Folem's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Folem's Profile › Folem's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 (of 21 pages)
[quote author=D-sense link=topic=521044.msg6831086#msg6831086 date=1285602978]Hey poster,are u sure bout the pic posted here that it belongs to Teslim Balogun Staduim coz i doubt it.[/quote]https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-344290.0.html |
yousouph:https://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/49213000/jpg/_49213368_composite_sink_toilet.jpg https://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/49213000/jpg/_49213369_composite_toilet_shower.jpg https://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/49214000/jpg/_49214024_bed766.jpg https://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/49213000/jpg/_49213370_compositer_external2.jpg https://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/49213000/jpg/_49213371_composite_external1.jpg https://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/49214000/jpg/_49214045_aircon766.jpg https://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/49216000/jpg/_49216117_1outside766.jpg https://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/49216000/jpg/_49216110_outsidewater.jpg from http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/commonwealth_games/delhi_2010/9025907.stm |
Jega is a perfect example of the Nigerian leader he is talking about. |
df2006:Below. http://www33.brinkster.com/iiiii/inventions/emeag.html |
http://www.ngrguardiannews.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=23001:court-of-appeal-to-hear-nffs-suit-against-order-sacking-board-members&catid=42:law&Itemid=600 [size=16pt]Court of Appeal to hear NFF’s suit against order sacking board members[/size] THE Nigeria Football Association (NFA) trading under the name of Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) has resolved to join issues with the Federal High Court, Lagos by filing an appeal at the Lagos division of court of appeal, challenging the decision of the lower court on Monday, September 6, annulling the election of its board members conducted on August 26, 2010. In the appeal, NFF is asking the appellate court for an order to set aside that decision of the court below, made by Justice Okon Efreti Abang. Apart from the appeal, NFF also brought an application to stay execution of the said order. The application is urging the court below not to give effect to the instruction given to the Inspector General of Police or any of his men or officers or any other public officers to bar the board members from using their offices having been constituted after the said election of August 26, 2010. Both applications were filed by the board counsel, Dr. Joseph Nwobike (SAN), who in his application, cited grounds of appeal, which include that the learned trial judge, before making the order annulling the said election failed to invite counsel or parties to address the court on whether the election held on August 26, 2010 should be annulled. On the other hand, he also on the same ground said that the court also failed to call counsel or parties to address it on whether or not the aforesaid election conducted on August 26 should be nullified. The ground raised the issue that the said order nullifying the said election was not based on any application by counsel for the parties in the entire proceedings of September 6, 2010. According to Nwobike, the decision of the learned trial judge nullifying the election conducted by the appellants on August 26, is unjustified in law and in breach of the appellants’ right to fair hearing within the context of section 36(1) of the 1999 constitution. Again, the trial judge erred in law by making unjustified consequential orders. It is on the strength of these grounds of appeal that he brought the application for stay of execution of the said order. There are three reasons in which the application for stay of execution is predicated. They include: • the applicants have filed an appeal against the orders of Justice Abang of the Federal High Court, Lagos on September 6, 2010 in suit N0: FHC/L/CS/962/2010 to the Court of Appeal, Lagos; • the grounds of appeal raises substantial and arguable issues of law with high probability of success on appeal; and, • in view of the foregoing, the depositions contained in the affidavit of Peter Ojih and the grounds of appeal, there exists special and exceptional circumstances why the execution of the orders of the court has to be stayed pending the final hearing and determination of the appeal lodged against it to the Court of Appeal, Lagos. Specifically, the appeal was filed by NFF, the electoral committee and A.U. Mustapher, in which they are seeking to allow the election that was annulled by the lower court. The Guardian recalled that a Federal High Court, Lagos had last week Monday nullified the August 26, 2010 elections into the board of the NFF. Justice Abang also mandated the most senior administrative staff of the NFF to take charge of the affairs of the association pending the conduct of a proper election to the board. In nullifying the elections, Justice Abang said it was conducted in deference to the order of the court made on August 20, 2010, in which the court ordered parties to maintain status quo ante bellum pending the hearing and determination of a motion by the Registered Trustees of National Association of Nigeria Footballers (NANF). The judge also ordered the Inspector General of Police to ensure none of those elected in the purported August 26, 2010 election enter the board offices. He further ordered that contempt proceeding would commence against those who conducted the election on September 21, 2010 |
http://www.ngrguardiannews.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=23001:court-of-appeal-to-hear-nffs-suit-against-order-sacking-board-members&catid=42:law&Itemid=600 [size=16pt]Court of Appeal to hear NFF’s suit against order sacking board members[/size] THE Nigeria Football Association (NFA) trading under the name of Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) has resolved to join issues with the Federal High Court, Lagos by filing an appeal at the Lagos division of court of appeal, challenging the decision of the lower court on Monday, September 6, annulling the election of its board members conducted on August 26, 2010. In the appeal, NFF is asking the appellate court for an order to set aside that decision of the court below, made by Justice Okon Efreti Abang. Apart from the appeal, NFF also brought an application to stay execution of the said order. The application is urging the court below not to give effect to the instruction given to the Inspector General of Police or any of his men or officers or any other public officers to bar the board members from using their offices having been constituted after the said election of August 26, 2010. Both applications were filed by the board counsel, Dr. Joseph Nwobike (SAN), who in his application, cited grounds of appeal, which include that the learned trial judge, before making the order annulling the said election failed to invite counsel or parties to address the court on whether the election held on August 26, 2010 should be annulled. On the other hand, he also on the same ground said that the court also failed to call counsel or parties to address it on whether or not the aforesaid election conducted on August 26 should be nullified. The ground raised the issue that the said order nullifying the said election was not based on any application by counsel for the parties in the entire proceedings of September 6, 2010. According to Nwobike, the decision of the learned trial judge nullifying the election conducted by the appellants on August 26, is unjustified in law and in breach of the appellants’ right to fair hearing within the context of section 36(1) of the 1999 constitution. Again, the trial judge erred in law by making unjustified consequential orders. It is on the strength of these grounds of appeal that he brought the application for stay of execution of the said order. There are three reasons in which the application for stay of execution is predicated. They include: • the applicants have filed an appeal against the orders of Justice Abang of the Federal High Court, Lagos on September 6, 2010 in suit N0: FHC/L/CS/962/2010 to the Court of Appeal, Lagos; • the grounds of appeal raises substantial and arguable issues of law with high probability of success on appeal; and, • in view of the foregoing, the depositions contained in the affidavit of Peter Ojih and the grounds of appeal, there exists special and exceptional circumstances why the execution of the orders of the court has to be stayed pending the final hearing and determination of the appeal lodged against it to the Court of Appeal, Lagos. Specifically, the appeal was filed by NFF, the electoral committee and A.U. Mustapher, in which they are seeking to allow the election that was annulled by the lower court. The Guardian recalled that a Federal High Court, Lagos had last week Monday nullified the August 26, 2010 elections into the board of the NFF. Justice Abang also mandated the most senior administrative staff of the NFF to take charge of the affairs of the association pending the conduct of a proper election to the board. In nullifying the elections, Justice Abang said it was conducted in deference to the order of the court made on August 20, 2010, in which the court ordered parties to maintain status quo ante bellum pending the hearing and determination of a motion by the Registered Trustees of National Association of Nigeria Footballers (NANF). The judge also ordered the Inspector General of Police to ensure none of those elected in the purported August 26, 2010 election enter the board offices. He further ordered that contempt proceeding would commence against those who conducted the election on September 21, 2010 |
http://www.supersport.com/football/nigeria/news/100910/Fifa_seeks_clarity_on_NFF_court_actions [size=16pt]Fifa seeks clarity on NFF court actions[/size] Nigeria fotball appears headed for another collision with Fifa, after the botched plan to ban Nigeria following government’s now reversed decision to withdraw the country from international football for two years. There is palpable confusion in Nigeria and indeed the followers of the game as another chapter in this never ending saga pits the federation between adhering to the ruling of the Federal High Court in Lagos and observance of the very strict rules of Fifa regarding third party interference in the running of its affiliate football federations. There may be no escape this time if ongoing inquest by Fifa is anything to go by. In response to our enquiries, The Fifa media department told SuperSport.com that; “To the best of our knowledge, no Fifa representative has received any copy of any injunction. In addition, Fifa has sent a letter to the NFF requesting the NFF to clarify the media reports relating to alleged court actions aimed at nullifying the results of the recent NFF elections. In the letter, Fifa reminds the NFF that such actions would be considered as interference from a third party and that, should any court action materialise, the NFF would be required to sanction the NFF member at the origin of any such claim to a court.” On Monday (September 6, 2010) the Federal High court in Lagos presided over by Justice Okon Abang nullified elections into Executive committee of the NFF and ordered 28 senior officials to appear before it on September 24 for contempt of court. He also directed the most senior administrative officer of the NFF to take over the administration of the Federation pending when elections are properly conducted. The suit in question was filed by the registered trustees of the National association of Nigeria Footballers (NANF). They had alleged that the process ran contrary to the clear wordings of Fifa’s statute and other extant laws relating to football administration in the country. |
http://www.supersport.com/football/nigeria/news/100910/Fifa_seeks_clarity_on_NFF_court_actions [size=16pt]Fifa seeks clarity on NFF court actions[/size] Nigeria fotball appears headed for another collision with Fifa, after the botched plan to ban Nigeria following government’s now reversed decision to withdraw the country from international football for two years. There is palpable confusion in Nigeria and indeed the followers of the game as another chapter in this never ending saga pits the federation between adhering to the ruling of the Federal High Court in Lagos and observance of the very strict rules of Fifa regarding third party interference in the running of its affiliate football federations. There may be no escape this time if ongoing inquest by Fifa is anything to go by. In response to our enquiries, The Fifa media department told SuperSport.com that; “To the best of our knowledge, no Fifa representative has received any copy of any injunction. In addition, Fifa has sent a letter to the NFF requesting the NFF to clarify the media reports relating to alleged court actions aimed at nullifying the results of the recent NFF elections. In the letter, Fifa reminds the NFF that such actions would be considered as interference from a third party and that, should any court action materialise, the NFF would be required to sanction the NFF member at the origin of any such claim to a court.” On Monday (September 6, 2010) the Federal High court in Lagos presided over by Justice Okon Abang nullified elections into Executive committee of the NFF and ordered 28 senior officials to appear before it on September 24 for contempt of court. He also directed the most senior administrative officer of the NFF to take over the administration of the Federation pending when elections are properly conducted. The suit in question was filed by the registered trustees of the National association of Nigeria Footballers (NANF). They had alleged that the process ran contrary to the clear wordings of Fifa’s statute and other extant laws relating to football administration in the country. |
Among the charges brought against the quartet are:Some of the charges are laughable. • incurring a $125,000 fine in South Africa over a deal with Hampshire Hotel; • mismanagement of $250,000 to charter a faulty aircraft for the Super Eagles from London to South Africa; and • spending $400,000 for a friendly match between Colombia and Nigeria in London. Is the EFCC for real? or are they pursuing hidden agenda. There will be no doubt that Lulu & co will have to answer for some cases of mismanagement of public funds but putting some of these charges trivialises the issues. |
[quote author=~Bluetooth link=topic=508034.msg6690277#msg6690277 date=1283504813]A party that can't even produce a councillor !!![/quote] ![]() |
medjai:There were no irregularities. All the decisions followed due process. It is only the losers and those who knew they stood little or no chance that are complaining. Those court injunctions were never officially served the electoral committee because of several reasons and FIFA/CAF/NFF statutes explicitly specify that football cases must not be taken to regular courts. |
http://africanfootball.mtnfootball.com/live/content.php?Item_ID=32720 [size=16pt]Players’ union raises alarm on NFF polls[/size] Nigeria’s players’ union, APFON, has raised alarm that some groups are desperate to ensure that world football governing body FIFA ban Nigeria on account of a stalemated elective congress of the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) on Thursday. National Association of Nigerian Footballers (NANF), led by Harrison Jalla, has reportedly secured a Lagos high court ruling that the elections do not take place on Thursday. President of the Association of Professional Footballers of Nigeria (APFON), Dahiru Sadi, told MTNFootball.com that NANF is an illegal body, which was expelled by FIFPro two years ago and as such they do not have the right to seek such an injunction. "NANF are illegal. They are among the unpatriotic elements who are hell bent on creating confusion at the congress for elections into the executive committee of the NFF on Thursday that would lead to a FIFA ban." FIFA observer, Primo Carvaro, has warned that the polls must take place in Thursday or else FIFA will take a very different view on the whole matter. Former international Sadi said: "Some desperate people are out to cause confusion during the elections on Thursday so that it will not hold. "That is an unpatriotic act and a sabotage because they want FIFA to finally ban us, which will not speak well of the sports-loving government of President Goodluck Jonathan." APFON is the players’ union recognised by the NFF and has a vote at the 44-man elective congress on Thursday. APFON patron, Collins Eselomo, insisted that elections will take place on Thursday and the court ruling has no bearing on the congress because it was unanimously agreed that no legal challenges will be entertained as regards the polls. "The elections will take place. No interference of the judiciary will stop the elections," he said. "We as a body condemn in its entirety the protest march by 1% of Nigerian players on Tuesday and the court ruling sought by an illegal organisation," said Eselomo. "We take serious exceptions that a handful of ex-internationals sponsored by Rivers State Governor, Rotimi Amaechi, now wish to constitute themselves into a nuisance. "Amaechi should know that he is a product of the law and should therefore not be naïve, but instead should properly advise his boys, who are looking for excuses for their failure." Former internationals like Segun Odegbami, Austin ‘Jay Jay’ Okocha and Mutiu are vying for positions on the NFF board, but the union has endorsed Christian Chukwu and Eselomo for this election. "Odegbami and Okocha never contacted us about their ambitions. We only read on the pages of the newspapers that they are contesting. Probably, they believe they can do without the association," said Sadi. "Okocha was the interim president of APFON for two years and we bumped into him during the recent Federation Cup final in Kano. We all saw Odegbami at the stakeholders’ forum hosted by the House of Representatives. But both of them never contacted us on their intentions. "The truth is that no single player is bigger than the player’s association." |
[quote author=omo~fat link=topic=502943.msg6637047#msg6637047 date=1282736407]I wasn't really commenting on the validity of your post to be honest. I was basically saying there's nothing uncivil about honeric's post that you were moaning about. My position is that all this zoning business is crude and undemocratic. The sooner we're rid of it the better.[/quote]When you categorically call another person's post as rubbish just because of his/her contrary views then I'm afraid I don't give such people the thumbs up. Zoning may be crude but it is not undemocratic. There is some form of zoning in the statutes because 12 board positions are shared equally among the 6 Geo-Political groups. Cheers! http://www.punchng.com/Articl.aspx?theartic=Art20100811063996 |
[quote author=omo~fat link=topic=502943.msg6636768#msg6636768 date=1282733777]There's nothing wrong with his language. He said you should promoting rubbish. Called you out on mis-informing the public. Nothng wrong with that.[/quote] Mis-informing? really? Are you that politically naive. Do you think it is a coincidence that only Northerners have been Minister of Sport since 1999? Do you think it is a coincidence that Baribote & Owumi who contested for the NPL Chairman position are from the South replacing Obaseki who is also from the South? Why do you think only people from the South are contesting the post of NFF Vice President? |
http://africanfootball.mtnfootball.com/live/content.php?Item_ID=32720 [size=16pt]Players’ union raises alarm on NFF polls[/size] Nigeria’s players’ union, APFON, has raised alarm that some groups are desperate to ensure that world football governing body FIFA ban Nigeria on account of a stalemated elective congress of the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) on Thursday. National Association of Nigerian Footballers (NANF), led by Harrison Jalla, has reportedly secured a Lagos high court ruling that the elections do not take place on Thursday. President of the Association of Professional Footballers of Nigeria (APFON), Dahiru Sadi, told MTNFootball.com that NANF is an illegal body, which was expelled by FIFPro two years ago and as such they do not have the right to seek such an injunction. "NANF are illegal. They are among the unpatriotic elements who are hell bent on creating confusion at the congress for elections into the executive committee of the NFF on Thursday that would lead to a FIFA ban." FIFA observer, Primo Carvaro, has warned that the polls must take place in Thursday or else FIFA will take a very different view on the whole matter. Former international Sadi said: "Some desperate people are out to cause confusion during the elections on Thursday so that it will not hold. "That is an unpatriotic act and a sabotage because they want FIFA to finally ban us, which will not speak well of the sports-loving government of President Goodluck Jonathan." APFON is the players’ union recognised by the NFF and has a vote at the 44-man elective congress on Thursday. APFON patron, Collins Eselomo, insisted that elections will take place on Thursday and the court ruling has no bearing on the congress because it was unanimously agreed that no legal challenges will be entertained as regards the polls. "The elections will take place. No interference of the judiciary will stop the elections," he said. "We as a body condemn in its entirety the protest march by 1% of Nigerian players on Tuesday and the court ruling sought by an illegal organisation," said Eselomo. "We take serious exceptions that a handful of ex-internationals sponsored by Rivers State Governor, Rotimi Amaechi, now wish to constitute themselves into a nuisance. "Amaechi should know that he is a product of the law and should therefore not be naïve, but instead should properly advise his boys, who are looking for excuses for their failure." Former internationals like Segun Odegbami, Austin ‘Jay Jay’ Okocha and Mutiu are vying for positions on the NFF board, but the union has endorsed Christian Chukwu and Eselomo for this election. "Odegbami and Okocha never contacted us about their ambitions. We only read on the pages of the newspapers that they are contesting. Probably, they believe they can do without the association," said Sadi. "Okocha was the interim president of APFON for two years and we bumped into him during the recent Federation Cup final in Kano. We all saw Odegbami at the stakeholders’ forum hosted by the House of Representatives. But both of them never contacted us on their intentions. "The truth is that no single player is bigger than the player’s association." |
honeric01:Pls mind your language. I will no longer respond to your posts if you are not civil while responding to dissenting opinion. |
honeric01:Only 37 get to vote from the State FA's delegates. There have not been election into the other 7 members making up the voting numbers since the NPL election was annuled by arbitration but the statutes allow for appointed delegates to vote. The 7 others are: 1. The Nigerian Referees Association 2. The Nigerian Premier League 3. The Players Association 4. The Nigerian Football Coaches Association 5. The Nigeria National League 6. The Nigeria Amateur League (Div 1 & 2) 7. The Nigeria Women's League [/b] This position is not lost on the outsiders, hence the call for amendment of the NFF statutes already cleverly amended two years ago to elongate the tenures of all state chairmen beyond the 2010 elections, effectively handing the crucial votes to the incumbents.NFF statutes were amended in 2008 to harmonize elections into State FA's beginning from 2010. Some State FA's tenure still have 6 months to run and some 1 more year to run. This scenario played out four years ago when Ibrahim Galadima was hounded out of office by “the stakeholders” - the political party in the Nigeria Football Federation. Believe me, I witnessed it first hand from within during the 2006 elections and what a soap opera that was. It was shockingly endorsed by Urs Linsi, Fifa’s general secretary, and I had fun running as a candidate, never once believing I could win.This is one of the weakness of NFF Statutes, SWAN members prefer to contest elections into NFF executive board & becoming Administrators instead of the watchdog they are supposed to be. SWAN elections are riddled with just as much controversy anyway. The state football associations never used to conduct elections and in fact do not exist s associations because they do not have a functional congress. The loose term football association is supposed to represent the very constituent members, which in this case should be the various elements of the game; clubs, players, coaches and district, local government, state, regional and national levels, with officials beginning from the base and working the way up the ladder.The reforms that started with the Galadima era has brought elections into State FA's. Somehow, in spite of all the sembleance of disorder, the outgoing board, on the strength of achievements, will appear to have performed well despite the world cup failure. At least they qualified, which was something the previous board did not achieve.The outgoing board was successful but the Super Eagles need to win the Nations Cup. |
Odegbami would have had no complaints if NFF President was zoned to South West. NPL Chairman was zoned to the South and he didn't complain either. |
12large:https://cdn.playfair.co.za/kickoff/483b3e3c7ca0d034254b93fb2de7e66b_412x367.jpg |
medjai:Not all State FA Chairmen tenure have expired. http://www.vanguardngr.com/2010/08/22/nff-elections-bio-clears-president%E2%80%99s-name/The tenures extended was for harmonization and was done legally. http://allafrica.com/stories/201005210361.html |
honeric01: ![]() Try to read the statutes. Is there really any significant difference between the the way the board of FC's and FA's are constituted? Only the State's (including F.C.T) FA Chairmen elected by the state FA congress (with each FC having 2 votes) get to vote @ NFF congress along with 7 others. |
honeric01: ![]() says who? well you can say the same for the football councils too. http://nigeriaff.com/docs/NFF%20Statutes.pdf Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) Statutes Article 21 State Football Associations 1. A State Football Association shall consist of the local government Football councils within the State. 3. j) Each State Football Association shall have the power to elect or appoint its representatives on the NFF Standing Committees in conformity with the Statutes of NFF and it shall ensure that such representatives exercise their functions with due respect and attention. Article 22 Local Football Councils 1. A Local Government Football Council shall consist of not less than five properly constituted clubs playing Football according to the Laws of the Game of International Football Association Board and which shall be duly registered with the NFF through the Council and State Football Association. 12. Each Council shall have the power to elect or appoint its representatives on the State Football Association standing Committee in conformity with the Statutes of NFF and it shall ensure that such representatives exercise their functions with due respect and attention. |
honeric01:Ok. I hear you. so the State FA is made up of who? who votes to make the State FA delegates? |
rasputinn:https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-500051.0.html Why do you want state FA elections before Local government Football Council elections? ![]() |
honeric01:http://www.completesportsnigeria.com/2010/05/why-state-fa-elections-must-hold-before-nff-elections/ The Levels Of Authority In Football I am the elected Chairman of the Ewekoro Local Government Football Council, affiliated to the Ogun State Football Association. From that position I contested and was elected into the board of the Ogun State Football Association that is an affiliate member of the Nigeria Football Association. |
honeric01:Why do you want state FA elections before Local government Football Council elections? ![]() http://wizardssolutions.com/ondostate/news_details.php?id=379 http://wizardssolutions.com/ondostate/news_details.php?id=529 |
honeric01:It is not illegal. It followed due process @ the Congress and the statutes were properly amended. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/illegal il·le·gal /ɪˈligəl/ Show Spelled[ih-lee-guhl] Show IPA –adjective 1. forbidden by law or statute. 2. contrary to or forbidden by official rules, regulations, etc.: The referee ruled that it was an illegal forward pass. |
12large:Do you know the answer yourself? I challenge you to give us the answer. |
medjai:Don't let confusionists mislead you. There is nothing illegal about the NFF congress extending the tenures of States FA Chairman so as to have a harmonised calendar of elections because the state elections have always been held at different periods and some have not had elections for many years. FIFA extended the tenure of Iraq FA by 1 year earlier this month and FIFA President's tenure was similarly extended by 1 year some years ago. It is not compulsory to hold State FA elections before National elections just like it is not compulsory to hold CAF or UEFA elections before FIFA elections. It is only people who have just smelled the coffee that they were going to lose the elections that are complaining about a decision made 2 years ago. |
[/quote][quote author=mama-gee link=topic=499041.msg6595794#msg6595794 date=1282157467][color=deeppink]This thread is biased. . .[quote author=mama-gee link=topic=499041.msg6596070#msg6596070 date=1282159803][color=deeppink]^^Can you stop being [size=16pt]a daft?[/size] And learn how to construct a sentence without creating a run-off line. You're just ridiculous when you try to be sexist.[/color][/quote] ![]() |
ov:1. Uruguay 2. Brazil 3. Argentina 4. Italy 5. Germany 6. England 7. France 8. Spain [size=16pt]8[/size] Countries have won FIFA World Cup i.e [size=16pt]7[/size] others. |
.