₦airaland Forum

Simple !! They are swear words

Philipsdael: its alryt...!
Ride-on, so long as there's peace n harmony in what u do and it gives u joy..... Thats all that matter.

ya thanks, and I'll keep posting as much more as possible, probably someday u get convinced

gcfr.com:
CrossRiver state police, goin by d blue n white painted car.

its ph bro(rivers state)

dickjay: @Frank, Are U a pagan? U mean U don't believe Heaven exists? Gush!!!

men ure really a dick, he's an atheist dim wit

They don't speak

Philipsdael: Bro,
Your threads are always facinating with interesting topics that gives much insight that can make a Thinker reduces the ideology of spiritism (expecially christianity) matter of fact, i started ff you when i notice your insights, pardon me as i deviate a little from this topic, like i said in the first 2 comment, you've said the fact" as i deviate from the topic, i'll like to know your ideology of being convince that "God doesn't exist" cos thats the believe of an Atheist.

bro the list is endless, u could meet new atheist all around Nigeria.. On our facebook pahe "Nigerian Atheists" where all ur questions about atheism are all answered there, thx I hope tht helped a little

Mr Troll: me sef no know say atheists dey Ph o! where una de hide na?

lol we deh o, I've never hidden mybelif frm$ anybody b4 my whole class knows(law2 UST)

Philipsdael: OP, i search for the video, its redirecting me to this same thread on Nairaland.
m.youtube.com/watch? v=fwL6l71SV60&gl=GB&hl=en&client=mv-google&guid=
and
m.youtube.com/watch?v=KRNSmaWs420&client=mv-
google&guid=&hl=en&gl=GB

ohhh I'll check d link again bro

aManFromMars: hmm, ph ppl don dey plenty for here. wetin happen?

haha na we sure pass na, PH boys on Point

Wulfruna: Captain Obvious?

hey wulfruna ,

emk4lif: They'll sure be tougher zombies than those Rick Grimes faces in Walking dead, Ezekiel also apparently conjured bony zombies too....the bible is such a fascinating collection of fables....

bro just checked ur profile saw we had a lot in common, (I'm a gothic rocer , a proud atheist, I stay In PH too) could u do me a favour and add me of fbk. So we could chat better (Flamez restro) thx

emk4lif: They'll sure be tougher zombies than those Rick Grimes faces in Walking dead, Ezekiel also apparently conjured bony zombies too....the bible is such a fascinating collection of fables....

yeah a complete mythological book, they find it hard to belive the greek mythology is real, arguing tht its too illogical to be real, but they adopt the jewish myths ? Come on who is fooling who,,, by the way thx bro

Here are veiw youtube links that are highly classified (not so much 4 geniuses like me though) I'll send the links here, watch em and get really surprised and trust me u will be short of words to see this once mythical creatures really exist

m.youtube.com/watch?v=fwL6l71SV60&gl=GB&hl=en&client=mv-google&guid=

m.youtube.com/watch?v=KRNSmaWs420&client=mv-google&guid=&hl=en&gl=GB

Especially this one tht has been taged by researchers had proved 100percent real

m.youtube.com/watch?v=cvsXiryu8jA&hl=en&guid=&client=mv-google&gl=GB
Ya enjoy,,, oh b4 I leave I'll also drop this of a real life alien caught on a survielance camera teleporting a ma who almost got hit. Here

m.youtube.com/watch?v=Gr2_5Me3b1k&client=mv-google&gl=GB&hl=en&guid=

m.youtube.com/watch?v=RdqWxNfySeY&client=mv-google&gl=GB&guid=&hl=en

please try and watch them all it wasn't easy getting all these down here thx,,, follow and I'll follow u back.. Enjoy

Etumgbe: where is my dad na?

u no fit see am brother, na him be photographer

fasho01: So so on point.

This is about the 1st write up on personality I'm seeing that really points to me. Cool

wht colour is urs bro

Rexsul: @ op....ds ASUU strike rily help u in ur research.......gud work though.

lol thanks bro but my skwl isn't on strike ( uni ilorin and my uni) we hv lectures even by 12 sef

esauy: http://www.m.webmd.com/sleep-disorders/guide/sleep-paralysis

It's sleep paralysis, please don't let anyone confuse you. This link is a good resource to help you with your issue

na so o brother

enilove: Are you a born again christian?Are you living a holy life. I need to know this quickly.
Pls be truthful.

guy u stpid oh

RED: You are extroverted and optimistic. You
are action oriented and physically active.
You like to be the center of attention. You
are ambitious and competitive. You have a
passion and enthusiasm for life and are not
afraid to pursue your dreams and goals. You
are impulsive. Patience is not one of your
strong points. You can be aggressive and
easy to anger, often exhibiting a violent
temper. you do not hold a grudge. You can
be somewhat of a know-it-all, not wanting to
appear unintelligent or ignorant. You can be
quite determined when you want something,
but tend to have a short attention span.
WHITE: You are neat and immaculate in your
appearance, in the presentation of your
home almost to the point of being fanatical.
You are far-sighted, with a positive and
optimistic nature. You are well-balanced,
sensible, discreet and wise. You are
cautious, practical. You tend to have a great
deal of self control. You are confident, poised
and self-assured when at your most positive,
but can also be very choosy and fastidious
when the mood strikes. You can be very
critical of yourself and others. You are self-
sufficient and a loner. You may appear to be
shy, but you do have strong beliefs about
most things and love the opportunity to air
those beliefs.
BLACK: Prestige and power are important to
you. You are independent, strong-willed and
determined. You are non-emotional and give
the appearance of a dignified and
sophisticated person who is in total control -
this is often a front as you may feel quite
insecure. You like to keep people at a
distance. You may be looking for protection
from any negativity that surrounds you. You
hold things inside and are not good at
sharing yourself with others. You are
methodical in your work, making sure
everything is completed as required, down to
the last detail. It may be a color of comfort
to you, allowing you to retreat and hide from
the real world. You may be retreating behind
black during a difficult time in your life.
YELLOW: You've a happy disposition and are
cheerful and fun to be with. You are creative,
often being the one who comes up with new
ideas. You tend to have your head in the
clouds much of the time. You analyze
everything, all the time, and are methodical
in your thinking. You are impulsive and
make quick decisions, but often, out of
anxiety, jump in too quickly and rush things.
You have a strong independent streak in you,
and are selective with your choice of friends.
You tend to hide your emotions, putting on a
brave face in times of adversity. You have a
modern outlook. New technology doesn't
faze you. You communicate well on a mental
level with like-minded people, but can
become bitter and sharp-tongued if crossed.
You are good at networking and getting
information out of others. You can be
stubborn but dislike pettiness and
spitefulness of all kinds. You are good at
anything that involves the mind, rather than
physical pursuits.
GREEN: You are practical, down-to-earth
person. You are stable and well balanced You
are kind, generous and compassionate. You
have a great need to love and to be loved
and you tend to wear your heart on your
sleeve- you are an open book. You have a
need to belong. You are at home in any
social situation. You have high moral
standards and doing the right thing is
important to you. You like to be
accepted,appreciated and admired for the
good you do in the community as well as in
your family life. You are a loyal friend and a
faithful partner, gentle but not passionate.
You are strong-willed and do not like to be
told what to do by others. You do like to win
arguments and do not concede defeat easily.
You are not a risk-taker and not action
orientated, rather more of an observer.
Detail bores you. You process information
quickly and prefer to develop an idea,
organize a plan and then delegate the rest to
someone else. The ability to put yourself in
the shoes of others is one of your true
talents.
BLUE: You are conservative, reliable and
trustworthy - you are quite trusting of others
although you are very wary in the beginning
until you are sure of the other person. You
are not impulsive- you always think before
you speak and act and do everything at your
own pace in your own time. You take time to
process and share your feelings. You are
genuine and sincere, and you take your
responsibilities seriously. You have a deep
need for peace and harmony in your
everyday life. You appear to be confident
and self-controlled, but may be hiding your
vulnerable side. You are generally fairly
even-tempered, unless your emotions take
over - then you can become either moody
and over-emotional, or cool and indifferent.
You are sensitive to the needs of others.
While you are friendly and sociable, you
prefer the company of your own close group
of friends. You are a rescuer and love to be
needed. You can be rigid - you like to stick to
what is familiar to you- you stubbornly do
things your way even if there is a better
way. Untidiness and unpredictability
overwhelm you. You don't like to draw
attention to yourself. While you don't like to
have discord or conflict in your life, you are
often the cause of conflict with others; you
can be quite manipulative but in a very
subtle way.
You make a loyal and faithful marriage
partner and you are an honest, trustworthy
and sincere friend. You are aware of others
feelings and sensitive to the moods of
others. You are approachable and friendly,
always making people feel welcome in your
life. You have a thirst for knowledge in order
to gain wisdom and appear knowledgeable
in whatever area interests you. You can be
too cautious and worry about every little
thing.
PINK: You are loving, kind, generous and
sensitive to the needs of others. You are
friendly and approachable with a warmth
and softness others are drawn to. You have a
maternal instinct, with a need to protect and
take care of others. You are very much in
touch with your femininity - this includes
men who are in touch with their feminine
side. You are romantic and sensual and
sensitive. With your optimistic and positive
outlook on life, you see the good in
everyone. You are methodical and organized,
although you can sometimes be rather
flippant when the immature girly side of pink
appears. You are refined, reserved, calm and
non-violent which may give the impression
of shyness. You have a naivety, sweetness
and beauty about you which can become
girlish and immature in some.
GREY: You are neutral about life, often to the
point of being indifferent. If you love grey,
you are trying to protect yourself from the
chaotic outside world, even to the point of
isolating yourself from others. It is important
for you to maintain the status quo - you
prefer a safe, secure and balanced existence
and never desire much excitement. You will
usually compromise in order to keep the
balance and stability. You are practical and
calm, do not like to attract attention and are
simply seeking a contented life. You are the
middle of the road type, cool, conserved,
composed and reliable. You are a hard
worker who just gets on with the job that
has to be done. You tend to be indecisive,
lacking confidence - a fence-sitter who finds
it difficult to make choices in most situations
in your life. You like to be in control of your
emotions and avoid experiencing emotional
pain by shutting off from your emotions. You
tend to make fair and balanced judgments,
and may be a good critic, because of your
emotional detachment. You prefer to not get
involved - you are quite independent and
may be quite individual in your attitude,
although you lack imagination and creativity
- this may give you a narrow outlook and
may prevent you being open to new ideas
and opportunities.
BROWN: Having a personality color brown
means you are honest, down-to-earth and
wholesome, with both feet planted firmly on
the ground. You are steady and reliable and
quietly confident. You are friendly and
approachable, genuine and sincere. You have
a keen sense of duty and responsibility.
Family and family life is extremely
important to you. You like physical comfort,
simplicity and quality. You are a loyal and
trustworthy friend, supportive and
dependable. You are sensitive to the needs
of others. You are sensual, warm and
supportive. Others are comfortable in your
presence and find it easy to open up to and
confide in you. You are hard-working,
industrious and reliable. You take life
seriously but have a subtle dry sense of
humour. You like a structured life with
everything in its place, although you are not
a perfectionist by any means. You are
materialistic, appreciating quality in
everything - a comfortable home, the best
food and drink and loyal companionship. You
may suppress your emotions at times,
retreating from the outside world. You tend
not to be carefree and spontaneous. You
prefer to know exactly what is going on
before you commit - no surprise parties for
you!
You feel uncomfortable about losing control
but will work hard to change a situation that
seems unjust or unfair. You have a strong
need for security and a sense of belonging,
which is why your family is so important to
you. You can be quite contemplative,
working out problems and becoming quite
absorbed until you find a solution.You have a
warm and encouraging manner that gives
reassurance to others. You do everything in
moderation and with restraint. You tend to
be quite frugal - you don't like to waste
money or time on unnecessary frivolities or
extravagances, but when you do spend, it is
on quality. You prefer to stay in your own
safe little world.
PURPLE: Having a personality color purple or
violet as your favourite color means you are
sensitive and compassionate, understanding
and supportive, thinking of others before
yourself. You are a gentle and free spirit.
Your feelings run deep and you can be quite
sensitive to hurtful comments from others,
although you would never show it. People
are drawn to your charismatic and alluring
energy. You are usually introverted rather
than extroverted and may give the
impression of being shy although this is not
the case. You are creative and like to be
individual in most of your endeavours,
including your dress and home decoration -
you love the unconventional. You are
idealistic, and often impractical, with a great
imagination, You tend to look at life through
rose-colored glasses. People who don't
understand you sometimes think you are
eccentric because you spend so much time
in your fantasy world. You inspire others with
your creative thinking and your ability to
deal positively with adversity. You are very
intuitive and quite psychic. You are a
generous giver, asking for little in return
except friendship. You can be secretive, with
even your closest friends not really knowing
you well. You dislike responsibility and have
difficulty dealing with real day-to-day
problems. You dislike being part of the
crowd. You don't like to copy others and you
don't like them to copy you. You are a
visionary, with high ambitions, dreams and
desires, and a compulsion to help humanity
and to improve the planet earth. You often
hold positions of power because you are
visionary, but you delegate to others all the
minor details that you aren't interested in.
You like to have the best of everything, so
you aim high. Being the free spirit you are,
you love to travel to experience different
cultures and meet new people. You are a
good judge of character and sum others up
quite quickly and accurately, although you
usually see the best in everybody. Time
means little to you and you are often late for
everything. You trust the flow of the
Universe to take care of everything. You can
sometimes appear arrogant and conceited if
operating from a negative perspective. You
can be selfish and self-indulgent as you
don't like being imposed upon by others
beliefs and regulations.

Merkki: Truce

follow me I'll follow u bck, oh n veiw my profile n add me on any of the medias there, when u do just tell me " Caribbean" ,got my reasons aiit hun

vivacious vivi: I see, No worries then. Biko, forgive him.

wtf viva:-S

Merkki: It's not about what she wrote. It's about something totally different and i bet she understands. I wonder why that guy wants to commit suicide.

ok fine I'm sorry, for yada yada yada, truce?

Philipsdael: Fact

lol true bro

Merkki: Go and sit down and mind your darn business. She understands the message and what it is about. And what makes you think i'm a Nigerian?

then shift jawe, we don't welcome Caribbean hoes in Nigeria, now fvck off kid

Merkki: You still haven't changed your ways. I expect you to grow up after deactivating your account. There is really no hope for you. Typical south african. We have seen ur äss, now swerve.

u know say na jealousy go kill u , wetin she talk na weh concern u eh.... Na wa 4 some naija bbes oh

lulukay: Oh my golsh! Warriz diz

lulu follow me make ah follow back

Nomski0: Dont buy that type for me. I want wheat bread, the one with no sugar. Come with plenty, i want to eat London bread.

nomski . Follow me make ah follow u bck

pastormustwac: This thread should be thrown into hellfire along with the op.

#Spits on the ground#

oh sorry pastor I thought it was don't judge so as u might not be judged?? So guess who'll be thrown in hell for that silly mistake)

Men I'm tired of u christains not accepting the fact and enjoy life a bit,,, and worse part is tht u christains are even d ones causing havocs in d society,..killings , kidnapping , robbery and all tht . U neva catch a criminal thts an atheist or a bomber thts an atheist, just chrsitains and muslims , even d eckankar ppl don't make noise like u all

reason you’ll
see so many
contradictions in the
Bible is because
there are at least
seven different
religions in it fused
together as if they
were one.
Originally there was
no Christian Bible
there was only, the
Hebrew Bible, which
was translated into
Greek (called the
Septuagint) around
the third and second
centuries BCE for Greek
speaking Jews living in
Alexandria, Egypt who could
no longer read Hebrew.
The Septuagint was adopted
by Greek speaking Jewish
Christians living in Egypt and
was later translated into Latin
between 382 and 405 CE..
Pope Damasus commissioned
Jerome (Eusebius Hieronymus)
to translate the New
Testament and the Septuagint
from Greek into Latin. Jerome
used these translations to
create the first official
Christian Bible, the Roman
Catholic, Latin Vulgate.
In the fourth century AD, the
Jewish religion was well
established when orthodox
Roman Catholic Christianity
was created, and
subsequently merged the
Hebrew Bible (called the Old
Testament by Christians) with
the New Testament writings to
provide a historical foundation
for their fledgling religious
cult.
The Jews don't accept the
Christian Bible because the
Roman Catholic Christians
reinterpreted their Hebrew
Bible, to make it support their
view that, Jesus was the
prophesized Messiah to come
or God in the flesh.
That’s how we get the first
two religions fused together in
the bible, as if they were
always one.
But even in the Old Testament
(the Hebrew Bible) there are
two different Gods of two
different religions. One of the
Gods was called El or Elohim
and the other was called Yah
or Yahweh.
El was the God of Israel and
you see El as a part of the
names of all the significant
characters who worshipped El
as their God: Michael, Gabriel,
Daniel, Samuel and even in
the name of the nation, Israel.
Yah or Yahweh was the God of
Judah and you see that in the
names of His worshippers, like
Elijah, Elisha, Nehemiah,
Jeremiah and in the name of
the original Jewish State,
Judah.
You don’t believe there were
two different Gods in the Old
Testament and that the
“Children of Israel” had two
different Gods or don’t want to
believe it?
Well let’s look at Kings 12:21
where it's stated, “And when
Rehoboam was come to
Jerusalem, he assembled all
the house of Judah , with the
tribe of Benjamin, an hundred
and fourscore thousand
chosen men, which were
warriors, to fight against the
house of Israel , to bring the
kingdom again to Rehoboam
the son of Solomon”.
The “Children of Israel” split
into two separate kingdoms:
the Northern Kingdom of the
ten tribes of Israel, named
after their God El and the
Southern kingdom of the
tribes of Judah and Benjamin,
who united to form the
Kingdom of Judah, named
after their God Yah or Yahweh.
Do you believe it now?
When we Add these Gods and
religions together with the
previous two, that makes four
religions in the Bible!
The writer of Exodus tries to
hide the fact that the
“Children of Israel” had two
different Gods with this little
bit of rationalizing;
“And God spake unto Moses,
and said unto him, I am the
LORD: 6: 3 And I appeared
unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and
unto Jacob, by the name of
God Almighty (in Hebrew El
Shaddai), but by my name
YAHWEH was I not known to
them”. Exodus 6:2 (You see…
here God says is Name is El
(God) almighty)
God changed his name?
Well it’s obvious that the
“Children of Israel” had no
knowledge of this God, that's
why the writer is trying to
make it seem as though it's
the same God as the “God of
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob” but
that doesn’t appear to be the
case. But here's the kicker,
“God Almighty” in Hebrew is El
Shaddai. El means God. The
patriarch Jacob's name was
changed to “Israel” because
his God was El. As I mentioned
earlier, the characters in the
Old Testament have the
names of their Gods
incorporated into their
personal names.
The writer of Exodus says God’
name is Yahweh but he's
trying to make it seem as if El
and Yahweh are one and the
same, in an attempt to make it
appear as if the “Children of
Israel” were always one nation
who believed in the same
God!
As if the ‘Children of Israel”
had a long historical
relationship with Yahweh
dating back to Abraham which
they obviously didn't. The
Exodus writer tries to hide
this, making it seem that this
is the same God with a
different name. Remember,
he’s writing years after the
fact (if it is a fact) when the
“Children of Israel” were
divided against each other and
in their choice of Gods; but
let’s move on.
And let’s not forget the fifh
religion in the Bible, the
monotheistic religion of Moses,
who led the “Children of
Israel” out of Egypt.
The reason that Moses had to
wander around the desert for
forty years disciplining the
“Children of Israel” was
because after living in Egypt
for four hundred years, they
were more Egyptian then the
were “ Israelite” and kept
reverting back to their old
Egyptian religious practices.
(They were just as much
Egyptian as African-Americans
are Americans after living in
America for four hundred
years.)
Moses was attempting to
create a new people with a
new identity and a new
religion. The poor guy had to
make numerous laws and
prohibitions against any
behavior, ritual or God, that
was like their former religion.
If you read the story, you’ll
see he had a hell of a time
trying make that happen!
Not to mention that Moses,
himself was, an Egyptian; He
was raised and educated in
the Egyptian royal household
from infancy to adulthood (if
you believe the text).
In fact, the text shows that the
daughters of the priest of
Midian couldn’t tell the
difference between Moses and
an Egyptian.
“And the shepherds came and
drove them away: but Moses
stood up and helped them,
and watered their flock.2:18
And when they came to Reuel
their father, he said, How is it
that you are come so soon to
day? 2:19 And they said, An
Egyptian delivered us out of
the hand of the shepherds,
and also drew water enough
for us, and watered the flock”.
Exodus 2:17
I think that pretty much
stamps him as an Egyptian
don’t you?
The writer of Exodus obviously
wanted to keep Moses
Egyptian identity secret,
because he deleted the first
part of his name and only left
the title, Moses. Moses is
Egyptian for son or heir, as
Ben or Bar is son or heir in
Hebrew.
There were many Egyptian
Pharaohs with Moses as part of
their names. There was
Thotmose, Amonmose,
Ahmose, Ptahmose, Ramose,
(translated Rameses in
English) and others. “The final
S is an addition drawn from
the Greek translation of the
Old Testament (the
Septuagint). It's not in the
Hebrew, which has ‘Mosheh’
instead of Moses”. (Moses and
Monotheism, S. Freud, 1939
Vantage Books.)
Current scholarship supports
the idea that Moses was
actually the heretical,
eighteenth dynasty Egyptian
Pharaoh, Akhenaton, who’s
credited with establishing the
first exclusively monotheistic
religion on record.
The archeological evidence
shows that Akhenaton was an
actual historical person, his
tomb, his city and other
artifacts have been found,
while there is no archeological
evidence to support that
Moses ever existed. (“Out of
Egypt, the roots of Christianity
revealed” Ahmed Osman 1998
Random House. “Moses The
Egyptian” Jan Assman, 1997
Harvard University Press.)
And let’s not forget the sixth
religion in the Bible, the
Christianity of the Apostle,
Paul, who never even met
Jesus (real Jewish name
Yeshua, in English, Joshua) but
is said to have had a visionary
encounter with him on the
road to Damascus.
“And as he journeyed, he
came near Damascus: and
suddenly there shined round
about him a light from heaven:
9:4 And he fell to the earth,
and heard a voice saying unto
him, Saul, Saul, why
persecutest thou me? 9:5 And
he said, Who art thou, Lord?
And the Lord said, I am Jesus
whom thou persecutest: it is
hard for thee to kick against
the pricks. 9:6 And he
trembling and astonished said,
Lord, what wilt thou have me
to do? And the Lord said unto
him, Arise, and go into the
city, and it shall be told thee
what thou must do. 9:7 And
the men which journeyed with
him stood speechless, hearing
a voice, but seeing no man”.
Act 9:3
Paul’s name was Saul before
this experience after which his
name was changed to Paul.
Actually, the text doesn’t say
his name was changed; it just
starts referring to him as Paul
instead of Saul.
So you see, Paul never met
the historical Jesus, so he was
focused on Christ, the spiritual
man, while the disciples
focused on, Jesus, the physical
man.
Paul says the he preached his
version of Christ long before
he met the disciples and that
his testimony of Christ wasn't
received from man,
“But when it pleased God, who
separated me from my
mother's womb, and called me
by his grace,1:16 To reveal his
Son in me, that I might preach
him among the heathen;
immediately I conferred not
with flesh and blood 1:17
Neither went I up to Jerusalem
to them which were apostles
before me; but I went into
Arabia, and returned again
unto Damascus.1:18 Then
after three years I went up to
Jerusalem to see Peter, and
abode with him fifteen days
1:19 But other of the apostles
saw I none, save James the
Lord's brother. 1:20 Now the
things which I write unto you,
behold, before God, I lie not.
1:21 Afterwards I came into
the regions of Syria and
Cilicia” Galatians 1:15
In Galatians 2:20 he further
says,
“I am crucified with Christ:
neverthless I live; yet not I,
but Christ liveth in me: and
the life which I now live in the
flesh I live by the faith of the
Son of God, who loved me,
and gave himself for me.”
Paul says that Christ lives in
him, not Jesus, which would
have been a physical
impossibility; nowhere in the
four gospels do the disciples
ever say that Christ lived in
them. This shows that Paul
and the disciples held
different religious view about
Jesus. Paul's Jesus was
spiritual, as was his
Christianity, where as the
disciples Christianity was
physical (centered on the
historical and physical person
of Jesus).
Even Paul's view of what a Jew
is, is based on a spiritual
rather than physical view,
“ For he is not a Jew, which is
one outwardly; neither is that
circumcision, which is outward
in the flesh: 2:29 But he is a
Jew, which is one inwardly;
and circumcision is that of the
heart, in the spirit, and not in
the letter; whose praise is not
of men, but of God”. Romans
2:28
Inwardly, of the heart, in the
spirit, not in the letter are all
proof positive that Paul’s view
of Christianity is spiritual not
literal. His experience of Jesus
was so different from the
disciples that they agreed that
they would preach their
gospel to the Jews while Paul
would preach his gospel to the
Greco-Roman and non-Jewish
world, collectively referred to
as the Gentiles.
Just to piggyback on this
difference between Paul's and
the disciples’ view.
Their focus was so much on
the resurrection of Jesus’
physical body. The writer of
Luke takes pains to show the
resurrected Jesus was flesh
and bones, and even has him
asking for some meat to eat,
as proof that his dead body
had risen from the grave like a
zombie!
“But they were terrified and
affrighted, and supposed that
they had seen a spirit. 24:38
And he said unto them, Why
are ye troubled? and why do
thoughts arise in your hearts?
24:39 Behold my hands and
my feet, that it is I myself:
handle me, and see; for a
spirit hath not flesh and
bones, as ye see me have.
24:40 And when he had thus
spoken, he shewed them his
hands and his feet. 24:41 And
while they yet believed not for
joy, and wondered, he said
unto them, Have ye here any
meat?24:42 And they gave
him a piece of a broiled fish,
and of an honeycomb. Luke
24:43 And he took it, and did
eat before them”. Luke 24:37
The writer of acts has Jesus
ascending to heaven
physically,
“And when he had spoken
these things, while they
beheld, he was taken up; and
a cloud received him out of
their sight”. Act 1:9
But in Corinthians Paul’s
expounds a more spiritual
view of the resurrection,
The first man is of the earth,
earthy; the second man is the
Lord from heaven. 15:48 As is
the earthy, such are they also
that are earthy: and as is the
heavenly, such are they also
that are heavenly. 15:49 And
as we have borne the image of
the earthy, we shall also bear
the image of the heavenly.
15:50 Now this I say, brethren,
that flesh and blood cannot
inherit the kingdom of God;
neither doth corruption inherit
incorruption”. 1Corinthian
15:47
Paul says flesh and blood can’t
inherit the kingdom of God but
Acts has Jesus physically
ascending to heaven.
This illustrates the variant
beliefs Paul and the disciples
had about the resurrection.
The disciples believed Jesus’
physical body rose from the
dead and ascended to heaven
but Paul's believed the
resurrection was of the
spiritual body not of the
physical body.
And the contradictions
abound.
Paul said that the gospel he
preached was the only true
gospel which means all other
gospels were false including
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
“I marvel that ye are so soon
removed from him that called
you into the grace of Christ
unto another gospel 1:7 Which
is not another; but there be
some that trouble you, and
would pervert the gospel of
Christ.
1:8 But though we, or an angel
from heaven, preach any
other gospel unto you than
that which we have preached
unto you, let him be
accursed’. Galatians 1: 6
Paul is so emphatic that his
gospel is the only true gospel
he says, even if an angel
preached any other gospel
besides the one he preached
let him be cursed!
Note, that Paul refers to the
gospel singular not the
Gospels plural.
So does Jesus “And saying,
The time is fulfilled, and the
kingdom of God is at hand:
repent ye, and believe the
gospel”. Mark 1:15
Paul’s writings predate the
writing of the four Gospels and
he said there was only one
gospel, his gospel, presumably
the same gospel that Jesus is
referring to, so where did
these later gospels come from
and Who wrote them?
Before Christianity became
the state religion of the
Roman Empire, it was
originally a Jewish cult
persecuted by Jewish and
Roman clergy as being
heretical. After it became the
state religion of the empire,
the New Testament
documents were written
collected and compiled into
one book with the Hebrew
bible. The doctrine that Old
Testament writings foretold
the coming of, Jesus, their
newly arrived God in the flesh,
was used as rationale for why
this was done.
As I said previously, that’s one
the of reasons the Jews don’t
accept the Christian bible,
even though it contains some
of their writings, because
neither Jesus nor the New
Testament were part of their
original bible.
So with Paul’s and the
disciples’ variant takes on
Jesus that makes seven
religions in the Bible.
So there you have it folks; at
least seven religions in the
Bible.
I know true believers will hide
behind the shield of their
beliefs will try to tear this all
apart.
Go right ahead…you’re
welcomed to try

What's up How ya
doing?
Here’s something that
occurred to me a while ago. So
I was inspired to hub about it.
But first, let me say this. I'm
not trying to prove the Bible is
true or false. I'm just taking an
open-minded look at what's
written in it and reporting
what I see.
Some people find certain
verses in the Bible, difficult,
contradictory and hard to
understand. But just shrug
and say "oh well!", and go on
their merry way. I'm not one of
those people.
So here we go,
"And Jesus cried out again
with a loud voice, and yielded
up His spirit. And behold, the
veil of the temple was torn in
two from top to bottom; and
the earth shook and the rocks
were split. The tombs were
opened, and many bodies of
the saints who had fallen
asleep were raised; and
coming out of the tombs. After
His resurrection they entered
the holy city and appeared to
many". Matt 27:50-53
Don't you find this story
interesting? I find it very
interesting. I never hear
anyone, believers or preachers
etc. talk about his scenario.
Dead saints rising from their
graves and walking among the
living, like zombies in the
"Night Of The Living Dead"
zombie movie! Woe!
How many times, have some
of you read this story and just
kind of glossed over the dead
saints rising from their graves
part?
Isn't Jesus supposed to be the
only person to come back from
the dead?
Isn't that a major reason why
Christians believe in Jesus?
Isn’t that part of what they say
makes him different from
anyone else in history?
.But here you have dead
saints rising from the dead
before Jesus does! Uh Oh!
Houston! I think we have a
problem.
Why don't Christians and
preachers talk about this
incident? Why do they skip
over it and only focus on Jesus'
rising from the dead?
Are we supposed to take this
story literally? That multiple
dead people, including Jesus
"came" back from the dead
and showed themselves to
many people, but that news
didn't spread beyond that area
where the incident supposedly
occurred? I don't think so.
No historians from those times
mention this tale.
Here's the first clue that this
story wasn't written during the
time this incident supposedly
occurred or by those who
supposedly witnessed it.
Dead saints!
What dead saints are they
talking about? Were there
saints in the Judaism during
that time? No.
Were there saints in
Christianity at that time? No.
Christianity didn't exist until
well after Jesus' supposed
"ascension" to heaven. So
they couldn't have been
Christian saints. So whose
saints were they?
Lets see what Eason's Bible
Dictionary says about the word
saint,
(Saint)
"one separated from the world
and consecrated to God; one
holy by profession and by
covenant; a believer in Christ
(Psalms 16:3, Romans 1:7 Phil
1:1;Hebrews 6:10).
(The "saints" spoken of in Jude
1:14 are probably not the
disciples of Christ, but the
"innumerable company of
angels" ( Hebrews 12:22 ;
Psalms 68:17, with reference
to Deuteronomy 33:2.This
word is also used of the holy
dead (Matthew 27:52 ;
Revelation 18:24). It was not
used as a distinctive title of
the apostles and evangelists
and of a "spiritual nobility" till
the fourth century. In that
sense it is not a scriptural
title".)
So, they couldn't have been
Christian apostles and
evangelists, because they
weren't called saints until the
fourth century AD, way after
this story was supposedly
written in the first century AD.
So which brand of Christianity
had saints in the fourth
century AD?
El correcto! Catholic
Christianity.
So I would say that this story
had to have been written after
the establishment of Catholic
Christianity and the Catholic
Church, in the fourth century
AD, because that's when the
apostle's and evangelists were
first called saints, wouldn't you
agree?
Do you really believe that if
dead Saints (zombies) came
out of their graves and walked
among the living it wouldn't
have made the "news" of day
or even leave a blip on the
radar screen of ancient
history, except in this story?
If you do...I want some of what
you been smoking!
And what happen to these
zombie saints?
The story says they showed
themselves to many people
after Jesus' resurrection, but
after that we her nothing
about them. Did they climb
back into their graves? Where
did they go? The zombie
saints seemed to be
mentioned in this story, along
with the temple cracking and
the earth quaking, to make
Jesus' death seem like a
supernatural occurrence.
I think this is a made up story.
The reason I say this along
with the other things I’ve
pointed out, is, if Jesus was
the "son of God" and
contradictory, "God in the
flesh". Why did he have to
die? Believers might say to
show he had power over
death. Then why is it when he
was dying on the cross he
cried out "My, My God Why
Have You forsaken me?
" Now from the sixth hour
darkness fell upon all the land
until the ninth hour.About the
ninth hour Jesus cried out with
a loud voice, saying, “ELI, ELI,
LAMA SABACHTHANI?” that is,
“MY GOD, MY GOD, WHY HAVE
YOU FORSAKEN ME?” Matt
27:45-46
Do you think Jesus was crying
out to himself for help or to
someone other them himself
for help?
I think the obvious answer is
someone other than himself
for help. All of this places the
authenticity of this story in the
"great bin of doubt" for me,
what about for you?
Either those who wrote this
story were too stupid to see
the glaring contradictions in
this tale. Or thought those
who would read it, were too
stupid to see them. But then
again, not many people could
read or write during those
times. Priests were the ones
who could read and write and
who educated the royalty and
the nobles. Most of the
common folks couldn't read or
write.
You've heard how if you
whisper something in
someone's ear at party and
tell them to whisper it in
someone else's ear and they
into someone else's ear and so
on and so on. That by the time
it gets back to you. It may
sound nothing like what you
originally said.
So imagine if some Hebrew
speaking person, told a story
like this one to one or more
people thousands of years
ago. Then those people told to
it other people and they told it
to other people and so on and
so on. Then Greek speaking
people learned the story and
told it to others and they told
it to others and so on and so
on. Then Latin speaking
people learned the story and
told to others and so on and so
on. Finally, Old English
speaking people learned the
story and told to others and so
on and so on. And this went on
for thousands of years. Then
we learned the story in
modern English from others
who learned the story from
others and so and so on.
Do you think that story would
sound anything like the
original story told in Hebrew?
Or the one told in Greek? Or
the one told in Latin? On the
one told in Old English?
And your answer is......... I
thought so!
What if this story about Jesus
and the dead zombie saints
rising from their graves and
walking among the living,
were about Buddha or some
other non-Christian god-man,
and you're a Christian would
you believe this story was
true? I didn't think so.
Now apply that same logic to
this story. Do you believe this
story is true?
And your answer is a
resounding...........
To paraphrase the Buddha,
those who accept tradition on
faith, are like a chain of blind
men, holding hands over time,
passing along the message of
what the first one said he saw.
And to quote Jesus, "... if the
blind lead the blind, both shall
fall into the ditch."

[color=#000099][/color] This may be the first
time that some of
you have heard of
this topic.
Well welcome
aboard this journey
into a religious idea
that has plagued the
minds of certain
groups of people
over long periods of
time, causing them
to wreck havoc and
scorn upon another
group of people for
hundreds if not
thousands of years.
Sadly, some people
still believe this idea.
First the text of the
curse then my
commentary on the
text
Genesis chapter 9
20 Noah was the first
tiller of the soil. He
planted a vineyard;
21 and he drank of
the wine, and became drunk,
and lay uncovered in his tent.
22 And Ham, the father of
Canaan, saw the unclothedness of
his father, and told his two
brothers outside. 23 Then
Shem and Japheth took a
garment, laid it upon both
their shoulders, and walked
backward and covered the
unclothedness of their father;
their faces were turned away,
and they did not see their
father’s unclothedness. 24 When
Noah awoke from his wine and
knew what his youngest son
had done to him, 25 he said,
"Cursed be Canaan; A slave of
slaves shall he be to his
brothers." 26 He also said,
"Blessed by the Lord my God
be Shem; and let Canaan be
his slave. God enlarge
Japheth, and let him dwell in
the tents of Shem; and let
Canaan be his slave." (Revised
Standard Edition)
My Commentary
Now let’s see what this
infamous curse is all about.
Well it appears that Noah got
drunk and passed-out naked in
his tent (Verse 21). His son
Ham saw him lying there
drunk asleep and told his
brothers about it and they
covered him with a garment
(Verse 22). So it seems that
Noah spoke this curse because
he was mad that his son, Ham,
saw him naked.
I guess he was pretty uptight
about being seen naked by
Ham but not about drinking so
much that he'd passed-out
and was lying there in the
nude where anyone could see
him, including Shem and
Japheth. Ham just happened
to see him first.
Now here’s where the story
gets interesting.
Noah’s mad at his son, Ham,
but he curses his grandson
Canaan (Verse 25). He says
"Cursed be Canaan; a slave of
slaves shall you be to your
brothers."
Why is he cursing his innocent
grandson Canaan, who's not in
this story at all up to this point
and who’s only mentioned
here in passing? (Verse 22)
And what’s so bad about being
seen naked that he’d want to
curse anybody anyway,
especially his innocent
grandson? Ham committed
this "horrible" offense so why
doesn’t he curse Ham instead?
Noah was drunk; so maybe he
intended to curse Ham but
mistakenly cursed Canaan. At
any rate, the person who
initially took the “forbidden”
action in relation to Noah was
Ham not Canaan.
Some people say that seeing
Noah naked wasn't the real
reason for his invoking the
curse…that the real reason
Canaan was cursed was
because he sexually molested
Noah while he was sleeping.
Read the text for yourself
folks;
“And Ham, the father of
Canaan, saw the unclothedness of
his father, and told his two
brothers outside. 23 Then
Shem and Japheth took a
garment, laid it upon both
their shoulders, and walked
backward and covered the
unclothedness of their father;
their faces were turned away,
and they did not see their
father’s unclothedness”. (Verse
22)
Do you see anything in the
text about Canaan molesting
his grandfather, Noah? Does it
seem to you that the real
reason for the curse was that
Ham saw Noah naked?
If seeing Noah naked wasn't
the reason why does the
writer emphasize the fact that
Ham saw his father's
unclothedness and Shem and
Japheth didn't? Anyway, the
innocent Canaan received the
curse not, Ham.
Let's move on.
Let’s dissect the historical
after shocks of this curse.
White supremacists and their
sympathizers say that Ham
was cursed by God with
blackness and as a result, all
of Ham’s descendants (Black
People) are cursed and are
destined to be slaves (A good
justification for enslaving
Africans during the European
slave trade.).
But as you can see by the
text, that’s not true. God
doesn’t curse anyone Noah
does. (Verse 24-25). Noah
doesn’t curse Ham he curses
his innocent grandson,
Canaan, and the text doesn’t
say that Ham or Canaan were
cursed with blackness.
Noah said in Verse 25,
“Canaan shall be a slave of
slaves to his brothers” and in
Verses 26-27, to his Uncles
Shem and Japheth not to
white supremacists or any
other group.
Now who are these brothers
Canaan is cursed to be a slave
to?
Get your bibles out, scroll
down to Genesis 10, Verse 6
where it lists the sons of Ham;
his son’s are listed as Cush,
Mizraim, Put and Canaan.
(Mizraim… was the name
generally given by the
Hebrews to the land of
Egypt…) (Easton’s Revised
Bible dictionary)
(This probably means that this
list of sons is metaphorical or
mythological because these
are all names of ancient
civilizations in Africa; groups of
people not individuals).
These are the blacks who
(according to the text) are the
descendants of Ham, who
historically, white racists say
were cursed by God with
blackness; but, again, as you
can see from the text that’s
not the case. God doesn’t
curse Ham or his sons with
blackness, but Noah does
curse Canaan.
So Canaan is cursed to be a
slave to his brothers Cush,
Egypt, and Put? Canaan is
cursed to be a slave to the
ancestors of the blacks?
Not to mention that if
Canaan’s brothers are black…
that means Canaan is black…
and his father Ham is
black...and since Ham, Shem
and Japheth all have the same
father and mother. It’s logical
to conclude that Noah, his
wife, Shem and Japheth are
black.
Remember Ham wasn't cursed
with blackness. So that means
that if his sons are black, he's
black, his mother and father
are black, and so are his
brothers. That’s how absurd
this whole thing about blacks
being cursed with blackness
is. Blacks weren't cursed with
black skin.
Dark Skin Is A Blessing
Actually, having black skin was
a blessing for Africans rather
than a curse. Dark skin
protected Africans and other
dark skin people from being
killed or severely burned by
the sun. The melanin content
of the skin is what causes dark
skin. It’s because of melanin
that you get tanned rather
than burned when you’re out
in the hot sun.
Those with very fair or pale
skin have very little or no
melanin in their skin, that’s
why they can be severely
burned or poisoned by
exposure to the sun. You could
say that those people are
cursed because they don’t
have dark skin which is just as
stupid as saying that those
with dark skin are cursed
because they don’t have white
skin.
I'm surprised by the number of
people that don't know about
melanin, especially white
people. Please those of you
who don't know do a search on
melanin and get updated and
maybe we can start to put an
end to some of the stupidity of
racism based on skin color.
Let’s trace the descendants of
the innocent cursed Canaan.
Go to Genesis 10, Verse15-20
and you’ll see that the
descendants of Canaan
actually end up populating a
large portion of what’s now
the Middle East. Canaan was
also the name of the
“Promised Land” (roughly
were present day Israel is
now) that Moses led the
Children of Israel to. And since
the Israelites were the
descendants of Canaan’s
uncle, Shem, that means they
actually fought their own
relatives for possession the
“Promised Land”.
As I said earlier, if Ham was
black, then the whole family of
Noah was black, therefore by
extension, Moses and the
people he led out of Egypt
were black. And if you believe
that we all descend from
Adam and Eve, they were
black; which goes along with
the current findings of genetic
and archeological science that
states that, all humans
originated in Africa near
Ethiopia.
Not to mention that Egypt was
also a descendant of Ham,
where these children of Israel
lived and intermingled for four
hundred years. (After
intermingling with Egyptians
for four hundred years, they
had become more Egyptian
than Israelite; as the
descendants of Africans have
become more American than
African after living in the
United States for a similar
length of time)
So if there were any “cursed
descendants of Ham.” It looks
like they would have to be
Canaan’s descendants. But
again…the text doesn’t say
Canaan’s descendants were
cursed just the innocent
Canaan (Verse 25-26).
So what happened to the
fabled curse on black people?
Unless you’re spiritually
myopic, you can see from the
text that this whole curse
thing has just been ethnic
propaganda, used for
centuries to justify enslaving
Africans and their descendants
for economic gain and to help
relieve the guilt of white
Christians for participating in
the slave trade. Generally
speaking, this myth has
allowed all whites to feel
superior to blacks for no other
reason than that they are
white!
According to the noted African
American Historian and
anthropologist, J.A Rogers, in
his book "Nature Knows No
Color Line" certain Jewish
Rabbis in the first or second
century A.D. taught that Ham
was cursed with blackness for
engaging in sex on the ark
against God’s command. This
is another source of historical
misinformation that helped
create the psychological
climate that made it easier for
various white Christian
cultures to abuse and enslave
blacks for social and economic
gain.
As Montesquieu, the French
political theorist said, “It is
impossible for us to suppose
these creatures, enslaved
Africans, to be men; because
allowing them to be men, a
suspicion would follow that we
ourselves are not Christians.”
In other words Christians
wouldn't enslave their fellow
man. So Montesquieu and
others would rather see the
enslaved Africans as not
human (not men) in order to
"save face" and still see
themselves as "good"
Christians. (How hypocritical is
that?)
The myth that God "cursed"
blacks made it easier for white
Christians and others to
engage in racist behaviors
without feeling guilty about it.
(Of course not all whites or
white Christians accepted this
ideology or engaged in those
behaviors and many were
totally in opposition to any
racist ideology)
Blacks must have previously
been very powerful and
enviously admired in the
cultural and religious history of
the various white cultures of
the world, for so much scorn to
have been heaped on them
starting in such ancient times.
“What a subject for
meditation, just think that the
race of black men today our
slaves and the object of our
scorn, is the very race to
which we owe our arts,
science and even the use of
our speech.” Anthropologist,
Count Constatin de Volney
(1727-1820).
Ironically there are African-
Americans who believe this
myth about blacks being the
"Cursed Descendants of Ham"
without ever researching it to
see if it's true or not! They
never critique nor question if
what they believe is true or
not. They just accept it as
true, because that’s what
they’ve been taught.
But that's the way it is with
those who are overly religious
or closed minded whether
they’re black or white. But we
should seek to know the truth
if want to free our minds of
deception and self deception.
“And ye shall know the truth,
and the truth shall make you
free” John 8:32
This article is dedicated to
those who believed that
blacks were the “Cursed
Descendants of Ham” based
on what they’ve been taught
or believed that the Bible said
on the subject. Hopefully after
reading this article the truth
flashed across your Minds like
Lightening across a darken sky,, thx and goodbye