Juicegal: imisi imisi imisi everywhere. Nigerians and mediocrity. It cuts across all our daily lives , systems, institutions and government. How someone so mediocre, lazy, uncouth, inarticulate and down right not worthy of top 5 judging by other HM's qualities is touted as the winner to be beats all sanity and objectivity.
olorun ma je ooo!!!!
Hahahahahahaha. Horrible reality. She no suppose dey for top 5 true talk.
scondy: Oya...give us example .....answer like u were imisi...
Yes she didn't say those words of a truth, but she should have answered like this :
"Ebuka pls I didn't say that, no no no I didn't ever say that , could you watch the clip again at your spare time. You will see I didn't say such. You are mistaken pls. What is Dracula?? Don't know what that is oooooo"
This is a first scenario, I can come up with more if Ebuka pushes forward but I doubt Ebuka would have gone further to mention Isabella after this answer. He would have let the matter rest.
Since she is sure she never said those words, then asking Ebuka to go watch the clip again before everyone reinforces her position in the eyes of fellow HMs andviewers who know she actually wasn't the one that said it but Isabella and also helps in maintaining her fraternity with Isabella, further avoiding all this bickering going on now. Na we wet dey outside knows who said what finally.
Imisi is a kind of friend one should never never pray to have. There were better ways to answer that Ebuka question without going all out on Isabella. Not nice
Go to section 179(2) to check the similar provisions for the qualification of a Governor.
I quote it for you:
"he has not less than one-quarter of the votes cast at the election in each of at least two-thirds of all the local government areas in the State, but where the only candidate fails to be elected in accordance with this section, then there shall be fresh nominations."
The each there is to specify and unequivocally declare that every local government is counted when calculating at least two-thirds. That's what the each does in 133 and 134 also.
this does not apply here and both are not comparable. It can only apply if the Constitution adds some extra to it. For instance like two thirds in each of all local governments in Lagos states and Ikeja. This makes Ikeja mandatory.
Statement A: he has not less than one-quarter of the votes cast at the election in at least two-thirds of all the States in the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.
Here Abuja is clearly seen as part of the states and all the candidate is requred is to score one quarter votes in at least 2/3 of all states even without Abuja and still will win the election.
Statement B: he has not less than one-quarter of the votes cast at the election in each of at least two-thirds of all the States in the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja..
Here "in each of" separates Abuja from other states and when a candidate passes the one quarter requirements in at least 2/3 of all states he also needs to get one quarter in FCT to win.