₦airaland Forum

Antoeni:
Dubious & Fraudulent Dangote , How Come That Imported Fuel Now Cheaper Than Dangote Fuel?

he is not forcing you to buy. You are free to buy the toxic, substandard imports just to save a few Naira but destroying your expensive engines in the process. He doesn't owe you anything because it's a private company not government owned.

Illiterate Okpebholo is after money that he cannot even read out without getting confused. Shame on him.

Shame on Tinubu and APC if they don't call illiterate Okpebholo to order. Because this action flies in the face of Tinubu's much vaunted reforms to guarantee Local Government autonomy.

Illiterate Okpebholo should be called to order. But why would the House of Assembly which is PDP agree to do such an unconstitutional thing? Shame on them all.

She's a stupid woman with inferiority complex licking the white man's ass. I have zero regard for her.

Na Nigerians de give that Kemi woman undeserved attention.

Exousiang01:
This whole issue of retired Col is one I find funny.

Nobody is asking why the estate is going down...

We should go against the law because of a retired Col?

As usual I see alot of Obidients saying this and that.
One day they say the law is for the poor, is this a poor family....

If the estate disrespects the law and master plan it has to go down...

I remember Bolingo hotels back then, even after the man died trying to get Obasanjo to prevent demolition. It still went down...

The estate should go down

the Retired Colonel's company is not even the owner of the land. The land belongs to government. Government only gave them a TEMPORARY PERMIT to use the land for their construction company yard.

Duke always fresh. Also very intelligent.

Stupid woman with inferiority complex. Insulting your country as if the white man country doesn't have bad people.

I have zero regard for that woman. She has inferiority complex.

So because he was 14 years old that time, he shouldn't do his job?

The funny part of it is that most of them that cry foul are not even legal owners of the land. Like Paulosa Nig Ltd that was given a temporary permit to use government land for its construction company yard. The land belongs to the government and government has not sold it to them, yet they are making noise.

OgatheTop:
I'm a lawyer.
My position was totally formed by media hype.

Notwithstanding the cronycism in the reallocation, the law must take it's course.

I even thought they made payment but the administration balked, for familiar reasons, it turned out they didnt fulfill their bargain.

Or did they?

They own onus.

the government agreed to sell to them and give them a Permanent Right of Occupancy on condition that they pay the required charges , but they didn't pay. For almost two years now.

OgatheTop:
Honestly I took the contrary position until I read this piece with proof.

Brother you are right. it's always good to hear both sides of a story.

Perpetual Wailing Wailers over to you.

AmiableMosquito:
Typical of the gullible over-sentimental Nigerian. See your dirty mouth like "May they revoke......". Spare me the theatrics this clown. You think you are in a circus and God is your puppet. May they revoke.....abeg abeg

I repeat you neither have a square meter of land nor know anything about land administration in the FCT. My advise is that you either crawl back into the hole you escaped from or try Wike and see, if your brain won't be demolished alongside the illegal properties. You id!ots enjoy illegality and hate to do the right thing, but when you are challenged, you begin to cry victimisation and become emergency activists.

Saao, Sour or whatever you are called, if them born your papa well, go buy land for FCT, no do proper documentation, you hear? You think say na Aboki still be Minister, abi?

It's a good thing your brain signalled you not to reply me further. At least, that part of your brain is still working. Because the more you respond, the more the world sees your stupidity.

PS: Like the OP said, if we were to do the right thing, VDM should be cooling off in detention by now. I don't give a fvck what good he has done in the past or that he intends to do in the future. You don't open your gutter mouth and ask the military to stop constitutionally elected/appointed public officials from carrying out their statutory duties. Animals everywhere. 🤮

my Brother you are right

Theunderman:
Yes new, bt not first grade cars

Bros those are brand new 2024 Hilux but not full options.

Saao:
lol, from what you wrote here, it simply means you don't have full knowledge on how it works. Application for purchase is different from documentation here. The issue here is documentation not Payment for the land. For Government to grant any right at all on a land, you have been offered and offered accepted and other procedures take place before getting to the stage temporary right of Occupancy and then to apply and get statutory right of Occupancy. What we are saying is that, when someone has statutory right of occupation, minister has no right to revoke it for non payment of ground rent that is annual payment. The fact that you own house rent, you landlord has no right to evict you from your apartment, except court. Owing a statutory R of o is beyond a tenant landlord relationship. The only way he can revoke R of o is when it's over riding public interest. I won't respond to any of u again

very laughable. Even a layman should know better

Saao:
lol, vdm shared their document. The man so who is a lawyer shared the Statutory R of O.

ok please post it here for us to see. Because even Wike said he would like to see it.

Saao:
I may not respond to you anymore as people that took a particular position don't change their mind. From what you posted here, they were granted statutory R of O. That's the main thing. Every R of O has a condition to pay ground rent. I'm very sure you haven't seen any R of O before. I'm also sure you're from Southwest so you may not know. Most past ministers of FCT did similar thing wike is doing but after their tenure, those lands will be returned to the original owners. So rest, don't waste your time

if you apply to me that you want to buy my land and I write to you that I approve your request, on the conditions that you must pay me ground rent for the years you stayed there, does it mean you own the land when you failed to pay me?

Saao:
bro as I said, every Right of Occupation comes with the condition of annual payment of ground rent. When you failed, Government will charge you for penal rent not revocation. You will understand it more if you have land in Abuja, I have land in Abuja. Even Lere Olayinka confirmed this fact of then granted Statutory right of O so that alone stood as fact. R of o/c of o are the same. Just like governor's consent and c of o are the same in lagos. Ground rent in Abuja, landuse charge in lagos are the same.

even the Paulosa people have failed to show any shred of evidence that proves that they own the land in question, other than the fact that they have been there for many years on a Temporary Right of Occupancy.

Saao:
bro as I said, every Right of Occupation comes with the condition of annual payment of ground rent. When you failed, Government will charge you for penal rent not revocation. You will understand it more if you have land in Abuja, I have land in Abuja. Even Lere Olayinka confirmed this fact of then granted Statutory right of O so that alone stood as fact. R of o/c of o are the same. Just like governor's consent and c of o are the same in lagos. Ground rent in Abuja, landuse charge in lagos are the same.

Let me quote Lere Olayinka before people are misled by your comment;


“A construction company, Paulosa Nigeria Limited occupied the land as a temporary office, under a Temporary Right of Occupancy arrangement granted in 1984 (40 years ago). For 36 years, the company occupied the land, built permanent structures on it, and rented them out without any approval from the government.

“On November 18, 2020, after occupying the land for 36 years without approval, Paulosa Nigeria Limited applied to the then Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, for the conversion of the Temporary Right of Occupancy to a Statutory Right of Occupancy.

“On February 1, 2023, approval was granted to Paulosa Nigeria Limited for a Statutory Right of Occupancy, subject to certain terms and conditions. Some of the terms and conditions are payment of Ground Rent Per Square Meter Per Annum, which was N50K/m² from 2022 to 2023, amounting to N2,332,143; payment of Premium of N500/m², amounting to N11,660,715 and payment of Ground Rent from 1984 to 2021 (37 years), amounting to N43,144,645.

“However, for 20 months, Paulosa Nigeria Limited refused to comply with the terms and conditions for the approval. Consequent upon the failure of Paulosa Nigeria Limited to comply with the terms and conditions for approval granted for a Right of Occupancy on the said land, the approval was revoked on October 10, 2024, more than 20 months after it was given. From the above, it should be clear that Paulosa Nigeria Limited never at any time, owned the land”

Saao:
you got those documents from Lere who happened to be media aid to Wike. Copy Lere explanation here. You simply gave half information. Here is the simple explanation. For 36 years, they have Temporary R of O. In 2020, they applied for Statutory R of O which they were granted in 2023 which made then owner of it Statutory. They were to pay ground rent from 2020 which amount to 40m plus, they paid 10m already. So wike has no right to revoke any land because of no payment of ground rent. When someone fail in payment of ground rent, you charge him for penal rent and if fail, you charge him to court so court can force him to pay. Revocation can only happen when it's over riding public interest. He revoke and reallocated to himself or friend that is abuse of power. Have you ever heard in lagos that government revoke plot because of annual landuse charge? Please stop supporting injustice.

please let us see the documents you claim was issued to them(Certificate of Occupancy or Permanent Right of Occupancy). The fact is that they applied for the Permanent Right of Occupancy and the application was approved based on clear terms and conditions (as shown in the letters posted above). They couldn't meet the terms and conditions. So at what point did the land belong to them ?

FourQu:
I know you're not the only person standing on shakey grounds, do you know some deluded people are still standing on a stolen useless mandate?

Pick a spot and stand till thy kingdom come you hear

you have said nothing

FourQu:
This op is not normal. This is the same person that created a thread jubilating that dangote refinery will reduce petrol pump price

Today what is the reality of that claim 🤔

This same confused op 😕

please counter what I wrote with facts not the usual misguided sentiments.

He's either ignorant or being mischievous. I say that going by his recent activity where he went to town with a FALSE story that Wike/FCTA revoked ownership of land "OWNED" by a construction company belonging to a late Military Man. This is false because the land actually belongs to the government. I will explain in layman's terms so that the gullible can clearly understand.

(1) The land fully belongs to the government not to the construction company in question. Lawyersarena.com describes a Temporary Right of Occupancy as thus, "A temporary right of occupancy as its title implies is essentially limited or transient in nature it amounts to no more than a bare licence to occupy land on a temporary and sometimes short term basis and generally confers no legal estate in the grantee of such a right".

Now it's clear that the government gave that construction company a Temporary Right of Occupancy in 1984. And as we can now understand, this permit only allows them to use the place TEMPORARILY. The government does that a lot of times. Construction companies are usually given land by government to use for their yard and other construction activities. Especially when they are handling a job for government . It doesn't make them owners of such lands.

(2) Because the government didn't recover the place for decades doesn't mean that a Temporary permit to use the place has translated to a Permanent Right of Occupancy or Certificate of Occupancy. And because they decided to build some houses and live on government land for which they only had a permit to occupy TEMPORARILY doesn't make the land theirs.

(3) The people recently applied to government to give them a Permanent Right of Occupancy, meaning they now wanted to buy the land from government. Government agreed 20 months ago and asked them to pay some money amounting to about N56 million. They didn't pay the money for 20 months (almost two years). So how are they the owners of the land? If my tenant has been living in my property for many decades and expresses interest to buy the property and own it permanently but fails to pay the money I asked him to pay to own the place, is he the owner of the property? Or am I not at liberty to sell the place to someone else who is ready and able to pay me?

(4) There is a trending video of VeryDarkMan calling on the Military to stop the FCT from recovering the land. This is a treasonable act. His calling on the Military to unlawfully stop the government from is Lawful operations is the height of stupidity and ignorance. He's only lucky that this is Nigeria where people get away with doing or saying treasonable things.

He's a typical ignorant youth. I say that going by his recent activity where he went to town with a wrong story that Wike revoked ownership of land owned by a construction company belonging to a late military man. This is not correct because the land actually belongs to government. I will explain in layman's terms so that the gullible can clearly understand.

(1) The land fully belongs to the government not to the construction company in question. Lawyersarena.com describes a Temporary Right of Occupancy as thus "A temporary right of occupancy as its title implies is essentially limited or transient in nature it amounts to no more than a bare licence to occupy land on a temporary and sometimes short term basis and generally confers no legal estate in the grantee of such a right".

Now it's clear that the government gave that construction company a Temporary Right of Occupancy in 1984. As the name implies, this permit allows them to use the place TEMPORARILY. The government does that a lot of times. Construction companies a allowed to use a land for their yard and other construction activities. It doesn't make them owners of the land.

(2) Because the government didn't recover the place for decades doesn't mean that a Temporary permit to use the place has translated to a Permanent Right of Occupancy or Certificate of Occupancy. And because they decided to build some houses and live on government land for which they only had a permit to occupy TEMPORARILY doesn't make the land theirs.

(3) The people applied to government to give them a Permanent Right of Occupancy, meaning they now wanted to buy the land from government. Government agreed 20 months ago and asked them to pay some money amounting to about N60 million. They didn't pay the money for 20 months (almost two years). So how are they the owners of the land? If my tenant has been living in my property for many decades and expresses interest to buy the property and own it permanently but fails to pay the money I asked him to pay to own the place, is he the owner of the property? Or am I not at liberty to sell the place to someone else who is ready and able to pay me?

(4) The VDM calling on the Military to stop the FCT from recovering the land is a treasonable act. His calling on the Military to unlawfully stop the government from is Lawful operations is the height of stupidity and ignorance. He's only lucky that this is Nigeria where people get away with doing or saying treasonable things.

This boy is very stupid and ignorant. The land in question doesn't even belong to the construction company owned by the retired military man. All the company has was a Temporary Right of Occupancy which means the government allowed them to use the place temporarily for their company work. The government regularly gives construction companies land to use for their yard temporarily. It's like being a tenant. And there's a difference between being a tenant and being the owner of a property. Now he is committing a treasonable act by calling on the Military to interfere in the operations of the Federal Government.

Wike delivers 100%

NewDea4:
The thieving drunkard has bought them refurbished trucks as usual

stop displaying your ignorance. You obviously can't tell a new vehicle from an old one, since you have never bought any. Those are new vehicles.

kingsways:
There are no pro-Wike law makers. They are not members of the house. They lost their seats when they voluntarily left the party that brought them

keep deceiving yourself. You think everything goes by social media noise-making.