The Best way out on this matter is to amend the police act to provide that,an appointed IGP shall serve in that office for a period of not less than three years or more provided that the officer so appointed must have not less than three years left of service as at the time of appointment, this will settle all problems once n for all
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu arrives Dar Es Salaam where he was received by the Foreign Minister of Tanzania, Amb. Mahmoud Thabit Kombo, and Chargé d' Affaires of Nigeria High Commission to Tanzania, Amb.Salisu Suleiman.
A Nigerian president visiting a an African country n being received by a minister not even a deputy president!,tueh!!
As it favours APC so,they would never accept that the electronic voting n transmission of elections results be made mandatory, instead they are busy talking about some mundane electoral law reforms.
As for Obasanjo I believe it but as for buhari I doubt much if he actually put up any coherent brilliant performance,n let's not over celebrate yet,I remember the bakasi issue at the world court during Obasanjo,there was high hopes to the point that Obasanjo foolishly entered into the prejudgement agreement,then bomb was drop during the final judgement,in this very case, it's expected that no patriotic citizen would/should testify against the interest of their country but I just hope that there are no incriminating documents to controvert the oral submissions by Obasanjo n buhari,na until final whistle ooh!
nairalanda1: The only way Nigeria can have a strong currency is via manufactured goods and services
And even then it won't make petrol cheap and affordable. People who give you the petrol all wanna be paid salaries that would prevent jakpa
if manufacturing is what really ensures strong currency, then why is the Japanese n Chinese currencies weak against the other major currencies like the dollar Euro n pound sterling?
YourNextLevel: When some people were hoping that relieve will come from the refinery in our soil, i just laughed
Guys you don't know these people. They cry when you touch them only, just like few months ago
Very Wicked men up there. If you know you know
I think you got it wrong,as long as crude oil prices continue to fluctuate in the international market so is going to be the prices of products from dangote as he keep sourcing for crude oil from outside Nigeria,if Tinubu is serious about helping Nigeria n Nigerians,he should have made sure that everything under the sun is done to ensure that dangote gets crude supply from Nigeria but most ironically dangote is sourcing for crude oil from abroad with all the attached problems of international trade n Nigerians expect dangote to keep prices low!, even try the so call crude oil sale in naira to dangote doesn't mean much in practical terms, dangote has nothing to lose as his market is far beyond Nigeria, Nigeria n Nigerians should have themselves to blame if they fail to take the huge opportunity that dangote refinery presents
Let 20 be A,8 be B,5 be C n 22 be D,your simple logic formula would be,D/B*C=A.e.g22/8*5=20.Apply same logic formula to the rest questions,change the subject of formula where necessary
iLegendd: Most times self. The only thing I pay is transport and giving her WiFi connection. I feel as if I'm the loser for even paying her TP. Why? The pleasure is hers, 80%. So, I'm supposed to be paid.
You can make a living by working as a gigolo you know!
Paramount01: But none of the northern Governor has come out openly to say why he don't want the tax reforms.the only things they are saying is that they will not be able to pay salary.How? They keep mute.
The northern governors have been making statements actually,they are trying to forge a common front so they are speaking through the NEF mostly,just few days ago AM DAGASHA a retired air force general of the NEF made a statement on behalf of the north,the media people certainly know those they can contact to get the real position of the north from,if efforts are not made to sincerely n openly. clear the grey areas of the tax reform bills, I'm afraid that it may eventually fail
Yampotatocarrot: I've watched Mr.Ayodele on several platforms and I've wondered why the organisers don't bring an expert from the opposite end of the divide to ask questions... It's the organisers asking him questions as if they're pampering him, and all his answers always sound too good to be true
If you listen to Mr.Ayodele alone, you'll begin to wonder why the northerners are against the bill, because from his angle, he is making it sound as if the bill will favour them more... If it's so, then what is/are the hidden clauses that's making the northerners rally against the bill?
I think the interview should have included an expert from the opponents of the bill to ask Mr Ayodele some critical questions bordering on their areas of concern or the interview organizers should have gotten list of questions from the opponents to ask Mr Ayodele so that the public can be properly informed about the tax reform issues,I have a very strong feeling that there are hidden but sticking points in this tax reform discourse that if not openly sincerely n adequately address might be the source of friction in the future.
Gajagojo: What is the relevance of the president sending emissaries to what we are talking about
All I am telling you is to inform yourself before you talk Inform yourself If you don't know keep quiet
It is simple. Must you comment on everything? You mentioned inheritance tax. Tell us what the bill says about that?
Learn how to learn by being silent especially when you know that you do not know. Don't pretend to know what you don't know
You that knows it all you can go ahead n feel,i don't know if you have personal issues with any of my previous posts,if not I can't understand why vehement in your attacks against my person,but you can go ahead the more if that would make you feel better ok.
You need to spend less time on Social media and when you come just read and go don't comment.
You are so cocky,you think you you know it all,but las las you would be humbled, already the president is reported to have sent emissaries to the northern governors, let's await the final outcome, sometimes what is needed is tact not just gragra.
Gajagojo: Honestly because you are sounding quite ignorant so I am wondering whether it is a matter of schooling or intrinsic low intelligence
Have you read the bill
It's ok,thank you for the insults n also arrogantly pointing out my ignorance n low intelligence,it really showed your maturity character n level of discipline,now can you please enlightened me with your super knowledge n intelligence about what the bills entails in detail?
bixton: You're right about it all. There's something hidden that's why the North is speaking half truths and pulling up sentiments and the FG is playing tom and Jerry and the entire South seems to take it whole and sinker( hook, line and sinker) and one wonders why......
As regards the inheritance tax, I just wonder what was/is going up in the head of whoever thought about such.... Anyways we await whenever they pass the bills...
Thanks much,i realize most unfortunately that the discourse around the proposed tax reform bills has just taken a north vs south argument with out proper knowledge n scrutiny by the public while in government circle they are playing hide n seek against each other,it really appears to me that the proponents of the bills want to take the other off guard while the opponents of the bills seriously suspect foul play but nobody want to come clean
Gajagojo: Inheritance tax is not VAT able. There is nothing like that in the bill. Inheritance tax is a personal income tax and therefore a Subnational issue. States will collect it Any Northern state that does not wish to collect it can omit it That should not apply across the country especially since it is being pushed on religious grounds. No one came to this world with anything and so when they die their wealth should be taxable.
What many of you fail to realize is that the VAT has already been determined by the court. It is a state tax. That court judgment was a response to a constitutional inquiry by Rivers State government. That judgment has not been overturned and so it is the status quo
All the legislation about VAT is a waste of time if that judgment is not overturned by the Supreme Court What that means is even if the law is passed. Rivers state can approach the Supreme court to repeal THOSE PARTS of the law that have to do with VAT
Tinubu must already know this and is just allowing the North to deceive themselves. He is more interested in the other parts of the bills because the VAT matter is ALREADY SETTLED. It is a state tax 100%
What I know about this tax bills issue is that while the government is afraid that it might lost the support of the people if it publishes the full details of the bills the north are afraid not to be tagged as religious bigots n retrogressives n so they are playing hide n seek with their approach in opposing the bills, from the snipets I got elsewhere,the, bills has something to do with intermittence tax which the Muslims are against as it is forbidden in Islam,the north would want the tax to shared centrally n the VAT net should be expanded to include livestocks which they feel would give them an advantage,I don't really think anyone stand to loss much ifPhe North's position is absorbed, I'm very certain that many in the south wouldn't accept inheritance been taxed,I don't support it either, individuals are suppose to pay tax while alive n doing business so what the point of taxing inheritance again?, there's certainly deceptions on both side of the divide as far as these tax bills are concerned.
The write up here is not complete enough for reasons best known to the writer or whoever forwarded the post,I know this because I have read a more detailed n explicit report on this same topic by the same NEFA through this same AM DAGASHA whom I believe is the retired air force general,in that report,the NEF gave a very detailed response which I think is worth considering,to the best of my mind the position or suggestions of the NEF wouldn't work against the interest of the south at all but rather simply open up the revenue base of the north in the estimation of the NEF, specifically the north want cows to be VATable,they don't want inheritance to be subject to VAT etc,I do not think these are against the interest of the south,the south can as well request for such agricultural consumables like Palm oil, plantains,kolanuts etc to be VATable also simple,but I'm fully in support of VAT been based on contributory efforts,let the bills be stand down for now so that new emerging facts can be incorporated into it for final passage to the satisfaction of all,that would just be fair enough.
Mynd44: I have heard Nigerians use "bride Price" and "Dowry" interchangeably and they seem to think they are the same. People just assume the bride price is the dowry or that they mean the same thing but this is a wrong assumption.
I knew this in Social Studies when I was in Primary 5 and it shocks me when people who I think went to school around the same time (not the current era where I don't understand the curriculum) make the same mistake. Perhaps people just think because they are both possessions and gifts exchanged around the time of a wedding they mean the same but nah. They are very distinct things.
So here is the major difference
From the definition above
1. Bride Price is given to the family of the bride by the groom and/or his family and this is mostly set by the Bride's Family.
2. Dowry is the property or money given to the bride by her family when she marries and she takes these things to her marital home.
In some cultures, Dowries cannot be sold by the couple as it is wealth that passes through only the female line so only the bride's daughter can inherit them. Thats why you see where some families have jewelry that their great grandmother used and a female descendant still wears it. It can even be shares of a company etc.
There has been cases in India and Northern Nigeria called "Dowry theft" in these cases, they grooms family (mostly committed by the groom's family) tries to convert the properties of the bride and steal them. I know India had to pass legislation against it. Sometimes, the husband himself tries to steal these possessions.
Note also that in a divorce, the husband cannot lay claim to the dowry as these are personal gifts and are mostly acquired before marriage so are outside the purview of shared items.
In Nigeria, dowries can include, Kitchenware, livestock, land, jewelry and in some parts of the north, the father actually buys furniture.
Note that Dowry is not wedding gifts given to the couple. These are gifts for the two of them.
This is very correct,but I think the woman's dowry should be very modest especially in physical properties to avoid future issues in her matrimony,I don't support the practice of a woman providing the furniture n electronic appliances in the home in the name of dowry,let the dowry be in form of personal clothing, jewelries, cooking n eating utensils only
Dpharmacist: As 2024 draws to a close, I’ve been reflecting on the lessons this year has brought into my life. From personal achievements to professional growth, this year has been a profound journey of self-discovery, challenges, and triumphs.
Here are some of the key lessons I learned in 2024, and I hope they resonate with you as well.
1. Consistency is Key to Growth
This year, I embraced consistency as a powerful tool for achieving my goals. Whether it was through my professional work as a health professional , my participation in the ALX Foundations course, or my ventures into writing books on diverse topics, I realized that showing up every day—no matter how small the effort—leads to significant progress over time.
2. Self-Investment Yields the Best Returns
I invested in myself by acquiring new skills like study design, statistical analysis using Python and R, and even some aspect web development using HTML and CSD through platforms like Chisquares. These skills not only enhanced my professional competence but also opened new doors of opportunity. The lesson here? The more you invest in yourself, the more valuable you become.
3. The Power of Collaboration
Being part of teams and communities, whether it was my subgroup in the ALX program or collaborating on various projects and outreaches, taught me the value of working with others. The diverse perspectives, feedback, and support I received from my peers proved that collaboration often leads to better outcomes than going it alone.
4. Adaptability is a Superpower
2024 wasn’t without its challenges. From competitive environment to navigating personal projects, I learned to adapt to changing circumstances. Challenges taught me to stay flexible, focus on solutions, and keep pushing forward.
5. Every Day Brings a New Lesson
Through my journey in 2024, I noticed that each day has its own lesson. I embraced the idea that each day offers something new to learn. From wealth creation to health and philosophy, life’s daily struggles and triumphs are filled with lessons if we choose to see them.
6. Purpose Drives Success
Whether it was contributing to the fight against climate change (my Grand Challenge) or writing books( such as Resolutions Recharged and Effective Followership) to educate and inspire others, I learned that aligning with a higher purpose fuels motivation and leads to meaningful achievements. Purpose gives life direction and makes the hard work worthwhile.
7. Time is Your Most Valuable Resource
One of the most significant lessons I learned is the importance of time management. Balancing work, learning, writing, and personal development taught me to prioritize effectively and make every moment count. Time management is about Self management. When lack management you will never go far.
8. Never Stop Learning
In our fast paced world filled with a lot of distractions I have developed the art of learning very fast and still effective at retaining what you ready. It reaffirmed the importance of lifelong learning. In a world that changes rapidly, staying curious and willing to learn rapidly is crucial for success.
9. Building Systems for Long-Term Success
Through my automated data vending business, I understood the importance of creating systems that work for you. Automating processes not only saves time but also ensures consistency and efficiency.
10. Gratitude is the Greatest Attitude
Lastly, I’ve learned to be grateful—for the challenges that shaped me, the opportunities that came my way, and the people who supported me through it all. Gratitude helps maintain perspective and keeps you grounded even when the road gets tough.
I will leave you with this quote :
No matter your altitude always have the platitude to give gratitude, for that is the right attitude – Dpharmacist 2024
Final Thoughts
2024 was a year of growth, resilience, and purpose. I faced challenges, but I also embraced opportunities and learned invaluable lessons. As I step into 2025, I’m more prepared, more focused, and more determined to make an even greater impact.
Homiesjinxbank: I asked a simple question is Russia an European country or not?
The fact EU countries could steal $300billion of Russia's money kept in various bank is the reason BRICS is here to stay, no sane countries would trust the West with their money.. even Turkey is applying to join BRICS, even France attempted it but was rejected!
I'll repeat my question, is Russia an European country or not!
I don't have much time n this is my last response to you,I would want you to ponder about this, doesn't it prick your conscience that the only thing Russia can n keep bragging about to the world are weapons of human destruction instead of greater economic development n prosperity?,take a sincere look around you n identify how many devices or appliances you use daily that are of Russia make as compare to those from the capitalist democratic countries?,what has been the level of development n economic prosperity of countries that allied with or came under the control of Russia after the second world war as compared to those that came under the control USA/Europe n accepted democracy n capitalism?, your sincere answers will tell the nature of Russias path, thanks n bye
Homiesjinxbank: Their goes a propaganda, You're saying I know Russia is the soul of USSR, how?? There was no Russia before the 1990, look up when Russia gained independent, Russia gained independent the same way Ukraine gained their independent!
They're only trying to break Russia into pieces the same way they did USSR.
Lastly since their is no USSR, no reason for NATO to not be disbanded!! That's my own point of view..
Is Russia an European country or not?? If yes, why didn't they allowed it to join the EU?
Well let's see how the war in Ukraine would pan out!
Some of you're saying Russia should attack NATO and see what's up, lol... Why can't Poland or Romania attack Russia first??
The most foolish of them is Sweden and Finland,they joined NATO when no single issue with Russia,now that they've joined NATO, they're now wasting money and resources meant for their citizens in a war that has nothing to do with them.. that a foolish move!!
There's no propaganda anywhere, its a fact that Russia was the heart of USSR ,the economy of Russia alone was far bigger than the other republics of USSR put together,it is not entirely correct to say that before 1991 there was no Russia,most of the republics that later constituted the USSR were actually forcefully annexed by Russia during the events leading up to the first world war(1914-17), NATO was not created in 1947 primarily to fight USSR but to prevent the rise n madness of another Hitler kind of lunatic which Putin is trying to replicate, NATO was formed by the democratic capitalists, Russia responded by uniting her allied communist under the Warsaw pact alliance that eventually faded out after the lost of the cold war, Russia tried regrouping the former Soviet non NATO members republics under common wealth of independent States CIS but it's largely a cosmetic show, Russia is now spear heading BRICS, various artemis by Russia to form alliances to counter NATO/the EU has mostly been a failure because of the historical distrust of the Russians due to their known history of suppressor oppression n brutality with little or insignificant economic gains from such relationships,every formed alliance including those by Russia has their terms n procedures of admittance,a country can not just force itway into an alliance with out satisfying those terms n procedures Russia can't be an exception,let Russia do a soul search , retrace her steps n cultivate true beneficial friendship with other countries n build whatever alliance they wish instead of forcefully trying to reclaim a lost glory by intimidation n inhumane destructive barbarism.
Homiesjinxbank: I will only copy one or two from the statement below quote ( them.during the nuclear missile crisis in Cuba in 1962,the American made it clear that they wouldn't accept the presence of the Russians in a place that is historically their sphere of influence n therefore they blockaged Cuba) it wasn't Russia that was trying to put missile in Cuba but the Soviet Union, which is a combination of these so called Ex Soviet Union State (Poland, Lithuania, Ukraine etc) and USA was against the whole missiles stuff.
but they came up with NATO to peg the Soviet Union!!! Now let me ask you,is there still Soviet Union??
You are not being sincere,you know it too well that Russia was the heart n soul of the USSR,all the other republics were just peripheral attachments, this explains why Ukraine had to hand over the nuclear weapons stationed on her soil to Russia after the collapse of the USSR,all the leaders of the defunct USSR were Russians,so yes it was Russia trying to put the nuclear missiles in Cuba, today the USA is undoubtedly the backbone of NATO n this is why the us is always mentioned whenever NATO is been discussed,if Russia were open n frank n sincere about Ukraine ab initio I'm sure many countries would have intervened to prevent the breakout of war,but Russia was deceitful n deceptive,the very behaviorial attitude that has scared away even their closest neighbors from allying with them,I'm afraid that Russia has shoot itself in the foot with her inhumane brutal war in Ukraine,no matter the eventual outcome of the war in Ukraine,it will take ages for Russia to gain the trust of many reasonable or significant countries,it was the same scenario that caused the ex Soviet states to break away from Russia as soon as the opportunity present itself in 1991,but it appears the Russians in their bearish mentality hasn't learnt any lesson from history.
Homiesjinxbank: Lol, each countries has foreign agents in various countries.. so they support pro this pro that!
The EU is just a free movement to other countries equivalent to cheap labours!
it's a trick bro, look what happened in Georgia, Moldova resisted and what did the EU do? Sanctioned!!!! Is EU a defend Alliance or an Economy Alliance? Then why are they tasking each EU members to donate money for Ukraine? The same Russia they so much hate is selling gas to them, they just want to hijack a region in Russia where the gas is for themselves!
Your question- Russia should improve her economy, civil technology and cultivate good relationship??
Ans- So you think Russia isn't developed? Be playing bro.. Russia is more super developed than other EU countries, this is why these stupid EU countries doesn't want Russia in EU, because they're going to be spending EU there. And people would migrate more to Russia because of the value of €..
Bro Russia is still standing and in top 6 despite all the sanctions, That should be an eye opener for you!
If Russia is such a great n good country as you try to portray,her neighbors would have been falling over to to join up with them,but because they are historically wicked brutal and oppressive even their neighbors are running away from them.during the nuclear missile crisis in Cuba in 1962,the American made it clear that they wouldn't accept the presence of the Russians in a place that is historically their sphere of influence n therefore they blockaged Cuba,the Russians saw the danger n backed off,but when the Russians were gathering troops on the borders with Ukraine in preparation for the present war n questions were asked, instead of the Russians to clearly admit their intent n give reasons why they wouldn't accept Ukraine joining NATO like the Americans did back in 1962,they denied it but eventually invaded Ukraine hence the war today, Russia's actions has cause Finland to sign up to NATO despite all the empty threats of Russia, NATO is now having a larger direct border with Russia,the very thing Russia never wanted in the first place,more countries are now wary of Russia, Ukraine may not eventually join NATO but they would never love or trust the Russians n so is many other countries.when eventually Putin get out of the way,the scenario that weakened Russia n allow many ex Soviet states to join the EU may also paved same way for Ukraine,the use of force will never help Russia rather Russia should urgently change n mend her approach for the good to achieve better results.
Why is the EU bent on all having Ex Soviet States in European Union?
Remember, Those Ex Soviet States are all European countries, just not in the European cult!!! because most of these countries participate in Europe Competitions!
The West entice them with EU membership first,then boom NATO Membership! All these are attempt to spite Russia!
Most of them are even saying Russia is too big, that it needs to be divided, e.g by giving up Siberia, but they're forgetting that USA and Canada too big, and they needs to be divided into small countries!
But the EU is not putting a knife to the neck of those ex Soviet states to join up now,ask yourself, why are those ex Soviet states not even resisting such invitation in the first place?, it's simply because they have seen the goodies n freedom those that have joined already are enjoying,let Russia improve her economy, civil technology and cultivate good relationship with other countries to win them over to their side instead of the continuous inhumane destructive use of force which is driving away more genuine potential friends from her leaving them with rogue Allies.
Homiesjinxbank: No one is shifting post, I only asked a simple question, Why are they inviting Ex Soviet States to join the EU? Mind you Free movement is the cookies here nothing else!
For God's sake are those ex Soviet states no longer sovereign states or must they be the eternal puppet states of Russia?, besides did the EU/NATO use any force to make those ex Soviet states their members?,what I see is that for most of you,your support for Russia is simply out of hate for the US, it's a good thing trump came in the nick of time.