₦airaland Forum

Sphinx419:
Which lexus reach my G35 coupe 2doors ... omoh on highway Rx350 dey burn to see my plate number

e pass the Lexus SC 430?

If you are talking this one what would you say about movies wey make person nearly commit murder eg

Just Play Dead (2026) just saw this last week.

Body heat

Basic instinct 1 & 2

Out of Bounds (1997) where RMD's life and marriage gets derailed by women.

Omo, movies and music video that "its your wedding day" wey make me kon dey find girl wey me too go get as wife. The disappointment ehn,

Sphinx419:
I use G35 Nissan infiniti... best car brand ever. Toyota dey learn for the handling and infotainment

The first Lexus is its mate na.

BJanta:
Don't mind the juvenile writer, just learning to pick his feet in writing. Bro , you forgot to include Datsun C20, Datsun 120 ,Urvan, Datsun E20 that dominated Nigerian roads in the 70s, 80s ,90s and so on. My first car was Nissan BLUEBIRD powerstrearinn. I love that car up till now, even though I drive a Camry now.

Hmm! Datsun 120. You know Datsuns oo

Oracleee:
I doubt you read the article to understand the point being made. It is obvious you read it just to comment and attack.

At my age, I remember when Nissan was a big name in Nigeria's automobile market. From the Nissan Pathfinder, one of the most popular SUVs back then, to the Datsun, Almera, Micra, Maxima, Primera, and Sunny, Nissan was a household name. The Micra, for instance, is still widely used in Ibadan to this day. And the Datsun was everywhere back then.

And should we even talk about the Nissan Bluebird? That car was so popular that it was once my dream car growing up.
Nissan was undoubtedly one of the most successful automobile brands in Nigeria at the time and I believe was competing with Toyota at some point. I doubt anyone above 30 won't know Bluebird, Datsun or even that old Pathfinder that looks like a box.

So, when the OP says Nissan was once a major force in the Nigerian automobile market, he is stating a fact, not making an exaggerated claim.
The question is, what happened to Nissan?
In my opinion, one of the major turning points was the introduction of the Nissan Murano into the Nigerian market. The Murano had everything going for it, but its transmission problems became a serious concern among owners. I remember an uncle who bought one and eventually sold it to his mechanic. Many other owners reportedly faced similar experiences, and that damaged consumer confidence in the brand.


Then came the Nissan Altima, particularly the newer models, which also developed a reputation for electrical problems.
These experiences contributed to the erosion of public confidence in Nissan. buyers begin to associate a brand with expensive repairs, they naturally gravitate towards alternatives they consider more dependable even as at then, I believe Nissan was rated ahead of Toyota and Honda. I will use chatgpt to verify the claim.


Nissan's Murano's transmission issues contributed significantly to the brand's loss of appeal.
That is the context of the OP's argument, and that is what you should address rather than dismissing his point that Nissan was never an household name. But then, perhaps you became aware of cars of recent hence your misyarns will be understood.

You just said everything i was going to say. Me too thought I would grow up to buy the Nissan Bluebird. I preferred it over Peugeot 504, corrollas and honda quintet. Passat and Santana were still on top of it sha

Josywhyte:
All sins are equal. No one is bigger than the other

So the sin of stealing your goat is the same as your elder brother gbenshin your wife?

ucheagu:
Have you ever wondered what other religion Scripture teaches? What is the difference between these books and the one you read and also do they have some similarities or are you scared of trying...

See what some other scriptures teaches
https://www.nairaland.com/8774256/these-sources-where-muhammad-copied#141043125

Ucheagu would not see this book now oo

sonmvayina:
since me and you came to this forum, you have not shown for once that what i am not saying isn't true, all you do is instead of engaging me, you resort to insults and answer a different question i have not asked.

you are really good at deflating.....

good luck toyou.

This thread proves you lying.
https://www.nairaland.com/6050137/jesus-new-testament-closer-look/4#92852845

Bye

LordReed:
LoLz. Forgiven.

🙏🏾🙏🏾

Holy2Glory:
Man! For once I have seen someone who you are really better than.

If you keep engaging you would see the rest

erico2k2:
ahah Im a christian

Ah! 😱😱😱

LordReed:
Is it reading comprehension or blindness that is giving you issues?

Oh, 🫢you mean you were replying him that several prophets had one wife and you were listing that Isaac, Moses, Isaiah, etc.had one. Oh sorry. 😬
I did not expect you would ever say this. I am most most sorry for calling you a liar.😭😭😭
Please forgive me.😬

They behave like robots and have completely submitted their hearts and souls to their council.

9) They never take correction even when valid evidence has been given to their wrong views. Clearly their rulers hold their hearts and souls in a bottle somewhere and unless their rulers say that they should take the correction, they won't

10) They lie and then try to defend that first lie with another lie, clearly not Christians as they don't want to understand that lying is of satan

erico2k2:
YOu amongst the few these pastors use to cash out, who told you MOSES had just one wife? your Pastor I guess and I also guess you was too lazy or ignorant to read your Bible yourself and get your own knowledge. Bro go and read the bible well, Moses had more than one wife.

See atheist dey attack atheist

Anyway, Chris okotie has had 3 wives and yet no one calls him a polygamist, so try thinking well

I told you, your antiGodism and antiChristianitism only shows you are illogical and that your arguments are always fallacious and bias permanently.

Roycemadeit:
Your analogy establishes, at most, that control can be evidence of ownership. It does not establish that every controller is an owner, much less that the biblical deity created the universe and therefore possesses legitimate authority over it.

Still committing the fallacy of Moving Post. The case is not about establishing if every controller is an owner but that that i have proven that acts of absolute control over a house is prima facie proof of ownership which yourself agree that God has exercised acts of ownership over this house called world which is what you are even complaining about.

So, You are talking OFF POINT and CHANGING THE GOAL POSTS because you have no reasonable and valid thing to counter this Answer.

So, yet again it is proven your that this is another rubbish thread lacking substance and merit exactly like the others. 🤣🤣🤣

LordReed:
Several. Isaac, Moses, Isaiah, etc.

Let's be clear though, the Bible supports both monogamy and polygamy.

You have come with your lies again Isaiah never had 2 wives

AI Overview
The Bible does not record that the prophet Isaiah had two wives.
• Wife's Identity: Isaiah is mentioned as having one wife, whom he refers to simply as "the prophetess" in Isaiah 8:3.
• Children: Scripture records that they had at least two sons with symbolic prophetic names: Shear-Jashub and Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz (Isaiah 7:3, 8:3).

Moses never had 2 wives like Rasak Okoya and co

If at all, the worse is that he was married twice just like Chris oyaks and chris okotie and no one calls that polygamy.

And isaac had only one wife. And he was not a prophet.
AI Overview
According to the biblical record, Isaac had only one wife, Rebekah.

But I'm sure you meant to say Jacob. And Jacob does not count because he was deceived into having it. "Deception invalidates an action".

AI Overview
In legal, ethical, and contractual frameworks, deception inherently invalidates an act or agreement because it destroys the core requirement of genuine consent. When one party relies on a lie or a misrepresentation, their choice is no longer truly voluntary or informed.

And then Deuteronomy 17:17 shows God completely bans polygamy which by the time the Bible reaches Malachi you no longer see any Israelite with more than one wife.

So, you see, you are lying as you usual do

Teymanhenry:
At this point, I’ll stop educating you on this matter. You’ve concluded that no woman would willingly accept her husband marrying a second wife, yet you’ve seen examples like the pastor’s wife and Sarah, alongside millions of other cases. You even went as far as calling it an act of wickedness. That is an emotional judgment, not a logical argument.

Let me repeat my point: polygamy has its consequences, but negative consequences do not automatically make something a sin.

First, because of your statement, let me remind you that Sarah did not accept Abraham marrying a second wife as Abraham made no such offer.

Acceptance means that an offer has been made first to her. And that did not happen.

Secondly, are you saying that because this pastor's wife allowed her husband to take a second wife, that therefore she willingly accepted it?

This is even born out of the known natural fact that women don't even allow their partners to cheat not to talk their partners marrying the person they cheated with, so is it that you are pretending to not see that in all the situations where a wife agrees to her husband taking another wife it is because of undue pressure and weakness and survival?

And how you say it is not wickedness, just blew my mind.

These threads shows that it is wickedness
https://www.nairaland.com/5306360/man-destroys-own-house-because#80355564

https://www.nairaland.com/4687997/lady-shares-how-man-abandons#70467149

Teymanhenry:
At this point, I’ll stop educating you on this matter. You’ve concluded that no woman would willingly accept her husband marrying a second wife, yet you’ve seen examples like the pastor’s wife and Sarah, alongside millions of other cases. You even went as far as calling it an act of wickedness. That is an emotional judgment, not a logical argument.

Let me repeat my point: polygamy has its consequences, but negative consequences do not automatically make something a sin.

My statement saying "no woman would willingly accept her husband marrying a second wife" is not the issue. (I will open a thread on that to understand this part cos i don't understand how you say it is not wickedness)

So can you counter my response on "the same common sense has been applied on this Deut 17:17 already for i answered you "from whom shall God choose to be king of Israel? Or do you presume that the King of Isreal will drop from the sky?

And that i already explained that in Exodus 21:10 they already had multiple wives just like the rest of the pagan world when they left Egypt.

Or you can't?

erico2k2:
see them. people like you are the reason Pastors take advantage of people in Nigeria cos if you lot bother to read, you will be wiser
The Bible indicates that Moses had two wives: Zipporah of Midian and a Cushite woman mentioned in Numbers 12:1. Zipporah is introduced in Exodus 2:21, while the Cushite woman appears later, and most sources interpret her as a second wife rather than another name for Zipporah.

Did Moses have 2 wives
AI Overview
The Bible does not explicitly state whether Moses had one or two wives, leaving scholars and theologians divided into two main interpretations.

1. The Single-Wife View (Zipporah is the Cushite)

• Zipporah as the Wife: Moses is widely known to have married Zipporah, the Midianite daughter of Jethro (Reuel), with whom he had two sons, Gershom and Eliezer.
• Geographical and Poetic Link: Some scholars argue that "Cushite" in Numbers 12:1 refers poetically or culturally to Zipporah herself. In certain biblical passages (such as Habakkuk 3:7), the region of Cush is closely associated with or overlaps the territory of Midian, meaning "Cushite" could simply describe Zipporah's non-Israelite ancestry or dark complexion.
• Conclusion in this view: Moses was married to only one woman—Zipporah

I just got this from Google which I never knew but my own answer is that "Did Moses have 2 wives like Rasak Okoya and co?
No!

Rather he was married twice just like Chris oyaks and chris okotie and no one said that that was polygamy.

So, you are wrongi

Holy2Glory:
So even you knows this. How come that fellow is this ignorant? Truly he may be having some unknown problems with God.

When a person sees that God has cast them, they start stretching the scriptures to cover the outcast land they live in

Roycemadeit:
.It's ridiculous how you think.

You don't even know how God came to be or how Christianity came to be, yet you're here calling my work “thrash production” and lecturing me about bias.

You accuse me of stubbornness while displaying the very intellectual stubbornness you're pretending to condemn. Nobody tests anything in what I wrote. You simply lack the comprehension to understand anything, and your response makes that painfully obvious.

I can only imagine how intellectually bankrupt someone must be to read an entire piece, understand so little of it, and still have the audacity to lecture the author.

Your comment is an embarrassment, and frankly, your ignorance would be less irritating if it weren't accompanied by so much arrogance. It's repulsive.

See, how you keep moving and changing post?
Is the topic about "how God came to be or how Christianity came to be"?

No!
Of which the Bible even answers and shows how Christianity came to be, so it is clear you were not thinking when you were making this thread

Further, the fact that you have made several new threads that have been thrashed for one fallt or the other and yet you made this new thread still containing thrashes, is clear evidence of your deficit intellectual facility and bias stubbornness.

And in further proof of your intellectual vacancy, it is apparent that you do not remember that even when we told children that "fire is hot, don't touch it"; they still touched because nature makes us verify every information we have been given.

So, it is clear from the beginning that the thread is again useless and stup.... just as the other threads you made have been.

Not to now talk about you accusing Christians of bias where you are the one doing all the bias!

So, it is you who embarrassed yourself, your antiGodism and Antichristianism will always bring yu shame and embarrassment as it has always done to others.

AntiChristian:
All these 4nicators everywhere!...

Same as you with your 4 x 4wives

Antoeni:
A man Can Cheat And Still Loves His Wife
Once a Woman Opens Her Legs For Another Man, Just Forget it.
No Real Man Should Forgive Cheating Wife .. Know This And Know Peace 📌

A man that cheats on his wife is guilty of a capital offence

Guestmale:
Who tell you that, adultery and fornication are great sins before Almighty God.

See, you. You don't know that that was what Satan used to destroy mankind?

Fornication/adultery is the forbidden fruit.

https://www.nairaland.com/7947204/truly-forbidden-fruit-sex#127583663

Niok:
Bible wey human being like me write
Dey whine yourself

Biology textbook no be person write am? You just dey strangle yourself

kiddaz:
King David and Samson just dey look you

And you see, shame gbab dem finish

Blue86:
Some have the erroneous notion that once you are saved, you are eternally secured no matter what you do.
And that those who left the faith were those who were not really saved.

Don't mind those people. They love lies and delusions.

Teymanhenry:
Very good. You explained the second passage well by considering its context and using common sense. You should apply the same reasoning to the verse warning kings against multiplying wives, which says they could turn their hearts away from God.

The core issue was that Israelite men were divorcing their Israelite wives to marry foreign women who worshipped other gods, similar to the problems addressed in Ezra and Nehemiah. The concern was not simply the women's nationality, but the potential consequences of these marriages for Israel's faithfulness to God.

We should interpret these passages consistently, considering their context rather than applying one verse literally while explaining another away.

The same common sense has been applied on this Deut 17:17 already for i answered you "from whom shall God choose to be king of Israel? Or do you presume that the King of Isreal will drop from the sky?

And you did not address this and hence why your moved post back to Exodus 21:10 where I already explained that they already had multiple wives just like the rest of the pagan world where it is known that if the first wife does not accept the husband marrying a second wife, (which we all know that she can never support if she is free) the husband shall do the additional wickedness of throwing her and the children out and cutting them off from sustenance. Yul edochie's case proves this.

And God never supports wickedness, so since they already had taken multiple wives in Egypt, then this is God in Exodus 21:10 stopping the wickedness that comes out of polygamy. Then in Deuteronomy 17:17 he completely bans polygamy which we see stopped by the time the Bible reaches Malachi were you no longer see any Israelite with more than one wife.

Ecomfreecourse:
No religion has ever been true. It's all trap, lies etc

Yet no Christianity never told a lie nor has it begged anyone to follow it