Blazebond:
This is the dream of obidioots,they are always seeking the downfall of tinubu government because their fraudulent importer messiah (obi) lost woefully at the last elections, people with zero brain, people with zombie mentality.if obi spit for ground them ready pack am lick and say e sweet.

Benediction99:
Please, if you’re in Ondo state and have any farm work to be done, hire me, I will do it perfectly. I have younger ones to cater for . Thank you.

Jarvis Johnson, a Democratic member of the Texas house of representatives, has asked the supreme court to order the unconditional release of Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB).

The supreme court is expected to deliver judgment in two separate appeals filed by Kanu and the federal government.

The IPOB leader is seeking release from the custody of the Department of State Services (DSS) where he has been since he was extradited from Kenya on June 19, 2021.

In a statement, Johnson said: “The consensus of legal opinion, within and outside Nigeria, expects the supreme court to affirm this plethora of judgments and orders”.

The undisputed facts are as follows; MNK was extraordinarily renditioned by the government of Nigeria (GON ) from Kenya on June 27, 2021,” the US lawmaker said.

“Then, and now, he is the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), a non-violent group, advocating for an internationally supervised referendum to resolve the Biafran issue within the Nigeria polity.

“Recently, on October 30, 2023, the high court of Enugu state held that the classification of IPOB as a terrorist group by the GON and the southeast Governor’s Forum contravenes Section 42 of the Nigerian constitution.

It follows that the present and any future treatment of IPOB, its leadership and members as a terrorist group is illegal, and per se, discriminatory. Therefore, there is now no valid legal basis for the continued solitary confinement of MNK.

“Many other Nigerian courts which had previously opined on the matter, including the high court in Umuhia, Abia state; the court of appeals in Abuja, had also reached similar conclusions, and have ordered for the immediate and unconditional release of MNK. There is no pending legal matter against MNK.

“On July 20, 2022, the United Nations Human Rights Council issued an opinion which found that MNK’s solitary confinement was in violation of International Human Rights Conventions to which Nigeria is a signatory and called for his immediate and unconditional release.

“That MNK was extraordinarily renditioned is not in dispute; and that extraordinary rendition is illegal under Nigerian and International Law is also not in dispute.

therefore, call on the Nigerian supreme court to uphold or affirm the considered judgments of its subordinate courts, and of the many International Tribunals, by ordering the immediate and unconditional release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

“This anticipated ruling will hasten the process of restoring confidence in the Nigerian judiciary, of which the supreme court is its apex court.”

Gajagojo:

Aston bring your papa enter the matter?

Don't open your mouth anyhow

Gajagojo:


What does owner of kids mean practically

How does one own a grown up child that has become an adult

What does this ownership look like?
When the child starts working he will give his father his salary or what?

What is the benefit of owning a child

NdubisiCharles:
[/color] I JUST ASK MY JNR SIS NOW FOR THE FULL DETAILS, SHE TOLD ME THAT SHE LEFT BECAUSE OF HER LIFE,
1) SHE SEES NOTHING TO EAT WITH PREGNANCY,
2) SHE WENT TO STAY WITH MUM AT LEAST TO SEE SOMETHING EAT, AND SOMEBODY TO CARE FOR HER OMUGWO, (MATERNITY CARE)
3) THE GUY VISITED THEM THEN ALL OF A SUDDENLY HE STOP VISITING
4) HIS LIFE IS AT STAKE BECAUSE OF NO CARING FROM THE HUSBAND
5) THAT SHE WAS 19 AS OF THEN
6) SHE NEED PROOF FROM THE GUY BEFORE GOING BACK
7) SHE IS CONFUSE OF THE STEP TO TAKE[color=#990000]

Curiouscity:


Your 1st paragraph and last paragraph are contradictory.

1. When your sister told you or your family 8 years ago, that her husband abandoned her/children, did you verify? Did you or anyone within the family ask the man? Or you just believed your sister?

2. According to your last paragraph, did the man make any effort to reunite with the wife/kids? If yes, when? 8 years ago or recently?

3. Your sister confirmed that the man is not violent or diabolical, he was only broke. Does this sound logical that a broke man will abandon his loving wife and kids?

My take: Your sister painted the man as evil, you guys believed her without verification. Many families have been ruined by lies from women who couldn't stand by their husband during economic hardship. Except there are more to this story than you have shared.

Namaster:
Your sister acted like a fool for breaking up her home because of momentary poverty. She deprived the kids of their father's presence.

If she could train them herself while away from her husband. She could have trained them WITH the husband in the picture.

That said, the man is equally MAD for abandoning his kids for 8 years. Especially, given the fact that one of them was a newly born infant.

He's massively delusional for asking them to return to him. He knew your family house and never bothered to check on his kids for almost a DECADE.

He's insane.

Tell your sister to NOT return to him. The trust in their marriage is dead. Your sister acted like a gold digger who jumped ship when she realized there was no gold. The husband demonstrated his irresponsibility by failing to connect with his kids in 8 years.

Now that he's conquered poverty, he can support his kids with money. Pay for their upkeeps, medical and other bills.

He'll only pay for his KIDS. NOT your sister.

Then, he can spend time (maybe holidays and weekends) with his kids. But as for the marriage, it's dead.

Advise your sister in this way.

NdubisiCharles:

Am afraid if is he for real or did he have any evil thing on mind, u know all this nnewi, Anambra men

GeneralPula:
With this your mentality, I doubt you’ll be able to meet any life partner anywhere..

Tueeeeh..

HarryGleb:
The justices are a disgrace to the law profession.