery of the judiciary and ridicule of the proven integrity of the justices of the Supreme Court. Steve and friends could have found a better option to ask for constitutional amendment to correct the anormally in the constitution.

In conclusion the judiciary has done very well in the Borno Case and we are hopeful that the Supreme Court will maintain its position. (Status quo ante).


EBELEME CHRIS Esq
Lagos, Nigeria.

Kindly help and check this vin number 027686

Kudos to all the car dealers in this forum
you are doing a great job here.

How do i get a brand new golf III full loaded
(automatic transmission)

If a brand new is not possible, at least a super
grade golf III with a lesser mile coverage.

I begin to wonder if the supporters of GEJ have anything to offer apart
from 'feeling the fresh air'.

If GEJ wins as his supporters kept emphasizing, let them know that it is
not because he is capable, it is because he belongs to a powerful party
surrounded by most corrupt members in the history of Nigerian politics.

At present, PDP has earmarked billions of Naira to buy people's vote on
that day - no wonder, GEJ is shouting that no one should rig election for
him, not knowing that, it is not about him alone, it is about protecting the
interest of the PDP that brought him into power.

I am optimistic that GEJ is going to win the election, but the question is that,
is he capable of correcting all the previous woes his party has inflicted on
Nigerians?

Where is GEJ?

This election has nothing to do with GEJ/SAMBO, it is about PDP ruling
Naija for good solid uninterrupted 12 years without positive impact.
We should not close our eyes to the fact that the PDP as a party now
is the same PDP 12 years ago and as tradition, every party must stick
to its manifesto.  The manifesto of the PDP is not result oriented.

this is a great challenge to the Nigerian Government.  I still can't imagine
the security saying that the owner is still not known? it does'nt matter the
quantity, even if it is a single bullet to come in through a legal means without
tracing its owner means someone is not doing his job right.

a fellow nairalander raises the question that journalist in Nigeria also ends
there story where they are told to stop and never go a mile to dig independently
because we have seen so much of these confiscation of illegal weapons without
knowing who did it.

this should be a challenge to all our journalist to follow up this case to its logical
conclusion so that this country will know who is importing these weapons and
for what purpose.

its time to stop shifting blames from one section of the country to the other, because
the end result is to the poor innocent Nigerian man on the street.

i was wondering what a veteran agriculturist will do in the defence ministry
just like how dora was sent to information - it is becoming too late for
baba go-slow!!

monitor, help me with this one though not advertised on nairaland
JHMCB36400C044380

jhmcb36400c044380 and this one too

can u pls help me with this one?
JHMCB36400C044380