₦airaland Forum

Teejay13:
Stop the critics. It can't add anything to your life.

Learn to appreciate other peoples believe..

damosky12:
That should show you the love of God...

He, by himself, laid down his life.

John 10:17-18
[17]Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again.
[18]No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.

Don't reject His act of love in PAYMENT for your sins. Your salvation is in His act of love of laying down his life for your sins...

John 15:13
[13]Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.

John 3:17-18
[17]For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
[18]He that believeth on him is not condemned...

Do you believe?

Dareal90s:
Lol, ur mumu level won't make u humble urself and ask from those with knowledge, He came to d earth to die for our sin so we won't av to offer ourself as sacrifice or offer burnt offerings to God d Almighty. So why would he escame being nailed when d main reason on earth is to die, our God is not a coward. Nd mind u HE is not a god, he is God, part of the trinity. I know most Muslims would b afraid of today nd get annoyed but that doesn't uproot anything from our body. Am happy am no
more a slave, am a child of God.

Dareal90s:
Where is Muhammed today? He is still in d grave.

diablos:
Almajiris everywhere, the vile and bile of any sane society. Very dirty, backward and uncivilized humans known for turning cities into slums.

sniperr007:
Two things happen when you don't know something:
Either u discard & demonize it
Or accept & learn more about it.

Ubenedictus:
Up till today nobody knows the source of the book of hebrew, should we also throw it away?

Ubenedictus:
Bible was not compiled by order of constantine and no respected historian will say such.

Ubenedictus:
he simply stood as judge over scriptures and decided for himself which to accept and which to reject and how to interprete.

IAmSabrina:
Someone can't joke again @bolded

Nawa 4 u christians o

IAmSabrina:
Yeah, Martin's theology contradicted them. Therefore, he declared them to be non-authoritative. They must have been eventually dropped off in the end to save on printing costs

jcross19:
roman Catholic were the first to compile bible in a single book and then all these 7books op was talking about were there from the beginning but the protestant removed them other Christians except Catholic make use of Protestant bible now. there were many books written by Paul that were not added to this bible today it was a strict law and the harshness of his rules so the synod's then removed it from the reading so that it won't cause severe division in the future

jcross19:
we are missing things here! first bible of today were written a script, a scroll or parchment before it was compiled to be in a single book! in 4 centuries AD when they compiled the bible a decree was made by then ceaser Constantine and many scrolls were examined, more than 1000 scriptures were gathered but only the few were compiled together while others were burnt and the remain were kept in the Vatican archive. in Ethiopian Coptic bible contains more than 88 or 100 books . if you doubt it google is your friend.

Ubenedictus:
Who set the standard abeg? was mark and luke not disciples of peter and paul and yet they have 2 gospels and 1 epistle between them a total of 3 books.

Should we throw those book out because they arent the original apostles?

budaatum:
I'd still like to read both. The Story of Susanna is after all a good lesson against stoning women for adultery, and Daniel and the Priests of Bel might make some poor.

I wonder why remove it.

Ubenedictus:
they were removed by the founder of protestantism Martin Luther in the 16th century because some of those books were against his doctrines.

So he stopped using the Christian accepted 7 books a chose the jewish canon instead. Martin luther also didnt like the book of james becos it was against his teaching, he called it a book of straws but he couldnt find an excuse to dump it. For the 7 books he had an excuse the mainstream jew after d distruction of the bible werent using them.

OLAADEGBU:
It is obvious that the identities of Jesus and Muhammad is different, what do you have to say about other points mentioned?

payosehtor:
some of those books never mate the standard.e.g the book of Baruch (stand to be corrected with the spellings) was a Secretary to prophet Jeremiah, ask yourself if you have a book by the prophet and one by his secretary who's book should be considered authentic or who among the two was inspired?

DeeTweenie:
lol, are u included?

DeeTweenie:
i for waka naked for 1 week

Mariangeles:
The word of God is vast. More than what is translated.

The originals are written in Hebrew and Greek.
It's impossible to record all in one book .

Uyi168:
...
When it comes to authority in biblical matters, who is pastor Chris

Mariangeles:
According to Pastor Chris Oyakhilome, those books were not connected to Jesus Christ from the old testament to the new as the others, therefore, they are not as important .