DeathStroke007's Posts
Nairaland Forum › DeathStroke007's Profile › DeathStroke007's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 (of 45 pages)
Gospel Of Barnabas Vs Bible Verse (John 8:1-11) The greatest gift Allah (creator) gave human being is free will... Free will let you make choices.. Choices make you who you are, what you will be .... No comments needed.. Just read and choose what to believe... |
Lawz20:Do not leave her if you love her, sit her down and talk to her, explain your pains to her... Her reply will make you know what's next... Forget pastor vision.. Na lie Forget all those 2go and Facebook.. Its only online not real.. Do you want to crash 4 years relationship because of your suggestions?? GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT BEFORE YOU JUDGE.. I DONT WANT YOU TO BLAME YOURSELF LATER |
17 YEAR ADVISOR TO THE POPE: EXPOSES BIBLE FRAUD AND FORGERY Retired highly regarded priest, who for 17 years (1980-1997) served as an advisor to the Pope, exposes bible forgery and fraud. |
The scrolls were discovered in 1948, and the Vatican, after a Church Father was put in charge of the translation, suppressed the publication of the Scrolls for many years. So, what do the Dead Sea Scrolls say about Jesus? Again:They don’t say anything about Jesus (or Christ). From:http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_do_the_Dead_Sea_Scrolls_say_about_Jesus#ixzz1yu8rrvsA The Dead Sea Scrolls are a collection of Jewish religious and secular documents, many of them dating back to pre-Christian times. There is no irrefutable reference among the scrolls to Jesus. There are references to cryptic persons such as the “Teacher of Righteousness”, but there is no evidence that the Teacher, or any other person mentioned in the scrolls, is meant to be Jesus. Nevertheless, some scholars have sought to find evidence about early Christianity among thescrolls. For example, Robert Eisenman (The Dead Sea Scrolls and the First Christians) sees apossible reference to Jesus in the Damascus Document, and believes “Teacher of Righteousness” may have been James the Just. Read more:http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_do_the_Dead_Sea_Scrolls_say_about_Jesus#ixzz1yu8E2sAQ A researcher follows up on this claim and turns up with a dead end:“I [(Michael Sanders, Author of “Mysteries of the Bible, James, the Brother of Jesus”) was notto be denied. I sent him [(Professor Robert Eisenman (Author of “The Dead Sea Scrolls and the First Christians”)]-this last note in brackets added by Author Samuel Butler- “fax after fax asking him the simple question. If James the Brother of Jesus is the Righteous Teacher, who was Jesus, I couldn’t find a character in the scrolls that would fit the picture. “He (Professor Eisenman) never answered the faxes until one day his assistant called and everything was made crystal clear. There was no mention of Jesus in the Dead Sea Scrolls because Jesus as a living historical figure, in their theory, did not exist. They could not state that publicly because of the fear of an outcry, but that was the situation.” What did Pope Leo X say about Jesus?Pope Leo X (1513-1521Some believe that he considered Jesus to be a mere legend. The Catholic Encyclopediarefers to a widely circulated remark:“How much we and our family have profited by the legend of Christ, is sufficiently evident to all ages.” http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_jcno.htm Pope Paul III expressed similar sentiments, saying “there were no valid documents to demonstrate the existence of Christ.”“ Historically, it is quite doubtful whether Christ ever existed at all, and if He did we do not know anything about Him.“ –Bertrand Russell |
WHAT DO THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS SAY ABOUT JESUS? The short answer: Nothing. Nothing, and the last of the scrolls have been dated to approximately 68 AD, 35 years after the year ascribed to the Crucifixion. |
IT’S IN THE BOOK :From:http://www.infidels.org/library/historical/kersey_graves/16/chap16.html The belief in the crucifixion of Gods was prevalent in various oriental or heathen countries long prior to the reported crucifixion of Christ. Here are 16: I. — CRUCIFIXION OF CHRISHNA OF INDIA, 1200B.CCrucifixion ?: Some say he was hung upside down from a tree. Other sources say he died from an arrow shot into his foot. Does it matter?They are different versions of a myth, anyway.II. — CRUCIFIXION OF THE HINDOO SAKIA, 600 B.C.III. — THAMMUZ OF SYRIA CRUCIFIED, 1160 B.C.IV. — CRUCIFIXION OF WITTOBA OF THE TELINGONESIC, 552 B.C.V. — IAO OF NEPAUL CRUCIFIED, 622 B.C.VI. — HESUS OF THE CELTIC DRUIDS CRUCIFIED, 834 B.C.VII. — QUEXALCOTE OF MEXICO CRUCIFIED, 587 B.C.VIII. — QUIRINUS OF ROME CRUCIFIED, 506 B.C.IX. — (AESCHYLUS) PROMETHEUS CRUCIFIED, 547 B.C.X. — CRUCIFIXION OF THULIS OF EGYPT, 1700 B.C.XI. — CRUCIFIXION OF INDRA OF TIBET, 725 B.C.XII. — ALCESTOS OF EURIPIDES CRUCIFIED, 600B.C.XIII. — ATYS OF PHRYGIA CRUCIFIED, 1170 B.C.XIV. — CRITE OF CHALDEA CRUCIFIED, 1200 B.C.XV. — BALI OF ORISSA CRUCIFIED, 725 B.C.XVI. — MITHRA OF PERSIA CRUCIFIED, 600 B.C. Statement at the end of the above stated web site. “NOTE. — The author desires it to be understoodwith respect to the cases of crucifixion here briefly narrated, that they are not vouched for as actual occurrences, of which there is much ground to doubt. It has neither been his aim or desire to prove them to be real historical events, nor to establish any certain number of cases. Indeed, he deems it unimportant to know, if it could be determined, whether they are fact or fiction, or whether one God was crucified, or many. The moral lesson designed to be taught by this chapter is, simply, that the belief in the crucifixion of Gods was prevalent in various oriental or heathen countries long prior to the reported crucifixion of Christ. If this point is established — which he feels certain no reader will dispute then he is not concerned to know whether he has made out sixteen cases of crucifixion or not. Six will prove it as well as sixteen. “ .Christianity was invented by Emperor Constantine , for political purposes, based upon the myth of Mithra, a Persian savior god born on December 25 , son of a virgin. Mithra performed miracles and was later crucified. Pope Leo X (died 1521) called Christ a “Fable”. Later Pope Paul III expressed similar sentiments. |
Charles Guignebert, who does not doubt that Jesus of the Gospels lived in Gallilee in the 1st century, nevertheless dismisses this letter as acceptable historical evidence: “Only the most robust credulity could reckon this assertion as admissible evidence for the historicity of Jesus” –http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus Nevertheless, I was concerned about the possibility of far older Gospels when I was stating that Christianity was invented around 325 A.D., but the research thread leads back to Eusebius, the FORGER, (“Papias, quoted by Eusebius…”). Eusebius was the dishonest Church Father historian of antiquity who made up a lot of Church history.“we shall introduce into this history in general only those events which may be useful first to ourselves and afterwards to posterity”.The research thread (about older Gospels) also leads to the “spurious” writings of Irenaeus:http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/gospels-late-forgeries/blog-249881/. THE RELIGIOUS QUICKSAND OF EARLY CHRISTIAN WRITINGS. What about pre-nicene so-called “Early Christian” (Gnostic?) writings?They disagreed with each other, were riddled with conflict and forgeries, of questionable and confusing timing and origin , had conflicting opinions about supposed truths, and were not coherent enoughfor an organized religion. So the myth of Mithra, the Persian Savior God, was chosen by Emperor Constantine and Bishop Eusebius as the model to create the new religion , Christianity. What if there are references to Christ and/or Jesus in pre-nicene writings? That doesn’t mean Jesus orChrist existed. What if there are references to “fairies” in pre-nicene literature? That wouldn’t mean fairies existed, prior to the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD or later, even if the Council claimed the existence of fairies and made it doctrine, with severe penalties for those who denied their existence. Yes, but what about Church father Justin Martyr’s purported use of the New Testament gospels?From Acharya S., Biblical scholar: (http://www.freethoughtnation.com/contributing-writers/63-acharya-s/679-does-justin-martyr-quote-the-gospels.html)“No verbatim quotes or unambiguous citations from the canonical gospels as we have them appear anywhere in Justin’s extant works.”Matthew, Mark and Luke arenevernamed by Justin; nor is John. Nor does Justin Martyr name any of the evangelists in any known text. All of the Gospels were written by anonymous authors, not by the actual disciples . In fact, the Church doesn’t even have the anonymous writings that purport to be written by a disciple that was written before the middle of the 4th century. “The earliest of the extant manuscripts [of the New Testament], it is true, do not date back beyond the middle of the fourth century AD”– (Catholic Encyclopedia, op. cit., pp. 656-7). That is saying, they have no manuscript of Mark,. no manuscript of Matthew nor Luke, nor John, written before the middle of the 4th century. Retired Episcopal Bishop says Hell is an invention of the church to control people with fear: http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=5BkP9-HG8-Ihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Shelby_Spong Information about Eusebius, Constantine, and Paul. FATHER EUSEBIUS, FORGER:http://www.christianity-revealed.com/cr/files/fathereusebiustheforger.html(One view, for what it’s worth-a bit harsh)_________________________ |
Charles Guignebert
|
In part: Josephus’s Testimonium Flavianum examined linguistically Greek Analysis Demonstrates the Passage a forgery in Toto From D.M. Murdock author of WHO Was Jesus? ?D.M.Murdock[at]StellarHousePublishing.com(With gratitude to Dr. Paul J. Hopper for his review of this paper) Abstract The passage about Jesus Christ in Jewish historian Josephus’s writings has been debated for centuries, as concerns its authenticity totally, partially or not at all. This brief “testimonium” is proffered by Christian apologists as the “best evidence" for the historicity of Jesus, but it has been declared many times to be a forgery in toto. A recent study by a renowned linguist confirms this analysis of the entire passage as an interpolation by a Christian scribe, likely during the fourth century or late Yes, but what about Pliny the Younger’s letter to emperor Trajan 112 A.D.(Pliny was not a contemporary of Jesus, and he never mentions “Jesus”?)Pliny the Younger(c. 61 – c. 112), the provincial governor ofPontusandBithynia, wrote toEmperor Trajanc. 112 concerning how to deal with Christians, who refused to worship the emperor, and instead worshiped “Christus”. What about that? |
Yes, but what about references to the four Gospels supposedly before the 3rd Century A.D.? For example: What about Tacitus, Roman Historian, who wrote about the persecutions of the early “Christians”? Regarding Tacitus, (Senator and Historian of theRoman Empire) these writings supporting the persecution weremysteriouslyfound in the 15th century in the forests of Germany, following a reward offered by Leo X for old writings, and following a history of forgeries in Catholicism: In any case, there has been serious questions about the integrity of the famous passage aboutChristians. From:http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/tacitus.htmlGordon Stein denied the authenticity of this passage, arguing: (1) no corroborating evidence that Nero persecuted the Christians (2) there was not a multitude of Christians in Rome at that date (3) Christian wasnot a common term in the first century (4) Nero was indifferent to various religions in his city (5) Nero did not start the fire in Rome (6) Tacitus does not use the name Jesus (7) Tacitus assumes his readers know Pontius PilateYes, but what about Josephus? His reference to Jesus in Testimonium Flavianum has been claimed as a later addition, (Forgery-Author) not questioning the authenticity of the main work. |
The Church makes extraordinary admissions about its New Testament. For example, when discussing the origin of those writings, “the most distinguished body of academic opinion ever assembled” (Catholic Encyclopedias, Preface) admits that the Gospels “do not go back to the first century of the Christian era” (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. vi, p. 137, pp. 655-6). This statement conflicts with priesthood assertions that the earliest Gospels were progressively written during the decades following the death of the Gospel (sic) Jesus Christ. In a remarkable aside, the Church further admits that, “the earliest of the extant manuscripts [of the New Testament], it is true, do not date back beyond the middle of the fourth century AD”– (Catholic Encyclopedia, op. cit., pp. 656-7). This statement conflicts with priesthood assertions that the earliest Gospels were progressively written during the decades following the death of the Gospel (sic) Jesus Christ. In a remarkable aside, the Church further admits that, “the earliest of the extant manuscripts [of the New Testament], it is true, do not date back beyond the middle of the fourth century AD”– (Catholic Encyclopedia, op. cit., pp. 656-7). That is some 350 years after the time the Church claims that a Jesus Christ walked the sands of Palestine, and here the true story of Christian origins slips into one of the biggest black holes in history. There is, however, a reason why there were no New Testaments untilthe fourth century: they were not written until then, and here we find evidence of the greatest misrepresentation of all time. It was British-bornFlavius Constantinus (Constantine, originally Custennyn or Custennin) (272-337) who authorized the compilation of the writings now called the New Testament. |
What (your local) Church doesn’t know and/or wouldn’t want you to know, if they knew. It has often been emphasized thatChristianityis unlike any other religion, for it stands or falls by certain events which are alleged to have occurred during a short period of time some 20 centuries ago. Those stories are presented in the New Testament, and as new evidence is revealed it will become clear that they do not represent historical realities. The Church agrees, saying: “Our documentary sources of knowledge about the origins of Christianity and its earliest development are chiefly the New Testament Scriptures, the authenticity of which we must, to a great extent, take for granted.” (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. iii, p. 712) |
It is not possible to find in any legitimate religious or historical writings compiled betweenthe beginning of the first century and well into the fourth century any reference to Jesus Christ and the spectacular events that the Church saysaccompanied his life. This confirmation comes from Frederic Farrar (1831-1903) of Trinity College, Cambridge: “It is amazing that history has not embalmed for us even one certain or definite saying or circumstance in the life of the Saviour of mankind … there is no statement in all history that says anyone saw Jesus or talked with him. Nothing in history is more astonishing than the silence of contemporary writers about events relayed in the four Gospels.” (The Life of Christ, Frederic W. Farrar, Cassell, London, 1874) This situation arises from a conflict between history and New Testament narratives. Dr Tischendorf made this comment: “We must frankly admit that we have no source of information with respect to the life of Jesus Christ other than ecclesiastic writings assembled during the fourth century.” (Codex Sinaiticus, Dr Constantin von Tischendorf, BritishLibrary, London) There is an explanation for those hundreds of years of silence: the construct of Christianity didnot begin until after the first quarter of the fourthcentury, and that is why Pope Leo X (d. 1521) called Christ a “fable” (Cardinal Bembo: His Letters…, op. cit.), and later Pope Paul III expressed similar sentiments, saying that there was no valid document to demonstrate the existence of Christ. He confessed that Jesus never existed, adding that he was no other than the sun, adored in its Mithraic sect…” BUT WAIT, WHAT DOES THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SAY ABOUT THIS? You will be surprised:From:http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/biblianazar/esp_biblianazar_40.htm |
Federic William Farrar
|
In 391 A.D., Christian Emperor Theodosius I ordered the destruction of all pagan (“heathen” they were also called) temples. The Christian Patriarch Theophilus of Alexandria (Egypt) complied with this request. Seizing this opportunity, Theophilus exerted himself to the utmost to expose the pagan mysteries to contempt, the Serapeum also he showed full of extravagant superstitions, (and) the commander-in-chief of the troops in Egypt, assisted Theophilus in demolishing the heathen temples (and) then he destroyed the Serapeum. -Historia Ecclesiastica TheSerapeum housed the Great Library of Alexandria.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_alexandriaWhy there are no records of Jesus Christ? |
These orders, said Eusebius, were followed by the immediate execution of the work itself we sent him [Constantine] magnificently and elaborately bound volumes of three-fold and four-fold forms (Life of Constantine, vol. iv, p.36). They were the New Testimonies, and thisis the first mention (c. 331) of the New Testament in the historical record. With his instructions fulfilled, Constantine then decreed that the New Testimonies would thereafter be called the word of the Roman Saviour God (Life of Constantine, vol. iii, p. 29) and official to all presbyters sermonising in the Roman Empire. He then ordered earlier presbyterial manuscriptsand the records of the council burnt and declared that any man found concealing writings should be stricken off from his shoulders(beheaded). NONE OF THESE 50 NEW TESTAMENTS EXIST TODAY OR ARE ADMITTED TO EXISTING! THIS NEW TESTAMENT WAS THE OFFICIAL BOOK OF THE NEW UNIFIED RELIGION OF CONSTANTINE NOT THE BIBLE! ALL OTHER BOOKS TO BE BURNED ,THAT WOULD INCLUDE THE TORAH/OLD TESTAMENT IT INCLUDED BURNING THE GREAT LIBRARY OF ALEXANDRIA IN EGYPT 391 A.D. |
Bishop Eusebius
|
Christianity was INVENTED. Eusebius (BishopofCaesareainPalestine“Father ofChurch History“) attended the Council of Nicaea in 325 A.D. and was a friend of Emperor Constantine, who also attended and made the keynote speech.ConstantineinstructedEusebiusto organize the compilation of a uniform collectionof new writings developed from primary aspectsof the religious texts submitted at the council. Eusebius has been described as follows: JacobBurckhardt (19th century cultural historian) dismissed Eusebius as“the first thoroughly dishonest historian of antiquity”. He has been also described as “a political theologian”. He favored doctoring his history in his own words to “be useful first to ourselves and afterwards toposterity”. Edward Gibbon (18th century historian –“The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire”) dismissed his testimony on the numberof martyrs and impugned his honesty At first, there was controversy about the new religion at the Council of Nicaea. Some claimed it was a fiction and Christ was a fiction, but they did not prevail.. (To be clear on this matter, I say don’t trust Eusebius’s reports of the Apostles or how the Apostles died, and be suspicious of all of his writings.) –AuthorSamuel Butler Eusebius then arranged for scribes to produce fifty sumptuous copies to be written on parchment in a legible manner, and in a convenient portable form, by professional scribes thoroughly accomplished in their art (ibid.). |
Christianity is a copycat religion created by Emperor Constantine (for political purposes). (Incidentally, Constantine murdered his wife andhis son, and later, the Church made him a Saint.)(For greater shocking revelations, see “Crimes of the Popes”, here) :http://www.ftarchives.net/foote/crimes/c7.htm) Saint Constantine’s copycat religion was based upon a myth (The Persian savior god Mithra, crucified 600 B.C. ? 400 B.C.?), which was based on other similar myths, all the way back toChrishna of India (a mythical god that some claim was “crucified” around 1200 B.C.). There were 16 mythical crucifixions before Christ. The belief in the crucifixion of Gods was prevalent invarious oriental or heathen countries long prior to the reported crucifixion of Christ. Of the 16 crucifixions,most were born of a virgin and about half of them on December 25th. At Amazon.com, take a look at the book “Beyond All Religion-Beyond religious SCRIPTURES and practices that support intolerance violence and even war, A PEACEFULWORLD AWAITS”. Website:http://www.beyondallreligion.net/Included: How is this for religious intolerance? Rabbi Yaacov Perrin said, “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” Muhammad married a 6 year old girl. Joseph Smith, the founder of Mormonism had 24 wives, one was 14 years old.Smith was convicted of fraud (of being an “imposter”- a con man), in a court of law.. Then he wrote “The Book of Mormon..”. The story of Moses is patterned after the story of Sargon the Great. Moses did not exist. Christianity was invented for political purposes by the Roman Emperor Constantine (“The Great”) in 325 A.D. based on the myth of Mithra (Persian savior godborn on December 25th). Look at “Compassion Center” on Facebook. A wonderful alternative toreligion. Emperor Constantine-continued: There were too many religions in Rome in 325 A.D. A Council was called in an endeavor to amalgamate the many religions of the Roman Empire into one. Christianity plagiarized older myths and legends historicized to suit the Roman Catholic Church while combining the numerous religions existing at the time (Krishna,Horus, Mithraism, Osirian, Isis, and many other mystery religions). For unity and to stop all the conflicts between the numerous religions… |
Emperor Constantine
|
if you can't, then Jesus was never a Christian |
Which of these article of Christianity faith is founded by Jesus.. said out by Jesus... if you will quote from Bible, quote from Jesus words to support your claims.... |
The religion Christianity article of faith is 1. Believe that jesus is your personal Lord and Saviour 2.Believe that he died for your sins 3.Believe that he's God 4.Believe that he's son of God 5. Believe in Bible 6.Believe in worshipping in Church 7. pay your tithes.. |
TruthHurts1: |
TruthHurts1:Paul started Christianity with the faith of Jesus died for your sins , Jesus as Trinity and other stupid believes which Jesus never know of.. original Christianity are Orthodox Christianity.. they believe there's one God and Jesus is HIS messenger |
TruthHurts1:its Paul words NOT Jesus word.. Paul never know Jesus nor Mary.. So its irrelevant |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 (of 45 pages)
