₦airaland Forum

LegendHero:
Tinubu gave Buhari victory in the primaries. If not for Tinubu, Atiku would have defeated Buhari in the presidential primaries of APC in 2014 in Lagos.

Even Buhari made mention of this on multiple occasions.

Your point is valid and historically accurate.

It is well-documented that Bola Tinubu’s political structure and strategic alliances were pivotal to Buhari’s emergence as the APC presidential candidate in 2014.

Without Tinubu’s backing, Buhari would have faced stiff resistance from other contenders like Atiku.

Even Buhari himself has publicly acknowledged Tinubu’s critical role in securing that decisive primary victory.

LegendHero:
The senate should just suspend her for another 6 months.

She is a disgrace to the senate. You intentionally lie against the senate president and even went ahead visiting major international news channel to regurgitate the lies when you don’t have a single proof.

Spare us the fake moral outrage.

1️⃣ You’re so quick to scream “suspend her!” yet you completely ignore the simple fact that it is the court, not the Senate, that ruled on this matter — and the same court never found her guilty of lying about the Senate President. If you actually cared about truth, you’d know she was asked to apologize to the court, not to your fragile senators.

2️⃣ What exactly is “a disgrace”? A citizen daring to challenge questionable power? Or a rubber-stamp Senate that panics when someone dares to expose their dirty dealings? If she had no proof, why is the establishment so desperate to silence her instead of disproving her claims with facts?

3️⃣ Let’s be honest — you want her punished because you can’t handle a dissenting voice. That’s cowardice, not patriotism. A functioning democracy needs bold citizens who call out rot — not spineless cheerleaders begging for suspensions to protect political overlords.

4️⃣ Next time you feel the urge to play attack dog for politicians, ask yourself: are you defending Nigeria’s interests — or just your favourite politician’s fragile ego?

Some of us prefer truth to sycophancy. Try it sometime.

TenQ:
As usual, you wouldn't answer direct questions because they betray the lies of your scholars which you have chosen to believe

It is you who refuse to answer direct question only because you are convinced that answering the questions truthfully goes against your claims. Indeed the questions corners islam because without lies, Islam cannot exist.



No sir. Qadr doesn't give you the free will to act.
Sahih Muslim 2643 a .....
By Him, besides Whom there is no god, that one amongst you acts like the people deserving Paradise until between him and Paradise there remains but the distance of a cubit, when suddenly the writing of destiny overcomes him and he begins to act like the denizens of Hell and thus enters Hell, and another one acts in the way of the denizens of Hell, until there remains between him and Hell a distance of a cubit that the writing of destiny overcomes him and then he begins to act like the people of Paradise and enters Paradise.

There is no free will in Islam, the destiny of Allah always win: don't you think so?


This is contrary to your prophets view sir. Is your prophet in error here?

Sahih Muslim 2662 c
'A'isha, the mother of the believers, said that Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) was called to lead the funeral prayer of a child of the Ansar. I said:
Allah's Messenger, there is happiness for this child who is a bird from the birds of Paradise for it committed no sin nor has he reached the age when one can commit sin. He said: 'A'isha, per adventure, it may be otherwise, because God created for Paradise those who are fit for it while they were yet in their father's loins and created for Hell those who are to go to Hell. He created them for Hell while they were yet in their father's loins.

Your prophet said: it is the destiny of Allah (and not mercy) that determines where a baby will go sir?
What is mercy if there was no sin in the first place?




Trinity is a description of God exactly as Taoheed is a description of Allah!
Is Taoheed anywhere in the Quran?

If Jesus didnt make your exact quote, would this make his being God invalidated?

Can you help me find this exact quote in the Quran: "I am Allah, worship me"
What if I show your where Jesus said that he is God: will your renounce Islam?
LOL!

You really think you’ve cornered Islam? Read carefully.

1️⃣ First, don’t twist hadith out of context. The Prophet ﷺ is teaching that Allah’s perfect knowledge and decree coexist with human free will. We choose — but our choices are within the limits of His absolute knowledge. That’s not fatalism, it’s the balance of Qadr and Ikhtiyar. Even your Bible says “God knows the end from the beginning” — so are you implying your God has less power than ours?

2️⃣ Second, your claim that “Islam can’t exist without lies” is laughable. The Qur’an invites all creation to ponder, question, and challenge. Unlike your distorted Trinity — a doctrine your own church fathers admit is irrational — Tawhid is consistent: One indivisible God, absolute, unique, eternal, and without partners. That’s not a description, that’s a reality your mind can’t twist.

3️⃣ Third, your emotional spin on the child’s hadith shows your poor grasp of core theology. Paradise and Hell are real destinations — Allah’s justice and mercy work together. Babies who die innocent are never punished unjustly; the hadith illustrates the divine foreknowledge that no one can twist or manipulate. You don’t get to cherry-pick one line and ignore the entire Islamic framework of divine mercy.

4️⃣ Fourth, your Trinity excuse is self-defeating. Show me one unambiguous verse where Jesus says: “I am God, worship me.” You can’t. Yet the Qur’an is full of direct, explicit proclamations:

> “There is no deity but Allah…” (Qur’an 47:19)
“So know, [O Muhammad], that there is no deity except Allah…” (Qur’an 47:19)
Your Prophet? He said it plainly: “Say: He is Allah, the One…” (Qur’an 112). We don’t need a word “Tawhid” dropped arbitrarily — the concept is crystal clear and consistent. Your invented “Trinity” was voted on in Nicaea. Ours was never changed or fabricated.

5️⃣ Lastly, you mock Islam with “LOL” but can’t answer your own contradictions. Jesus prayed to God — who was he praying to? Himself? If your God “died”, who was running the universe? If your God is three yet one, that’s a logical absurdity. Ours is truly One — no partners, no sons, no fabricated councils.

Before you come for Islam, fix the mess in your own theology. You’re out here parroting mistranslated hadith while ignoring the clear contradictions in your books. Try again — we’re ready for you.

TenQ:
Then be bold to answer direct questions and don't flee the consequences of speaking the truth with anger. The truth is constant. The truth is never afraid. The truth is consistent.

The Questions were:

According to Sahih Muslim 2643a
1. Is it true that the destiny of Allah is WRITTEN for a baby forty days after conception?
2. Is it true that whatever that written destiny is MUST SURELY come to pass over the child after he was born?
3. Is it UNTRUE that the destination of the person in Paradise or Hell Fire is part of what is written from the Destiny of Allah for the person?

According to Sahih Muslim 2662c
1. Is a baby guaranteed paradise because it has not committed sin?
2. Is it untrue that some babies while in their fathers loins were created for Hell Fire while others are created for paradise while they were still in their fathers loins (meaning before their conception)?


Either you answer the questions OR admit that you cannot bear to accept the consequences of the truth they hold.

Then, I will know that you choose deliberate ignorance.


Taoheed is a faulty and weak doctrine, if you will not run away again, I dare you challenge me to open a fresh post on Taoheed !

I guarantee that you will be sorry for yourself!

You want ‘bold’? Good. Sit tight and read carefully — because your childish attempts at cornering Islam with your shallow ‘trap questions’ just exposed your ignorance, not mine.

🔹 1️⃣ Yes, Islam teaches Qadr (Divine Decree). Everything — life, death, provision, deeds, and final destination — is decreed by Allah. So what? Allah is the All-Knowing and All-Wise. His perfect foreknowledge and decree do not oppress anyone — because He also gives you the free will to act. Your Bible also says, ‘Before I formed you in the womb I knew you’ (Jeremiah 1:5). But of course, you pretend not to see the same idea in your own book.

🔹 2️⃣ A baby’s fate is with Allah — who is Just and Merciful. In Islam, babies who die before accountability are granted Paradise by Allah’s Mercy — and there are authentic reports proving this. The fact that Allah knows some souls will choose evil later in life does not make Him unjust — it makes Him all-knowing. Unlike your theology, we don’t have to invent an ‘original sin’ scam to patch over Divine Justice.

🔹 3️⃣ You mock Qadr because you can’t grasp the difference between perfect knowledge and coercion. Allah’s decree does not ‘force’ anyone to be evil — it is His foreknowledge that encompasses your choices before you even make them. Try reading real Islamic scholarship before barking recycled polemics.

🔹 4️⃣ Now, let’s flip the table — if you really care about ‘truth being constant’:

Where is your Trinity in the Bible? Quote Jesus explicitly saying, “I am God, worship me.” You won’t find it.

Why did your ‘omniscient’ Jesus admit he didn’t know the Hour? “No one knows the day or hour, not even the Son…” (Mark 13:32). Explain how an all-knowing God doesn’t know.

How does God die on a cross yet remain alive? Mortal yet immortal — make it make sense.

🔹 5️⃣ You want to open a post on Tawhid? Be my guest. Just be prepared to watch your self-contradictory, Council-edited theology collapse in broad daylight. Tawhid is crystal clear: One God, no partners, no sons, no three-but-one mental gymnastics. Your creed needs Ecumenical Councils and centuries of edits to force people to swallow your contradictions. Islam needs none of that.

✅ So let’s settle this:

Yes, destiny is written — because Allah is God, not your imaginary ‘powerless savior’ begging people to accept him.

Yes, Allah’s knowledge is perfect — your confusion won’t change that.

No, Islam’s consistency will not bend to your recycled rhetorical traps.

If you’re so convinced you can ‘make me sorry for myself’, open your post — and come prepared with more than your stale slogans and desperate twisting of hadiths you barely understand.

I stand by Tawhid. It doesn’t break under your selective cut-and-paste ‘questions’. Raise your intellectual game — or spare me your empty chest-beating.

Truth is constant, indeed — that’s why your contradictions keep imploding, while Tawhid remains unshakeable. Deal with it.

ogaemma:
Obi is now becoming too desperate.
He has forgotten his root in a hurry.
This is a man who got 6 million votes in the last election without any of these political vampires.
Why can't he stand alone, build his party and shake Nigeria again.

Desperation is not in Peter Obi’s character—what you’re seeing is strategic coalition-building, a proven approach in democracies worldwide. Winning 6 million votes was just the beginning; real change requires broader alliances to break the stranglehold of Nigeria’s failed political duopoly.

Standing alone against entrenched systems isn’t pragmatism—it’s political naivety. Even Obafemi Awolowo and Nnamdi Azikiwe forged alliances when necessary. The goal isn’t individualism; it’s liberation from the APC and PDP’s decades of decay. If collaboration weakens their grip, then it’s a step forward, not backward.

Obi’s focus remains clear: rescuing Nigeria. The methods may evolve, but the mission hasn’t.

grandstar:
Look at Akpabio and Natasha. I believe Akpabio because hardly any other woman came out to make similar accusations.

With all due respect, your reasoning is deeply flawed and reflects a selective standard of credibility. Let me clarify why:

1. The number of accusers is not the sole determinant of truth.
The absence of multiple public accusations does not mean an allegation is false — it often means victims fear retaliation, stigma, or lack of protection. Many survivors stay silent precisely because they see how those who speak up are ridiculed or ignored.

2. Credibility rests on evidence, not crowd size.
Natasha has provided her testimony and supporting details, which deserve to be examined on their own merit. Dismissing her claim simply because “hardly any other woman came out” undermines the seriousness of individual experiences.

3. Power dynamics discourage others from coming forward.
In cases involving influential figures like Akpabio, it is common for victims to stay silent out of fear of social, political, or professional repercussions. The fact that Natasha spoke up despite these risks strengthens, not weakens, her credibility.

4. Consistency is key.
If we genuinely care about justice, we should apply the same standard across all allegations: assess the facts, listen to the evidence, and avoid prejudging based on numbers alone. Selective belief damages the integrity of fair investigation.

In summary, dismissing Natasha’s allegation solely on the grounds that she is the only woman who came forward is unfair and unjust. Every allegation must be judged on its individual merit, with due process and respect for the courage it takes to speak up against powerful interests.

TenQ:
Too bad.

1. Why are you this aggressively agitated? Did you even once answer any of my questions?
No! So, what is bothering you?

2. It seems that the definition of your intellectual discussion starts and end with me accepting ANYTHING you say as facts without question. But you know that is intellectually wrong


Your problem is that when your Hadiths and Qur'an are scrutinised with simple questions, it breaks down.

The breakdown is why you get angry : you want Islam to be TRUE but here is me showing you how faulty your Standard Islamic Narrative is.

Let me clarify a few points for you with all due respect — and in the spirit of genuine debate, not your circular provocations.

1️⃣ First, your questions were answered in substance — but you choose not to acknowledge the answers because you cling to a framework built on contradictions. You ask questions not to understand, but to distort and repeat the same hollow points.

2️⃣ You speak of ‘intellectual honesty’, yet ignore the glaring inconsistencies in your own creed — the idea of a God who is One but somehow three, mortal yet immortal, all-knowing yet ‘doesn’t know the hour’. Spare me the pretence that your doctrine is a standard for logical consistency.

3️⃣ You accuse the Qur’an and Hadith of breaking down under scrutiny — yet Islam’s concept of pure monotheism (Tawhid) has stood the test of time and reason, uncorrupted by councils and contradictory edits. Meanwhile, the Bible remains a patchwork of human additions, redactions, and theological guesswork.

4️⃣ If I appear assertive, it’s because truth deserves firmness. I will not water down clear answers to appease someone whose mission is mockery, not understanding.

✅ When you have genuine, sincere questions — free of arrogance and recycled polemics — I am here to engage. But if all you want is to hurl the same tired accusations, then know that Islam will not bow to your strawman tactics.

Raise your standards, refine your questions, and maybe then you’ll find answers worth your time — and mine. Until then, keep your contradictions to yourself.

Enough with your pointless trolling and mindless repetition. The question you keep spinning in circles was never meant for people who thrive on confusion and contradiction — it was for people of sound understanding, not for those trapped in the mental gymnastics of your so-called Trinity.

If you can’t grasp a simple point or contribute a fresh perspective, do everyone a favour: stop wasting our time with your hollow noise. This space is for reasoned dialogue, not endless parroting of the same worn-out talking points.

Raise your intellect, find some clarity — or stay silent. Next time, remember: questions of truth are for people of insight, not for those who can’t even untangle their own contradictions.

NairaLTQ shadeyinka2 TenQ

TenQ:
Mr CreativeOrbit

As usual, your people has deleted my post and placed me under ban. But here is your response again.

Nice writeup but it doesn't address the problems of the claims of your prophet. Let's look deeply into it again

According to Sahih Muslim 2662c
1. Is a baby guaranteed paradise because it has not committed sin?
2. Is it untrue that some babies while in their fathers loins were created for Hell Fire while others are created for paradise while they were still in their fathers loins (meaning before their conception)?

Your comments frequently appear designed to provoke rather than contribute to meaningful discussion. Would you care to explain your communication objectives?

TenQ:
Mr CreativeOrbit

According to Sahih Muslim 2643a
1. Is it true that the destiny of Allah is WRITTEN for a baby forty days after conception?
2. Is it true that whatever that written destiny is MUST SURELY come to pass over the child after he was born?
3. Is it UNTRUE that the destination of the person in Paradise or Hell Fire is part of what is written from the Destiny of Allah for the person?

There were just two claims I made
1. Your prophet said that even a sinless baby born of Muslim parents cannot be guaranteed to enter paradise if he dies because the baby's fate had been determined while it is in his father's loins.
2. Your fate as a Muslim is already decided: don't you believe in the destiny of Allah?



If a baby's destination in Paradise or Hell is uncertain in Islam, your salvation as an adult is exponentially uncertain!

I’ve noticed a pattern of provocative comments from you. Could you clarify the intent behind your consistently inflammatory remarks? I’m interested in understanding whether there’s a constructive purpose to this approach or if you’re simply engaging in trolling behavior.

shadeyinka2:
Hello Mr CreativeOrbit:
I told you that that my post would be deleted and it was!

Here is a final snippet !

This ḥadīth teaches us about the stages of human creation and the decree (qadar) of Allah. It shows that:

1. Stages of Creation: Human life passes through clear, divinely ordained stages in the womb — from a drop of fluid, to a clot, to a lump of flesh — demonstrating Allah’s precise and deliberate design.

2. Written Decree: An angel is commanded to write four matters for each person: their sustenance (rizq), lifespan (ajal), deeds (‘amal), and whether they will be blessed or wretched (destined for Paradise or Hell). This affirms the reality of divine predestination (qadar).

3. Human Action & Destiny: Despite what is written, a person must act righteously. A person may live in apparent righteousness or sin, but their final deeds determine their true end — showing that hearts can change and that none should feel secure from misguidance nor despair of Allah’s mercy.

4. Key Lesson: We must combine faith in Allah’s decree with striving for good deeds and sincere supplication for a good end (ḥusn al-khātimah). Destiny is Allah’s secret, so humility and dependence on Him are essential.

Core takeaway:
Life, provision, deeds, and ultimate fate are all in Allah’s control — but we are responsible for our choices, and our final actions matter most. So always ask Allah for steadfastness and a blessed end.

TenQ:
Unfortunately the truth is not welcomed by Muslims, I would have spoken my mind AND I would have received a ban which will not make you see my post.

So, until otherwise, I will speak only what Muslims want to hear!
I will not also justify my claims with evidences
You should also accept whatever nice things I say about Allah, Islam, Mohammed and Muslims!

Dantata is inside his grave enjoying bliss!
He knows the answers to the three Question of
What is your Religion : Islam!
Who is your Prophet : Prophet mohammed
Who is your Lord : Allah

Surely, Dantata knows the Answers to these three Questions!


On your first paragraph (before i collect another ban)

Sahih Muslim 2816f
Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) as saying:
None amongst you can get. into Paradise by virtue of his deeds alone. They said: Allah's Messenger, not even you? Thereupon he said: Not even I, but that Allah should wrap me in His Grace and Mercy.

Your response reveals a lack of understanding of Islamic doctrine and a tendency to misrepresent our beliefs while projecting your own frustrations. Let me clarify a few points logically and with textual precision:

First, you quote Sahih Muslim 2816f, as if it contradicts Islamic teachings about deeds — but you fail to grasp its full context. Islam never claims that deeds alone guarantee Paradise. Rather, Islam teaches a balanced view: deeds are essential, but entry into Paradise is ultimately through Allah’s mercy. That is exactly what the hadith you quoted affirms. The Prophet ﷺ emphasized that even his status doesn’t entitle him to Paradise without Allah’s mercy — not to diminish deeds, but to remind believers to remain humble and reliant on God’s grace.

Secondly, your sarcastic reference to Dantata and the "three questions" Muslims believe the deceased are asked in the grave — “Who is your Lord? What is your religion? Who is your prophet?” — is noted. But your tone implies mockery while ironically admitting that you’re aware of Islamic eschatology. Whether Dantata or anyone answers correctly depends on the truth of their faith and life — not hollow slogans, but sincere belief and righteous action. Islam doesn't glorify individuals uncritically; their legacy is only as honorable as their faith and deeds before Allah.

Furthermore, your comment about “speaking only what Muslims want to hear” is a shallow deflection. No one stopped you from engaging respectfully or intelligently. If your “truth” only survives when cloaked in provocation, sarcasm, or passive aggression, maybe it wasn’t truth to begin with — just provocation posing as boldness.

Lastly, understand this: Islam welcomes truth — not distortion, sarcasm, or selective quoting. If you're going to quote Islamic sources, learn them well, respect the interpretive framework, and engage with sincerity. Otherwise, you're not here to discuss — you're just here to bait.

TenQ:
This one na paradise straight... To be Buried in medina!...

It’s important to understand that, in Islam, the honor of being buried in places like Medina is not a guarantee of paradise. Muslims believe that salvation is ultimately determined by one’s faith, deeds, and the mercy of Allah — not merely by the location of burial.

The significance of Medina comes from its historical and spiritual value as the city of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Many Muslims wish to be buried there due to its blessings, but Islamic teachings make it clear that the final judgment rests with God alone.

I hope this clarifies the misconception.

lamentor78:
I don't know why people like supporting Iran, just look at this war that was just concluded, Israel is attacking military facilities in Iran and their generals, Iran is just throwing missles anywhere belle face and some uninformed Nigerians are supporting them, the day they get that stuff they may decide to test it in Africa.

Your statement reflects a shallow understanding of the regional dynamics. Israel has a long record of violating international law and striking sovereign countries at will — yet you conveniently ignore that.

Iran’s missile response is a form of deterrence, not reckless aggression.

If you’re genuinely concerned about stability, you should question why Israel can strike anywhere it pleases without accountability, instead of blaming those who resist.

And dragging uninformed Nigerians into this is pointless — most people supporting Iran do so because they see through the double standards and endless provocation.

Focus on the facts, not fearmongering.

TenQ:
It is untrue sir.
There is no Islamic text that says "Allah MEANS the one true God"

If there is, show the evidence of the Meaning.
Don't forget that Mohammed's father and Grandfather served "this one true God"!

All you need to do is to show anywhere where ANY of the prophets before Mohammed refer to their God as Allah otherwise, you are making yourself believe unsubstantiated claims.


Against your claim, here is proof..
Read instead of propagating untruths like your claim that
"The Israelites used YHWH to express God’s eternal, self-sustaining nature"

Exodus 3:14-15
“I AM WHO I AM.” And He said, “Thus you shall say to the children of Israel, ‘I AM has sent me to you.’” Moreover God said to Moses, “Thus you shall say to the children of Israel: ‘YHWH, the God of your fathers ... has sent me to you.’ This is My name forever ...”

Exodus 6:2-3
“God spoke to Moses and said to him, ‘I am YHWH. I appeared to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as God Almighty [El Shaddai], but by my name YHWH I did not make myself fully known to them.’”

The true God says that YHWH is His name forever Mr man. Read!!!

The Jews used TITLES for God such as Adonai= Lord, El-ohim, El-Shadai, El-Elyon, Hashim etc BUT God's name remains YHWH (Holy name)


Allah has 99 names, which one of these names it YHWH?


Zachariah means YHWH Remembers
El- or Al- is an old Semitic Language means Deity like
Al-LAH= God Lah
Al-Lat= god Lat
Al-Manat= god Manat



The differences is a conclusive proof that we serve different God.

God is a TITLE for the Creator
Just like
President is a TITLE for the Head of a Country

The NAME of the President give us the IDENTITY of the president we are speaking about.

Donald Trump is a President
Bola Ahmed Tinubu is a President
Vladimir Putin is a President
Vladimir Zelensky is a President

The same way:

Allah is the Name of God
Vishnu is the Name of God
YHWH is the Name of God.


Sorry!
This is a wishful thinking exactly like

What will you say if the following claimed they worship Allah?
-The Ifa worshipper claiming that his God is also Allah
-The Chi Ukwu worshipper claiming that his God is also Allah
-The Sango worshipper claiming that his God is also Allah
-The Ala worshipper claiming that his God is also Allah
-The Ikenga worshipper claiming that his God is also Allah

Would these claims be TRUE?
How would you determine that they are untrue?

Sorry,
Allah is not YHWH and you know it. You only wish it was TRUE!

It is evident that you are simply here to provoke and waste time. I see no value in engaging further with you.

Llight101:
Iran will fall if they mess up.
Power belongs to Allah?
Make I shock you, Iran will fall befall your eyes.
Leader will not only hide but he'll be no more.
Kiss reality and stop the noise.

Your empty threats expose more wishful thinking than reality. Iran has stood firm through coups, wars, and sanctions for decades — not by your permission, but because power truly belongs to Allah alone.

Leaders come and go, but nations built on faith and resilience outlive the loud mouths who boast of their downfall. So keep hoping — but understand this: Iran will stand long after your noise fades.

SeeWahala:
I can taste the pain and anguish dripping from your soul as you typed this long post here for me to read my Muslim friend but I'd still keep my smug face thanks

Keep your smug face if it comforts you — it changes nothing about the weakness of your argument.

1. International Implications:
From Iran’s standpoint, it is important to clarify that Iran has repeatedly stated its nuclear program is exclusively peaceful and remains under the safeguards of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), to which Iran is a signatory. Nonetheless, any unfounded perception of a nuclear weapons program could certainly raise regional security concerns, fuel further mistrust, and risk an unnecessary escalation that destabilises the Middle East — a region already fragile due to decades of foreign interventions and conflicts. Iran believes that the international community must distinguish clearly between peaceful nuclear activity and allegations driven by political motivations.

2. Credibility of Grossi’s Assessment:
Iran recognises the technical expertise of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and its Director General, Rafael Grossi. However, Iran also stresses that any assessment must be objective and evidence-based, free from political pressure by states with a clear interest in maintaining tensions with Iran. Iran has repeatedly cooperated with the IAEA and provided access within the framework of its legal obligations, and calls for balanced reporting that does not rely solely on unverified intelligence from adversarial states.

3. Diplomatic Strategies:
Iran maintains that the best way to prevent misunderstandings is through constructive, good-faith diplomacy and mutual respect for international agreements. Reviving and fully implementing the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) — which the IAEA itself confirmed Iran complied with until the US unilateral withdrawal — remains the most credible diplomatic pathway. Sustainable solutions require the lifting of unjust sanctions, guarantees against future unilateral withdrawals, and a recognition of Iran’s right to peaceful nuclear technology under the NPT.

In conclusion, Iran stands ready to engage responsibly, but any durable solution must be based on fairness, respect for sovereignty, and an end to selective or politically motivated accusations.

SeeWahala:
Let them start 😏 Israel and their jets are also being refuelled and serviced for another round of SKY DOMINATIONS

Your arrogance drips through that smug face, but history has shown that “sky dominations” mean nothing when a nation stands firm on its feet. Israel and its backers have waged endless campaigns, yet they still can’t break the will of Iran or its allies.

Every time you boast about jets and bombs, remember this: oppression and occupation only sow the seeds of greater resistance. You can dominate the skies, but you’ll never dominate the spirit of free people fighting for their dignity and land.

May Allah strengthen Iran and all the oppressed who refuse to bow to tyranny. May He protect them from the cowardly raids of those who hide behind foreign jets while spilling innocent blood.

Boast all you want — but know that real power belongs to Allah, and His promise is true: the oppressor always falls, no matter how loud his engines roar.

gohf:
first off you have a misunderstanding, I didn't ask you what Allah means nor did I say anything about it being a new invention.

Secondly you made no point in your accusations that using YHVH is misguided, because you are being subjective in your view and understanding of the discuss.

To show your ingenuity even after dismissing the name of God accepted by the Jews while trying to camouflage it with o there are other beautiful names of God, you state that well Ilyas means ‘My God is Yahweh’ (Eliyahu in Hebrew).

But these names don’t imply that we worship a different deity. They simply show continuity: these were prophets sent to the Children of Israel, using the language and context of their people.

And you concluded that Allah and "Yahweh" are the same God, now let's cut out all your unnecessary irrelevant digressions.

In simple answer, if it is difficult for you to type a simple yes then you are deceiving yourself and trying to deceive others

Do you accept that THE ONE TRUE GOD is YHVH? Yes or No

Your attempt to corner the discussion into a simplistic “Yes or No” trap shows you either don’t understand how language and revelation work — or you’re being disingenuous on purpose.

Let’s be clear: Muslims worship the One True God — the same Eternal Creator worshipped by Abraham, Moses, and Jesus (peace be upon them all). In the Hebrew scriptures, that Name is rendered as YHWH (Yahweh) to the Children of Israel in their language. In Arabic, the same Eternal God is called “Allah.”

So your entire argument hinges on treating the label as if it changes the Essence of God. It doesn’t. God is not bound by one language. He revealed Himself using names people could understand within their own tongues.

As the Qur’an says: “And We did not send any messenger except [speaking] in the language of his people, to state clearly for them…” (Qur’an 14:4).

So the answer is straightforward: YES — the One True God, the Eternal, Self-Existent Creator, is the same Supreme Being that sent revelation to Israel, and the same One we call “Allah” today. Your error is acting as if your pronunciation or spelling in Hebrew gives you exclusive rights over Him. It doesn’t.

If you want a real discussion, stop fixating on transliterations and start asking whether you truly worship that One God alone, without partners, equals, or invented doctrines that contradict His Oneness. That’s the real test of sincerity.

gohf:
honesttalk21 BibleInterpreta AntiChristian TenQ CreativeOrbit narialtq jimrohn

Now Muslims say the name of their God is Allah even though it means the God like referring to a specific God, and they claim he is the same God of Moses who revealed Himself as YHVH.

Now many Muslims say Allah is not YHVH so my question is why do prophets of Allah that Muhammad associates with himself have names like Zakariya which is Zechariah in hebrew.

Now what does Zechariah mean?

What does ilyas mean? One of the prophets in Islam.

First, let’s clear up your misunderstanding about the name Allah. ‘Allah’ simply means The One True God — it’s not a new invention by Muslims. Arab Christians and Jews used this exact word for centuries before Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Even today, Arab Christians pray to Allah and their Bibles say Allah where yours says ‘God.’ So this linguistic point is shallow.

Second, the idea that YHWH (Yahweh) is a ‘proper name’ that must be used is also misguided. The Israelites used YHWH to express God’s eternal, self-sustaining nature (I AM WHO I AM), but the Qur’an confirms that Allah is the same One God of Abraham, Moses, and all prophets. He has many Beautiful Names and Attributes — His reality isn’t limited to how one language pronounces His name.

Now, about the prophets’ names: the reason you see names like Zakariya (Zechariah) and Ilyas (Elijah) in Arabic is because they’re the same historical individuals, with their names naturally rendered in the language of the Qur’an. For example:

Zakariya means ‘God has remembered’ — that’s Yah Zakar El in Hebrew roots.

Ilyas means ‘My God is Yahweh’ (Eliyahu in Hebrew).

But these names don’t imply that we worship a different deity. They simply show continuity: these were prophets sent to the Children of Israel, using the language and context of their people. Prophet Muhammad ﷺ came as the final Messenger to all nations, calling people back to the same One God they called upon — the God of Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad — Allah, the Eternal and Unique.

If some confused individuals claim ‘Allah is not YHWH,’ they’re only confused by semantics. Allah is the same One God, whether you say Elohim, YHWH, God Almighty, or Allah. We just reject the later distortions: that God ‘became a man,’ or that He needs a son to forgive sins. That’s the real break from the clear monotheism of Moses and the prophets.

pcagbaji:
Insecurity in the north is evidence of shettima failure
If Shetima is doing well nobody will be calling for his removal
The most critics of tinubu government are from Shetima's strong hold
A beneficiary of tinubu government

Your argument is shallow and conveniently ignores the real facts. Insecurity in the North did not start with Shettima — it’s a decades-old problem rooted in poor leadership long before his time. Blaming him alone is intellectually dishonest.

Secondly, healthy criticism does not mean a leader is failing. It shows there’s political awareness in his base — people who expect accountability. That is far better than blind loyalty.

Finally, Shettima is not a ‘beneficiary’ of Tinubu’s government — he is an elected Vice President, not an appointee or a hanger-on. Trying to reduce him to a mere ‘beneficiary’ only exposes your bias, not the truth.

pcagbaji:
You lied Shetima did not bring any political value to the ruling APC government we thought he could an end to insecurity in the North

That’s a shallow and ignorant take. Claiming Shettima brought ‘no political value’ to the APC is pure fiction — his influence in the North-East secured critical votes that kept the party afloat in that region.

As for expecting him alone to magically ‘end insecurity,’ that’s laughable. The security crisis in the North didn’t start yesterday, and no Vice President has the sole power to dismantle complex terror networks overnight.

Next time, base your accusations on facts, not wishful thinking.

seunmsg:
I sincerely hope this won’t backfire. While I want Kwakwanso to join the party, Ganduje is a very strong and reliable ally that must not be allowed to leave the party. The President must do everything possible to placate Ganduje and his supporters.

For Shettima, I really hope they also settle with him. However, he seems to have lost control of his home front and that’s not good enough for an incumbent VP. Borno state governor and Senator Ndume have been the fiercest critics of the Tinubu administration despite both being from the Vice President’s camp. The fact that he even narrowly won only Borno state for APC in 2023 out of the 6 north east states says a lot about his leadership and popularity. He’s not bringing much to the table so he should put his camp in order.

With respect, your argument does not fully reflect the political complexities at play. It is misleading to suggest that Vice President Shettima has “lost control” simply because key figures like Governor Zulum and Senator Ndume express critical views. Constructive criticism within a party is a hallmark of a healthy democracy, not necessarily a sign of weak leadership.

Secondly, winning Borno state convincingly — despite heightened security challenges and shifting voter sentiments in the North-East — demonstrates Shettima’s enduring influence and strategic value to the APC. Reducing his entire contribution to electoral numbers ignores his pivotal role in stabilising the region and balancing delicate political interests across the country.

Leadership is not about imposing uniformity but about managing diverse perspectives while maintaining cohesion. By that measure, Vice President Shettima continues to bring critical political weight to the table and remains a key asset to the administration.

FreeStuffsNG:
That Yahaya Bello may not work. He may even defect if his EFCC case lingers. Finitri may become a Federal Minister

Don't underestimate Sani Uba and Shettima.

Yahaya Bello has no real political clout in Kogi Central, let alone across the entire state.

If President Tinubu chooses to align himself with Bello despite these serious allegations, he risks alienating genuine grassroots support and could lose Kogi entirely before the first ballot is even cast.

Gbadebo19:
Tell your AI that we hear the creaking machinery of its skewed submission

You clearly can't handle well-structured arguments without blaming a machine. My words are mine — sharpened by thought, not generated by AI.

What you're hearing isn't "skewed submission" — it's the sound of your bias being crushed under the weight of inconvenient truth.

bcomputer101:
Iran should be closely monitored for the next 10years. I don't trust those beasts.


The world would have been a beautiful place without Islamic terrorist.

Your comment reeks of unchecked bigotry and intellectual laziness. To refer to an entire nation of over 80 million people as “beasts” simply because of political disagreements is not just vile — it is the very language of fascism. It reflects a deep-rooted hatred that has no place in any civilized or intelligent discourse.

Labeling Iran or Muslims in general as “terrorists” is a tired, unoriginal trope used by those who ignore the fact that state-sponsored violence, Western invasions, and decades of foreign-backed coups have created far more instability and bloodshed globally than anything you accuse Muslims of. Who armed militias, overthrew democracies, and bombed entire countries into rubble under the pretext of “freedom”? It certainly wasn’t Iran or Islam.

Let’s be clear: Iran, for all its flaws, is a sovereign nation with a clear strategic doctrine, regional alliances, and the right to defend its interests — just like any other country. If “monitoring” is your standard, perhaps Israel, which has repeatedly violated international law, occupies land illegally, assassinates people on foreign soil, and possesses nuclear weapons outside any international treaty, should be your first subject of concern.

And as for your claim that the world would be a better place “without Islamic terrorists,” perhaps you need a history lesson: The vast majority of terrorism worldwide — including colonial massacres, genocides, and modern drone warfare — has been carried out not by Muslims, but by secular, nationalist, and even so-called democratic regimes. Your selective outrage exposes your hypocrisy.

You’re not concerned with terrorism. You’re obsessed with demonizing Islam and Muslims — and that’s what makes your comment not only ignorant, but dangerous.