₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,344,779 members, 8,513,641 topics. Date: Thursday, 05 November 2026 at 10:27 AM

Toggle theme

Elated177's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Elated177's Profile › Elated177's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 (of 217 pages)

Christianity Etc › Re: There Is No Commandment Greater Than These. by elated177(op): 10:58am On May 31, 2022
None.
Christianity Etc › Re: Sexual Purity Is One Of The Worst Enemies Of The Forces Of Wickedness. by elated177(op): 9:59pm On May 30, 2022
judedwriter:
Jehovah
But the letter "J" is about 600 years old?
Romance › Re: To The Homosexuality Advocate/apologist. by elated177(op): 9:42pm On May 30, 2022
RedpillAnalyst:
I am not advocating for same relations neither do I say it is the worst thing humans do. I want to let you know most people in the LGBTQ spectrum are intellectuals and they will flaw your argument swiftly if you say the penis is exclusively designed for the vagina because of the shape and what not.
You really are advocating same-sex sexual relationships. Actually, homosexuality will always be one of the worst things that any human being will ever engage in. Do you know the kind and level of uncleanness associated with homosexuality? It wasn't for nothing that the Creator of the heavens, the earth, the seas and everything in them, the one and only true God, YHVH Almighty, called it detestable and abominable. It is a vile affection.

Spiritually sensitive persons, including those who engage in it, know that homosexuality pollutes the environment spiritually.

Aren't you one of the lgbtwhatever? Aren't you trying to do that here and failing miserably? With what are you going to "flaw" an unimpeachable fact? It is the eternal Covenant - eternal truth, if you prefer. The penis and the vagina are made for each other, as long as sex is concerned. The only hole that the penis is supposed to penetrate sexually is the vagina. Any other hole is unnatural and abnormal. Sticking the penis into the anus is an aberation.


Why didn't you refute the assertion that the anus is not a sex organ?

Why is it not possible for the penis of one male to open for the penis of another male to penetrate during the abominable act of homosexuality? Why do they resort to evacuation of excrement?

Why can't one female use her vagina to penetrate the vagina of the other female during their detestable sexual activity? Why do the still revert or resort to prosthetics and other penis-like objects?

Answer those questions?

If nature wanted two males to have sex with each other, males would have been equipped with both male and female sex organs - penis and vagina. The same with the females - both vagina and penis.

Why is it that between two people of the same sex who are in the abominable same-sex sexual relationship with each other, one acts like the member of the opposite sex? Do you have any explanation here, redpillanalyst?

RedpillAnalyst:
Penis and Vagina are reproductive organs. They are not the only sexual organs, You know sex can be accomplished without necessarily using the reproductive organs.
How would you define an "accomplished" sex?

RedpillAnalyst:
Some people get off with just nipple and navel manipulation. Some women get off riding horses or sitting on a spinning washing machine. I am sure you have heard the word Mouth Gig and Hanal entry non-LGTBQ folks and married couples you see everyday do this more than you know and that's not really a sin or abomination.
You haven't said anything.

As a saint, servant and messenger of the one and only true God, YHVH Almighty, the Creator and Father of all spirits, fellatió and cunnilingus are outside scripturally recommended sexual activities. We, the saint, servants and messengers, of YHVH Almighty, of Yahushua the Messiah, do not engage in such. Our mouths and tongues are not for such acts. Such acts are probably the inventions of demons.

RedpillAnalyst:
They would say if God didn't want people to be having pre or extra marital sex humans would have been made to only get pleasure with their husband or wife only.
Which people would say such? Who are the "they"?


RedpillAnalyst:
We have the same stance, but your points will not fly if your were to make a case as a leader of a church, a state or a country.
I don't know what you are talking about?
Christianity Etc › Re: I Have Come In my Father's Name. by elated177(op): 9:54pm On May 28, 2022
haekymbahd:
What name did Jesus call his Father because I curious if one claims to come in his Father's name but failed to mention the name of his Father?
Are you sure you are ready for this discourse that you want to start?
Christianity Etc › I Have Come In my Father's Name. by elated177(op):
El Elohe Yahshrael!

John 5: 43 I have come in my Father’s name, and you do not accept me; but if someone else comes in his own name, you will accept him.


What is the Father's name? Do you know? Is it important to you?


El Elohe Yahshrael! Hallelu YAH!
Christianity Etc › Re: Sexual Purity Is One Of The Worst Enemies Of The Forces Of Wickedness. by elated177(op): 4:10pm On May 28, 2022
judedwriter:
I am not arguing with you.

God has an expectation of the kind of the life we live on earth. That's a part of your destiny.
What is the name of your God?
Christianity Etc › Re: Sexual Purity Is One Of The Worst Enemies Of The Forces Of Wickedness. by elated177(op): 12:16pm On May 28, 2022
judedwriter:
Yes. But God's will consists of a lifestyle not just obedience
How do you mean? Can an obedient saint of Yahushua the Messiah have a lifestyle at variance with the one associated with obedience to him?
Christianity Etc › Re: Sexual Purity Is One Of The Worst Enemies Of The Forces Of Wickedness. by elated177(op): 10:15am On May 28, 2022
judedwriter:
God created you to do something.(purpose)

God also has His expectations for your life. (will)
John 6: 28 Then they asked him, “What must we do to do the works YHVH requires?” 29 Yahushua answered, “The work of YHVH is this: to believe in the one he has sent.”

Ecclesiastes 12:13 Now all has been heard;
here is the conclusion of the matter: Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the duty of all mankind.



Do you agree?
Christianity Etc › Re: The Fourth Commandment: The Sabbath. by elated177(op): 9:52am On May 28, 2022
It is another glorious Sabbath.
Christianity Etc › Re: Sexual Purity Is One Of The Worst Enemies Of The Forces Of Wickedness. by elated177(op): 9:51am On May 28, 2022
judedwriter:
I will take that as a rhetorical question.

You don't know what God's will and blessings are?
It wasn't. Just so we are on the same page on this. Can you answer the questions?
Christianity Etc › Re: Sexual Purity Is One Of The Worst Enemies Of The Forces Of Wickedness. by elated177(op): 2:49am On May 28, 2022
judedwriter:
God's purpose for our lives. His will and blessings.
What is his purpose? What is his will?
Christianity Etc › Re: Sexual Purity Is One Of The Worst Enemies Of The Forces Of Wickedness. by elated177(op): 8:40pm On May 27, 2022
judedwriter:
If anyone can keep themselves free from masturbation, fornication and adultery, they will surely fulfill their destinies on earth.
What do you refer to as "destinies"?
Christianity Etc › Re: Which Group Of People Will Be Persecuted? by elated177(op): 2:16pm On May 27, 2022
Apt.
Christianity Etc › Re: Sexual Purity Is One Of The Worst Enemies Of The Forces Of Wickedness. by elated177(op): 2:15pm On May 27, 2022
Hold on to it.
Christianity Etc › Re: Be Conscious Of Your Forehead/Brow While Seated In Your Churches Today. by elated177(op): 2:03pm On May 27, 2022
Apt.
Christianity Etc › Re: He Distinguished Himself From Them All. by elated177(op): 2:03pm On May 27, 2022
It is about power.
Christianity Etc › Re: The Persistency Of Balak, Tactics of Balaam And The Glory Of The Saints Of YHVH by elated177(op): 2:02pm On May 27, 2022
Apt.
Christianity Etc › Re: There Is No Commandment Greater Than These. by elated177(op): 2:01pm On May 27, 2022
True.
Christianity Etc › Re: How Is Your Son's Husband/how Is Your Daughter's Wife? Doesn't It Sound Weird? by elated177(op): 2:00pm On May 27, 2022
Very weird.
Romance › Re: How Is Your Son's Husband/how Is Your Daughter's Wife? Doesn't It Sound Weird? by elated177(op): 2:00pm On May 27, 2022
Abnormal tendencies.
Romance › Re: To The Homosexuality Advocate/apologist. by elated177(op):
RedpillAnalyst:
The argument of male Instruments fitting perfectly into the female Instruments can always be flawed anytime.

There are loopholes in the lock and key / ball and socket joint theory and a low level homosexual will flaw it easily.


Factor these:

Using the lock and key theory is somewhat valid for both heterosexuals and gays, but not lesbians as two women can't lock.

There are some men with micropenis and can never have a normal coitus with a woman.

If the ultimate purpose of sex is for reproduction and not for "entertainment" what about women who can not give birth.

Not all women lubricate.

The Vargina and peinis are not the only sexual organs in the human anatomy.

Talking of sin, homosexuality is not worse than premarital sex which is common amongst youths who think devouted religious people.

Homosexuality is not a cultural thing. The argument that is natural or unnatural will be flawed everytime. I do agree it is not sustainable and its promotion isn't good, but we have thousands of "micro-sins" out there that you and I have committed today which are equally bad.
Apart from the penis and vagina, what other physical sexual organs are there in the human anatomy?

Is the anus for sex? Nope! The anus is not a sex organ. So the "lock" thingy which you assigned to faggótry is an aberation. You see, just as I pointed out above, the vagina and the penis are sex organs and they effectively complement each other during coitus. Now, if a male was naturally designed to have sex with another male, by that very fact making homosexuality natural, the penis would have had the ability to open for another penis to penetrate. The same applies to the vagina and lesbianism.

There is a reason a male is born with a penis - whether micro or macro - and not with a vagina as well. The same with a female.

The vagina was designed perfectly for the penis. No one can "flaw" such. It is an unimpeachable assertion.


Homosexuality is abnormal and unnatural. No one can "flaw" such assertion. Nature abhors it. With what facts?

Sin is sin. That sin is sin does not mean that we shouldn't talk about how sinful a sinful act is. This thread is not about stealing, lying, cheating, fornication, etc. Nope! It is about the abominable act of homosexuality. Discussing it has not exempted other sins. Why do homosexuality apologists resort to this all the time?

I can't remember saying that homosexuality was/is a cultural thing.

About micro sin or macro sin, speak for yourself.

That not all vaginas lubricate, according to you, does not negate the fact that the vagina is the only natural hole which a penis should be going into for sexual activity.

So, Mr redpillanalyst, you have succeeded in analyzing nothing here. If you really want to be homosexuality apologist, tackle the questions. Here they are again:


males to have sexual relationships with females are explicitly displayed by the sexual organs of both males and females. It was/is a resounding assertion.

Truly, if nature wanted people of the same-sex to engage in any kind of sexual relationship, the bodies of the male and the female would have been equipped with both male and female sex organs. It is simple to understand.

When two males have sex, why isn't it possible for one male to penetrate the other male via his penis? Why do they resort to evacuation of faeces?

Why can't a female use her vagina to penetrate the vagina of another female? Why do they still revert to prosthetics and penis-like objects?

Why is it that between two people of the same sex who are in their so-called relationship, one must act like a female or a male in almost all the cases?


Your colleague, to whom those questions were directed, couldn't handle any of them.
Christianity Etc › Re: If There Was Really A Single Atheist Here: apt. by elated177(op): 11:05am On May 23, 2022
FERNANDEZISBACK:
My identity is that God is man made..
Nah! Reveal your identity. I want assess your mental state.
Romance › Re: To The Homosexuality Advocate/apologist. by elated177(op): 11:03am On May 23, 2022
IMAliyu2:
I also suspect op to be possibly closeted.

He displays way too much interest on this topic far beyond the typical anti-gay religious rhetoric.
Exactly what anyone who doesn't want the abominable and detestable act of homosexuality condemned would say. Emotional blackmail won't cut it.

Is it only closeted? Openeted kwanu?
Romance › Re: To The Homosexuality Advocate/apologist. by elated177(op): 10:51am On May 23, 2022
FERNANDEZISBACK:
Anything more than one person does together to have orgasms or other sexually satisfying sensations is sex...

There are so many ways for a same-gender couple too have sex..There are countless way that lead to sexual pleasures...PiV is not the only sexual act available out there..brace up and stop day dreaming..
What kind of sexual activity does not involve the sexual organs? Can you mention one?


FERNANDEZISBACK:
It’s not natural” is a stupid argument for any human activity.
Wearing clothes is not natural...Air conditioning is not natural...Buildings and cars and money are not natural...Almost nothing in the modern world is “natural” for a human being...
Where did you get that from? So humans were supposed to move about without clothes, huh? Chai!

FERNANDEZISBACK:
The natural state of human beings is as naked hunter-gatherers living in small family groups on the African savanna... If you’re not willing to commit to that, don’t try to play the “natural” card...
Absolute hocus pocus. What a humbug!

FERNANDEZISBACK:
Ask yourself this…
Is engaging in sex with the same gender natural?
You might say no...You can’t have offspring so it mustn’t be natural...

But take a look at the definition of natural...
"Existing in or derived from nature; not made or caused by humankind."
Homosexuality is literally defined as natural...Anything which can occur in nature must be natural...So how is something that’s clearly natural thought of as a unnatural?
If you want people to believe that nature approves of homosexuality, made provisions for it, address or counter the assertions below and answer the questions where necessary.

The male has penis. The female has vagina. The vagina, the sex organ of the female, is designed in such a way that it accepts the penis - the sex organ of the male. It even secretes its own natural lubes. How explicit and resounding do you want nature to make the assertion?


Well, the provisions that nature made for males to have sexual relationships with females are explicitly displayed by the sexual organs of both males and females. It was/is a resounding assertion.

Truly, if nature wanted people of the same-sex to engage in any kind of sexual relationship, the bodies of the male and the female would have been equipped with both male and female sex organs. It is simple to understand.

When two males have sex, why isn't it possible for one male to penetrate the other male via his penis? Why do they resort to evacuation of faeces?

Why can't a female use her vagina to penetrate the vagina of another female? Why do they still revert to prosthetics and penis-like objects?

Why is it that between two people of the same sex who are in their so-called relationship, one must act like a female or a male in almost all the cases?

And the penis of one male can't still open for the penis of the other male to penetrate. The vagina of one lesbian can't spread for the vagina of another lesbian for sexual activity.
Can't you see that homosexuality is abnormal and unnatural?

FERNANDEZISBACK:
The answer is culture...
It is not nature that says homosexuality is unnatural it’s culture...Culture has made its mind up and determined that homosexuality is unnatural...

But culture isn’t nature so what unnatural really means is this: a deviation from the cultural norms.....
Is homosexuality unnatural? No.

Is homosexuality deviating from many cultural norms? Yes.
Homosexuality always has and always will be natural It’s our culture that says it isn’t... understood? wink
You have no idea of what you are saying. If you did, you would have realized that some cultural beliefs stem from nature. Some cultural beliefs are against nature. Any culture that condemns homosexuality is a good one and is line with nature.

Nature, regardless of what any culture says or how any culture views homosexuality, has explicitly and unequivocally asserted that homosexuality is abominable and detestable. Period. End of the matter.
Romance › Re: To The Homosexuality Advocate/apologist. by elated177(op): 3:34pm On May 21, 2022
blinking001:
Avoid that moniker. You don't reason with people that deliberately wants to be stupid. Stop expecting anything rational from that moniker
It is not for his benefit. It is for the benefit of those who may be genuinely confused. Our paths have crossed prior to today.
Romance › Re: To The Homosexuality Advocate/apologist. by elated177(op): 3:30pm On May 21, 2022
FERNANDEZISBACK:
Read to understand..I made it clear to you that it's natural..do I need to start asking why straight persons put their d**k in the vagina of the opposite sex.. doesn't it sound odd.. develop yourself and stop whining around cluelessly.. wink grin
Who is exhibiting cluelessness between the two of us?

Of course it would sound odd because the answer is obvious even for the most foolish mind to understand. The male has penis. The female has vagina. The vagina, the sex organ of the female, is designed in such a way that it accepts the penis - the sex organ of the male. It even secretes its own natural lubes. How explicit and resounding do you want nature to make the assertion?

Can you say the same for homosexuality?
Romance › Re: To The Homosexuality Advocate/apologist. by elated177(op): 3:03pm On May 21, 2022
FERNANDEZISBACK:
Well if you think that homosexuality is wrong because it is "unnatural" then you don't know mother nature really well...Humans are not the only species wherein you would find homosexuals...And it's not just homosexuality which exists in nature but also a lot of other kinds of behavior as well which humans would consider as a crime or unnatural if they'd do it..

Being stupid is not natural does that make it unethical to be a stupid homophobe?
Besides homosexuality is natural otherwise why the hell would it exist?

Do you think people sit down one day and decide.."I think I'll be attracted only to members of my own sex from today!"
Do straight people do that similarly for the opposite sex?

It's their nature and they have a right to live as they wish without someone saying its wrong or making a stupid fuss!..
So pls keep mute and stop embarrassing yourself.. talking nonsense all the time makes you f**lish..you and your imaginary creature should start thinking...you have to grow up and stop whining like a kid over people's personal choice that doesn't even affect you..*pukes*
You still haven't answered the questions. Rants and rambles won't cut it. Aren't you the homosexuality apologist wannabe? Answer the questions.
Romance › Re: To The Homosexuality Advocate/apologist. by elated177(op):
FERNANDEZISBACK:
It's called choice..if it was a norm from start you wouldn't be saying this..
Do they hurt anyone?no...s why the nonsense..
Can you now see how empty you really are as long as holding these views of yours are concerned? I thought you were going to reel out points effortless to answer or to counter or to address the questions asked. Same with your shallow rants and rambles bordering on the existence of the Creator or the supernatural. When one pins you down and asks you to provide concrete points, you provide zilch.
Romance › Re: To The Homosexuality Advocate/apologist. by elated177(op): 2:42pm On May 21, 2022
Flamemignon1:
And that's a fact
And the penis of one male can't still open for the penis of the other male to penetrate. The vagina of one lesbian can't spread for the vagina of another lesbian for sexual activity.
Can't you see that homosexuality is abnormal and unnatural?
Romance › Re: To The Homosexuality Advocate/apologist. by elated177(op): 2:37pm On May 21, 2022
Flamemignon1:
It's completely obvious the four walls of this country are the only places you've seen. I implore you to travel around and see parents with gay kids,these are parents,they are not parents who give an ultimatum to have a kid but are gracious for the ones they have. Dude, it's 2022 and straight parents with gay kids,gay parents with straight kids are a norm
Dude, it is 2022 and humans still depend on oxygen for survival.
Romance › Re: To The Homosexuality Advocate/apologist. by elated177(op): 2:35pm On May 21, 2022
FERNANDEZISBACK:
What provision?There is no ‘reason’ for being gay...Is there a reason for being heterosexual? No so why would it be different for homosexuals? Just accept that people will be different and stop trying to label everyone...
Well, the provisions that nature made for males to have sexual relationships with females are explicitly displayed by the sexual organs of both males and females. It was/is a resounding assertion.

Truly, if nature wanted people of the same-sex to engage in any kind of sexual relationship, the bodies of the male and the female would have been equipped with both male and female sex organs. It is simple to understand.

When two males have sex, why isn't it possible for one male to penetrate the other male via his penis? Why do they resort to evacuation of faeces?

Why can't a female use her vagina to penetrate the vagina of another female? Why do they still revert to prosthetics and penis-like objects?

Why is it that between two people of the same sex who are in their so-called relationship, one must act like a female or a male in almost all the cases?

Answer those questions first.



Homosexuality is an aberration.
Christianity Etc › Re: To The Homosexuality Advocate/apologist. by elated177(op): 10:08pm On May 20, 2022
Abstain from this abominable act.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 (of 217 pages)