Givemetoto's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Givemetoto's Profile › Givemetoto's Posts
Scam Alert... Scam Alert please do not fall a victim to this scammer... I was a victim... Please do not fall too... |
. |
. |
powerfulsettingz:click like if you believe this guy is an attention seeker who will likely scam a desperate nairalander if they inbox him. |
wow!!! really impressive, so both Land, materials and Labour cost about 3M... this is an eye opener... used to think that building a standard bungalow like that one in Abj will be nothing less than 6.Milli. |
ok |
I want to buy Nairaland, Please how much will it cost me? |
. |
smith09A:this idiot is a scammer... So you later create another naira land account abi? Your cup go full very soon, you will receive mob action and your gist go flood Naira land front page... in Jesus Name, Amen... guy you must die of this scam... I assure you... |
na wa ooo... beatings everywhere... Nigeria is no longer safe ooo... everybody just dae vex anyhow, any way, check out this awesome video, you can't help but to Britten up Lol https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maUS4aqYvfw&itct=CBcQpDAiEwjZ7vaxoMPLAhXSHhwKHZkHDAcyCWM0LWZlZWQtdVoYVUNBLWloWHBuS1YzeGVIQTNEZDRMZV9n&client=mv-google&hl=en&gl=NG |
ayindepremier:how does it work please? |
Lolz... incredible video... can a woman be this powerful even without taking drugs? https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCA-ihXpnKV3xeHA3Dd4Le_g? |
. |
greatbrian:Well, that one dae Shaa... But these girls are not answering my question... they are only trying to derail my thread... |
Johnnoah1st:Who cares, please do the needful Other nairalanders might learn too... |
Sempumping:Who cares... more over, you are a female, please do the needful Other nairalanders might learn too... |
menabae:Who cares, you are a lady, Please do the needful and not this your holierthanthou attitude. |
Mimido2:Please no knowledge is a waste, do the needful... Other Nairalanders might as well learn from you... |
luvlyqueen:hmmmm... well that does not answer my question... Please do the needful ma'am ![]() luvlyqueen:hmmmm... well that does not answer my question... Please do the needful ma'am |
seriously annoying... |
OK, this might sound strange though, but I invited a babe to my place the other day, you know all these heat stuffs nah, though I put on Gen and my two fans, one thing led to another, we did it, though I noticed she was on her period but me no too send sha... As long as I put on quality Nylon, but my problem then was that about 30 mins in action she told me that she was tired and needed to sleep... That got me wondering, is it because she was on her period or is it that she was truly tired? A beg let the girls give me real answer because me no want dae for middle of groove babe tell me sae she don tire ooo all because she dae her period.... |
Look... If you are a girl no problem... but if you are a guy true true... Na God go punish you... you just make it seem like we guys can never be faithful... its people like you who go about telling girls this shit... thereby making it hard for girls to be faithful... Its the Like of you that make girls to be keeping numerous Boy friends... because of the fear of being cheated on... Seriously this your thread vex me... so because you are a he-goat makes every other guy the same abi? seriously... Na God go judge you... people like you give girls the wrong mindset... that is why you can hardly see a faithful girl these days... better delete this thread... |
his cup of shit... meanwhile check this out... |
Lalasticlala, Freiburger, r231 |
Donald Trump's latest threat against the media came Friday at a rally in Texas. Once elected president, Trump promised, he will "open up" federal libel laws to make it easier to sue news outlets like The Washington Post and New York Times — a pronouncement to which journalists reacted in predictable horror. Okay, so Trump just announces he's going to partially repeal the 1st Amendment, "open up the libel laws". — Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) February 26, 2016 Trump wants to "open up the libel laws." Threatens litigation when president vs NYT, WaPo etc. The defense currently against libel is truth — Domenico Montanaro (@DomenicoNPR) February 26, 2016 … Trump vows to “open up those libel laws” in order to sue papers like the NYT/WaPo and “make lots of money.” — Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) February 26, 2016 Trump just threatened to “open up libel laws” to sue the Washington Post and Times if they write bad things about him. Amazing. — Derek Thompson (@DKThomp) February 26, 2016 Trump on the media: "I'm gonna open up the libel laws so that ... when they write hit pieces, we can sue them, and they can lose money." — Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) February 26, 2016 Rest assured, First Amendment lovers, that a hypothetical President Trump could not unilaterally change the libel laws. A big reason why President Obama's executive actions on immigration and gun control are so controversial is because they raise questions about whether he reached beyond the limits of presidential power. It's hard to imagine any serious debate about an attempt to alter libel laws, however; such an effort would clearly exceed Trump's — or any president's — authority. Alternatively, Trump could simply use the bully pulpit to promote a culture of frivolous libel suits that ultimately wouldn't go anywhere but would force media companies to spend precious resources on defending themselves. If his goal is to cause news outlets to lose money, Trump could conceivably achieve that objective without changing any laws at all. But if he really wants to lower the bar for legitimate libel claims, he does have one recourse — a rather topical one, actually, in the wake of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's death. Through judicial appointments, Trump could theoretically reverse decades of legal precedent that requires a public figure like him to prove "actual malice" in a libel case. Here's how things work right now, as explained by the Legal Information Institute at Cornell University Law School: To win a defamation case, a plaintiff must show four things: 1) a false statement purporting to be fact; 2) publication or communication of that statement to a third person; 3) fault; and 4) damages, or some harm caused to the person or entity who is the subject of the statement. Since the U.S. Supreme Court's 1964 decision in New York Times v. Sullivan, defamation claims have been limited by First Amendment concerns. Thus, for instance, public officials and public figures (people who are famous) must show that statements were made with actual malice to recover in an action for defamation. Actual malice means that a statement was made with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether or not it was false. In addition, a plaintiff must show actual malice by "clear and convincing" evidence rather than the usual burden of proof in a civil case, preponderance of the evidence. A private person suing about a matter of private concern need only show negligence, meaning that the defendant knew the statement was false, or would have known if she or he had exercised reasonable care. The key here is that the "actual malice" standard for public figures is not codified in federal law; it is merely a longstanding legal precedent. Precedents can change in the hands of the right (or wrong, depending on your perspective) judges. In one notable recent example, the Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United decision reversed at least 20 years of legal precedent on corporate spending in politics. Trump, of course, would need congressional approval of his judicial nominees. And he would need just the right case to work its way up to the Supreme Court and for a majority of the justices — most of whom would not be his appointees — to overturn Times v. Sullivan. This is a pretty far-fetched scenario. But it is technically possible, without Congress acting on a new law, to lower the libel standard for public figures to match the one applied to private citizens. That would accomplish Trump's mission to make it easier for people like him to successfully sue media companies. Source: http://znews360..com.ng/2016/02/us-presidential-aspirant-trump-vowed-to.html
|
Motherfucker2:did you read the news at all? the slowpoke was killed not because he stole the TV per se.... but because of his thread... Imagine feeling invisible when one commits a crime? it simply shows that he is an unrepentant criminal... the Law is only for criminals who can take a new leave tomorrow... bro just check it na... to me he got what he deserved, imagine releasing him tomorrow, and he comes for any of your relatives(God forbid) who took part in apprehending him... do you think he will be merciful? coupled with the numerous women he robed and raped.... Please let's call a spear what it is... |
Hello, I have some Payoneer funds, would like to know if you buy Payoneer too, and what is your rate? |
Ishilove:I heard that you are one of the mods in this forum? why isn't my posts making FP? I want to know... |
Freelanswer:Please, what etisalat plan are you using? and what is its subscription code? |
I don't like this... click like if you like it and share if you don't... |
coolsix:bro shut the Bleep up, you ain't making any sense at all, a mofos like you have probably made no online transaction before that's why your typing shit. |
I