₦airaland Forum

blackchris: boooo. not funny at all.

the report clearly says rural areas dummy. last time i checked, your rural areas also suffer the same fate. so whats your point you this baboon

Rural areas still behind in infrastructure development
http://thenetworks.co.za/2013/01/rural-areas-still-behind-in-infrastructure-development/

Of course it's not funny to you.

It goes without saying that our rural areas will be behind.

Still, that doesn't mean that suddenly Naai-geria is on par with South Africa. It isn't. South African standards aren't Naai-gerian standards.

Fact. Not dreams.

zetdee: How can they afford to waste the little electricity that they produce to operate gates, we talking about a country thats still in the stone age, even a stone age practice like cannibalism is still common.

Given that the country has a hot climate; and that they obviously have aircon issues, surely their men and women stink?

It follows, non?

Makes sense, I should think...

Msauza: That is true, many Nigerians that I have met have disabilities of some kind. I was wondering why.

Mental ones not being the least!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8JIzUU4d8I

agaugust: .

[size=14pt]Black South Africans Begin Gang R.ape Of White Women[/size]


https://www.cwporter.com/rapevictim.jpg


http://violenceagainstwhites./2012/12/31/blacks-kidnap-rape-and-beat-white-woman-on-christmas-day/


[size=14pt]Policemen All Blacks, Have Started Their Own R.ape Of White Women In South Africa[/size]


http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t652380/

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/south-africa/TA20VP6LSO7SDVR97

The heights of desperation or idiöcy or both

You love your fake pictures, don't you?

http://news.softpedia.com/news/How-to-Behave-With-The-Sexual-Assault-Victims-48290.shtml

blackchris: ode, there are a lot of houses with remote controlled gates in 9ja.

how many remote controlled gates do you have in SA? guy reason well na. it's not a necessity for any society.

i'm very sure south africans will not be able to pay gate men like we do. so shut up before you reduce yourself to an a*s

Hahahaha!

Gate men.

Bleeehhh! Oh, my days.

zetdee: Hehehehe you see, the nigerian face some form of physical or mental deformity right from birth. Their problems start from the womb. Many of them don’t have access or can’t afford ante-natal care. So they are born with all sorts of defects-low birth rate, underweight and stunted, being anemic etc , which affect their IQ and cripple their foo for good.

The shocking part is that even nurses across that sh!thole have to use mobile phone lights to deliver babies because of chronic power outages! https://www.nairaland.com/1282283/nurses-use-mobile-phone-torchlights#15605877

Folks, what kind of babies can be delivered through such a system? You just need to look at this thread to see what I am talking about! why do you think this thread is full of deluded lunatics?

That is the reality of the nigerian situation. So sad, isn’t it?

Naai-gerians come from a dark place.... literally!

And they want to come here and compare themselves to a country that is light years ahead of them. SMH

Light years? Geddit?

blackchris: and crabB finally reveals the roots of his racist sentiments . but that won't save you

It's sarcasm, fool. Every South African understands that what I actually mean is that my family does not live there. South Africans understand that I mean that there are more white South Africans who live outside Orania then there are those who live there.

Sarcasm is not taught in Naai-gerian schools. I understand. 98% of you lot fail English.

agaugust: thanks for telling the true reason why south african men are lazy and dont work, they get government grants to drink beer while nigerian immigrants take over their jobs and their finest women


.

Well, it's not as if Naa-geria does not have scores of unemployed people. The question is: Are they looked after? We all know that your politicians have the highest salaries in the world!

As for your story about Naai-gerians and South African jobs...
...Well, I'm sure that you consider everything "Hillbrow" to be "the finest". Not surprising, considering where you come from, Mr Hausa.

blackchris: yeah, like ordinary poachers shooting down military helicopters in SA. who will save you when the real genocide starts after mandela's death?

Like desperate Naai-gerians cook up stories that don't exist?

Like Naai-gerians don't know what the difference is between a military operation and an environmental operation?

Talk to me after Mandela's death. There's not story here. Not today.

The only story is in Naai-geria, where at least 12 soldiers were caused to meet their maker by a supposedly "defeated" enemy.

There is no such story in South Africa.

blackchris: yeah, to join their brothers and sisters in orian so they can be safe in their divided and fensed community when the attack starts. run baboon, run

Oh really? "Orion" where my family lives too? Hahaha, the desperation and disappointment of a Naai-gerian monkey.

Read it and weep, loser. I repeat: South Africa is not Naai-geria.

___


It's Orania, idîot. Don talk about things you know nothing about.

blackchris: see this ode

me that just came back from Yobe state on assignment and it seems like boko haram never happened. keep up with the comedy

boko haram have been reduced to attacking border communities even at limited cappability.

EID-EL-FITR DURBAR (HORSE RIDING AND MUSIC FIESTA) HOLDS IN BORNO FOR THE FIRST TIME SINCE THE BOKO HARAM INSURGENCY COMMENCED ; SIGNPOSTS A RETURN TO PRE-CONFLICT NORMALCY
https://beegeagle./

"Reduced, you say?

Tell that to the soldiers that just died

And seeing as you've failed to eliminate them, what happens when you stop your military campaign?

Or, are you telling us that you're stuck with the campaign forever?

By the way, are you not the idîot that asked me when the last time was that I heard of a Boko bomb? Well, I heard worse. I heard of soldiers being killed in their own country..in their own base! Now THAT is the real comedy!

And you keep telling us that you're the best, like comical Ali.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfAeMtcURg0

zetdee: Can you believe that soweto uses more electricity than the whole of Nigeria? Midupi which will be online in 2014 will generate 5.5GW, thats more than Nigeria's total capacity.

I'm embarrassed for the Naai-gerian monkeys just from reading this.

agaugust: better run to Australia like your fellow white south africans who want to save their white heads from Zulu matchetes :

Only to come back a few years later


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnivMNqS41Y

Jonathan putting together his next policy, in the dark.

Explains everything.

agaugust: see your white brother's head undergoing 'zulu surgical treatment' in post above

I laugh it off, because I am not an idîot who laps everything up, like someone with no brain.

Next time you meet a South African white who's come to conquer Lagos, ask him if he believes in "white genocide".

South Africa is not Naai-geria.

blackchris: abeg make that man do waka. make i see how people like CrabB go survive the attacks.. hehehehe

Wishful thinking, loser. As for what is currently happening in Naai-geria, there's nothing wishful about it. It's reality today.

Msauza: Wow! I can't believe this. Gauteng alone will never manage with that nonsense. Obama must just come and help because the whole country on its own is broke.

Wow, dropped by almost half?

How will the Naai-gerians sustain any war, with no power?

[quote author=agaugust][/quote]Any white person who believes in "white genocide" is laughed at and shunned by the more sane among us.

Try again.

agaugust: After Mandela dies...maybe soon, @CrazeB will be one of the first heads to be chopped with machete by hungry and angry black Zulu tribesmen in Hillbrow

.

Goes to show that your are more ignorant than initially thought. Uneducated Northerner, Mandela has been out of public life for years. He will be mourned, but my head will remain intact.

Wishful thinking, humanoid.

blackchris: dude, you should be tired with this boko cliche by now. by gosh it's now more boring than ever.*yawns*

even mrs mandela herself has testified that SA is on the brink of something dangerous due to incompetence of your government. and it's only a matter time. then you'll understand what @Naijapickingidi once said.."karma is real"

[b]South Africa is an angry nation on the brink, warns Nelson Mandela's wife
“South Africa is an angry nation,” she said. “We are on the precipice of something very dangerous with the potential of not being able to stop the fall.

“The level of anger and aggression is rising. This is an expression of deeper trouble from the past that has not been addressed. We have to be more cautious about how we deal with a society that is bleeding and breathing pain.”[/b]
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/southafrica/9916310/South-Africa-is-an-angry-nation-on-the-brink-warns-Nelson-Mandelas-wife.html

He calls Boko a cliché. A cliché that has caused your whole military to run around like headless chicken? A cliché that has caused your soldiers to die by the dozen? A cliché that has produced refugees and thousands of deaths?

If boko is a cliché than, I don't want to know what it is that is considered to not be a cliché in Naai-geria.

Let's talk when South Africa is over the cliff. Now when its "on the brink", because I don't see any terrorist uprising in South Africa today. Do you?

Try again, loser. Weak commentary simply serves to expose your desperation.

Boko Haram is here, right now. Killing your people. We aren't talking about some future wishy-washy thing here. We are talking about the hear and now. Boko Haram.

NaijaPikinGidi: Decades after, yet the IRA debacle lingers on.
http://www.mail.com/int/news/uk/2266582-police-decry-belfast-anarchy-56-officers-hurt.html#.1258-stage-hero1-4

The great Nigerian Armed Forces have done significantly well in such a short period.

Done well? Where?

In any case, if it weren't for incompetence, Boko Haram never would have grown in the first place.

Has anyone noticed how many non-Naai-gerian pictures accompany Mr Seleka's posts?

It's really sad. Naai-geria has nothing to post and their fake researcher knows it.

SMH.

Naai-gerian liars, who are being shown their behinds by Boko Haram.

I'm sure even this figure of 12 dead is a lie.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/nigeria-12-troops-police-killed-uprising-19925526


Killed and made to cry in their own country. Some military, this. sMH.

_____

Nigeria: 12 Troops, 7 Police Killed in Uprising


The commander of the military joint task force fighting northeastern Nigeria's Islamic uprising admits 12 soldiers and seven police officers were killed in recent attacks.

Earlier the military had said only two soldiers and one police officer were killed when suspected members of the Boko Haram terrorist network attacked a military base and police outpost near Nigeria's border with Cameroon on Aug. 4.

Maj. Gen. Jah Ewansiah made the admission Saturday when he spoke to the Borno state governor and journalists were present.

He said that despite the losses the task force is "resolute and committed to ensure that peace is completely restored in Borno state, even if it means losing our lives."

Thousands more troops were sent into northeastern Nigeria after a state of emergency was declared mid-May.

NaijaPikinGidi: Combat kills by whose account? In which battle frontlines? Verified by who? This statement is a sure mark of stupidity caused by the asphyxiation of your tiny brain by your flat buttocks! Too bad!

Too late.

You've already confirmed yourself a foöl, like the rest of your Naai-gerian brothers.

You're on record as having gone to town about "combat skills", before you woke up. Suddenly you want to be listened to, having realised it's actually "combat kills"?

You can't be taken seriously now. You're just saying stuff for the sake of saying stuff; and you can't read.

agaugust: easy to see why nigerian military is sticking very close to India for modernization of our weapon systems.

Finally admitted that your weapon systems aren't modernised.

Thank you, humanoid.

We've been saying.

NaijaPikinGidi: You are still stubbornly choking your tiny brain right under your buttocks! Obviously, every African (and world) army has combat skills. Yet, it is not the knowledge of the skills that makes an army great, but the successful application of the skills against an enemy force! So far, Africa and the world awaits to see SA showcase "the many combat skills" that they have been mouthing forever. The very skills they used in CAR and had to retreat in fear and defeat! In deed South Africa is the only African country with the bragging rights of being the most overrated ... As they are yet to defeat any country/enemy force talk less of ragtag rebel fighters.

Combat skills indeed! Can you for once free your your brain?

Are you drunk?

The man said combat kills.

We know Naai-geria's education is subpar, but this takes the cake.

I spit on you, humanoid.

As for South Africa being overrated, I doubt we're going to see new rankings tomorrow...

Surely, you can't be the most credible commentator on the topic...

blackchris: believe me i know and it's exhausting.

aren't treaties and conventions signed under UN guidelines? if a country were to sanction the other, under what guidelines will they do so if not the UN. you see why i hate you?

you still foolishly gave an example of Argentina being sanctioned during the falklands war, but your poor knowledge of history was further exposed for not finding out what cause the war, after i gave the main categories or reasons a country should be sanction under such treaties you yapped about without even knowing the meaning. f00lish 1diot.



Argentina invaded the Falklands island nation with south Georgia, thereby violating the sovereignty of the island nation committing an offense in line with the first category, this made it right for Britain and US to sanction them.

your 1dioticy made you blind to connect it to my post and yet you f00lishly posted it as an example with pride. you are truly stup1d.

I'm daring you to post other countries that were sanctioned and hit with arms embargo that committed offenses that doesn't fall into any of these categories i posted.

it is even south africa that will be sanctioned for violating our sovereignty if your ships move close to us. while Nigeria will have the right to defend itself and import more arms. unless a neutral ground is used for such battle.

you see why i said i hate people like you with a passion?

don't respond to my post if you don't have anything reasonable to say cos last time i checked you intruded in a conversation i was having with someone else.

What a foòlish monkey. Now, you think that you will take the lesson that I gave to you and give it back to me!

You think I worry about your emotion-induced logic, seeing as you readily admit to hating passionately? Emotion and logic never mix, monkey.

You subhuman knew absolutely nothing about treaties and conventions, until I told you. All you "knew" was this thing called a resolution, which you kept demanding, ignorantly so. I don't care if you hate people like me and cry and run to your mother, I will tell you where to get off. An idîot is an idîot is an idîot. Fact of the matter is individual countries sanctioned Argentina: France and the Uk to be exact. Fact is the Farklands war was a war.

Therefore, imbecîlle, the possibility of sanctions if Naai-geria sails to Cape Town or marches on South Africa is there. You idîots have been harping on about invading South Africa, which is why the issue of sanctions even came up in the first place. Now, just because you spent all of two days researching categories doesn't mean that you know anything, you still are clueless. Do you know what it is that South Africa and Naai-geria would be fighting about? NO!

Given that, how can you dismiss the possibility of sanctions? You made a big mistake when you demanded a resolution. Tell me this, fool: ARE YOU STILL DEMANDING A RESOLUTION from Mike and Msauza, or have you accepted that your demand was ignorant? A demand that you have been repeating for two days straight - you have now dropped because i Have told you to stop being a idîot! Have you now changed tact, thanks to my having you bliksemmed?

You go as far as admitting that history has seen wars where one nation is sanctioned - i..e Argentina, but you want to harp on about categories when you have no idea what SA/Naai-geria would be fighting about! Face it, your argument fell apart when you demanded a resolution, which you did because you're stupîd. Cry and run to your mother - I will keep telling you.

You cannot dismiss the possibility of sanctions. On what grounds do you dismiss it? Do you have a crystal ball to see what would have started the war between the two nations?

I'm the one who told you that you cannot demand a resolution. That you have to look at history and precedent. Now in true monkey-see, monkey-do fashion, you're doing just that. I would hate people like me too, if I were you.

You did well to drop the resolution demand. You're learning.

Now, you idîots need to accept the point that until you grow the brains and build weapons, you cannot march on South Africa.

Oh, one more thing: This is a public forum. I will happily respond to any idîotic comment. If you don't want to be responded to, grow a brain. Simple.

NaijaPikinGidi: Ignorant idiot. Typical South African arrogance in public display. Nigeria that procured certain weapon type will not know how to use it? Will not have men trained to use it? Will not have expert trainers/veterans to provide training? Cannot invoke our Military bilateral relations to to deal with shortcomings or threats?

You are an idi.ot!

Isn't this the argument that the uneducated Naai-gerians had been making about South Africa?

Isn't this why you spoke about our bullet-proof vests issue in CAR?

There's only one idîot here.

Naai-gerians have no principled arguments. They say things based on how they feel on any given day.

The workings of a sub-human brain.

Everything highlighted by South Africans to the uneducated Naa-gerian forumites.

Naai-gerians who don't read.

_____


http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/09/nigeria-africa

At the dawn of independence in 1960, everything seemed possible for Africa's most populous and powerful state. Oil wells promised an endless flow of wealth, fertile land produced enough to feed the nation, and Nigeria single-handedly held half the entire manpower of West Africa.


As with elsewhere across post-independence Africa, the army strongmen who seized power six years later were seen by many as defenders of this vision of prosperity. Thus Nigerians of a certain generation recall the first decade of military rule with rose-tinted nostalgia. These were golden years of press freedom, rivalling that of western countries. In contrast to today's bloated and venal civil service, public workers kept the country running efficiently.

But by the time the civilian government ascended in 1979, they were grappling with the legacy of three disastrous years of civil war and the beginnings of a downward slide into corruption. It was during this era that "government ministry buildings would mysteriously burst into flames just before audits, making it impossible to discover written evidence of corruption," writes historian Max Siollun in Soldiers of Fortune, which charts the history of the middle decade of nearly 30 years of uninterrupted rule by the gun in Nigeria.

After four years of disorderly civilian government, the population gladly welcomed in a military in 1983 that saw itself as "an emergency rescue team that could be called out to depose the civilian government any time the public got fed up with its policies."

Soldiers of Fortune looks at the regime of two men who steered Nigeria for the next decade, setting the country on a path it is still treading today. In lucid prose, Siollun shows how "the military doctor became infected by the ills it came to cure," plunging Nigeria into virtual anarchy.

The book argues that understanding modern Nigeria's apparently default state of being on the brink cannot be understood without going back to this critical junction of military politics. Ethnic politics that plague the civilian population crept into a military swollen more than 20-fold on the back of the Biafra civil war. As it continues to do today, the vast oil wealth pumping in would seduce and corrupt the new strongmen.

By the time General Muhammadu Buhari and General Ibrahim Babangida had between them ruled for a decade, corruption reached levels Siollun calls "spectacular." But it shows the path Nigeria could have followed. One of the defining elements of Buhari's regime was its anti-corruption stance. Indeed the harsh sentences meted out to politicians and drug traffickers cost the regime popular support. But Babangida, who usurped him, unleashed a tide of corruption that continues to swamp Nigeria today, elevating "settlement" – the use of state funds to manipulate and compromise – into state policy.

Military rule eventually reached its nadir with the infamous General Sani Abacha, the diminutive dictator with a Viagara habit, whose death while cavorting with Indian prostitutes in 1998 sparked days of jubilation.

Soldiers of Fortune holds a much-needed mirror to Nigeria's history, and the reflection is not pretty. The press and ordinary folk are accomplices in the country's downward trajectory by "welcoming news of a military coup d'etat and the overthrow of a government they elected with characteristic jubilation."

For those less familiar with the country's past, Siollun's meticulous research provides juicy inside details of pivotal moments. How, for example, did Israeli intelligence officers from Mossad end up sending an agent disguised as a TV producer in an attempt to snare an ex-regime leader exiled in London? Why did ex-military ruler and continental heavy-weight Olusegun Obasanjo refuse to take part in another coup?

While personal memoirs of Nigerian military history abound, a removal from the crises enables Siollun to dismantle the military machine that has ruled Nigeria with more objectivity than these other tomes. Even to seasoned readers familiar with the story, the scholarly attention to detail makes for a refreshing read. It provides a timely insight into the same military rulers still wielding power today, either now wearing civilian garb or from behind the scenes.

Hot off the printing press of the Abuja-based Cassava Republic, Soldiers of Fortune is also testament to a budding and much-needed home-grown publishing market.

agaugust: show us a source that says nigeria does NOT have any Otomat missiles. simple.

How can anyone post a source that you don't have anything?

The lunacŷ continues. SMH

Naai-gerian schools really are useless. Look at how these monkey (don't) think.

blackchris: wow!! a round of applause for your such an incoherent write up that took you so long to respond to after cracking that childish and slowpoke mind of yours, which would have been better if you had just kept ignoring me as i have done with you.

am only replying this your usual stup1d post because of @mike..za since he has become silent as he has no idea what he's talking about. so don't get your hopes up.

of all examples you gave, kindly point out which of them was not an oppressive regime?

you that can't state the principles of diplomacy wants to tell me about UN resolutions being made when the problem comes. as if the UN is a headless group like SADC that is not guided by principles.

to further prove your ill educated mind, you are directing me to a freaking dictionary when your proof should come from reasons for international sanctions by UN principles.

if that's your best response, then what guides the resolutions? from Bosnia, Iraq, Libya, Syria, DRC were all internal conflicts by oppressive regimes on it's people that needed international sanctions to make both parties come to negotiation table, not two warring countries.

there are three categories of sanctions.

the first category is when a country invades another without being provoked. which thereby violates international law of recognizing another countries' sovereignty.examples are when iraq invaded kuwait

The second category of design is those sanctions with the purpose to contain a threat to peace within a geographical boundary. The 2010 Iran nuclear proliferation debate is a contemporary example. The current United Nations Security Council passed on June 9, Resolution 1929 providing restrictions on missile and weaponry materials that could be used for the creation of destructive weapons. This principle of restriction is to contain the possibility of Iranian aggression with in the neighboring region

The third category involves the United Nations Security Councils condemnation of actions of a specific action or policy of a member/non-member nation like the apartheid regime Libya and military coups.

The three categories are a blanket explanation on the reasons sanctions are applied to nations. i repeat, the UN is not a toothless and headless group like SADC that is not guided by principles.

so your Libya resolution is guided by the third category.

so i don't see reason that will cause arms embargo on two countries that declare war on each other based on their irreconcilable differences, as many countries have gone to war and were still allowed to import arms. @augugust already gave example(Eritrea vs Ethiopia). so your comrades need to stop the rubbish talk of arms embargo unless Nigeria invades and occupies south africa.

you seriously need to sit back and reason with yourself, check into a proper class to learn DEFINITION SPEECH instead of spending so much time ranting insults, you can actually develop your brain by practicing conversations with cognitive inference because your comments have always lacked ideal purpose except for hatred . i seriously hate people like you and don't wish to converse with your type as it has always been a setback for anyone who desires to develop a sound mind.

I repeat, do not be an idÎot.

I repeat, go back to school, in ghana!

You've apparently gone and researched something for the first time in your life; and your still come up with this diatrïbe? The description of my post, that you gave? That's yours idïot!

There isn't a single thing in my post that's wrong. So, iffy it believe it's incoherent, it serves to confirm what I already said: you're ignorant.


Are you still demanding a resolution? Or have you learnt something, seeing as your demand has shifted now to mikeZA stopping saying that there will be embargoes if there's war?

There's never a stand-alone resolution! All resolutions go hand-in-hand with a very specific problem. Resolutions are informed by international laws. You can't ask for a resolution here regarding the point raised SMH.

Your education continues here föol. The reason why you keep talking like you do is because you have no clue what you're barking about.

Never mind that that I've already told you how resolution as work and that you cannot demand that Mike gives you a resolution, I've also already told you that conventions and treaties will be your basis for international laws. Yet, you stupîdly ask me what guides resolutions.

I also told you that you can look at history as precedent.

It's not only the UN that slaps countries with arms embargoes foôl. In any case, UN resolutions are non-binding for the most part.

Individual countries can also put nations under embargoes. Falklands war, idîot. Simple example of a precedent! Was there not an arms embargo against Argentina? Just yesterday, in 1982. Was there not?

You have no idea what you're talking about. That's why you keep harping on about the UN "embargoes resolution", like someone who memorised the wrong lesson in class. The most ignorant question ever asked. Mike did well to be silent. You know what they say about arguing with a föol.

I won't even go into your categories.

Tragic.

Back to school for you!

blackchris: dude i am chris(every username that has chris including 2smooth) and i've been following this thread for a year plus now. i have many accounts on nairaland cos my job allows me to have minimum of 6 emails.

you started the issue of sanctions if Nigeria goes to war with SA, since you've seen how your military is powerless against Nigerian. thereby, giving SA a edge cos you manage to mass produce MRAPS and R4 rifles with some artillery guns.

now before i go ahead with you, i've been asking you to present such a resolution cos the UN is not just an organisation you just take to a beer parlor discussion.

is that military enough for you? come on boy, you started. you should be able to see it through.

you know there's nothing bad in accepting your ignorance in some levels

Chris, you're the one that's ignorant boetie. You need to be told.

You have no clue what a UN resolution is and how the security council issues resolutions. Seeing as you're the one that brought the issue of resolutions up, then you need to hang your head in shame for demanding answers to an ignorant question.

You will never find a resolution that is not attached to a specific incident. The specific incident or problem precedes the resolution. Look up security council resolutions and you will see things like:

"...resolution on Libya", "resolution on apartheid" etc. Apartheid and Libya are incidents that a resolution would attach itself to. Incidents or problems that require that a cause of action be decided upon.

Afterall, "resolve" Is defined as follows:

"resolve |rɪˈzɒlv|
verb
1 [ with obj. ] settle or find a solution to (a problem or contentious matter): the firm aims to resolve problems within 30 days.
• [ with obj. ] Medicine cause (a symptom or condition) to heal or subside: endoscopic biliary drainage can rapidly resolve jaundice.
• [ no obj. ] (of a symptom or condition) heal or subside.
• Music (with reference to a discord) pass or cause to pass into a concord during the course of harmonic change.
2 [ no obj. ] decide firmly on a course of action: [ with infinitive ] : she resolved to ring Dana as soon as she got home.
• [ with clause ] (of a legislative body or other formal meeting) make a decision by a formal vote: the executive resolved that a strike would be detrimental to all concerned | [ with infinitive ] : the conference resolved to support an alliance.
3 chiefly Chemistry separate or cause to be separated into constituent parts or components."

There needs to be a problem first, that needs a resolution. You cannot have a resolution that's hanging in the air. Libya was a specific problem that needed a resolution. The DRC was a specific problem that needed a resolution. Mali was a specific problem that needed resolution.

I'm sure you get the drift by now.

You can only speak of precedent and history (just to help you with your hapless thought process).

You have treaties, conventions and the like (which together will be your suite of international laws) and then there will be resolutions adopted from time to time, as specific problems come up.

Don't be an idîot. You probably overheard somebody talking about a resolution and you decided you were going to throw the word around. I've been watching you making a foöl of yourself,repeating a question that's fueled by the Naai-gerian disease of "not knowing".

Go back to school, my China. Preferably, in Ghana.