₦airaland Forum

Piiko:
Yea I did

Piiko:
Damn boring song

Gwaihir:
Concerning Boondocks, I wished I had not watched it so I could relive the thrill as a newbie again, you will be too hooked to feel lazy, perhaps the same for American Crime story too 'cause I finished that in a day

Do tell me what you think about them, You welcome!.

pocohantas:
My future husband is on Nairaland...in Science & Tech, Career, Business or Investment section...any section but Romance is cool

Gwaihir:
I try

Insecure is the only black series I like ATM, but am sure you will like American Crime story(this is a must watch, the OJ Simpson trial, talks about a lot of racial stuffs and how it came to play. it was also very hilarious to me.) . You can check Narcos( Pablo Escobar), Casual, Rick and Morty(anime), I don't know if you have watched Boondocks(this is damn hilarious)

So in order of fun
American Crime Story(this is also more centered on blacks and gender too)
Narcos (cartel drug related)
Boondocks (blacks, racism, politics etc)
Rick and Morty (witty sarcasm) currently watching
Casual. (about modern day relationships and its upheavals) Currently watching

Gwaihir:
Okay. All is well...

I was afraid perhaps someone has decided to go vorpal on you again.

Gwaihir:
You are too egoistic, unenlightened and narrow minded to get my drift hence why you are being dismissive and casting shallow aspersions at a failed attempt in sounding intellectual. Dude is even asking me to post dates as to when women started childbirth and childcare? Or what other social expectations is there again.

Good bye.

ToyinDipo:
Let's put a bookmark here, and continue from there next time, lol

Gwaihir:
Well she was frustrated and trust a guy to take advantage.

I stated that to agree with you that she comparing Lawrence wasn't that deep of an affection.


Hope everything is fine? Please come back online

ToyinDipo:
I cited 1919 because it’s an example of not being allowed at all rather than just being restricted

Laws like 1919 were more or less just formal agreements and didn’t necesarily mean a change in attitude, sexism was still carried through ‘generations’ despite being passed ‘since’...
Law is one of the professions that is ever changing and evolving, asides I am wondering how an action that occurred in 1919 can be remotely linked to what is happening in 21st century, this ain't history woman.

Nobody denies talent if it's staring in their faces, there are several records to prove this. If they ain't exceptional, they go where they fit

Are we talking ASTRONOMY here?

With the considerable amount of female lawyers, that we have today, I don't get this point

How did I insinuate this, when I emphasized on the word 'sampling' emotion or logic here?

Did you manage to find the part where I got emotional, drifted etc? [/b]
If I had quoted those references, we will end up derailing the major subject.

ToyinDipo:
I quoted based on your emphasis on the word rational
If you want to debate with a lady, you keep it as simple as possible to allow drifting, that's why I hinged the argument on the major point, because all other points will only point to why men dominate logic based profession.

sunshineG:
abi that is the most important thing jare

See you around

sunshineG:
no I am not
I finished studying some three years ago
But currently trying to further my studies sha

So you are bawling hard now

sunshineG:
OK but it is almost the same thing

But because we are from the same place, I will agree with you

So don't mind me asking this question that is bigger than my mouth

Are you studying in London ?

sunshineG:
yes I know, I said some not all

So in essence, you agree with me that although woman might have been discouraged in the past, there is nothing to suggest that those very intelligent men who are the top of the food chain will have been displaced anyway if the reverse have been the case for women

Cause you are twisting my very small brain now

Gwaihir:
I guess, she would not have cheated if she had compared Lawrence to the dude she cheated with.

sunshineG:
1) some of the studies you use as evidence are cross sectional in nature ( which means the information were only collect at once from the participants and at a particular time) while these studies are great in measuring opinion of a certain place or people it will be very difficult to draw absolute conclusion from it

2)loosing of interest is something that happen in both genders. Although, it is true that women may be pressured into loosing interest more than men because of societal issues

3)I never dispute the cognitive performance of women in any way. However, does that mean that men who reach top position through their cognitive abilities wouldn't have done that if women are more motivated. I doubt it

hope I made sense

sunshineG:
so your arguments is only based on the social issues being a major reason for limited numbers of women in top position based on mental capacity, not that they will automatically be in top position if given the chance
Hope I made sense

Don't mind my pry 2 grammar