mine is LPIJMNKR

***

It's colder during christmas period, so naturally, everyone will be friendlier, cos that will increase your chances of keeping warm from body heat -just another perspective,

Tosh gara akwukwo na Cardiff, munwa ka na agu nke m.
Handle nke ozo. . . o tela m ji nke ahu de ihe na forum, mana ihe nji gbanwe ya bu maka na oyiri aha m 'which defeats the anonymity part of nairaland ID'

Maybe. . .

Dclique:

He needs a girl.

Lol. . . How you take know?

maybe

Newscaster

@Ifyalways

O nweghi ihe gbasara mu na Tosh. . .Biko kee ihe onyea a na akpo Tosh jiri di special?

@Otele
Nna, i di funny. Even aha gi (otele) di funny. Anyway kita ka m na anu maka tochman for the first time. m ga etinye 'toshman' na search tool di na nairaland ka m fugodi posts ya. Enwerem ID ozo na nairaland, mana o bughi 'toshman'

@all
Biko gbahara my combination of Igbo and Bekee. Otele na acho ihe o ga eji bata 18.

otele:

gbam, ejidela m gi taa fredik a bu toshman in disguise maka ama m na toshman guru akwukwo na cardiff university, and amuru toshman na abakaliki

fredik aka toshman ndewo, welcome back from honeymoon . . . . i understand, now u are married, i need-iri new name, anyway, aga m na akpokwa gi toshman

Kedu onye bu Toshman? Guo ihe m dere ozo. I ga afu na m siri na abum onye abakaliki, mana amuru m ma zuo m na Enugu. Ima ihe bu 'coincidence'? Toshman a no na Cardiff University ka O guchago? Munwa ka no ebe a. Hence we are two different people.

Banderas:


Let's be aware of one thing - I don't advocate co-habitation, neither am I against it. I'm totally neutral - I believe cohabitation, just like most things in life has it's advantages and disadvantages. But I also believe that a lot of the arguments being raised against cohabitation on this thread (women who cohabit only make themselves cheap? WTF!!?) have no place in today's world.

Precisely.

ifyalways:

Fredqiue i bu onye Onicha ?

Mba o, aburo m onye onicha. Abum onye abakaliki no na ebonyi, mana a murum ma zuo m na Enugu.

agabaI23:

Ihu onye mmanya na-egbu I ga-enwe onu okwu?

Fredique no na cardiff,

Unu adi sure na O bughi Tosh laghachiri azu na cardiff jee gbanwoo aha?

Lol. . .Say what? Ihugo mmanya m na ako maka ya? Aghotaghi ihe i na ako. . . meanwhile, blog gi di mma.

Lol. . .O dika mmanya a na ebu gi. Je raru ula ka i nweta onwe gi

agabaI23:

hmm dalu so

ka m sikwa gi na I na-ato ka . . . .

Kwutopu ihe di gi n'uche. . . I kpu mmiri n'onu?

Abia LG boss dragged to EFCC - for approving N1m as wife’s kitchen allowance monthly
Biola Azeez, Umuahia - 30.08.2009

COUNCILLORS and some stakeholders in Abia State have dragged a council boss, (names withheld) to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) for allegedly approving the sum of N1 million every month in the past two years as kitchen allowance for his wife from the council funds.

The spokesperson of the people, Mr. Clement Nwator, in an interview with the Sunday Tribune, accused the council boss of allegedly governing the council from overseas, saying he stays abroad most of the time.

Nwator, who said the people had written to the state governor, Chief Theodore Orji, the Inspector General of Police and the state House of Assembly over the matter, also wanted the EFCC to investigate accusation of alleged financial misappropriation of the sum of N750 million against him and some of his principal officers.

They said that the sum included normal and excess crude account allocations of the council since the inception of the present administration.

The people, who said the area had not enjoyed any dividends of democracy in the two-year administration of the council boss, also accused him of inflating contact sums, citing as an instance, the tarring of half-a-kilometre road located inside the council’s headquarters for N45million.

While reacting to the allegations, one of the special assistants to the council boss told Sunday Tribune in a telephone conversation that the council boss was not in the country at present, adding that he would comment on the matter when he returns from his overseas trip.

He described the allegations as part of speculations towards the next council elections in the state from the people who were spreading it, adding that truth would be revealed soon.

http://www.tribune.com.ng/30082009/news/news5.html

@kellorah
Animeshon di na profile gi na ato m ochi. . . biko, were ya nwayo. . .lol

chiogo:

Nee the link http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1177263

Nice once, Chiogo! I mere ofuma. Jisike

Innocent

patwhizkid:

Worwor fikin

Lol. . .

chiogo:

Chinenye, kedu?

Ndi igbo, kedu ka-odi? this place di dull. me nu nkpotu

Kee udi nkpotu I choro?

I thought Erastus Akingbola was a heavy tither?

https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-315675.0.html

Shake-up In Civil Service - North Loses Top Permsecs, Directors

https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-314472.0.html

tensor777:

@Fredrique

You have been told that, to your surprise,  evangelical churches run free health programs for people living in poor neighbourhoods and people on low income. So that should deal with the issue of whether or not they are concerned
about the health-care needs of poor people.

Whilst it was something I didn't know, I wouldn't say I was surprised. They should be concerned. What surprises me rather is why they wont support it to be extended on a larger scale in the same way they were outspoken about the war. That seems hypocritical to me.

tensor777:

As I alluded to earlier, determining which method of financing America's health care delivery system is the most efficient, economic and effective depends on one's ideological leanings. I don't see it as primarily a moral or ethical issue and so it is not suprising that pastors have not made outspoken pronouncements on the issue either way.

Generally, what is moral and ethical is becomiing increasingly relative, but if placing profit making before saving lives by insurance companies (to the extent of withdrawing cover for pre-existing conditions) is not a moral issue, then maybe nothing else is a moral issue.

tensor777:


What you are attempting to do, rather disengenously if I may say, is to put in the same boat:-

1) Evangelical pastors who support the policies of the Republican party as regards issues like personal
   responsibility, abortion, gay marriage and school prayer; and

2) Fiscal conservatives who support the policies of the Republican party as regards low taxes, low government 
    spending and policies which support the growth and development of  private sector businesses.

It is a known fact that the Republican party consist of Fiscal conservatives and the Religious right (evangelicals) -they are already in the same boat. The evangelicals are in because of their stance on the issues you rightly highlighted. The Evangelicals have also canvassed for support for the Republicans based on their interest, which is OK -politics is all about interest, right? My point is, shouldn't health care be their interest? I can predict your answer since you dont consider health care primarily as a moral issue. But if health care is a moral issue (which I think it is), and the religious right are interested in moral issues (as their provision of healthcare to members of poor communities show), I dont see why they should not make their stand known. Were they not vocal about Iraq war?

This is what I think: They wont speak out because it is the democratic party policy. They are also putting 'rather disengenously' in the same boat:

1- Cultural liberals -who support gay marriage, abortion etc

2- Social Liberals -who support equality under the law and relief provided by the government from suffering (this is where the supporters of healthcare fall under)