₦airaland Forum

lordfalcao:
hello how are you

oladayo042:
Bros I hail ooo.

mymadam:
Welcome back... from the Republic of Ireland. No weapon fashioned against you shall prosper. God bless Nigeria.

Successdude:
pls wats bargain domain ? i was negotiating with a buyer and he said he needed bargain domain.
Thanks

Calculux95:
I bring you Good news!!!



Assnal will lose


#united all the way

WASMOG:
I WASMOG IS A LOSER

ojubi:
JOSE MORINO THE BOSS
DIEGO COSTA THE BEST
HAZARD UNSTOPABLE
CHELSEA INVISIBLE.

ihesiuloa:
Unnecessarily beefing don't win games, play the game and appreciate good football!

colossus2:
Why are we here?
Why do we watch football?

Because of the interesting debates and post-match discussions.
If video tech is introduced now, it means everything has to be right in football. Now when everything is right, there would be no fascinating talks. We all want talking points no matter how fair a game could be.

If such tech is introduced, so what's the need of having a referee on the pitch. It's better of creating a robot to officiate a match.

Now looking at the build-up to chelsea's 2nd goal, ball had crossed the line for a throw-in, but referee allowed play-on.
Video tech would disrupt the pace and free flow of the game.
It won't boost player morale in a high-tempo game.

We all need talking points sire that's why we love to watch this game.

Jah bless

franchizy:
chelsea playing 12 against 11 with d ref number 12. shame on chelsea and her toothless fans. i will keep crying until the ref remains neutral

thegoodjoehunt3:
Starting with shift abeg shows you put no thought behind your words. All major sports including basketball, lawn tennis, Ice Hockey etc use replay technology.

Do those games take four hours. There is a senior referee behind the cameras supported by quick technological replays and cameras to make more accurate decisions.

thegoodjoehunt3:
[b]I will continue crying out for video technology. That is the only way to stop bias officiating.


It Is Time For Video Technology In Football

however one thing is true about it. The pros of video technology is more than the coins of it Almost all sports have embraced technology. Those sports have not lost its passion. The game gets interesting and intriguing with video technology.

Some people say that bias officiating favors all teams as time progresses. I do not see it this way. What statistical analysis was used to come up with this fact?

Every time poor officiating takes place, my mind goes back to why people feel the video technology will work against the greatness of the game. Due to poor officiating, we see players lose their tempers and take matters into their hands to hurt other players. Zuniga and Neymar incident at the World Cup comes to mind.

Some argue the video technology will take the powers off the referees hands. I wonder why that is the case. In video technology, there is going to be a referee behind the cameras who takes the final decision. That referees decision is final. Video technology will improve the accuracy of the referee's decision and helps his final judgment. It would not undermine the referee but improve the referee's decision.

The argument that replays will slow down the game is another flawed argument. If we want the game moving along, why add fouls. Every foul in the frame slows down the game. Without video technology, we have cases where players have walked out of the pitch and refused to play. For instance, the game between France and Portugal at the European Cup of nation in 2000. A video technological decision would have saved this. Sometimes players decent the referees and lead to them sending off. Sometimes it gets to a point where coaches argue with referees. All these slow down the game. Video technology would make the game move faster than slow it down. It is a technological system and most problems have been addressed.
https://www.nairaland.com/1986327/it-time-video-technology-football[/b]

johnstar:
meaning