₦airaland Forum

Debroslink:
What a Tall order

we are not arsenal fans that are satisfied with their specialist in failure winning FA cups

I don't care about who Chelsea signs, what i want is the Champions League trophy next season. Nothing less.

Normally after the game I do not watch my goals back but when it is a goal like this, for one week I watched it every day,’ Hazard admitted.

Chelseafan1:
Congrats to our best player, haters won't like this, all of them don disappear

Hazard's goal against Arsenal and those of Pedro against Tottenham and Everton are in contention for the EPL goal of the season. Hazard may still win it.

eph12:
Chelsea is a better team.

Arsenal has everything they need to succeed, even more than Chelsea. It is not my fault that they decided not to succeed.

chelseabmw:
Eden Hazard wins goal of the season ...... Chelsea Award Night

that will be two seasons in a row now

eph12:
We know the truth. If tables were turned and Sanchez swaps team with Hazard, he will probably go 5 straight seasons as best player in EPL. He will even be a serious candidate for WPOTY.

what makes Chelsea different from Arsenal?

Interesting
www.m.goal.com/s/en/news/1862/premier-league/2017/05/26/35856882/the-incredible-story-behind-diego-costas-rise-from-brazils?ICID=HP_HN_5

dopeJemi:
who won pfa player of the year? kante or hazard? after answering the question, tell me how hazard is the best player in Chelsea currently when somebody else won the pfa player of the year


and since when did defenders start getting awards based on goals and assists?

who the fnck is this

in that same pfa player of d yr, who came second, is it hazard or sanchez?

jonsnow92:
My brother I know the instance you are talking about..Let's see what the real rule says..Then we can analyze.

this offside has been causing controversy for years with the issue of what the referee judges as interfering with an opponent.

jonsnow92:
Do you have a link that shows the FIFA rule about this said Argument?.. Let's see what the rule clearly says..From my perspective Fifa summarizes the rule by saying interfering with play means kicking the ball or touching the ball or with an opponent..Let's see what the real rule says..As for Lampard the guy wan dey claim objectiveness..He doesn't know this pundits always show a soft side to issues regarding their teams..They show it albeit professionally

the rule leaves the opinion to the referee. The rule says "if in the opinion of the referee".
You can look for the law of the game pdf in the fifa website.

jonsnow92:
Do you have a link that shows the FIFA rule about this said Argument?.. Let's see what the rule clearly says..From my perspective Fifa summarizes the rule by saying interfering with play means kicking the ball or touching the ball or with an opponent..Let's see what the real rule says..As for Lampard the guy wan dey claim objectiveness..He doesn't know this pundits always show a soft side to issues regarding their teams..They show it albeit professionally

the rule leaves the opinion to the referee. The rule says "if in the opinion of the referee".

timbros:
Gbam!

But even if the goal was cancelled, Arsenal still played much much better than us and probably would have still won the game.

Their pressing no be here. Thumbs up to Wenger. He knows that our players don party hard this past week and hangover still hold them so he instructed his players to press like tomorrow no dey.

See sliding tackles coming in left right center. Imagine Per feeling like Maldini!

Mehn forget. Arsenal needed that game more than us.

Arsenal played well, but arsenal many times have played well against us and still lost. I sure that if not for those referee decisions, Chelsea were going to at least send that game to extra time. Chelsea didn't play their best game, but they were firmly and always in the game. It was never like the 3 0 lose. Never.

I am not too disturbed that we lost a final because I never expected to achieve this much this season. My target was for us to qualify for UCL.
I was with Ibime on us not having the chance to win the league for the next three years if we don't sign a top coach and that prediction is never absurd considering what was going on in Manchester then. I expected a lot from the Manchester clubs, but they disappointed. We achieved beyond everybody's expectations.

My problem with this lose to Arsenal is the controversy around it which I strongly think was a conspiracy. Finish!!!!!

Chelseafan1:
Lool, he wasted chances that could have made us draw that match, we scored immediately he went off.

That doesn't mean he is the reason we lost sha.

for me, even though we didn't play our best game, the only player that played as if he was forced to wear the shirt was moses. He was annoying; playing as if he was not told that there was a match that day. Who plays football like that?

For us to score a goal and create chances despite being one man down, had we been complete, I would bet my left yansh that we wouldn't have lost that game.

Again, moses clearly dived.
But, what happened to waving play on instead of destroying an interesting final with a little opportunity to halt Chelsea's improvement in the second half.
This is the same reason i didn't enjoy Chelsea's win over man utd in the quarter final.
Manchester United were clearly fouling hazard, but the ref should have avoided giving a red card in a big match that was interesting.

If you have the replay of that goal, you will see that the commentator agreed that ramsey interfered with play because his run made our defenders not to go for the ball.
You can watch the replay to hear it.

jonsnow92:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-4548116/Should-Alexis-Sanchez-s-goal-Arsenal-vs-Chelsea-stood.html

Graham Poll is a former refree,A Pro and writes for dailymail..Who do I believe like this?

my brother free that thing, na them them. Ramsey gained an advantage through his position.
Do you know of the instance i gave in the 2014 match against Manchester city and Newcastle? Go check that out?

jonsnow92:
Despite many suggesting the Welshman had interfered with play, replays showed he didn't. According to FIFA, simply running towards the ball doesn't amount to being involved in 'active play'.
The laws state that a player is not committing an offence by simply being in an offside position - or even in the same area of active play for that matter

Ramsey didn't interfere with an opponent, he didn't touch the ball, and he didn't ensure his side gained an unfair advantage from his on-pitch positioning.
FIFA summarise the 'interfering with play' law saying you can only do so by "playing or touching the ball passed or touched by a teammate," which Ramsey didn't do.

This is Fifa rule been explained

you just misinterpreted the rule.

In 2014 that man city won the league, there was a match against Newcastle when a goal was scored by Newcastle against Manchester city that was disallowed. The shot was taken and tiote that was in an offside position shifted from the ball for it to go into the net. The referee was correct because toite gained an advantage by deceiving the goalkeeper despite not touching the ball but rather moving away from its path.
In this ramsey case, he went for the ball; which is interfering with play.

Even if we are to overlook the offside issue; how can the referee claim to be in a position to see that ramsey didn't interfere with play, yet he was not positioned to see Sanchez's handball?

Bimffo:
Why did Ramsey run after the ball and not leave it for Sanchez alone.?

Your team won, credit to you guys. But please always call a spade a spade.

exactly. Immediately he ran towards the ball, that was when the linesman raised the flag and that was the right call.

Ibeme:
I no know wetin spambot see for my post o.

Anyway I was agreeing with Greatihex post about the referee.

How can Ramsey not be interfering with play when he runs toward the ball as if to shoot, causing Courtois to hesitate on what would have been a straightforward pick-up for him. Not to mention it was a blatant handball. Ramsey is literally about to shoot when Alexis shouts him to leave it. I swear that referee vex me die.

[img]http:///media/5-28-2017/txN4VH.gif[/img]

Arsenal played like people who wanted to win a final, but to say that ramsey did not interfere with play in that scenario is a case of someone telling himself a lie.
Surprisingly, this what goal.com is saying, that ramsey didn't interfere with play and that the referee was right to overrule his assistant.

pamcode:
I wonder why Hazard is been blamed here, with our midfield lost there was no feeding to him, He had to always drop deep and try to create. He wasn't Hidden at all.

don't mind them. As long as he didn't score, them go say em no play well.

I don't care what other people think, but what i know is that there was a conspiracy.

Ibime:
That's JM in a final. He did same to Bayern in 2010 and Monaco in 2004. If I'm a fan of Manure, this would be what I'm looking for, but as a neutral, this is worse than anaesthesia.

mehn!!! This one too much.

007author:
Did you watch their match against everton?

when league don already finish. That one follow?

Mehn, hazard really try for mourihno o. Imagine to play for defence finish come still deliver for attack. E go hard mourihno to find person wey go do that kind work for am o.

007author:
Arsenal can pull out surprises

have arsenal ever pulled a surprise?

www.m.goal.com/s/en-ng/news/4055/main/2017/05/24/35793042/mourinho-might-belong-in-the-europa-league-final-but


Somebody is trying so hard to paint Mou black.

spartacus11:
buy kane sanchez and debrune to Chelsea sell costa and hazard to finance it and we keep the remaining change

The grass is not always greener at the other side

raumdeuter:
This is the EVerton some people call a top team and one of those they say are competing for the league

Played 80mins vs 10 men and cant even draw

what then should we call the Barcelona of 2012 that were leading with 2 goals against 10 men and still drew the game.

Ibime:
I'm starting to change my mind on selling Willian. That dude has balled out of control everytime he has played this season.

The guy no wan comot o.

Tottenham have three players with 20+ goals
all competitions this season (Kane, Alli and
Son) – no other club in the Premier League
Football League have more than one player w
20+ goals.


Yet, they couldn't win anything. It is not by scoring 4 against one team and not scoring enough against another.