₦airaland Forum

miembamish:
@Msrita. Yeah ah knw u.. We're inde Faculty in Unical. Well qoute me den we talk. Try to recall de dude called "Mish" in skul in ur Faculty, dats me. Emmm!!! Juz quote me 1st

You sef wan login abi? See your coconut head.

raumdeuter:
Best league in the world

0-3 at half time

What was the scoreline when Madrid visited Munich 6 months ago?

•I was hoping to see di Maria swap wings with the lethargic januzaj but unfortunately, it didn't happen.

• Luke shaw got foward a lot but his deliveries were simply not good enough.

• it's unfortunate mata has been making us "miss" rooney. As e no see "tap in" chance yesterday, he was uber- useless as usual.

• For whatever reasons, we have played Leicester, westbrom, Sunderland and Swansea yet we have only gotten 2 points from those 4games

Seems RVP needs a lengthy spell on the bench!

Nawa for this shaw oo

Sessegnon's pace and pawa

1025:
i see

I thought you perished (in real life) with the NL tsunami

SailorXY:
a Vidal-Mata swap is been touted, I'll like to hear the figures involved tho.

IMO, we shouldn't pay more than 10-15m

Odunharry:
buhahahahah...to me Sneidjer is better

He is too old Abeg.

PS; isn't it the same sneijder wey dey do shakara for us that time? Learnt he's being owed 3months salary in turkey as we speak.

Karma is truly a bïtch!!

oemmanuel:
People, please I need the past question for system engineering (MSc). I will appreciate anyone that can help. My email is erowland247@gmail.com
Thanks.

Didn't they sell to you at the point of submission of form in the department?

mcfarlin:
In what way did nasri perform better than ozil?

* I am talking about EPL.
* Nasril has not played in Laliga before. The German team and Madrid are a different set up.
Agreed he hasn't played in laliga before..

But he was considered surplus to requirements in a french team that was much easier to break into than the star studded german team..he wasn't even considered as a replacement for ribery!?

Was it strictly due to footballing reasons?

mcfarlin:
one or two good games doesn't determine a player consistency does


I agree its a good price for a gamble buy like khedira.

The fact that those performances took place almost immediately after a lengthy spell on the sidelines, is worthy of mention. Vidal on the other hand hasn't looked his old self ever since chile rushed him back for the worldcup and there are already fears that he might not attain those heights again.

If we buy khedira for 15m and e "Lana", e no go too pain person.

mcfarlin:
Strootman is younger and under a coach of van gaals class he will improve over time.

Aside the age factor, there's really nothing to separate the two IMO.

mcfarlin:
I agree khedira was once a very good player but never underestimate the power of injury on a player.

The khedira I saw in the UCL final and worldcup doesn't look finished.

mcfarlin:
A case in point radamel falcao who was out injured for 6months at a time still struggling to hit top form...talkless of khedira who has being battered by a series of injury.

That's why my emphasis is on cut-price, bro. 15m for a player like khedira isn't a bad idea

afrodoc2:
LOL.
Sorry i never sleep since last night....

Who is the 4th person again?

Chei, madam don suffer be that oo

mcfarlin:
I prefer vidal/strootman.

My preference is based on current fitness issues viz a viz price - It has nothing to do with who the better player is.
As a matter of fact, strootman isn't really an upgrade on khedira, if you ask me.

mcfarlin:
Khedira was hardly missed in the realmadrid team.

Matter of fact alonso actually got more game time than him.

That's because Madrid have long abandoned the combative midfield pivot, hence their purchases of scholesy-clones in modric and kroos. I need not remind you that Alonso ( arguably the best player in the world in his position), couldn't have been dropped last season

elampiro:
Who is a better player between Ozil and Nasril?

This is a very close call.

Which of the ozils? The one that took the epl by storm during the early stages of last season or the one that has been lethargic for the past 6months?

afrodoc2:
Mcmanaman
Anelka
Heinze
Owen

He never played for Everton or Liverpool

mcfarlin:
What?

They are not on the same level fitness wise.

They are less injury prone than khedira.

Can you imagine khedira even copped an injury of six months two seasons ago.

And what were the reasons that made us thread softly on the Vidal/strootman deals in the last transfer window? I reiterate - I'd rather we pay 15m for khedira than cough out 50m for Vidal

mcfarlin:
Don't forget we are trying to get our physios to work on our injury prone players.

Adding khedira to the list will be disastrous.

What's the importance of a player who spends 3 to 5 months of a season on the sidelines.

For the past 2 years atleast khedira has been hopping from one injury to the other.

Surely it would have a negative influence on his abilities don't you think??.

That's why the emphasis is on cut price. Despite his supposed injuries, he was one of the key players in Germany's worldcup triumph. I'd rather pay 15m for him than 45m for Vidal or strootman - Players I presently consider to be in the same category with khedira fitness- wise.

mcfarlin:
Herrera will be good playing in the hole

I pray we never get khedira

The guy is injury prone.

If you ask me, a cut-price of 15m thereabout for a proven player /worldcup winner, isn't a bad gamble, despite his supposed injury/ fitness concerns.

SetrakusRa:
Ander Herrera playing the No. 10 role? anyone?

I won't mind seeing him there. Push him in the hole and get khedira in January. The German shouldn't cost more than 15m.







....... Unfortunately the captain must always play

elampiro:
You are the most ignoramus I have seen on nairaland sports session. You ignorance will not be healed if you continue to refuse to learn.

This is not Balogun market where you just talk tatatatattataatatata loquaciously without thinking or reasoning and able to give verifiable evidence to back your points.

elampiro:
Yes, I saw a few friendly matches he played. I was hoping he did well but he didn't play like the Rafael of Manchester United. Let's hope he takes ownership now that Brazil is rebuilding.

I pray he continues to get snubbed by the selecào.

The last thing I want to hear is " Rafael ruled out for _ weeks after picking up a _ injury in a friendly match for Brazil"

raumdeuter post: Just remain in your ignorance. No use trying to force you out of your comfort zone.

Nobody is here to challenge your position as that glorified moronic douchbag who is always quick to exhibit astute stûpidity at the slightest opportunity. The crown has been yours and it will always be. Ade a pe Lori oo!!

raumdeuter post: I saw that Hazard has potential, plays for a coach who wouldnt maximize his attacking POTENTIAL

Saw that we had a player who is starting to decline, Logic and common sense would want Hazard to come right now and grow up in the correct system where his POTENTIAL can be used instead of waiting till he is 25 when he might already be a waste due to bad coaching

But in your own upside-down thinking that means Hazard is already better than Ribery?

Another proposition typically bereft of logic and common sense by the daft midget.

You claimed ribery was shyte and that you needed hazard as his immediate replacement because you couldn't put up with such performances anymore since hazard is kinda like the immediate fix to the urgent problem. Why would any sane person pick a "shittier" hazard to continue stinking up the joint pending the time "he reaches his potential"?

It's obvious your brain-cells are filled with thick mucous.

raumdeuter post: Luke Shaw was bought to replace Evra. I would bet that based on CURRENT play Evra is still better than Shaw, If there is a Man Utd vs Bayern game today, Most managers would use Evra over Shaw.

That's probably because shaw doesn't have UCL experience, especially in such a game of that magnitude. That aside, shaw is better than evra as we speak and will surely start ahead of him in the domestic league.

raumdeuter post: But sensible management dictates that you buy the long term replacement and bed him early enough for long term gains.
I guess all this is beyond your intelligence quotient

Like I said earlier, stop trying so hard to sound knowledgable and intelligent - no matter how hard you try, those two words will never be used in the same sentence with your name.

Now run along!!

raumdeuter:
Either comprehension is your problem or just logic.

A player has the potential to replace does not mean he is currently better.

Stop forcing yourself to sound intelligent. You wanted scarface out of your team with immediate effect due to his supposedly shitty form. Are you now telling us that you wanted an "inferior" hazard to replace him with more shittiness just because he has potential?

Nihilist:
I don't think you understand English.



If you believe that Hazard is a good enough replacement for Ribery right now, then why are you arguing that Hazard cannot surpass Ribery's achievement?

Abi which Kain agbo Jedi you drink this night?

This is the painful aspect. Was it not this same dayokanu that was asking you guys how much hazard would cost because he was sick and tired of the sh*ty football ribery was serving them ?

raumdeuter:
Based on potential, Hazard is a decent replacement for Ribery who is already over 30 and would start declining

Just like for example One can wish Raheem STerling as a future Robben replacement, Does that mean Sterling is better than Robben?

Dayo, stop lying....

You wanted ribery out of your team, with hazard as his immediate replacement. It's just unfortunate that your posts woulda been erased.

Ogbeni ramdauter; in 2014, who has been the better footballer between hazard and ribery??

This dayokanu guy funny sha. After the Allianz arena massacre by Madrid last season, No be you dey talk am for Chelsea thread say make dem give you hazard and that scarface can go to calabar rovers for all you care? How I wish the nl tsunami didn't happen.

Elampiro, stop this argument please. Hazard is a top top player...yes but David silva no be hin mate for football Abeg.

SailorXY:
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha dadehmola what can u say about this?

Sh*t happens joor !!

He meant to use the word "dribble"

chrisley024:
Which kind like for like? They play same position; @ the left wing. Iniesta plays in a 3-man midfielder.

Or u want to compare him with Navas?

Iniesta isn't a winger by default, same as silva. Comparing hazard to a winger will be more appropriate.

MaziOmenuko:
Remove Fabregas and we all would be discussing how Torres was better than Costa! Its a fact:

That's because fabregas was the one creating chances for costa at Athletico with the kinda agbero football they are known for abi?

MaziOmenuko:
leave the responsibility of creating chances for Hazard and you'll see a struggling chelsea this season. When you dance around with the ball, your strikers will keep running into offside and eventually get frustrated.

Hazard is a tactical dribbler of the ball - his dribbles create space in the opposition's defence for his team mates to exploit.

MaziOmenuko:
I believe Torres would have fared better if he had Fab behind him as Costa is presently enjoying.

Even if Chelsea bought 10 fabrepasses, it wouldnt have improved toress' form. The earlier you stopped thinking about the toress at Liverpool, the better. No be the same toress wey dey miss empty net at Chelsea??

As we speak, toress isn't better than Connor wickham.