₦airaland Forum

Krismas:
1. No community did not have headhunters
2. Head hunters only hunt STRANGERS, as a means of protecting the community from spys and invasion

Defending trespass (invasion) is Lawful but not murder of passersby, travellers and sojourners.

And let's not forget, they too trespassed on other people's lands.

LoneSoldier:
Why are you just a nuisance, defending a God that you ain't sure will defend you when you need him the most....?

Hahahahahahahaha. Find another thing to say for God always stands for me and defends me.

tctrills:
Sir who created these childish rules, you?

See it.
Now you are complaining about Law and Rules and insalting it because it is has caught you in a wrong.

And now you pretend as if you do not know the purpose of Rules.

Yet you are the same person who expects to speak freely even if you say something very very foolish and stupid such as you have done yet you expecting not to be insalted and called a fool because of the Law/Rule

No 1
Quora
https://www.quora.com ›
What are the basic rules of an 'argument'?
26 Jan 2019 — What are the basic rules of an 'argument'?
Top answer · 4 votes
The first basic rule is: Fight fair! No low blows, no insults or ad hominems. No fallacious

2. THE FREEDOM RULE
PARTIES MUST NOT PREVENT EACH OTHER FROM PUTTING FORWARD STANDPOINTS

See how you prove you deserve to be in hellfire with Satan and Eve?
I'm done.

LordBiden:
Read through genesis at the beginning to know God's initial plan for mankind at the beautiful garden of Eden,suffering only started after they disobeyed God.

Correction. After woman listened to Satan and obeyed him and then womanipulated her husband to join her since she has already sinned.

So they did not just get up one day and decided that they would disobey God.

Educationalserv:
over 100,000 kids have been killed in Gaza and Ukarine I wonder how this will be allowed to happen by a deity that is most compassionate.
This are abbreviation

Why should He do anything about it when you people told Him to leave you alone, with your wishes that He was not there?

Now He has left you people alone and now you are complaining, see how foolish you are?

LoneSoldier:
Then why did your God program humanity to be like this?

And why did he also create hell for innocent humans that doesn't no anything that happened in the beginning, but was program by God to do wrong so that they can go to hell and suffer an eternity punishment after enough suffering on earth by your heartless God??

Lots of Questions but answer this one...!

Did you not see His programme was perfect until someone hacked into it and scattered it, Fool?

Fireoflife:
It's the other way around bro. Humanity does not love God one bit. He says if you love me keep my commandments. Je even sent his son to us

Exactly.

And when God finally leaves them alone the cursed fools start wailing that God does not love them.

tctrills:
Again, you seem to be uncomfortable when I introduce you to more verses that counter your falsehoods..

Rule of argument.
Arguments must be on the point (Stand Point). Anything outside the standpoint is off point and invalid.

So you can not depart from your post.

4) THE STANDPOINT RULE (AkA OFF POINT/GOAL POST SHIFTING RULE.

"A PARTY’S ATTACK ON A STANDPOINT MUST RELATE TO THE STANDPOINT THAT HAS INDEED BEEN ADVANCED BY THE OTHER PARTY (You cannot go off point).

Thoth02:
So God is not male puhahahaha...

Exactly the mannequin saying you are plastic because it is plastic, hence why you are just foolishly repeating yourself.

See the evils and murders God endured from the peoples of the earth!!!

And yet the peoples today are still the same peoples of old.

"The tribesmen were also called HEAD-HUNTERS because of a social custom which required the male members of the community to collect as many heads as possible, hence a man’s strength and ability to protect his wife was assessed by the number of heads he had collected. Therefore youths of marriageable age would try and collect as many heads as possible and hang them on the walls of his house, as the more heads a man had, the more eligible he was considered."

tctrills:
That makes no sense. No work is judged in isolation. It would be foolish of I or anyone to insist that no other verse can or should be added to the discussion. No one learns that way.
For example, you claim that only the Laodicea would be allowed a place on his throne.
But then in verse 5 of the same chapter, speaking to the church in Sardis he says.
He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels.
So according to your childish logic, only members of the church in Sardis will have white clothes, will have their names in the book of life, and will he confess before the Father and his angels and no one else?

Did you talk about Sardis in your Op? No. As I said, your microscope and your funnel.

thesicilian:
Marrying a pregnant girlfriend is like studying a lifelong course just because you mistakenly walked into the classroom

That is why we say "no dey waka anyhow".

uuzba:
Is it by force to have sex with the girl when you're dating her?

Ask them oo.

tctrills:
You are a clown. Your point here is that I am not allowed to quote any other verse that supports the one I earlier quoted right?

That is your own fallt. You are the one who laid the microscope and funnel you wanted us to use to read your work.

Yes.

In those days, her family would have killed you for defiling her.

tctrills:
Yes they will inherit all things is in revelations. Do you even read your Bible?

Now you prove that you are still the same old twisting lying serpent for I clearly said the Revelation 3:21 which you stated at the beginning and not just Revelations

Man, you are damned!

cutecommend:
You can bring your good points too.

You are right already.

tctrills:
I wish you spend more of your time providing meaningful response that talking about me. Wike is not on Tinubu's throne. Don't let Tinubu catch you.
We don't steal God's throne, he will freely give it to those who overcome
They will inherit all things
So God said they that overcome will inherit all things but to you, only the Laodicea will inherit all things. To you, God has 2 set of commandments, one for Laodicea and the other for the rest of us. Carry om.
According to you, the sermon on the mount was only for those Jesus Christ was speaking to on the mount. It doesn't concern the rest of us.

Is "they will inherit all things and the sermon on the mountain in Revelations 3:21? No.

So you are going round trying to find a door to use to sneak in.

mysticwarrior:
This is not true, please g to youtube and watch the "Reed dance" of young Zulu girls in South Africa. Many of them already have fully developed breasts, and some even have slightly fallen breasts. Please note that these girls have been tested before the event and they were all certified virgins.

YouTube is edited meaning vital evidence could be cut off. So natural investigation still beats YouTube.

Nachmonides:
I don't know, he seems to be reading a script.

How can one say and believe that the Talmud is more reliable than the Torah!?

I weak ooo.

See wetin pagan Catholic church don cause

guysbewise:
Christianity was upgraded from pagan worship to now resemble that of the Jewish God in the Torah...

Do you people not think before you speak? Is Abraham, the beginning of Christianity not the father of the Jews?

All you prove is that Catholics are pagans

Meanwhile, every reasonable person has come to the conclusion that Catholics are not Christians, so your presentation does not stand

tctrills:
Very wrong use of English. Being on the throne or in the throne doesn't signify being under the rule of the king. It signifies being the king.
Let's look at another verse in that same revelations.
Revelation 1:6
6 And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.
So again you are wrong.

You are just proving the truth of what I said when I said that you are committing one of Eve's crimes (and the angels crimes too).

Clearly you you are still the same guy I know who is full of sins and perversions, therefore you are blinded by sins.

Wike, is clearly on the throne of Tinubu but is Wike not bound to obey Tinubu whether he, Wike agrees with Tinubu or not? Yes

That clearly means Wike is under Tinubu's rule which is what Rev 1:6 is simply saying.

Because you are trying to steal God's throne is why you are thinking it this evil way just like Eve did.

Like Eve you are going to get a punishment no mind can conceive.

tctrills:
You are saying that the bible never called the faithful heirs of God?

Do you see your perversion? Now you have departed from Revelation 3:21 "To the Laodicea" to use other doors to sneak into Revelation 3:21?

Do you not see that you are the thief whom Jesus was talking about who cometh not through the door?

PP123:
even now na women dey make men sin

90% of the time.

Eg Most men want to be rich, why?

Because of woman and women.

Poor men spend their earnings purchasing clothes and shoes and phones and perfumes, why?

Because they want to acquire a woman or women.

Most men commit crimes because of a woman eg mama, girlfriend or wife.

Most boys/men become proud and arrogant and speaking loudly and boasfully because one girl said "are you not a man? Why you dey sme sme?

And this made the boy to go stealing from his parents so that he could take her out to expensive places or to buy her expensive phones, clothes, hair all the rubbish we see today.

Sometimes I think it is as high as 95% to 98% in some men's cases.

Neither does this detract from the fact that the woman's name too was Adam.

But it is noticed that people do not know that the woman's name too was Adam
Genesis 1:27; 3:9 and 5:2

And it was only after she had destroyed him and had obviously fallen that male Adam then separated from her (a kind of divorce) then took his name from her and changed her name from Adam to Eve.

Thereby laying the fact we now know that when a woman messes up big time in doing something like cheating, every husband separates and divorces his wife and also takes away his name from her.

Which is why she reverses to her maiden names.

So, you see another proof why sex is the forbidden fruit.

Husbands do not generally withdraw their names from their wives for lesser offences like gossiping or flamboyance. But once it's cheating, it bye bye time.

That aside, this post is to remind all that saying Adam and Eve is kind of very wrong for it was Eve, the woman who sinned first.

So we ought to say Eve and Adam when we are talking about the origin of sin.

I was just reading a pamphlet and they referenced Adam and Eve.

And everytime/everywhere people always say Adam and Eve.

Meanwhile saying Adam and Eve draws a picture of man first then woman.

And this reference to Adam and Eve is always used in reference of sin/offence and in laying blame on a person.

So clearly man aka Adam is impliedly blamed for sinning and he is made to carry the blame of sin.

Whereas it is woman who should be blamed for sin and who should carry the blame of sin BECAUSE SHE WAS THE ONE WHO SINNED FIRST.

And it was after she had finished sinning that she then involved and implicated her husband, the man

So clearly, women, (for I wonder which man would implicate himself to carry the blame of the world) found a way of reversing this fact and turn it into a fact where man (Adam) is blamed for the sins of the world whereas it is she, the woman, who caused the sins of the world.

And therefore she should be blamed.

Thus, for this purposes we ought to say Eve and Adam, so as to remember that it was woman who started the tradition of sinning.

And not the Adam and Eve that women have turned it into!

I was just reading a pamphlet and they referenced Adam and Eve.

And everytime/everywhere people always say Adam and Eve.

Meanwhile saying Adam and Eve draws a picture of man first then woman.

And this reference to Adam and Eve is always used in reference of sin/offence and in laying blame on a person.

So clearly man aka Adam is impliedly blamed for sinning and he is made to carry the blame of sin.

Whereas it is woman who should be blamed for sin and who should carry the blame of sin BECAUSE SHE WAS THE ONE WHO SINNED FIRST.

And it was after she had finished sinning that she then involved and implicated her husband, the man

The clear understanding is that the world back then saw God in nature and through nature for His Presence was Strongly felt everywhere.

Thus, there was the worship and appreciation of God through Nature, which is what we see in Cain and Abel, Abraham, Jacob.

But as more people became sinners and evil people and when they saw that God has cut them off they started creating/looking for ways how they could steal and obtain God's goodnesses and blessings and this is the origin of witchcraft and paganism.

And since evil people always ensure that people join them in doing evil, therefore it was only a matter of time that the pagan way would overwhelm the Natural Way.

And this was made worse by the fact that God then started removing Himself from man ("My Spirit shall not tarry with man...) so paganism grew and filled the earth.

So it is in this shit that God found one man called Abram, and decided to try him and test him asking him to leave his father's gods.

Now, this information clearly tells us that Abram did not subscribe to them exactly as we have seen some children not wanting to be babalawo or Muslims or Catholic or JW or deeper life as their parents are.

And the result we see is the beginning and growth of God's own religion called "Christianity".

So since Abraham did not subscribe to his father's gods then it is right to say that Christianity does not have pagan roots.

Just saw this thread https://www.nairaland.com/405508/pagan-roots-christianity#5599605 and after due consideration I do state that it is Falls.

Nachmonides:
This is false.
Christianity has its roots in the biblical old testament, which was ordained by God himself.

The clear understanding is that the world saw God in nature and through Nature for His Presence was Strongly felt everywhere.

Thus, there is the good worship and appreciation of God through Nature, which is what we see Cain and Abel did.

But as more people became sinners and evil people and when they saw that God has cut them off they started creating/looking for ways how they could steal and obtain God's goodnesses and blessings and this is the origin of witchcraft and paganism.

And since evil people always ensure that people join them in doing evil, therefore it was only a matter of time that the pagan way would overwhelm the Natural Way.

And this was made worse by the fact that God then started removing Himself from man ("My Spirit shall not tarry with man...) so paganism grew and filled the earth.

So it is in this shit that God found one man called Abram, and decided to try him and test him asking him to leave his father's gods. (Which clearly tells us that he did not subscribe to them).

And the result we see is the beginning and growth of God's own religion called "Christianity".

So since Abraham did not subscribe to his father's gods then it is right to say that Christianity does not have pagan roots.

They are not sub humans, just humans who have fallen.

Exactly how a thief is still a human being even though he cannot lift his head where others are.

And see it you can do stupid shit and still expect to be respected.
https://www.nairaland.com/8325578/husband-beats-wife-wearing-singlet

tctrills:
No sir, in and under are not semantics.
Semantics is the study of meaning in language, so analyzing two words in semantics could involve looking at their definitions, relationships (synonyms, antonyms, hyponyms, etc.), connotations, or how they function in different contexts.
It is impossible to be in and under at the same time.
You can't be in a car and under the car simultaneously. But you can be on the train and in the train at the same time.

You can see the bold. And right now there function is to point out you are still within the power and rule of the king and his throne which is the point I was making.

tctrills:
Now to the Laodicea, according to your theology, the people of Laodicea would inherit the throne of God and the rest of us would not. I disagree.

Don't substitute God's Words. He did not Say "inherit" He Said "will I grant".

And grants are given under examination and at the discretion of the Grantor.

And not by inheritance. Inheritance means rights.