₦airaland Forum

Wallade:
Yes, the Senate belongs to the people, senators are elected by people of various constituencies to represent them in the Senate. However, those senators are expected to represent the people in the legislation business for the growth and development of the various people, they are expected to be sane, honourable, honest and matured. They are expected to focus on the legislation job rather than trivial issues and social media drama.

Your senator Natasha Apoti seems to be psychologically challenged already.
She is obviously dishonorable especially because she is so rude and dismissive of her colleagues and disrespectful to the Senate as an institution.
She embarrassed the Senate at the IPU of the UN with misinformation, callous, mischievous and despicable allegations.
Senator Natasha Apoti is a serial liar, the evidences are all over the social media. She is very immature as a person, she is always throwing tantrums like a child, on social media, in the plenary and all over. She is chaotic, unruly and disruptive.

Please note that the Senate has rules and regulations that guides the activities and conduct of every member in the Senate especially during plenary and if a senator violates or goes contrary to the rules and regulations, there must and will be punishment. If you can't respect the rules and regulations of your community or association, then you should not be there, you might as well take a leave.

Besides, which of the leaders in Nigeria is afraid of Natasha Apoti? I can't see any. They have all seen through her charades and shenanigans. She lacks the carriage and charisma of a true leader. She lacks decency and she is dishonorable.

She will resume her constitutional duties when she obeys simple instruction as expected from every other members of the Senate. They unanimously and collectively requested her to apologize for her disruptive, unruly, disorderly and disrespectful behavior in the Senate on that day. If she can't simply and respectfully apologize to the Senate and her colleagues, then she will be further punished and sink into oblivion. The Senate is an esteemed institution that has been existing before her and will exist in the forseable future, it is going concern that will outlive Senator Natasha Apoti. The Senate has rules and regulations that will not be bent for her or any other senator that will be so disruptive, disrespectful, unruly and exhibit such misconduct.

The Senate is not a place to silent dissenting views or bold voices. It is a place that accommodates bold voices of reason, sound minds on th core business of legislation and dissenting views with conscience and national interest purpose.

What national interest does Natasha Apoti's lies, disruption, disorderly, misinformation, cantankerous and disrespectful conduct serve?

What is the reason for a foul mouthed lady to voice out opposition against change of seat, that is a normal exercise in the Senate, to the extent that she would insult the presiding officers, disrupt the activities in the Senate, become unruly and then come up with mischievous, unproven and damning sexual harassment allegations like she did with Reno Omokri and others in past, just to get at them.

We know your Senator Natasha Apoti's stock in trade already; her tactics have been made already.

The law is on the side of the Senate, in other words the collective people of Nigeria, not on the side of Senator Natasha Apoti.
She is a liar, malicious and damaged character. We have had enough of her drama and tantrums. The Senate is not for activism and disruptors. The Senate is for diplomatic, developmental and team workers who find a way to get their colleagues to understand, accept and propagate agendas inspired by them to the benefit of their various constituencies. If you lack such skills and you are unwilling to learn, you should not be in the Senate.

Please advice senator Natasha Apoti that if she needs a career in Nollywood, it is not too late. It seems to be the suitable industry for her.

Your long emotional rant is a perfect example of how truth threatens the powerful. Senator Natasha Akpoti is not in the Senate to massage egos or conform to a toxic culture of silence. She was elected to speak boldly — and that’s exactly what she’s done.

The real embarrassment isn’t Natasha; it’s a Senate that suspends members illegally and fears strong, independent voices, especially women. The Federal High Court ruled her suspension unconstitutional. She is not above Senate rules, but neither is the Senate above the Constitution.

The desperate attacks on her character only prove how deeply her refusal to bow to intimidation unsettles your political idols. If it takes boldness, resilience, and fearless truth-telling to clean out the rot in the system, then Natasha is exactly where she belongs.

She represents the future — and no amount of propaganda can erase a lawful mandate or an unstoppable voice.

Wallade:
She will continue in her Senate at her husband's house or in her constituency, not the Senate of the FRN.

If she get mind, tell her to attempt to resume at the Senate of the FRN.

Your comment perfectly reflects the mindset of those who mistake public institutions for personal property. Let’s be clear: the Nigerian Senate is not a private club owned by Akpabio or any political godfather. It belongs to the people — and Natasha Akpoti was duly elected by her constituents and affirmed by INEC and the courts.

She doesn’t need to 'get mind' — she already has what your preferred leadership fears: a legal mandate and the courage to stand firm against institutional abuse. The court has ruled her suspension unlawful, and she has every right to resume her constitutional duties — not from her husband’s house as your condescending tone suggests, but from the floor of the Senate chamber where she was elected to serve.

If there’s anyone who should be worried, it’s those who think the red chamber is a place to suppress dissent and silence bold voices — because that era is fast fading. You may be comfortable with illegality and selective justice, but we’re not. The law is on her side — and no amount of threats, mockery, or intimidation will erase that fact.

Wallade:
You may have to go and watch the video of the Senate session when she was suspended again. Let me remind you:

She was placed on six months suspension without pay and ordered to apologize formally to the Senate for her unruly, disrespectful, disruptive and shameful behavior in the Senate on that day. Other wise, upon expiration of six months, the Senate will decide to extend her suspension provided she didn't do the apology.

Thank you for the reminder, but what you’ve described is exactly the problem — a politically weaponized suspension wrapped in emotional language, not rooted in due process or constitutional authority.

Senator Natasha Akpoti was suspended by a Senate leadership that acted as judge, jury, and executioner in a matter where emotions and power play overshadowed legal procedure. Her so-called 'unruly behavior' was nothing more than firm dissent — which is a core function of any lawmaker in a healthy democracy. The Senate is not a monarch’s court where members must grovel before leadership to be heard.

The key issue here isn’t whether the Senate issued an apology ultimatum — it’s whether that ultimatum was legal. The Federal High Court has already answered that question: the suspension was unconstitutional, unlawful, and violated her rights as an elected representative of the people. No amount of emotional retelling changes that legal reality.

Now, let’s be honest: this wasn’t about decorum — it was about control. Under Akpabio’s leadership, the Senate has demonstrated increasing intolerance for independent voices. Senator Natasha’s boldness exposed a Senate more concerned with silencing critics than upholding the rule of law. If the chamber were truly concerned with ethics and standards, it would apply the same measure to others — including those involved in public scandals, budget padding, and executive appeasement.

She has approached the court, won her case, and asked to be reinstated — that’s how a public servant upholds the law. The real shame would be if Nigerians allow power-drunk leadership to override the courts and trample on democratic principles in the name of 'discipline.'

So let’s stop repeating political talking points and start asking the real question: Why is the Senate under Akpabio afraid of reinstating a woman who simply refuses to bow to illegality?

MadamExcellency:
Iran is not an Arab country and should stay clear and not interfere in Arab governments.

Iran is Persia and has no relationship with Arabs. Turkey is a better partner than Iran.

Your response only reveals a superficial understanding of geopolitics in the Middle East. Whether Iran is Arab or not is completely irrelevant. This is not a cultural pageant — it's a struggle against neo-colonial domination, Zionist apartheid, and foreign interference in sovereign lands.

Iran, though Persian, is a key regional power and an indigenous actor in the Middle East — unlike the United States or Israel, both of whom are foreign implants with no historical, religious, or cultural legitimacy in the region. Iran’s involvement is not about Arabness; it’s about resisting foreign occupation and injustice — a position widely respected by movements like Hezbollah, the Houthis, Islamic Jihad, and other resistance fronts across Arab countries.

You say Turkey is a 'better partner'? Partner for who? For NATO? For Western economic interests? Turkey plays both sides — hosting U.S. military bases on one hand and pretending to sympathize with Palestine on the other. Iran, on the other hand, has paid in blood and sanctions for standing openly against Israel and Western aggression. The resistance respects action, not empty diplomacy.

The region doesn’t need to be divided into Arab vs Persian — that’s an old colonial tactic. What unites the people now is the collective stand against U.S. imperialism, Israeli apartheid, and Western hypocrisy. And in that struggle, Iran has proven itself to be more principled and consistent than many so-called ‘Arab governments’ who normalize with Israel behind closed doors.

So no — this isn't about ethnicity. It's about resistance vs subjugation. And Iran, whether Persian or not, is on the right side of history.

ozo13:
court gave a ruling but she wanted the case to drag on in her own wisdom because she sees apologizing as a weakness and sign of defeat. Akpabio in his own wisdom too choose an aspect of the ruling to appeal exact same way Natasha picked an aspect to obey and also another aspect she preferred to appeal. This will drag the case on and the Senate including the female Among them are surely not in her support because of the reckless show of shame she displayed in the hallow chamber and the court didn't also rule in her favor in that show of shame in the Senate. To the issue of sexual allegation, she was in several occasions asked to provide even just one evidence but till now, noting has been provided reason most citizens don't take her serious anymore

Let’s stop twisting facts to please fragile egos. The court gave a clear ruling that Natasha Akpoti’s suspension was illegal, unconstitutional, and a violation of her rights as an elected senator. That’s not up for debate. Now, if she chooses to appeal the part of the judgment that suggested an apology — that’s her legal right, just as Akpabio is appealing the part that exposed his abuse of power. That’s how the justice system works. Stop painting her assertion of rights as arrogance while portraying Akpabio’s vindictiveness as ‘wisdom’. That double standard is exactly what’s destroying the Senate.

As for the so-called “show of shame” — let’s be clear: the only shame in the hallowed chamber is the dangerous culture of silence, intimidation, and executive bootlicking championed by Akpabio. A Senate President who publicly boasts of ‘holiday money’ for senators, protects corrupt politicians, and suspends elected voices without due process, has no moral right to talk about shame. Akpabio is a walking scandal. If anything, Natasha’s refusal to tolerate his abuse is a badge of honor, not disgrace.

You say ‘female senators are not in support’? That speaks volumes — not about Natasha, but about the deeply rotten power structure that expects women in politics to be silent, submissive, and obedient to corrupt men to earn 'support'. She wasn’t elected to massage egos — she was elected to represent her people with courage, not cowardice.

On the issue of sexual harassment, your statement reeks of ignorance and insensitivity. Survivors aren’t obligated to parade evidence to entertain the public, especially when the power structure is designed to silence them. Natasha made allegations in a system known for covering up rot — and the predictable reaction was victim-blaming and threats. That alone proves her point.

What scares you people isn’t that she’s loud — it’s that she’s fearless. She won't bend to Akpabio’s dictatorship. She won't stay silent in a chamber where corruption is wrapped in flowing agbadas and defended with selective outrage. And whether you like it or not, history will remember her courage — not the cowardice of those who chose silence to please power.

razzydoo:
Bravery without wisdom.
Gentility, decorum doesn't mean you're a coward or stupid. I hope you get it. No matter how you look at it, she's losing heavily.
For years to come she's setting a precedent for those coming behind to learn from how not to go about Senate issues. They are called distinguished Senators for a reason.
Peace. ✌️

Your analysis misses a crucial point: true leadership is not measured by passive ‘decorum’ in the face of injustice, but by the courage to challenge systemic rot. Senator Natasha Akpoti is not losing — she’s redefining what it means to stand firm in a space where silence has long been mistaken for wisdom.

If anything, her boldness is setting a new and necessary precedent — one that future lawmakers will admire, not avoid. Distinguished titles mean little if they’re used to preserve a toxic status quo. So no, she’s not failing — she’s disrupting a culture of political complacency, and history will remember that more than carefully crafted silence.

razzydoo:
Speaking from an emotional standpoint. We pray and hope not have people like you around the corridors of power because of things like this. In a bid to show agreeability and political correctness, you allow decadence to prevail. Ego of the SP is not the bone of contention here. Rather the ideals and value of a great institution like the Nigerian Senate are being preserved.

Save your sanctimonious lectures — you talk about ‘ideals and values’ as if the Nigerian Senate hasn’t been crawling with the same spineless opportunists who let corruption and incompetence fester for decades. If anything, people like you — who masquerade cowardice as ‘political correctness’ — are exactly why we have decay at the corridors of power.

You pray we never get close to power? Too late — voices like ours are already shaking the old rotten tables you desperately cling to. Unlike your hollow rhetoric, Natasha stands for a Senate that actually works for the people, not one that hides behind empty talk of ‘institutions’ while gutting them from within.

So keep praying your prayers — but know this: the days when self-righteous sycophants dictate who speaks up are long gone. You’re part of the problem, and people like Natasha are part of the solution. Deal with it.

Lanruze:
I totally support another round of six months of suspension for Natasha.

Let the Ibira people conduct another election and bring another candidate as Senator.

Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan is an example of bad parentage and lack of home training now magnified on a national scale.

What does she think she is sef ?

No apology, No resumption.

What a joke. You’re so threatened by one outspoken woman that you’ve reduced yourself to spewing gutter talk about her family — as if your insults can erase the fact that she has more courage and integrity than your entire band of political stooges combined.

If suspending her on repeat is your master plan, then brace yourself — because every sham suspension only proves you’re terrified of a woman who refuses to crawl for your corrupt godfathers. The Ebira people chose her with their votes — not your rotten backdoor deals — and they’ll stand with her again and again, no matter how many times you fantasise about replacing her with your spineless errand boys.

Bad parentage? Lack of home training? The only ones who need home training are the cowards who think they can muzzle a fearless woman with childish threats. Natasha is exactly what your rotten political class fears most — a woman who can’t be bought, silenced, or paraded like a puppet.

So keep foaming at the mouth about “no apology” — she’ll never apologise for standing her ground. She’ll finish your joke of a suspension, come back sharper, and keep exposing the filth you’re so desperate to hide. Better get used to it — because your worst nightmare is just getting started.

sailor2011:
Natasha will be dealt with appropriately....this legal battle will ensure she does not return till the tenure of this Senate expires.😂😂😂😂

Keep fantasising — Natasha is not the type you “deal with” into silence. If your so-called legal battle was built on truth and integrity, you wouldn’t need threats and intimidation to keep her out.

The fact that you’re desperate to keep her away till the Senate expires shows just how terrified you are of a woman who won’t bow to corrupt power brokers. Enjoy the courtroom drama — every day spent fighting this sham only exposes the rotten underbelly of the same system you’re trying so hard to protect.

Natasha will return stronger — while you’ll be stuck defending the same failed politicians who fear a single fearless woman more than all their rigged numbers combined.

tunjilana:
Killing someone is a criminal offence and totally within the jurisdiction of the courts. However internal affairs of the national assembly is not. Only issues bothering on not following due process in the removal, can be entertained by the court, as well as proven criminal actions like sexual harassment, violence etc but an internal process like suspending a senator according to the due process of the senate is not what a court can interfere with

With due respect, your argument overlooks a fundamental point: no institution in a constitutional democracy, including the National Assembly, operates above the law. While it’s true that legislative bodies have internal procedures, those procedures must always align with the Constitution, which guarantees fair hearing, due process, and protection from unlawful sanctions.

If a suspension is carried out arbitrarily, without giving the affected senator the opportunity to defend herself, or is motivated by political intimidation rather than genuine disciplinary grounds, then it crosses the line from “internal affairs” into a violation of constitutional rights. At that point, the courts have both the jurisdiction and the duty to review such actions.

Moreover, allegations of harassment, blackmail, or any other serious misconduct that arise in the course of these so-called “internal processes” cannot be shielded by parliamentary privilege. If there are credible claims that due process was subverted or that the process was used to suppress a senator for speaking uncomfortable truths, then the courts absolutely have the right to intervene.

Natasha Akpoti’s fight is not just about her seat — it is about setting a precedent that no arm of government should weaponise its internal rules to silence accountability, especially when the rule of law is at stake.

Omoawoke:
Natasha will learn the hard way

She will complete that 6 months of suspension whether she likes it or not

And where’s her apology letter?

Keep fantasising — Natasha owes no apology to power-drunk men terrified of a woman who can’t be silenced.

Let them enjoy their kangaroo suspension; she’ll serve it and return with more fire while your scared ‘lords’ keep hiding behind empty threats.

The only ones learning the hard way are the cowards who thought they could intimidate her — and failed.

JASONjnr:
She will have to suffer for ridiculing a senate president and attempting to blackmail the number three power in the most populous African country without evidence.

Stop biting the fingers that fed you.

I stand with Akpabio until Natasha provides evidence of sexual harassment.

It’s laughable how you parrot “suffer” and “blackmail” like you’re the self-appointed mouthpiece of a corrupt political god. Let’s get one thing straight: nobody “fed” Natasha Akpoti — she has earned her place through grit, competence, and the people’s mandate, not by licking the boots of power-hungry men who think they’re untouchable.

Your so-called “number three power” is not above scrutiny simply because he hides behind titles. If a sitting senator raises allegations of harassment or corruption, it’s her democratic right and moral duty to speak out — not to stay silent to please spineless sycophants.

You demand “evidence”? Good. That’s exactly what an independent, credible investigation is for — not your blind loyalty. If your almighty Akpabio is so clean, he should submit himself to open, transparent inquiry instead of hiding behind paid praise-singers like you.

And let’s not pretend that Nigeria’s political elites are saints — we all know how dirty that house is. So stop sermonising about “biting the fingers that fed her” — the only thing being bitten here is the ego of men who think a courageous woman should bow at their feet forever.

We stand with Natasha because she represents a new generation of leaders who refuse to be intimidated by threats, blackmail, or crude gendered bullying. If you can’t handle that, brace yourself — because more women of integrity are coming for the sacred cows you worship.

I remember former President Muhammadu Buhari primarily for the gap between the weight of his promises and the reality of his governance. He came into office on the strength of three core pledges: to tackle insecurity, fight corruption, and revive the economy. Unfortunately, by the time he left office, these very areas had either stagnated or deteriorated further.

Security challenges multiplied, with widespread banditry, kidnappings, farmer-herder conflicts, and a persistent insurgency causing untold human and economic losses. The anti-corruption fight often appeared selective and failed to deliver lasting institutional reforms or credible convictions of high-profile offenders. On the economic front, millions slipped into poverty, unemployment reached historic highs, and debt rose sharply, all while the country remained heavily reliant on oil revenues with little diversification.

So, in summary, I remember ex-President Buhari as a leader who inspired hope but ultimately left behind a legacy marked by unfulfilled promises, worsening socio-economic conditions, and missed opportunities to set Nigeria on a more sustainable and secure path.

With all due respect to Pastor Bakare, the assertion that ‘nobody could pin any corruption on Buhari’ oversimplifies the reality of governance under his administration. While it is true that President Buhari maintained a personal reputation for modest living, corruption is not limited to individual conduct alone — it extends to the systemic failures, impunity, and the protection of cronies that flourished under his watch.

Under Buhari’s administration, we witnessed staggering allegations and documented cases of mismanagement: the opaque fuel subsidy regime, the multi-billion naira scandals in NNPC, the unaccounted trillions in security spending, and the repeated failure to prosecute high-profile aides credibly accused of corruption. Even respected global agencies consistently ranked Nigeria poorly in corruption perception indexes during his tenure.

Therefore, claiming that nobody could ‘pin any corruption on Buhari’ is misleading because the test of integrity in leadership is not merely personal frugality but the courage and will to build transparent institutions, ensure accountability at all levels, and subject all public officers — including allies — to the rule of law without selective treatment. In that regard, the record speaks for itself.

Folajustin:
I have said these over & over again... If Natasha thinks she's stubborn, dis men are more stubborn & dangerous dan she think. U can't mess around wit the senate. I told my friend dat since Natasha had appeal de judgement because she doesn't want 2 apologize,& pay 4 court contempt, dis men will cross appeal and prolong her punishment. She is just too arrogant!!! Apology would have ended dis drama long ago but she wan 2 chase shadow and dis men will messed her up & her political career will be over b4 her very own eyes. She can never win dis battle against de senate because she at fault in first place & she does not want 2 apologize because of her Ego but she will learn de hard way because after all dis her court circus she will till need 2 apologize b4 she is accepted back 2 de senate.

Stop peddling cheap fear tactics — this is exactly the backward mentality that lets corrupt power blocks bully honest leaders into silence. Natasha’s so-called ‘stubbornness’ is what real courage looks like: standing on principle, defending the truth, and refusing to bow to political gangsters in flowing agbada.

What apology does a woman owe to a rotten system that’s more interested in protecting its dirty secrets than serving the people? If these so-called ‘men’ think they’re more dangerous, let them keep exposing themselves. The whole world can now see how far they’ll go to cling to stolen power and intimidate voices they can’t control.

Natasha won’t bend for empty threats. She’s fighting for justice — not shadows. And if that scares them, then let them keep running from court to court. At the end, it’s not her career that will be over; it’s their stranglehold on Nigerians that’s crumbling bit by bit. Keep watching.

Exactly! Nigerians must never allow this shameless opportunist to crawl back into power through the back door. Yahaya Bello is the very definition of failed leadership — billions allegedly stolen, workers owed for months, pensioners abandoned, and Kogi State reduced to a begging bowl under his watch. Now he wants to parade himself as a ‘party father’? What a joke!

This man should be standing in the dock defending himself, not defacing Abuja with worthless posters. He thinks Nigerians have short memories — but we remember the hardship, the looted treasury, and the reckless arrogance with which he silenced critics.

Any party that wants to maintain credibility should run far from Yahaya Bello’s toxic baggage. He represents everything wrong with Nigeria’s rotten political culture — corruption without consequence, godfatherism without shame.

We refuse to sit back and watch this same recycled failure hijack the APC and extend his greed to the national stage. Nigerians have suffered enough under political criminals who think they are untouchable. Yahaya Bello is a stain on Kogi State’s name already — he must not be allowed to stain Nigeria further. Enough is enough!

TenQ:
Please find me just one evidence that any Jibril came to Mohammed?
All the evidence to Islam starts and stops with one man Qutham Ibn Abdul-Lah aka Mohammed, the second first in command to Allah!
Are you aware that Jibril never once introduced himself to Mohammed?

If you doubt, show me one example!


At least you understand that God became Man and not that man became God. This is sufficient for now. Jibril coming to Mary as a perfect man doesn't change the fact that he is an angel!

Satanists have pure monotheism exactly like you : so in what way are you different when all the natures of Iblis as one is the same as your God. Allah is not Omnipresent, not Omnipotent and not Omniscient exactly as Iblis. So, what is the essence of your so-called "pure monotheism"?



No wonder your prophet says you would be the most divided in sects and only one of these 73 sects will enter paradise.
Sunan Ibn Majah (Hadith 3992) and Jami` at-Tirmidhi (Hadith 2641)
Is this another lie of Mohammed?

You speak like someone whose confidence is shredded by TenQ. Too bad!


There are hundreds of religions revelation coming out by the day sir.
Does it matter what revelation you follow as long as it is not from God Himself?

Your entire rant only exposes how deep you’ve drowned in contradictions while throwing stones at Islam. Let’s drag your points back into reality:

1️⃣ ‘Show me proof Jibril came to Muhammad ﷺ’?
Your Bible has zero firsthand eyewitnesses for its anonymous ‘Gospels’. At least Islam doesn’t need corrupted scribes or Greek editors rewriting the ‘word of God’. The Qur’an is word-for-word revelation recited by the Prophet ﷺ — memorized by thousands of companions. The evidence is the Qur’an itself: unmatched in language, preserved, unchanged. Your entire scripture can’t say the same.

2️⃣ ‘Jibril never introduced himself’?
You think revelation is a casual coffee meeting? Jibril’s identity is clear in countless authentic hadiths, witnessed by companions — not just claimed in secret caves. Meanwhile, your ‘Holy Spirit’ turns into tongues of fire, a dove, and you still can’t explain if it’s separate from your ‘Father’ or ‘Son’. Spare us the confusion.

3️⃣ Your ‘God became man’ circus.
You admit your god ‘became man’ yet you pretend this makes sense? Your doctrine says an Eternal, All-Powerful Creator became His own creation so He could beg Himself for forgiveness? Meanwhile, He ‘died’ for three days — so who was controlling the universe then? Your entire Trinity puzzle is mental gymnastics that no apostle ever taught. Jesus never preached it. Paul did.

4️⃣ ‘Satanists have pure monotheism’?
Ridiculous. Iblis never claimed divinity. He disobeyed the One True God. Islam’s Tawhid is the absolute declaration that nothing is like Allah — He is Ever-Living, Eternal, Omnipotent, Omniscient, while your god dies on a Roman cross, gets beaten by humans, then cries out ‘My God, my God, why have You forsaken me?’ How pathetic is that for your so-called ‘Almighty’?

5️⃣ ‘73 sects’ hadith?
Yes — and that only proves the truth of the Prophet ﷺ: he predicted exactly what’s happening — divisions and sects. Christianity split into thousands of sects long before Islam’s internal divisions ever appeared. Orthodox? Catholic? Protestant? Mormon? Jehovah’s Witness? Who even wrote your Bible? It’s an open graveyard of contradictions.

6️⃣ ‘Hundreds of revelations’?
And how many of those are preserved, memorized word-for-word, consistent in doctrine, law, and language for over 1,400 years? Zero. Only the Qur’an. Your ever-rewritten Bible is a museum piece of Greek, Latin, and kingly edits.

👉🏼 Bottom line:
You claim to stand on ‘God’s revelation’ but your entire faith is built on shaky manuscripts, forged letters, and centuries of councils voting on which parts to keep. Islam stands on one perfect Book, one final Prophet ﷺ, one unchanging God — not three contradictory persons trapped in philosophical knots.

May Allah expose your lies, protect His truth, and guide sincere hearts — whether you twist it or not.

TenQ:
Hu huh hu!

Islam is based on cascades of lies that need many more lies to prop up.

My objective is to show you that your scholars have told you lies AND you need to choose either to believe them or to believe Allah himself.

Of course, you have chosen your scholars over both Allah and his prophet Mohammed : too bad!

You have the nerve to call Islam ‘a cascade of lies’ while ignoring that your own Bible is a patchwork of contradictions, forgeries, and anonymous authors you can’t even verify. Let’s break this down so you don’t keep embarrassing yourself:

1️⃣ Your ‘scriptures’ are riddled with proven fabrications.
How can you talk about ‘lies’ when your Bible has books you can’t trace to any eyewitness? Even your own scholars admit parts were added or removed over centuries. Islam’s Qur’an, in contrast, has been memorized word-for-word by millions for 1,400+ years — no council, no pope edits, no Greek scribes forging ‘gospels’ decades after Jesus left.

2️⃣ You talk about ‘believing Allah Himself’ while you worship His creation.
Your doctrine says God became a man, got tortured by His own creation, then pretends that a sinless prophet’s message is a lie? Islam upholds pure monotheism: God is One, Absolute, Eternal — not a human who eats, sleeps, or dies on a cross begging His own ‘Father.’

3️⃣ You accuse Muslims of blind following, yet you’re a textbook example.
You parrot claims about ‘our scholars’ while your priests, popes, and councils have spent centuries debating basic truths — is Jesus God, is he the Son, is he the same as the Father? Three in one yet not three gods? You call that truth? It’s a theological circus — and you have the nerve to mock Islam’s clear Tawhid?

👉🏼 Bottom line:
Don’t project your confusion onto Islam. We follow the final revelation, preserved exactly as Allah revealed it — no middlemen rewriting it centuries later. You should focus on fixing the gaping holes in your Trinity puzzle before spewing lazy insults.

May Allah expose falsehood and guide sincere hearts to the truth — no matter how much you twist it.

Boss Mustapha’s sudden memory loss is embarrassing, to say the least. Let’s not twist history to massage fragile egos. Buhari’s so-called 12 million ‘core votes’ were dead weight after three failed elections — that ‘solid base’ was politically useless until Asiwaju Bola Tinubu stepped in.

For the record:
✅ Tinubu risked his entire political structure.
✅ Tinubu built the South-West bridge that the CPC alone could never penetrate.
✅ Tinubu brokered a real coalition when nobody else had the courage or resources.

Those three million ‘extra votes’ didn’t fall from the sky — they came from Tinubu’s sweat, network, and strategy. Without that decisive merger, Buhari would have carried his 12 million ‘museum votes’ to retirement — yet you now want to rewrite the script like Tinubu was some bystander.

👉🏼 Bottom line: Buhari may have had loyal northern supporters, but it took Tinubu’s political genius to convert scattered support into real national power. Pretending otherwise is cheap revisionism — and Nigerians know the truth.

TenQ:
LOL!
What is the difference between what you are trying to say and what I wrote for you?




Qur'an 5:115
Allah said, "Indeed, I will send it down to you you ISA and your Disciples , but whoever disbelieves afterwards from among you YOUR DISCIPLES —then indeed I will punish him with a punishment by which I have not punished anyone among the worlds."

OR

Qur'an 5:115
Allah said, "Indeed, I will send it down to you, but whoever disbelieves afterwards from among you—then indeed I will punish him with a punishment by which I have not punished anyone among the worlds."

Which one do you truly believe without re-interpretations?

The question remains:
How did Allah speak to the disciples of Jesus?

Your persistent trolling and repetitive questioning are unproductive and reflect poorly on you. What do you hope to achieve with this behavior?

Moving forward, I will not engage with redundant or disrespectful inquiries. Please refrain from such conduct if you expect further responses.

efemena5050:
Creative orbit indeed.No need to engage u since hv made my points which are clear and devoid from prejudice and sentiments but rather based on sound rationality.
The bible made it clear to us....." A quite response sooths anger while a rash tone exaggerate it" .......my friend let's assume Natasha heed to the call to move to another sit in the chamber when she was asked while planning her points to nail her distractors don't u think it would HV help her summed up valid points to hit firmly rather she took the path of childish tantrum, unsubstantiated claims,and vituperation of excessive exuberance. Now she seemed scorned and mocked ....bcus people like u urged her to act without recourse to civility and objectivism. Fire+ fire= nothing
Fire+ water = something.....I hv nothing against ur idol but her lack of cranium application in both simple and complex issue.

To even exhume her myopic personality she opted to resume plenaries without waiting to get feedback and certified true copies of her judgement now all her boasting hv gone to the dust......can't u see that she acts on impulse Which is bad for her reputation..............

So for u, if u lack analytical ot cognitive cotient to decipher write up of objectivism u better stand down......

Your entire sermon only proves you’re more concerned with lecturing about ‘tone’ than addressing the real rot Natasha has been courageously exposing. Let’s get a few things straight:

1️⃣ Your so-called ‘objectivism’ is selective.
You preach about civility but ignore the institutional injustice that forced her to fight back. If the chamber truly respected due process, there wouldn’t have been any need for ‘childish tantrums’ — yet you blame the victim while excusing those who provoked her.

2️⃣ ‘Fire + Water = Something’?
Your analogy falls flat because what you’re suggesting is blind submission. Sometimes, when the system is rigged against you, calm silence doesn’t solve anything — it buries the truth. Natasha’s ‘fire’ is exactly why corrupt power brokers are rattled and desperate to silence her.

3️⃣ ‘Acts on impulse’?
No — she acts on courage. If she waited for endless fake committees and manipulated ‘certified copies,’ they’d bury her victory and spin another lie. Her decision to assert her mandate shows resolve — not recklessness.

4️⃣ Don’t mistake spinelessness for wisdom.
Your so-called ‘cranium application’ is just cowardice dressed up as ‘caution.’ Meanwhile, Natasha’s consistent stand for fair representation and accountability speaks louder than your pages of moralising.

👉🏼 Bottom line:
You can wrap your patronising jabs in fancy Bible quotes all you want — but truth doesn’t bow to fake decorum. Natasha will keep confronting the hypocrisy you’re too afraid to name.

TenQ:
Let me help you rewrite the Qur'an maybe it will smell nice to you


Qur'an 5:115
Allah said, "Indeed, I will send it down to you you ISA and your Disciples , but whoever disbelieves afterwards from among you YOUR DISCIPLES —then indeed I will punish him with a punishment by which I have not punished anyone among the worlds."

Mr CreativeOrbit,
The above is exactly how you WISHED Allah spoke isn't it?

You wish to Change the word YOU to the word YOUR as if Allah doesn't know how to speak better.

Your childish attempt to twist the Qur’an’s wording only exposes your desperation — and your arrogant belief that you know Arabic and divine speech better than the One who revealed it. Let’s dismantle your petty rewrite:

1️⃣ Your fake ‘rewrite’ is pathetic.
You think adding ‘your disciples’ magically changes the meaning? It doesn’t — because context rules, not your wishful editing. In Arabic grammar, ‘kum’ (you) is plural — it clearly includes Isa’s disciples because the request originated from them through Isa. The Prophet prays, Allah answers the Prophet, and the message is delivered through the Prophet — that’s how revelation works. You can’t force your church logic of confusion onto clear Qur’anic structure.

2️⃣ Stop acting like you discovered some profound point.
The verse is a divine warning to the followers: ‘Whoever disbelieves after the miracle...’ It does not mean Allah came down and chatted with each disciple at the dinner table. Isa عليه السلام, as the Messenger, conveyed it. That’s basic Islamic creed — understood by every sane reader except someone desperately twisting words to plug holes in their own contradictory beliefs.

3️⃣ Your mockery of Allah’s speech is your downfall.
You have the audacity to talk about rewriting the Qur’an while your own Bible is a stitched mess of missing manuscripts, Greek forgeries, and church edits over centuries — and you still parade it as ‘inspired’. If you’re so confident, try bringing one unaltered gospel chain with direct authorship. You can’t.

4️⃣ Your ignorance of Arabic is showing.
‘You’ (plural) in classical Qur’anic Arabic includes all concerned in the context — the disciples who asked, Isa who prayed, and the condition attached. That’s what makes the Qur’an clear and precise. Unlike your Bible, it doesn’t need endless councils to ‘clarify’ what God ‘really meant’.

5️⃣ Bottom line:
You can mock, twist, and ‘rewrite’ all you want — you still haven’t produced a real contradiction. Your entire attack boils down to ‘I wish the Qur’an said this instead’. Sorry, the Qur’an doesn’t bend to your delusions.

👉🏼 So keep sneering — but know this: every time you distort the truth, you only prove how powerful the Qur’an is at exposing liars. May Allah guide you or shatter your arrogance if you persist in mocking His perfect words.

efemena5050:
This woman feel she is wise but most time the reality is stupidity empty pride and outright foolish.she is even loosing more bcus of lack of foresight...
No legislation,no representation,no salaries.now she will pay 5 million again....
No wonder she want to run back nd resume duties ....she acts like an illiterate....simply apologies would HV saved all this .while she work secretly to get her full evidence against the Senate president

Your cheap rant only exposes your bitterness towards a woman whose courage terrifies spineless benchwarmers like you. Natasha’s so-called ‘lack of foresight’ is exactly what exposes the rotten backdoor deals you worship.

👉🏼 No legislation? She’s done more with real projects and people empowerment than your entire clique of rubber-stamp senators do with fat salaries and fake ‘representation’.
👉🏼 ‘Acts like an illiterate’? No — she acts like someone who won’t lick boots or grovel for crumbs. That’s what’s choking you.
👉🏼 Apologize to fraudsters to keep a stolen seat? Never. Keep crying — her integrity is worth more than your cowardly advice.

TenQ:
Islam cannot withstand scrutiny.
You said that Allah's words were conveyed through ISA, but check this verse

Qur'an 5:115
Allah said, "Indeed, I will send it down to you, but whoever disbelieves afterwards from among you—then indeed I will punish him with a punishment by which I have not punished anyone among the worlds."

Muslims always struggling to defend Allah and Mohammed with falsehood. As you can see, contrary to your claim in 3&4, Allah wasn't speaking to Jesus!

The question remains:
How did Allah speak to the disciples of Jesus?

Your reply only exposes your stubborn ignorance and your desperate attempt to twist a clear verse you obviously don’t understand — or pretend not to. So let me drag you back to reality, step by step:

1️⃣ Reading comprehension 101:
When Allah says in Qur’an 5:115 “I will send it down to you…” — who is ‘you’? Go read 5:112-114 properly: The disciples asked Prophet Isa (Jesus) عليه السلام to pray to Allah to send down a table spread with food. So Isa عليه السلام prayed to Allah on their behalf — and Allah responded through Isa, because Isa was their Prophet and Messenger. Allah did not sit and have a tea party directly with the disciples — He answered Isa’s supplication (du’a). That’s exactly how divine communication works: through revelation to the Prophet — not casual chit-chat with followers.

2️⃣ You expose your ignorance of your own Bible’s so-called ‘communication’.
You want to mock the Qur’an’s clear method of revelation, yet your own Bible says God is ‘not the author of confusion’ — while your entire theology is a contradiction of man-gods, literal sons, and ambiguous ‘Trinity’ puzzles you can’t explain without mental gymnastics.

3️⃣ This verse is a warning — not casual dialogue.
Allah’s statement in 5:115 is a divine decree of consequence for disbelief after a miracle — not a chit-chat. Who conveyed this to the disciples? Isa عليه السلام did — as their Prophet. No Muslim scholar, no Arabic grammar, no tafsir says Allah sat and spoke to them directly like a neighbor. Stop lying.

4️⃣ Your real struggle is projecting your Bible’s contradictions onto the Qur’an.
Unlike your Greek manuscripts with anonymous authors, fabricated conversations, and scribal forgeries, the Qur’an is preserved, clear, and consistent in its mode of revelation: Allah speaks to His prophets, who then convey the message. It’s called wahy (revelation) — try reading a real source before you embarrass yourself further.

5️⃣ Next time, bring an actual contradiction — not your lazy cherry-pick.
Your entire line of attack is just noise. The verse proves exactly what I said: The disciples asked Isa, Isa prayed, Allah answered Isa, and Isa conveyed it to them. That’s consistent, logical, and unchanged.

👉🏼 Bottom line: You don’t ‘scrutinize’ Islam — you twist verses hoping no one reads context. But Alhamdulillah, the Qur’an crushes liars and exposes falsehood. If you’re too arrogant to accept clarity, that’s your problem — not ours. May Allah guide you or humiliate your ignorance if you persist in mocking what you neither understand nor respect.

TenQ:
Islam and lies is like 5&6

Let me break it down according to the Qur'an
1. The disciples of Jesus are no prophets
2. Allah did not even speak directly to Mohammed
3. The disciples asked Jesus for food from Allah
4. Jesus spoke to Allah about this request
5. Allah spoke directly to the Disciples


Tell me, how did Allah speak to the disciples of Jesus?


It is easy to propagate lies when there is no witness!

Your entire rant only exposes your ignorance and desperation to twist what you clearly don’t understand. Let me educate you since you’re so eager to embarrass yourself publicly:

1️⃣ No one ever claimed the disciples were prophets — they were sincere followers of a prophet, which is exactly what the Qur’an states. Unlike your contradictory scriptures that confuse prophets with ‘sons of God’ and ‘God incarnate’, the Qur’an is clear and consistent.

2️⃣ Allah spoke to Prophet Muhammad ﷺ through revelation — the same way He spoke to Moses through the burning bush and through an angel to Mary. You want a physical conversation? That’s your flawed understanding of divine communication — not Islam’s problem.

3️⃣ The disciples asked Prophet Isa (Jesus) عليه السلام to pray to Allah for the miracle — exactly as the verse says. He prayed. Allah answered Isa — not the disciples directly. Learn to read before you vomit your ignorance.

4️⃣ Allah’s words were conveyed through Isa عليه السلام — He was the messenger. So where’s your imaginary contradiction? You only prove that you neither understand your own Bible nor the Qur’an you keep misquoting.

5️⃣ As for “no witness” — the irony is rich coming from someone who relies on anonymous Greek manuscripts and centuries of forgeries, contradictions, and church edits in your own book. Meanwhile, the Qur’an remains preserved word-for-word, unchanged, and memorized by millions.

👉🏼 Bottom line: Your cheap insults don’t refute anything. They only prove that when you have no real argument, you resort to childish mockery. The Qur’an exposes falsehood with clarity — whether you like it or not. May Allah guide you — or break your arrogance if you persist in mocking His signs.

ogaemma:
Obviously a hired crowd.
Blame idleness and unemployment.
Welcome Aregbesola.
You are fighting the man who made you what you are today.
He made you his Commissioner while serving as Lagos state governor.
Before 1999, you where nobody.
Do not bite the fingers that once fed you.
Ekaro.

With due respect, loyalty should never silence truth. Gratitude for past opportunities does not mean blind submission to present injustices or failures.

A free and dignified people must hold leaders accountable, regardless of past favours.

Islam teaches us to stand for justice, even if it is against ourselves or those we once benefited from. May we be guided rightly.