It's acidic

kingxsamz:

.
The verse you claimed is meant to punish rapist is even worse because if the woman is raped in the city and then discovered, she'll be stoned if nobody hears her crying for help.

Which means, if the rapist subdues her and prevents her from screaming and then they're discovered, the woman would be stoned for not being able to cry out even though she was actually raped.

And you people claim that your Yahweh guy is wise. 😂

Wait, I think it's situation like this that made Jesus not to condemn the woman that was brought to him because of a supposed adultery. The narration can be found in John 7:53–8:11. A case group of scribes and Pharisees confronts Jesus, interrupting his teaching and an allegation was laid against the woman claiming that she was caught in the act.
Perhaps, Christ must have raised the question in his mind that why was the man she was fornicating with not brought to him together?

Well guess what Christ did, he states that the one who is without sin is the one who should cast the first stone at her. All the accusers ended up leaving the woman alone.

The thing is laws just like any other rules are dynamic. It keeps changing because society and time changes. Still, there is always something to use as a yard stick or guidance to effect laws. That's where the Torah and new testament comes in to play

Brief Fact Summary :- A husband promised to pay his wife a £30 per month allowance. The wife sued her husband to enforce the promise.

Synopsis of Rule of Law . Agreements between husband and wife to provide monies are generally not contracts because generally the “parties d[o] not intend that they should be attended by legal consequences.”



Facts. The Plaintiff and the Defendant were a married couple. The Defendant husband and the Plaintiff wife lived in Ceylon where the Defendant worked. In 1915, while the Defendant was on leave, the couple returned to England. When it was time to return to Ceylon, the Plaintiff was advised not to return because of her health. Prior to the Defendant returning, he promised to send the Plaintiff £30 per month as support. The parties’ relationship deteriorated and the parties began living apart. The Plaintiff brings suit to enforce the Defendant’s promise to pay her £30 per month. The lower court found the parties’ agreement constituted a contract.
Issue. Does the husbands promise to pay £30 per month constitute a valid contract which can be sued upon?

Held. The court first recognized that certain forms of agreements do not reach the status of a contract. An agreement between a husband and wife is often times such a form of agreement. In such agreements, one party is given a certain sum of money on a daily, weekly, monthly, etc.. basis. This agreement is sometimes termed an allowance.

However, these agreements are not contracts because the “parties did not intend that they should be attended by legal consequences.” One reason the court is hesitant to treat these agreements as contracts, is that there would not be enough courts to handle the volume of cases. Thus, here, the husband’s promise did not rise to the level of a contract.

Discussion. The court makes an interesting argument in not enforcing these types of promises. The court argues that if these promises are treated as contracts the flood gates will open.

THE AGREEMENT PROCESS
Balfour v. Balfour
Citation. 2 K.B. 571 (Court of Appeal 1919
https://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/contracts/contracts-keyed-to-calamari/the-agreement-process/balfour-v-balfour/amp/

StillDtruth:


Genesis :19, man for the first time through Lamech "took him 2 wives ".

Genesis 5:5 God saw that wickedness became great and every imagination/thought was evil and of course to do evil.

And who is happy that evil increases? Satan and atheists!

Who always wants evil increased and done?
Always Satan and atheists!

Ok

garfield1:


Yes as we are about winning the epl since 2004

Lol you are just leading Mancity with 1 point o
AFC BOURNEMOUTH is always angry whenever they meet Arsenal. Una go chop am

StillDtruth:

True!
And that is one of the proofs of satan and the success of his evil work and schemings.

I am curious, how is polygamy being a human reality and coming before religion a proof of satan and success of his evil works??

Veecruz:
Now another uncule has come up.with his own definition.which was nearly the correct one we all know except that he now did magu-magu and wuru-wuru and hid one more important piece of information.

Polygamy is human reality. It comes first before religion.

AbuTwins:
The earth is of the Lord's but Paul said in 2 Cor 4:4 that Satan is the God of this world.

What is the sharing formula for God and Satan?

100 to zero percent.
That's why if God gives you a thing, it comes with long lasting peace.
But if you get it from, the controller of materialism, it soon vanishes because it doesn't actually belong to him

What's the earth without a church: a gathering of the Lord's People?

Urheadmaster:
Consumers ought to go on strike because this is getting out of hand ✋

That's why FCCPC is there. Nigeria needs a price regulatory body

Help everyone you can help. Ignore the ones you are not capable of assisting. Just do your own.
Atleast when you gave him the clothes your friend and his mother showed happiness about it.
That should be satisfying enough either he wears it or not