Ibime: Sharrap dia. No one cares about Iniesta Euro 2012 player of the tournament with zero goals and zero assists all tournament. When Italy were being spanked by 4 goals, it was Xavi providing two of the assists. Keep kwayet about that disgraceful polling booth award.
Xavi 2008 award is backed all through by assists and by midfield dominance.
It does not matter if Xavi was only recognised in 2008. Kante only came to prominence at 25 and Zidane was only recognised by a big club at 24.
What matters is how dominant you are when you take centre stage. From the moment Aragones made Xavi centre stage in 2008 and Barca copied, Iniestas life changed.
Iniesta had been playing with Van Bommel and Deco since 2004 and not a single person put him higher than an Isco of those days. He was Isco till Xavis era of dominance turned him to Zidane.
Before Xavi brought the dominance in 2008, Iniesta would never be mentioned with top midfielders. When nominations for WPOTY or Midfielder of the year go out, nobody even looked at Isco Iniesta. It was Ronaldinho, Lampard, Gerrard, Pirlo all the way.
When Xavi arrived to cut soap for Iniesta in 2008 was when Iniestas life changed.
Even for Spain, Xavi was the difference maker while Iniesta will be taking polling booth award with no quantifiable contribution on the pitch.
Xavi:
7 goals and assists in Spain knockout matches including 3 assists in finals.
2008 Euro final vs Germany 1-0, xavi assist, 2012 Euro final vs Italy 4-0, 2 xavi assists, 2010 WC semi vs Germany 1-0, xavi assist, 2010 WC QF vs portugal 1-0 xavi assist. 2010 WC 2nd rounnd vs Paraguay, 1-0, xavi assist
Iniesta:
Assist against Russia in 3-0 win and 1 World Cup final goal after being carried along all tournament with no contribution.
Iniesta should pray to Xavis picture every night before going to sleep instead of trying to steal flowers from his grave.
If I bring passes per game stat here that show that Xavi was making 100 passes per game while Iniesta was making 50-60 every season, you will see that the commentators usual refrain of the Xavi-Iniesta midfield was the greatest lie ever told to football watchers. There was only one name that should be attached to that midfield and it was XAVI ALONE.
If you can't drop Xavi's stats from 1998 to 2007 (10 years), then it's a shame.
Xavi was a bench warmer at Euro 2004 at age 24. Xavi at 26 at 2006 WC was a passenger. Iniesta at 24 was a MOTM in Euro 2008 final. Iniesta at 26 was Spain's hero at WC 2010 final
Xavi was 2nd fiddle during Barca's back to back La liga and UCL win in 2005 and 2006. Ronaldinho, Eto, Deco et Al ran the show. But NO your 100 Xavi passes nonsense started after Iniesta became a star.
You were probably the only sane person while the whole world was mad when Iniesta won this. Oya show us Xavi's own
Here comes Iniesta still trying to live off Xavi even after death.
In Euro 2008, Xavi made all the assists and was named Player of the tournament. In that tournament, he set the template for how Spain and Barca will be successful going forward.
Xavi cut soap for everyone from Senna to Busquets to Fabregas to Iniesta. None of them could reprise the same thing without Xavi.
All of them were asked to replace Xavi. None could. Fabregas was given the opportunity to do so, he failed. They later dropped Iniesta to Xavi position to do the same thing, he couldn't. Barca had to rely on the most lethal front 3 of the last 20 years in MSN to win that last UCL.
When Xavi was making 100 passes per game, Iniesta was making 60. They will call it Xavi-Iniesta midfield. After Xavi left they asked Iniesta to do the same thing, he couldn't. Barca midfield was no longer dominant.
Instead of facing his fellow AMs who were scoring and assisting in the hundreds while Iniesta was dragging stats with John Terry, you want to leave his fellow AMs and come and steal Xavis glory.
Iniesta is the luckiest footballer that ever lived. 2010 World Cup, Xavi was making all the assist, Iniesta did nothing only to come and steal the headlines in the final with his only contribution.
2012 Euros the mofo didn't even drop a single assist or goal.
That's how in 2015 season the mofo went a full calendar year in the league without a goal or assist only to come and assist in the final and make it seem he's been contributing all season.
Xavi cut soap for all these boys from Euro 2008 where he set the template on how they would play. He controlled, he dictated, he dominated that midfield. None of them did. They were only periphery to what Xavi was doing. From 2008 till retirement, there was only one game Xavi played where Barca did not have the majority of possession. After Xavi bowed out, that midfield dominance turned to shït.
Here we are trying to give Xavi his flowers and the career leach Iniesta is still trying to steal those flowers from Xavis grave instead of talking about how his stats measure up to equivalent AMs of his era. We know how Xavis stats in CM measure up to all the CMs of his era.
He should go and face his fellow AMs and stop trying to live off Xavi until the grave.
I knew you would write megedefegebe when Iniesta is being discussed.
Xavi started playing in 1998, but you started rating him in 2008. Xavi was in the shadows of players like Rivaldo, Ronaldinho and Deco for 10 years.
Even in NT, Xavi was 24 at Euro 2004 but was always on the bench. Where was his 100 passes? At 26 during WC 2006, where was his 100 passes to help Spain clinch a title? But NO. You had to start from 2008 when Iniesta came into limelight.
Xavi played for 17 years, but you could only pinpoint the era between the 2008 - 2012. I repeat where was Xavi before Iniesta came into limelight?
Xavi @ 24 was a bench warmer for Spain. Iniesta at 24 was bossing Euro 2008 final. Iniesta made Xavi a god. Period.
Let me remind you that Iniesta was MVP of Euro 2012. Oya start talking about 100 passes.
Ibime: Messi, Xavi and Dani Alves were the best in their positions in their era.
All the others were very good players though overrated into being the best in their position.
The only wack player was Victor Valdes. Busquets was wack (as a DM) but very good technically. As a CM, he would be very good. Iniesta was a very good player but could not compare to other AMs of his era.
There were some very underrated players in that team too who were solid as a rock and helped Barcelona when game went physical. I am talking Seydou Keita and Eric Abidal.
I agree with everything you said except the bold. Iniesta made Xavi a god in midfield.
Jodera: falcao, one of the core players who took athletico from top 7 to top 3 team while winning trophies along the way. Went to Monaco and won the league from psg with most of his goal important goals(as he's Monaco highest goal scorer).
Won super cup against Chelsea with a hat trick. Shone at Porto, elevated his status at athletico.
As for forlan, well his good and his achievement speaks for him. But, he was just a good player at Villarreal, not so great at man u and also a good player at athletico. Just a top player but not world class in my opinion.
When you win Europe's Golden Boot TWICE while playing for 2nd tier clubs.
When you are the MVP of the World Cup,
When you drag Atletico from being a mid-table club to a top 3 club long before Simeone became the coach
When you captain your country to win Copa America despite the presence of Brazil and Argentina.
BlueMann: There's little more he can do with the squad and players he plays with, and the manager at the helm of affairs.
Messi not doing a lot against the big teams should not be of any surprise if you actually follow Barcelona. Rather, you should ask yourself: how did the manager plan for those aforementioned big games?
Barca's tactics against them big boys was mostly pass to Messi and Inshallah. So once you lock Messi, the whole team becomes predictable and stale. Did you see the game against Real Madrid, when they lost 2-1? Did you see the tactics employed by Koeman? Busquets at DM, and an extremely high line featuring Pique against a Real Madrid side that were more than happy to sit back and hit on the counter, which is probably their biggest strengths. The moment the lineups were released and the formations predicted, even Barca fans knew they were in for some trouble. The only reason the scoreline was respectable was because of profligacy.
That has been the theme for Barca in most of the big games. And you expect Messi to do it all by himself? Which of the supporting cast raised their game? Griezmann? Dembele? Or is it youngsters like Dest, De Jong, Pedri, Ilaix Moriba abi Puig wey Koeman no even gree play? Abi na Braitwaithe? Sergi Roberto?? Lenglet?
And even against PSG, he got both their goals. Against Atletico nko, when his best chance came when he dribbled like four or five players before drawing a fantastic save from Oblak? And when Dembele had a clear chance, he nodded over.
That has been the theme of Barca's season, especially in big games.
My point is, you cannot conveniently say Messi is finished just because he "failed to turn up in the big games". That would be conveniently ignoring Barca's problems.
And I dare say if you remove Messi and put Mbappe, Ronaldo, Haaland, Neymar etc in that Barca team, they would not fare much better.
You are not even a Barca fan, yet you 've been able to explain the current state of Barcelona more than 95% of those parading themselves as Barca fans on nairaland.
ThierryJay: Villa scored 186 liga goals. Forlan scored 128.
Villa 186 goals in 354 games ( with Xavi, Iniesta, Silva and Aimar backup)
Forlan 128 goals in 240 games. No real super midfielder backup. (Riquelme was a Barca reject)
If you watch the Forlan video posted above, you'll realise most of Forlan's goals were GOLAZO and long range shots. He didn't receive killer passes before scoring.
ThierryJay: As a footballer, if you are good enough, you will eventually find yourself among elite team mates. That Forlan was demoted from elite company to Europa-tier teams is an indicator of his class.
And Villareal of 05-06 was mainly powered by Riquelme and Marcos Senna. How many goals did Forlan score that UCL season? Less than 4 goals and you are calling that "carrying" when he doesn't assist much.
I'd say their world cup 2010 feats cancel each other. They both scored 5 goals. In fact Villa scored higher percentage of Spain's goals than Forlan did for Uruguay. Meanwhile, Villa's Euro 2008 was better than Forlan's Copa 2011.
Forlan is good but not in Villa's class.
Villa is elite no doubt. Let me remind you once again that we are talking about La Liga exploits, not really overall career play.
Be sincere. Villa at Valencia, Barcelona and Atletico VS Forlan at Villarreal and Atletico. Look at their individual performances minus team glory. Who's the Daddy?
ThierryJay: Villa wasn't far behind in Pichichi race on the 2 occasions. Scored 25 goals when Eto won it with 26 goals. Again scored 28 goals when Forlan won it with 32 goals.
More significantly, Villa won the Spanish player of the season award in 2005-06 which is a better indicator of individual impact than Pichichi. Forlan never won a player of the season award. So why can't we compare.
David Villa was a reliable striker highly sought after by top clubs. Forlan was reliable for only 2 seasons and grossly inconsistent in the others.
Not even in the same class for me.
David Villa had the luxury of playing with David Silva and Pablo Aimar at Valencia. He also had Xavi and Iniesta at Barcelona with him.
Can you list the superstar midfielders Diego Forlan played with at Villarreal and Atletico aside Riquelme?
We are talking about Forlan that helped Villarreal to UCL Semis at their very 1st attempt.
Same Forlan without Simeon as coach destroyed peak Liverpool with coach Benitez and peak Torres home and away, and dragged lowly rated Atletico to Europa title scoring all the goals in the final.
You think it's easy to win Europe's Golden Boot playing for two minor clubs? Villa may have won WC, but Forlan was the best player of the tournament.
ThierryJay: Nah bro. Apart from scoring up to 29/30 league goals for Valencia in one season, Villa was Spain's highest goalscorer at Euros 2008 & 2012 and World Cup 2010. He also chipped in his quota for Barca's UCL win in 2011; scored a delightful goal in the final.
Meanwhile, Forlan was a misfit at Man Utd, then went to Villareal to redeem himself. Did decently at Villareal and Atletico Madrid but not as good as Villa at Vàlencia. It was with Uruguay at 2010 WC that Forlan truly excelled, but unfortunately Villa's input to Spain's WC and 2 Euros win trumps Forlan's Uruguay exploits.
I thought you said La Liga strikers, but you are mentioning Villa's exploits for Spain.
Villa at Valencia (La liga top 4 then) and VS Forlan at Villarreal. Who won Europe's golden Boot? Answer is Forlan
Villa at Barcelona with Xavi and Iniesta vs Forlan at Atletico with nobodies at midfield. Who won Europe's Golden Boot? Answer is Forlan again
National team
Villa vs Forlan at WC 2010. Both scored 5 goals each. But who won the MVP Golden Ball? The answer is Forlan
You mentioned Euro ezploits for Villa, I'll mention Copa America 2011 exploit for Forlan. Forlan captained Uruguay to the title.
Kindly insert Diego Forlan into La Liga's top 5 strikers in last 20 years.
ThierryJay: The top 5 greatest La liga strikers in the past 20 years are Raul, Suarez, De Lima, Eto'o and David Villa. The best La liga striker in the past decade is Suarez.
Suarez, MVP of Copa America. He dragged Uruguay to the title alongside Forlan.
Benzema wasn't even called for Euro 2016 which France hosted. France believed more in Giroud. France won 2018 WC without caring about the existence of Benzema.
With their crappy storylines, I'm not surprised stars like Strowman moved on. WWE seriously needs a major rival. I hope AEW steps up real time.
Only God knows where they buried the FIEND. Alexa Bliss is just wasting away. So many stars are being rendered useless because of lack of or crappy storylines.
coded01: Sell off those mediocre players...Then you get what you need...
It's not as easy as that. Can we sell say Dembele at 50m currently? Which club will spend that on him? So we sell say Dembele for maybe around 50m and buy say Kane for 150m. Is that not more debt incurred?
jpmoriarti: Maybe a 20 something year old Messi. Not this present Messi, who defenders easily crowd.
Chelsea's formation tonight is ideal for nullifying false 9s. Talk and aggressive defenders who give very little away. ManCity had only one shot on target all game.
Guardiola played false 9 against Chelsea, he lost not once, but twice. Common sense should have told him to use his 2 strikers tonight. But stubbornness didn't allow him.
coded01: Barcelona's last uefa champions league trophy was 2015... And I have seen a gradual decline ever since...
We now have LaPorta that many of us thought should know better...Imagine bringing in Aguero...a 34 year old that only played about 13mins in a " Uefa Champions League Final"
Barca
Money no dey ó. That's why he's looking for free agents.
It's not new, in fact he tried this in barca but it worked only because we had the best playersMESSI in the world then but we should not even consider him for managerial position... Very arrogant Tuchel I hail oh...
jpmoriarti: ManCity couldn't trouble the keeper at all. I dont know if Mendy had any saves of note. The absence of a DM actually hurt them in the first half. In the second half, they brought in Fernadinho but it was too little too late.
Very rubbish formation from the onset. Look at Kanye today. Fernandinho would have prevented that Chelsea goal. Man city's loss is 100% Guardiola's fault.