Kukutente23:

Now that you're sharing screenshot, go and read what EA says and what the judgement is saying in this regard. I hope you can spot the variance especially with what SC has previously said about preponderance of evidence

Kukutente23:

Oh so you agree it's 165,000 no longer 130,000 but now a new level of ignorance. What is the new thing you're seeing in your screenshot?

Faiththatworks:
I totally disagree with Oga Farooq on the judgement of the Appeal court on the Kano Election.
He intentionally left one of the reasons for his disqualification which is the purported 165000 invalid votes.
For those trying to quote some sections of the Electoral acts about stamped ballot papers,I disagree with them too.
How can you forget to stamp 165000 ballot papers,for those who don't understand,a booklet contains around 100 pages of leaflet for voting.
Not stamping more 1650 booklets is a red flag for any right thinking individual,that's around 1000 polling units,haba every Right thinking individual can add up the rigging mathematics the NNPP were involved in.
You can forget to stamp some pages in the booklet maybe a few thousand,but 165000 leaflets is the biggest and most blantant rigging that the NNPP ignoramuses forgot to correct when submitting their ballot papers.
I repeat Gov Abba should make sure he loots the Kano Treasury very well before the pronouncement of the Supreme Court ruling.
He will be removed,even if the Supreme Court overlooks the party Nomination issue,the ballot papers stamps is a forgone conclusion.
Still selling LAND in my Estate
God bless Nigeria......

Kukutente23:

Now you're asking me
I thought you read the judgement with an unbiased mind. So why were you pulling figures from thin air when you never knew?
Is it not already obvious you're biased and just looking to justify APC's thievery?

Kukutente23:

Now you're asking me
I thought you read the judgement with an unbiased mind. So why were you pulling figures from thin air when you never knew?
Is it not already obvious you're biased and just looking to justify APC's thievery?

Kukutente23:

Oga Appeal Court is based on tribunal ruling. It's not a new ruling. Go and read the tribunal ruling and be properly informed.
Anyways it's on the net. Abba Yusuf won with over a million votes while Gawuna had 890k votes.
That's over 100k
Endeavour to stop telling lies on behalf of politicians who don't give a rat's ass about you.

Kukutente23:

Oga Appeal Court is based on tribunal ruling. It's not a new ruling. Go and read the tribunal ruling and be properly informed.
Anyways it's on the net. Abba Yusuf won with over a million votes while Gawuna had 890k votes.
That's over 100k
Endeavour to stop telling lies on behalf of politicians who don't give a rat's ass about you.

Kukutente23:

Now you're asking me
I thought you read the judgement with an unbiased mind. So why were you pulling figures from thin air when you never knew?
Is it not already obvious you're biased and just looking to justify APC's thievery?

Sholaco:
Media are also the problem.
Your analysis is an incitement to violence

Kukutente23:

This is the second time you're repeating the lie that he won with only 50,000 votes. Abba Yusuf won with over 100k votes. Go and check the figures.
The EA makes provision for using unmarked ballot papers. The Appeal Court can't make judgement outside of the provision of the law.
What are you saying self?

Kukutente23:

Yeah open mind indeed.
You read nothing. Just depending on lies and propaganda from APC WhatsApp group.
For your info, the votes deducted from APC were from a different ward and was for overvoting.
ALL the unsigned ballot papers from different wards were for NNPP. You would have known this if you really read the judgement.

Mind you, another zombie Aquila99 is claiming the direct opposite of your claim by saying all the unsigned ballot papers were for APC. Which should we go with between you two

Kukutente23:

Stop trying to twist words. You're just proving to be an incorrigible liar.
You claimed total invalid ballot papers were 166,000 out of which 130,000 was for NNPP and 30,000 for other parties which is mathematically wrong. Your aim was to project a sense of fairness that it was not NNPP alone that had the void ballot papers.
I showed you that ALL the 166,000 were for NNPP and you're now coming to change story.
Must you lie even in the face of hard evidence?

Kukutente23:

Your estimation? Where is your estimation coming from? You just lied abs you're now claiming estimation.
Show were 30,000 votes were invalidated for other parties.
You're lying to justify stealing and still making estimation. Na wa o

Great2017:

The Law did not say so.

Kukutente23:

Keep quiet and stop telling lies

https://dailytrust.com/breaking-kano-tribunal-sacks-gov-yusuf-declares-apc-winner/

The court deducted 165,663 votes from Gov yusuf total as invalid votes, stating that the ballot papers (165,663) were not stamped or signed and therefore declared invalid.

Great2017:

Whose fault that those votes were invalid?

Kukutente23:

So the remaining 30,000 belonged to APC abi.
Come and lie

Kukutente23:

It's 165,000 not 130,000. Apart from the obvious lie that EA requires ballot papers to be signed and stamped, I'm sure if NNPP were given same access and time to go through ballot papers, they'll find same against APC if not worse.
Look at Rivers for example. Inec deliberately delayed allowing APC access to electoral materials used in the gubernatorial polls. By the time they were given access, Wike's thugs are into their time by denying them access to Inec's office.
So that APC in Kano had enough time to check over 2m and see 166,000 unsigned ballot papers is suspicious

ican2020:

Understanding is very important

His nomination was the reason why the appeal court sake the governor whereas the same court has previously ruled that nominations is internal part affairs

Kukutente23:

165,000 is the number against NNPP.. I'm sure if you dig further you'll also see unsigned ballot papers favouring APC. I hope you're aware those ballot papers were not from one PU or ward.
Secondly, Ganduje has not won Kwankwaso in both elections were they opposed each other. He's always relied on the courts to do the job for him.

Kukutente23:

Did the returning officer reject the ballot papers?
You are beginning to sound like the average APC zombie

Bobloco:


But the ballot was counted which means that the returning officer was convinced which settles it

Kukutente23:

Read and reread that section. All this talk of signature and stamp is simply a misinterpretation of that section. The section is talking about security embossing on the ballot paper such as inec seal and watermarks as well as serial number not signature and date. Read that subsection 2 very well

Bobloco:


You don't need to ask me that bro, there's a body responsible for conducting elections and that body in Nigeria is INEC. Did INEC say that the unsigned and unstamped ballot papers didn't emanate from them?

Here is what the law says as regards ballot papers not signed and stamped


"(1) Subject to subsection (2), a ballot paper which does not bear
official mark prescribed by the Commission shall not be counted.
(2) If the returning officer is satisfied that a ballot paper which does not
bear the official mark was from a book of ballot papers which was furnished
to the presiding officer of the polling unit in which the vote was cast for use at
the election in question, he or she shall, notwithstanding the absence of the
official mark, count that ballot paper".

From the above, the law provided a leeway to the issue of unsigned and unstamped ballot papers

jahsharon:


Zombidients don't have brain to think, so they cannot reason with you

Bobloco:


Are you now implying that only the NNPP could have done that. Don't forget that Ganduje and the APC were the incumbent government when this election was conducted.

The truth is that Tinubu, Ganduje and the APC are hell bent on snatching Kano state using the judiciary and you know it

Bobloco:


The question is, did INEC say that the ballot papers didn't emanate from them

Bobloco:


It is not serious as well because here is what the electoral law says

(1) Subject to subsection (2), a ballot paper which does not bear
official mark prescribed by the Commission shall not be counted.
(2) If the returning officer is satisfied that a ballot paper which does not
bear the official mark was from a book of ballot papers which was furnished
to the presiding officer of the polling unit in which the vote was cast for use at
the election in question, he or she shall, notwithstanding the absence of the
official mark, count that ballot paper.

wirinet:

Is INEC the only electoral body in the world? How come others countries including those much poorer and less politically stable than Nigeria are able to have credible elections, conclude all litigations and reruns before the winners are sworn in.

In Nigeria, INEC is not interested in holding credible elections. The are only interested in announcing winners and then asking other candidates to go court to prove they won the election. Meanwhile, inec is the one with all the evidence of the elections.

wirinet:

It's not about Atiku or Obi. It about the whole electoral system which promotes getting INEC to announce a winner by hook or crook, and then asking other candidates to go to court. Once the announce winner is sworn in and has his/her hands on the levers of power, they use that power to manipulate the system.
Atiku has been challenging the presidential elections since 2007, so you cannot claim to understand the system more than he does.