₦airaland Forum

raumdeuter:
That will be if you can read or have the intelligence to process it

Bwahahahah @ posting something and not even understanding it.
Jesus, you and Bemeruca have to be 2 of the most undereducated posters in this thread.

You see the part where it says "Is it legal?"
That's probably the part you should have read.
Let me help you. I circled it in red.

"A person's sex alone is generally not enough to justify detention or arrest"

cococandy:
She’s about to become persona non grata in their camp.

You know facts matter less to them than who’s willing to lie for them

Very big deal.
And honestly the worst outcome for the MAGA propagandists.
No outside force to blame.

Look for Basilico to post a story of how the deep state kidnapped her husband/child/dog or all of them in order for her to drop the case

LordReed:
Pirro is going to go the way of Bondi.

Yup, she must have been in some legal peril to do this.

Comedy.
Trump disagrees with the Prosecutor who he hired who initially lied for Trump then after realizing there was more tant enouh evidence that it was a "rushed and botched" job, feared for her license and dropped the case.
Trump is really a deranged person.

Here is Burgum lying:
Absolute liars.
If they lied about something like this, somethign we could see with our own eyes, they will like about ANYTHING.

BASH: But it peeled off. Why?

BURGUM: It didn't.

BASH: There are photographs of people cutting a 350 foot gash in the reflecting pool?

BURGUM: Dana, why you & others in the media wanna keep questioning it

(This was a few weeks ago btw) He lied! pic.twitter.com/k3Scxmpg0Q

— Lucas Sanders 👊🏽🔥🇺🇸 (@LucasSa56947288) July 31, 2026

Have we ever had an administration filled with liars from top to bottom?
He is Pirro brazenly lying.
Absolute liars

Some sharp reporter really navigated this conversation towards the issue that would ultimately sink the Reflecting Pool case: pic.twitter.com/wiy5xPgVFw

— Ryan J. Reilly (@ryanjreilly) August 1, 2026

Pirro: Someone was intent in doing incredible damage to the pool. pic.twitter.com/qYuC6sjXzf

— Acyn (@Acyn) July 3, 2026

basilico:
That's an isolated case .
I'll see how it goes in the end.
I always say whatever truth is buried will one day come to light.

Mr. "I can rip up epoxy with my bare hands" said he'll see how it goes in the end.
It is the end olo.-.do.
They dropped the case.
And they said the damage was caused by poor workmanship.
aka There was no vandalism. No 300 yard knife cut.
Just lies, the liars who told them and the olo.-.dos who believed them.

ijebosb:
So the governments only witness to the Grand Jury testified there already was bad damage to the reflecting pool and that they "could not identify any damage directly caused by Hearn or say repairs would have been different because of his alleged conduct".
So, it calls into question what instructions the DA gave the grand jury to get the indictment.
Looks like this case will go the way of all this Trump's administration cases.
Ending in a dismissal/acquittal and sanctions of a strongly worded dressing down by the judge.

So, it's easy to see this as a small story but it's a big deal characteristic of the Trump administration and perfectly sums it up.

Trump tells a lie to protect his ego (same with the 2000 election) and then he marshals his power and the power of the federal government to personally destroy people who aren't on the same level and did nothing wrong(same with the 2000 election).
And people like Basilico and Raumdeuter cheer on as some innocent person has their life destroyed because they are soul.-less ghouls and don't know or pretend not to know that you can't cut and remove epoxy with your bare hands because they have seemingly never touched a tool or tried to remove paint from a wall in their lives even as they pretend to be "macho men".

https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/david-hearn-lincoln-memorial-pool-grand-jury-trump-b3022734.html

I called it.

But you can tell how bad this case was going to be for Pirro by how it ended.
Instead of allowing the judge to dismiss it and allowing people like Basilico and Raumdeuter to yell about a rigged biased Judiciary, Pirro basically called Trump a liar in the dismissal by admitting the contractor messed up the job.
Yeah, Pirro knew she was going to be in Big trouble in court if she pushed further.

basilico:
Ijebosb. Im not yet done with your epoxy.

🚨 JUST IN: Video has been released of suspected vandals DESTROYING the lining of the Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool

Trump Derangement Syndrome seems to be a BRAIN EATING disease. This is INSANE.

This particular incident took place on June 19. Now, even NYTimes is admitting… pic.twitter.com/PdYJUG1jr9

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) June 24, 2026

Evans Miller that you dismissed has a report of the pool too.
EXCLUSIVE: Photos prove Pres. Trump report that vandals destroyed Lincoln Reflecting Pool construction by cutting a huge piece out of the sides.

He said the damage showed long, deep cuts consistent with a box knife or knife-like cutting tool.

Construction crews completed work at the Reflecting Pool before discovering extensive damage. A 170-foot gash was found on the south side and a 70-foot gash on the north side. Physical evidence indicated foam and caulking had been cut out. Fence connectors were recovered in the basin. Atlantic Industrial Coating and contractor Eddie Wood were involved on site as repairs were prepared.

U.S. Park Police are investigating. Photos and video evidence have been turned over to investigators.


https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1JiCyPtYYn/

Trump said about 250 meters was slit by a knife ,Emily Miller estimates 240 meter well within the margin.

Suddenly all media is on Trump statement, mocking him for the comments.

When liberal media unites to attack ,there must be a narrative they are spinning.

bump for Mr. I'm never wrong.

cococandy:
I honestly feel sorry for trashing him sometimes.

But he makes it too easy

He does.

It's like Charlie Brown attempting to kick the football.
He's like this time I'll get her.

raumdeuter:
Obama in 17yrs post college before presidency was worth 1m, in 8yrs of working hard as a president he added 70m to it from $400k a year. He did 5000% increase in his networth

Engage the vacuum between your ears and guess

Dementia Raumdeuter is at it again repeating propaganda he found on some right wing nutter site, as if it's a trance he goes into when someone calls out his nonsense.

Let's try it again.

ijebosb:
Simple questions. Do you think how Obama made his money (while President) was corrupt. Do you think how Trump is making his money(while President) is corrupt?

[b]I guarantee you'll find a way to gaslight, post some propaganda or do you dementia verbal tic writing the same thing again, instead of answering those two questions because you are a Finished [/b]person.

raumdeuter:
How did a Post Harvard career of 17yrs that made him 1m networth before presidency suddenly turn around within 8yrs of Presidency into 70m

I am sure its the same way Democrat Pelosi was beating the S&P 500 by knowing which stocks to pick better than all money managers on Wall Street

Didn't I call it?

ijebosb:
Simple questions. Do you think how Obama made his money (while President) was corrupt. Do you think how Trump is making his money(while President) is corrupt?

[b]I guarantee you'll find a way to gaslight, post some propaganda or do you dementia verbal tic writing the same thing again, instead of answering those two questions because you are a Finished [/b]person.

Why didn't you answer the question?
Because you are as dishonest as you are incapable of critical thought.

raumdeuter:
The same way Nate Silver polls told you Kamala has a 51% chance of winning

You are easy to fool I am jealous of everyone that hasn't read from you

Spoken like someone who has 0 idea what a 51% probability means.
I told you to take that night school class or even just google what a 51% probability means.

This quote should help you immensely.
It is better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubts

cococandy:
you’re not making the point you think you are making. It is still a steupid line of thought. Accept that move on



Well that would mean you’re sharing the st***pid-man title with Trump too. Because everyone will immediately look at you and say that was a weird unrelated question to ask.

You can’t even come up with a decent analogy to attempt to drive your argument home.

Fire must be coming out of Basilico's head.
He thinks women are lower than him but has a woman here who is clearly smarter than him and repeatedly trashes him.

It's not even a fair back and forth.

raumdeuter:
Like the Ann Selzer polls you posted here

He said one poll being wrong means all polls are wrong?
Isn't that the height of an uneducated emotional argument?
Unfortunately, that's the type of logic you always bring to the table.

Might want to take another online night course at Harvard night school. You can get another Harvard email out of it.

princeabdul:
first time am going to see a learned person defend Obama. 😀

So the reference is Obama as an American President. So, how is decisions pushed American goals.
History will remember Obama as probably one of the better US Presidents. He was.
But, he wasn't as bold as he should have been and made some political decisions because he was a black man and needed political cover for other things and as all black men know in the US (except Raumdeuter who thinks he has white skin) even as President you have to act a certain way aka "code-switch" in public.

raumdeuter:
Obama graduated from Harvard several years before becoming President, How much did his education make for him

Obama graduated from Harvard law in 1991, he became President in 2008, that is 17yrs to be worth 1m, But when he spent 8yrs as president he suddenly found the wealth making scheme that jumped his networth by 5000%

Trump came into office a billionaire actually the richest man to ever become president and how much percentage increase has he had in his networth to compare to Obama

So, are you saying he wanted to make money but couldn't, or that he didn't want to make money and changed his mind when he became President?
I don't even think you understand the nonsense you write.

Even though Obama could have made tons of money, he didn't care to. He instead was a community organizer and was struggling because he cared about doing good. He only made money on a book he wrote because people now wanted to learn about him when he became President.
Trump spent his life swindling people, cheating, stealing from charities, making fake Universities, filing bankruptcies and is only a Billionaire because his dad gave him money. He continued that into the office.
In fact Trump would have had more money before he became President if he just invested the money his father gave him.
I guess that's your type of business man, abi? A failure. You see him in you.

Simple questions. Do you think how Obama made his money (while President) was corrupt. Do you think how Trump is making his money(while President) is corrupt?

I guarantee you'll find a way to gaslight, post some propaganda or do you dementia verbal tic writing the same thing again, instead of answering those two questions because you are a Finished person.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2021/10/11/its-official-trump-would-be-richer-if-he-had-just-invested-his-inheritance-into-the-sp500/

raumdeuter:
In 2008 Obama was already far gone in his career. So that analogy is the type someone with a vacuum between both ears will make

Obamas worth in 2008 before presidency is what?
Obama after Presidency is what

What was the percentage increase

$2.4bn will depend on how much he came into it with. Your illiteracy is astounding

Lol @ trying to pigeonhole the example because it makes your nonsensical argument sound like the nonsense it is.
If percentage increase is what matters it would matter in every situation.
And it sounds like an example of what someone with a vacuum between both ears will make because it is your argument.

Obama went to Harvard Law School and was the first Black president of the Harvard Law Review.
He could have went anywhere(big law, finance) and done anything and made beaucoup money.
He didn't.
And he didn't make Billions in office selling pumping and dumping stocks, hawking crap to his supporters, or making international deals with Middle Eastern despots. He wrote books that were well received.
In fact all modern Presidents didn't do the obviously corrupt money-making Trump is.

But of course, false equivalency is the death of critical thinking.
And that is the only thing you know how to do.

So, I want to say that you are being intellectual dishonesty, but I can't say that as I'm not sure you're even capable of understanding that it's a false equivalency, because you've proven you lack critical thinking skills.


I think

This is from Bloomberg, that notoriously Liberal ( /s ) news site.
But Raumdeuter, nothing to see here.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2026-07-17/how-to-profit-off-a-presidency-video

raumdeuter:
Democratic presidents somehow managed to grow their netwrths by thousands percent

Bill Clinton Increased His Wealth by the Most After Presidency, Barack Obama Was Second
Clinton, the Democratic president who was in office for two terms between 1993 and 2001, started his presidency with a net worth of $1.3 million, and after leaving office, had accumulated a wealth of $120 million, according to celebritynetworth.com.

Per the outlet, it is also thought that Clinton and his wife Hillary have earned more than $250 million to date from speaking engagements, book advances and royalties, and through investment and consulting fees.

Barack Obama was the president who saw the second highest increase to his wealth coming out of office, at around 5,300 percent.

A college grad's first job pays them 100k. Before they were making 1,000 working part time.
So they increased their income by 99,900%.
Because of that, Trump's 2.4 Billion increase in 2 years isn't as bad and isn't corrupt because it's a smaller percentage of his net worth.
How Raumdeuter's mind works.

Most voters, business reporters and even Republican leaders are talking about how utterly corrupt it is. And here is Raumdeuter making nonsensical arguments in support.

raumdeuter:
Democratic presidents somehow managed to grow their netwrths by thousands percent

Bill Clinton Increased His Wealth by the Most After Presidency, Barack Obama Was Second
Clinton, the Democratic president who was in office for two terms between 1993 and 2001, started his presidency with a net worth of $1.3 million, and after leaving office, had accumulated a wealth of $120 million, according to celebritynetworth.com.

Per the outlet, it is also thought that Clinton and his wife Hillary have earned more than $250 million to date from speaking engagements, book advances and royalties, and through investment and consulting fees.

Barack Obama was the president who saw the second highest increase to his wealth coming out of office, at around 5,300 percent.

A college grad's first job pays them 100k. Before they were making 1,000 working part time.
So they increased their income by 99,900%.
Because of that, Trump's 2.4 Billion increase in 2 years isn't corrupt because it's a smaller percentage of his net worth.
How Raumdeuter's mind works.

As I said you write the most asinine nonsense in defense of your rapist racist God.

raumdeuter:
When you show us Obama wealth growth percentage pre and post presidency then we will compare with Trump

Its basic Math which you probably dont understand since you struggle with percentages

Stuck on repeat like a dementia addled patient with a mental/verbal tick.

Yes Basic Math: Is earning 2.4 Billion corruptly in 2 years more than 20 million from Obama's salary and through sales of a memoire in 8 years?
Let's leave out the amount of time.
Is 2.4 Billion > 20 Million.
You seem to be struggling with that simple enough math.

Maybe you need to take another Harvard online night school class on math.
Oh, you already got the fake Harvard email you like to flash around, so no need, abi?

raumdeuter:
When will you tell us how much Obama grew his wealth in office, By how many percent

Why don't you make whatever point (bound to sound uneducated) you want to instead of repeating the same thing over and over like someone with a verbal tic.

And these trades are usually before a major announcement (tarriffs, Iran War) or followed by tweets to his followers to buy the stock.
Raumdeuter will see this chart and say, "Nothing corrupt here, how many books did Obama sell while President".

raumdeuter:
How much was Obama and Clinton worth before presidency and how much are they worth after presidency

This is the type of stuff you write that makes you sound uneducated.
Trump is literally leveraging his power as President of the US to facilitate a deal with his son in laws to sell FIFA and you are bringing up how much Obama made by selling a book he wrote?
One of his many corrupt deals in something he regulates or has power to affect that have netted him close to 3 Billion dollars since he took office.

No past president has seen financial gains in office like those reported by President Donald Trump this week — not even Trump.
The president’s income last year soared to more than $2.2 billion, fueled by cryptocurrency holdings and related ventures, according to his latest financial disclosure forms. The figures represent a vast expansion over his first term, when Trump reported still-significant income gains but on a smaller scale.

https://archive.is/20260702061907/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/07/01/trumps-wealth-grew-scale-without-modern-presidential-precedent/#selection-447.0-453.309

Trump, the most corrupt US President in History
Raumdeuter, tell me again how Obama making 10 million in 8 years on a book he wrote before become President is worse and more corrupt than Trump making Billions(not even counting the Billions his family is making) in 2 years on deals leveraging his Presidency.

File it as today's "what the actual hell" moment in the sports world. The Times is reporting that FIFA president Gianni Infantino has been in talks with private investors about selling stakes in the World Cup. It's a move that would take complete control of the global tournament out of FIFA's hands, and give a seat at the table to private entities with their own agendas. Moreover, the report added that a key figure in brokering these deals is U.S. President Donald Trump, whom Infantino cozied up to during the 2026 World Cup by presenting him with the inaugural FIFA peace prize and then sitting next to the president at games he attended.

https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/fifa-president-aims-sell-world-162617434.html