₦airaland Forum

Can you people see Obj cloth? He was wearing the Tinubu Infinity signature all over him.
Baba no get choice but to respect TINUBU sagacity. He knows that Obi/Atiku goes nowhere.

No Be Juju Be Dat?

treesun:
Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar says vested interests are responsible for the crisis rocking the African Democratic Congress (ADC).

Speaking in an interview with DW Hausa, Atiku alleged that as a result of its growing popularity, ADC had become a target.

Smart Video

He said regardless of the crisis, Nigerians still have faith in the party and have continued to show solidarity for it.

“So far, people from all states are still joining the party. Nothing has happened to suggest that Nigerians are withdrawing their support. Not at all,” he said.

Police: How 27-year-old man burnt father alive in Jigawa
Aide: Wike never planned to shoot Okinbaloye
Although he did not mention any name, Atiku said an official of the party, suspected to be Nafiu Bala, is enjoying unusual privileges suggestive of outside backing.

“What is happening is external interference. Some individuals have been bought over and used because certain interests have noticed that the party is gaining momentum by the day. They see this growth as a threat if it continues.”

“How can someone who claimed to be the party chairman suddenly be provided with security, vehicles and a residence? It clearly points to outside influence. We have evidence. We know where he resides and we observe how he moves around, almost like a governor,” he said.

He also questioned the factional chairman’s movements since the crisis began.

“Since the beginning of this crisis, he has not travelled to his hometown. Why is he afraid?” he asked.

The crisis in the party reached its height when the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) removed the names of David Mark, National Chairman, and Rauf Argebesola, National Secretary of the party, from its portal.

INEC based its action on the ruling of the Court of Appeal.

Daily Trust reports that Nafiu Bala, factional chairman of the party, has been locked in a battle with Mark over control of the party.

Bala, who was Deputy National Vice Chairman of the ADC, had rejected the ratification of Mark as National Chairman, back in July.

He had said after the previous exco of the party resigned, he was supposed to take over as chairman.

He had headed to the court for an injunction to restrain Mark and others under his National Working Committee (NWC) to stop parading themselves as leaders of the party.

He also sought an order to ask INEC to recognise him as acting national chairman.

Bala also sought an order to stop the commission from recognising or dealing with Mark’s group as officials of the party.

The motion ex parte was heard on September 4, 2025, after which Justice Emeka Nwite of a Federal High Court in Abuja granted his prayers and directed the respondents, including INEC, to show cause why the application should not be granted.

Mark had appealed the order on December 18, 2025, challenging the jurisdiction of the trial court, but the court of appeal dismissed the appeal on March 12, 2026, and issued preservatory orders.

Bala had filed another motion on September 15, 2025, seeking to restrain the ADC from holding any convention, congress, conference, or meeting, and to stop INEC from monitoring or recognising any such activities pending the determination of the suit.

Last week, INEC said it received multiple letters from solicitors to both parties, making competing claims to the party’s leadership and issuing various demands.

In its resolutions, INEC said it would abide strictly by the orders of the court of appeal in handling the leadership dispute within the ADC.

https://dailytrust.com/atiku-factional-adc-chair-now-has-security-moves-around-like-a-governor/

Why is Atiku and co monitoring Nafiu's movements? Are they planning to _______ him or set him up?
Atiku must explain his statement clearly.

NOTHING MUST HAPPEN TO NAFIU BALA GOMBE.

NO BE JUJU BE DAT?

Uchesis:
You are even typing this with fear


Na you suppose grow some balls man

Wike pursued you from PDP.
Nafiu wants to pursue you from ADC.
Where are you going now? NDC?
Because submission of party register ends on 21st April, just two weeks time.
After that, na to place all your hope on Federal High Court decision. If it turns out south, your candidate(s) will not appear on the ballot and heaven will not fall.

No Be Juju Be Dat?

Denko2721987:
Oga, You are reasoning like the typical irrational mouthpiece of this unreasonable government.. Always without substance

What is the substance? That the DEAD should be left on the voter register since 2014?
Make it make sense.

No Be Juju Be Dat?

Uchesis:
Even with 32 governors APC is still scared



No be juju be dat?

Scared of what?
Losers that can't face Wike? Or
Losers that are panicking because of Bala Gombe?

Na like that TINUBU do when Buhari and his cohort wanted to stifle him or what Obj/Jonathan were using federal power?

Salute your boss and grow some balls like him if you want to displace him.

No Be Juju Be Dat?

Denko2721987:
Does the dead vote?? Even the living isn't voting becos of the mistrust in the electoral process but they are worried about the dead when they haven't even made the process viable to attract the living.. How many people do you think will even bother stressing themselves for this again further creating more voter apathy.. Do u need to wait for a specific timeframe close to elections when everything will be stressful and congested for an exercise which should easily be done at anytime by logging into their website in saner climes to know those that are dead and those that are living

But you people count the dead when your analysis shows that 15% turn out during the election without factoring that the dead are also on the voter list. LETS CLEAN IT UP.

BACK TO THE LIVING.
If any living Nigeria is not interested in our election, why should their names be on the voter list or have a voter card in the first place?
Let's clean up the system to know those who are really interested in the first place and let those people feature and vote.
When the uninterested people change their minds in the future election, they know how to go and revalidate or reregister their names.

MAKE WE SEPARATE THE DEAD FROM THE LIVING FIRST AND THEN SEPARATE ELECTORATES FROM THE UNINTERESTED ONES.

NO BE JUJU BE DAT?

portacabin:
How will Inec know who is dead? Inec should focus on logistics challenges management, which is the major issue.

If you don't revalidate your voter card, it is ASSUMED that you are dead.
If you are alive, go revalidate, if not now maybe after the election.
If you choose not to revalidate, we assume that your are dead (at least dead electorally of not literarily)

Logistics does not affect the integrity of the election. It has never. Supposed voter aparthy does and that must be sorted. Logistics is an addendum.

No Be Juju Be Dat?

Uchesis:
2015 dem no do am,

2019 dem no do am,

2023 dem no do am,


But they want to do it now because one man wants to continue ruling Nigeria even when Nigerians don't want him anymore.

NO BE JUJU BE THAT?

Was he the president in those years?
If he conduct census now, you will also ask him why others did not do it?
Someone must do it and he slchose to be the one.
You have problems with that?

No Be Juju Be Dat?

U09ce:
You missed my point. People like you should be contacted to revalidate. I can remember that mobile numbers are collected during registration. Also, physical copies can be pasted at the PUs.

I don't use the phone number anymore.
What makes this acceptable is the fact that you can do it physically and can also do it online. That is why I support the clean up model. It's not perfect but it's a great choice/decision.

No Be Juju Be Dat?

Denko2721987:
Just the same way they told you to link your NIN to your sim to stop or reduce insecurity nah and the country is now swimming in so much security among several other trojan horse promises, what about the Irev promise or how they told you after removal of subsidy Nigeria's economic fortunes would be rivalling the US and by now the issues of erratic power supply would be long gone and we're now generating and distributing in excess 20,000 MW. Scoofs.. Fela sang a special song concerning highly circular reasoning and gullible people like you.. See am for down there just in case u may need to play am to heal from what's obviously afflicting you

So they should leave the dead.
Is that your supposed wise advice?

No Be Juju Be Dat?

ExudeLoveToAll:
You are very ignorant, this exercise should be done for this small amount of time? What happened to doing it continuously for 4 years before the next election cycle so majority of voters can be captured? What happened with starting after 2023 election cycle? You wait to 10 months before the election to do this? For a list that you took decades to compile and you think people won't be disenfranchised? So now Nigerians are now smart they are no longer the normal rescues that these crazy politicians churn out to rig elections, 'out people are not on the Internet, it's too short a time'. If you are doing something like this you will start early and give the necessary time for most not even all to be captured. Start 4 years before the election, it's people like you that emboldened these elections riggers to perpetuate electoral malpractices through INEC polities

So, ten months to election is too short abi?
Something that won't take you more than minutes on phone or at the location right(
Let's wait for ages now before we do it just like census. This is the best time to do it cos some people will still die before election but still fewer or inconsequential.
I advise this should be done every four years around this time exactly.
Person wey wan cry should cry.

No Be Juju Be Dat?

portacabin:
Does dying and travelling out invalidate INEC records? How many many people have travelled out since the last elections? It's another exercise organised by a bunch of disorganised rascals to stress and disenfranchise people

So, dead people should be left on the voter register? So that when the living goes to vote, the dead will be counted as part of low voter turn out.
You are overwise

No Be Juju Be Dat?

U09ce:
This is another way of burdening the common voter. Let them go through their records and take note of voters who have missed at least 2 election cycles, paste their names at the PU to revalidate. If they don't come for it, they are deemed dead or invalid.

The big problem is that we don't have a clear way of reporting deaths in our national identity database. International passport, NIN, driver's license.... name it.

If the INEC voting system is really foolproof, there should be no way for someone who's absent to vote.

This is the best way to approach it. I have not voted in the last four elections and I am still alive and I may choose to vote in this election. The revalidation as organized by INEC is still bmthe better option than your opinion of automatic wipe out of names or delisting people who may change their minds to voted this coming election. Let every man go and use his hand to confirm or otherwise his fate.

THE CLEAN UP IS ESSENTIAL AND A WELCOME DEVELOPMENT.

NO BE JUJU BE DAT?

Some people/comments up there are just stack ignoramus. Asking why INEC have to do revalidation of voter cards is the highest level of illiteracy.

Many people on that list are (long) dead while some have traveled outside the country for years with no intention of coming back.

This revalidation will help us know the exact turn out level of voters in every election cycle. Not all these shout of "low voter turn out, low voter turn out" "voter aparthy, voter aparthy" everytime when even many on that list don die, are we expecting them to rise from the dead to vote?

Voter revalidation should be done every four years before the general election to know those who are still alive or in the country to vote then we can judge our voter turnout with that.

THIS IS A WELCOME DEVELOPMENT! KUDOS TO INEC!

NO BE JUJU BE DAT?

This just made me remember the PDP Ibadan convention and how they were recalcitrant about it, "We will go ahead, we will go ahead, we don't need INEC to monitor it. Political issues are family affair...blablabla".
Last last, Ibadan convention turn to Ariya party.
ADC is walking in that path too and the end result is obvious.
Note: Nothing will happen if Obi and Atiku do not feature on the ballot, nothing will happen."

No Be Juju Be Dat?

fergie001:
This case the person posted is cut-and-join.... Let me take you down memory lane; Akapo Vs Hakeem-Habeeb & Ors.

Akapo was elected Chief Ojora of Lagos to handle properties scattered all over Lagos owned by the Ojora family; The family has a Constitution (Terms of Settlement) enacted 17/12/64 that the Chief Ojora as head & other members of the Family Council (involving extended family members) are responsible for collecting all levies and rents from their many properties in Lagos,12 must form a quorum. Due to deaths, they hadn't formed a quorum for a long time hence on 22/4/84, they removed Akapo in a meeting not convened by him. The family continued as before to share rent until dissatisfied that Akapo was still benefitting, some members on 1/4/85, drove out all persons, seized the receipt books including cash in one of their properties and on 7/4/85, formed a caretaker committee (excluding Akapo) to oversee collection of all rents and levies in all their properties and published same on newspapers This committee started managing and renting out offices to persons blocking same from the Chief Ojora, Akapo.

Akapo went to the Lagos High Court, that he wanted all monies returned, injunction barring the said caretaker committee from entering or leasing any of the offices or properties belonging to the Ojoras, that he is also entitled to same as Chief Ojora. The High Court said No, he didn't suffer any damages and it will not grant the injunction because he didn't file the suit quick enough, again, the properties needed to be managed hence granting the injunction will have effect on the management, hence all monies to be collected by the caretaker committee be paid to the Lagos State Registry pending when the suit is successfully dealt with.

Akapo went to the Appeal Court and by 1-2 lost again, he approached the Supreme Court and won. The Supreme Court held that any meeting not convened by him cannot stand and granted the injunction but again in law, you look at the lead judgement. Other supporting or opposing judgements, are called orbiters, and are not quoted or used as base/foundation.
Mind you, this was an interlocutory appeal.

The lead Judgement was read by Justice Karibi-Whyte on 10/7/92. Nnaemeka Agu was just a member of a panel of 5, but I will still deal with the matter here;

Some things are instructive:
1. There was some disagreement prior to the formation of the caretaker committee.

2. There was no meeting because of the lack of quorum.

3. Any meeting must be convened by the Chief Ojora, Akapo.


status quo Vs status quo ante are both restraining orders urging parties to hold forth.

In "Mr. Kolawole Oronti Vs Alhaji S. A. Onigbanjo (2012)":
The Supreme Court, per Mary Odili JSC held "
“…Status quo ante bellum means the state of affairs existing before the case was filed.”

This is the latest Supreme Court Judgement and will hold fast and trite than the previous ones. The very slight difference is that whilst status quo talks about State of matters as it were, status quo ante is before the war.

Now to ADC.

David Mark & Aregbesola were brought in on July 2 (on interim basis). They hadn't started acting at the time despite the speeches they made, they were only pre-coronated. That they were endorsed did not mean they had taken over. They didn't carry out one administrative function on or before July 29.
There was no forceful takeover.
On Nafiu's now-deleted Facebook posts, he was backing Mark and co as far as July 11.

A NEC meeting was held by the highest ruling organ of the Party, NEC and monitored and approved by INEC on July 29 where formal handover took place. By July 31, Nafiu held a press conference that he is the Acting National Chairman. Let me pause here:-

Decisions of NEC are binding and final. So, even if Bala or any other exco had claimed not to have resigned, they have been caught up by NEC decisions. When Oshiomhole and Giadom had their fight, APC NEC dissolved the whole NWC even though some of these excos were not involved in the fight. Leadership and membership issues are within the internal affairs of a political party and the Court is divested from delving into such matters (except since 2023 for obvious reasons).

Nafiu had filed his suit on Sept 4 but as at July 29, David Mark had started his job. Before July 29, Nwosu was in-charge.

If I agree without conceding INEC and/or your position, when did the hostilities start? Before Sept 4? Before July 29?

By virtue of the latest Supreme Court Judgement on this, the suit was filed Sept 4, 25; a period David Mark was already Chairman.
INEC claims David Mark it endorsed David Mark on Sept 9, so does INEC have the rights to dabble into leadership issues? So why did Nafiu file a suit against someone whom INEC doesn't recognise according to the Commission?


To end this: The new Electoral Act 2026: Section 83(5):
“Subject to the provision of subsection (3), no Court in Nigeria shall entertain jurisdiction over any suit or matter pertaining to the internal affairs of a political party.”

Hopefully, we can follow Congresses leading to the April 14 Convention of the ADC

I have faulted this your explanation of "status quo antebellum."
The interpretation is to return to the base before the war.
They question is when?
The answer is, before David Mark leadership.

Consequence is that Ralph Nwosu's leadership.

Sideline is that Nwosu has resigned and the National Deputy Chairman should assume chairmanship

The quagmire is that the National Deputy Chairman has purportedly resigned is position along with the whole working committee.

Effect is that the ADC currently do not have a structure has a base for the "... antebellum" therefore INEC left the vacuum. Simple as ABC.

What can save David Mark NWC is for them to prove that Bala actually resigned. Failure to do so is an Anyanwu PDP case Season 2 because he will be declared the Substantive National Chairman.

No Be Juju Be Dat?

fergie001:
But he was Deputy National Chairman on 20/7/25!

But Nwosu claimed that have all resigned as at 2 July, 2026.
Did Nwosu lied?
What date does the purported resignation letter of Bala Gombe carry?

Can you answer these two questions and I will know whether you understand law or you are just capping.

No Be Juju Be Dat?

fergie001:
Immaculatesense. ..

You said Nwosu resigned July 2, so who was the Chairman then?

Look at this Facebook page, the ones Nafiu managed not to delete.
So when did he become National Chairman?

He was Deputy as at 20/7/25
But Nwosu resigned July 2, 2025.

Make do with that however

He never claimed to have resigned (it's you people that claim he has).
He has never accepted that David Mark is the National Chairman of the party.

Why did Nwosu said "we have resigned to pave way for the leadership of David Mark and Aregbeshola who will steer the party to success" - Ralph Nwosu (2 July, 2025) Punch Newspaper/ Guardian Newspaper.

Answer the question.

No Be Juju Be Dat?

fergie001:
I know where you are headed, insults ....but I will oblige you.

1. What is the highest ruling organ of any political Party?

2. Who wrote to INEC for the NEC meeting?.

3.;Did Mark carry out any administrative function from July 2-29?

4. Did you see Ralph Nwosu's resignation letter?

5. The Constitution is clear, if you defect without a crisis in your Party, you forfeit your seat. For Rivers, it wasn't a position of replacement but forfeiture.
So I ask again, did you see the resignation letters of the Rivers lawmakers other than what they read on National TV?

6. Are you aware Nafiu had been expelled by his Party?.

7. Ganduje submitted his resignation letter to the NEC, who did Nwosu submit how own to, before July 2.
If he resigned, why was INEC there and accorded him all paraphernalia of office?

Answering number one will help me know whether I will proceed with this exposition or not!
.
.....With thanks
.

Go follow my trajectory, I don't insult.
Let me answer your questions one after the other as I put mine below.
1. The National Convention is the highest making organ of the party.
Q. Who makes up the NEC of the party? And how do you legally resolve an NWC of a party whose tenure has not elapsed without litigation? Did the David Mark leadership do that legitimately?

2. Ralph Nwosu.
Q. Does a chairman who has resigned have the locus to write to the electoral body on behalf of the party? If you claim he didn't resign at the time, why did he say they did or why should we accept that Bala actually resigned.

3. No.
Q. Why didn't they?

4. No.
Q. Why did he keep it secret if there is nothing fishy about the whole charade? When did he resign? When did Bala resign? Before or after July 29?

5. Yes, you lose your sit.
Q. Who has the power to declare a sit vacant in the legislative house? Is that a lacuna in our constitution? What is the supreme court verdict? Do you fault the verdict?

6. Not substantiated.
Q. Which leadership expelled him? David Mark or Nwosu? Does David Mark leadership have the locus to suspend a sitting National Deputy Chairman?

7. INEC always take their time before changing names on their portal. Julius Abure was on the portal for the longest of time even after a court order/judgment.
Q. What is the interpretation of the Court of Appeal order, and how should INEC have interpreted it (since the court do not interpret its own judgments)?


No Be Juju Be Dat?

fergie001:
He announced it, did you see his resignation letter?
Who chaired the NEC of 29/7/25?
You can make announcement but there has to be ratification.
Ganduje resigned and the rumour was everywhere that his replacement will be Nentawe, until he was ratified, can you say he is Chairman?

Rivers lawmakers announced their defection to APC on live TV ... Go and hear what the Supreme Court told them. The SC asked Fubara to produce the resignation letters submitted to their parties and acceptance letters from the APC.

Any other question?

You don't get it. You should be wiser than this narrow comparison of yours.

Firstly, the Rivers assembly is an unrelated issue because nobody took their place simultaneously.

Secondly, when Ganduje resigned, he ceased to be playing the role of the chairman nor was he sending letters to INEC on behalf of the APC. Nentawe took over immediately in acting capacity and held a NEC meeting. Ganduje did not hold a NEC meeting after his resignation.

Ralph Nwosu on the other hand said he resigned on July 2 and on the July second David Mark took over in acting capacity. The question is, " On what ground did Ralph Nwosu write a letter the commission on July 29 when we have an acting chairman as at July 2."

On "status quo" and " status quo antebellum" you analysis was totally wrong.

If the court had declared a "status quo" be maintained, David Mark should maintain the chairman pending the verdict of the court, but the court declared a "status quo antebellum" meaning Ralph Nwosu should remain the chairman but since he had resigned (that is not in question), his deputy Bala Gombe should be chairman pending the verdict of the court on the matter. That is the interpretation of the "... antebellum".
INEC should have recognized Bala, but INEC did the write thing because they have received the purported resignation letter quoting that Bala had resigned (although it is being questioned).

INEC decision is the best decision judging the antebellum and the purported resignation.

No Be Juju Be Dat?

fergie001:
I wil fuse both in one.
Nwosu resigned on July 29.

False.
According to data produced by Punch ng Newspaper and The Guardian ng Newspaper of July 2, 2025, Ralph Nwosu resigned on July 2, 2025, and David Mark stepped in in acting capacity and then ratified by NEC on July 29, 2025.
I have provided Punch and The Guardian as my source.

Do you have your source/evidence to back yours up?

No Be Juju Be Dat?

fergie001:
This case the person posted is cut-and-join.... Let me take you down memory lane; Akapo Vs Hakeem-Habeeb & Ors.

Akapo was elected Chief Ojora of Lagos to handle properties scattered all over Lagos owned by the Ojora family; The family has a Constitution (Terms of Settlement) enacted 17/12/64 that the Chief Ojora as head & other members of the Family Council (involving extended family members) are responsible for collecting all levies and rents from their many properties in Lagos,12 must form a quorum. Due to deaths, they hadn't formed a quorum for a long time hence on 22/4/84, they removed Akapo in a meeting not convened by him. The family continued as before to share rent until dissatisfied that Akapo was still benefitting, some members on 1/4/85, drove out all persons, seized the receipt books including cash in one of their properties and on 7/4/85, formed a caretaker committee (excluding Akapo) to oversee collection of all rents and levies in all their properties and published same on newspapers This committee started managing and renting out offices to persons blocking same from the Chief Ojora, Akapo.

Akapo went to the Lagos High Court, that he wanted all monies returned, injunction barring the said caretaker committee from entering or leasing any of the offices or properties belonging to the Ojoras, that he is also entitled to same as Chief Ojora. The High Court said No, he didn't suffer any damages and it will not grant the injunction because he didn't file the suit quick enough, again, the properties needed to be managed hence granting the injunction will have effect on the management, hence all monies to be collected by the caretaker committee be paid to the Lagos State Registry pending when the suit is successfully dealt with.

Akapo went to the Appeal Court and by 1-2 lost again, he approached the Supreme Court and won. The Supreme Court held that any meeting not convened by him cannot stand and granted the injunction but again in law, you look at the lead judgement. Other supporting or opposing judgements, are called orbiters, and are not quoted or used as base/foundation.
Mind you, this was an interlocutory appeal.

The lead Judgement was read by Justice Karibi-Whyte on 10/7/92. Nnaemeka Agu was just a member of a panel of 5, but I will still deal with the matter here;

Some things are instructive:
1. There was some disagreement prior to the formation of the caretaker committee.

2. There was no meeting because of the lack of quorum.

3. Any meeting must be convened by the Chief Ojora, Akapo.


status quo Vs status quo ante are both restraining orders urging parties to hold forth.

In "Mr. Kolawole Oronti Vs Alhaji S. A. Onigbanjo (2012)":
The Supreme Court, per Mary Odili JSC held "
“…Status quo ante bellum means the state of affairs existing before the case was filed.”

This is the latest Supreme Court Judgement and will hold fast and trite than the previous ones. The very slight difference is that whilst status quo talks about State of matters as it were, status quo ante is before the war.

Now to ADC.

David Mark & Aregbesola were brought in on July 2 (on interim basis). They hadn't started acting at the time despite the speeches they made, they were only pre-coronated. That they were endorsed did not mean they had taken over. They didn't carry out one administrative function on or before July 29.
There was no forceful takeover.
On Nafiu's now-deleted Facebook posts, he was backing Mark and co as far as July 11.

A NEC meeting was held by the highest ruling organ of the Party, NEC and monitored and approved by INEC on July 29 where formal handover took place. By July 31, Nafiu held a press conference that he is the Acting National Chairman. Let me pause here:-

Decisions of NEC are binding and final. So, even if Bala or any other exco had claimed not to have resigned, they have been caught up by NEC decisions. When Oshiomhole and Giadom had their fight, APC NEC dissolved the whole NWC even though some of these excos were not involved in the fight. Leadership and membership issues are within the internal affairs of a political party and the Court is divested from delving into such matters (except since 2023 for obvious reasons).

Nafiu had filed his suit on Sept 4 but as at July 29, David Mark had started his job. Before July 29, Nwosu was in-charge.

If I agree without conceding INEC and/or your position, when did the hostilities start? Before Sept 4? Before July 29?

By virtue of the latest Supreme Court Judgement on this, the suit was filed Sept 4, 25; a period David Mark was already Chairman.
INEC claims David Mark it endorsed David Mark on Sept 9, so does INEC have the rights to dabble into leadership issues? So why did Nafiu file a suit against someone whom INEC doesn't recognise according to the Commission?


To end this: The new Electoral Act 2026: Section 83(5):
“Subject to the provision of subsection (3), no Court in Nigeria shall entertain jurisdiction over any suit or matter pertaining to the internal affairs of a political party.”

Hopefully, we can follow Congresses leading to the April 14 Convention of the ADC

I would like to ask you two simple questions:
1. When did Ralph Nwosu resign as chairman ADC? Before or after July 29?

2. Can a chairman who has resigned write a letter to communicate INEC on behalf of the party? Yes or No?

No Be Juju Be Dat?

⚖️ Parties Involved
Mr. Nwosu — former Chairman (resigned)
Mr. Nadia — Deputy Chairman (claims he should succeed)
Mr. David Mark — currently acting as Chairman (recognized by the electoral umpire)
Electoral umpire — Independent National Electoral Commission

🧾 Key Dispute
Constitution says: Deputy steps in if Chairman resigns
Mr. Nadia says: “I never resigned, so I should be Chairman”
Mr. David Mark says: “Mr. Nadia also resigned, so I lawfully stepped in”
INEC recognizes Mr. David Mark for now


⚖️ Scenario A: Court Orders Maintain Status Quo
🧑‍⚖️ Court Pronouncement:
“All parties are to maintain the status quo pending the determination of the suit.”

📌 What is the “status quo” here?
At the time of the order:
Mr. David Mark is already acting Chairman
INEC recognizes him
Mr. Nadia is not in office

✅ What INEC Must Do:
Continue recognizing Mr. David Mark as Chairman
Deal only with him for party matters
Ignore any attempt by Mr. Nadia to assume office

🚫 What Cannot Happen:
Mr. Nadia cannot take over
INEC cannot reverse recognition

🔑 Interpretation:
👉 The court is saying:
“Do not change anything from the current situation.”
Even if the situation is disputed, it is preserved as-is.


⚖️ Scenario B: Court Orders Maintain Status Quo Antebellum
🧑‍⚖️ Court Pronouncement:
“Parties are to maintain the status quo antebellum.”

📌 What is the “antebellum” state here?
This refers to the position before the dispute arose, i.e.:
Before:
Mr. Nwosu resigned
Mr. David Mark stepped in
INEC recognized him
At that earlier point:
Mr. Nadia was still Deputy Chairman
No controversy yet about his resignation

✅ What INEC Must Do:
Withdraw recognition of Mr. David Mark
Restore the position as it was before the dispute:
Either:
Recognize Mr. Nadia as the rightful successor (if deputy succession is automatic), OR
Revert to the last undisputed structure (pending clarification)

🚫 What Cannot Happen:
Mr. David Mark cannot continue acting as Chairman
Any action based on the disputed change is suspended

🔑 Interpretation:
👉 The court is saying:
“Undo the contested change and return to the last peaceful position.”


⚖️ The Core Difference in This Case
Court Order
Who INEC Recognizes
Practical Effect
Status Quo
Mr. David Mark
Keeps current leadership intact
Status Quo Antebellum
Mr. Nadia (or pre-dispute structure)
Reverses the change and restores prior order

🧠 Critical Legal Insight
Status quo protects stability of the present
Status quo antebellum protects fairness of the original position
In politically sensitive matters like this, the difference is huge:


One favours the person currently in power
The other favours the person claiming wrongful displacement

Just know that presidential election and governorship will hold in October - November.
If they remove it from February - March because of fasting, they can't put it in March - April or April - May because of swearing in and litigations.
The news of October - November 2026 elections has been in the news since mid last year. I think it is no longer rumor, it is getting closer to being true and that may put the opposition on disarray as the APC already knows who they are fielding for elections but the oppositions are yet to put their house in order.

No Be Juju Be Dat?

ogododo:
PRESS STATEMENT



Source

This is the best response that could have been given to the concerns raised. It's very professional to say least.
If you need the dates to be changed, tell your legislature to amend the necessary provisions in the act.
Very apt indeed.

No Be Juju Be Dat?

KonTagiousBull:
Look at this one trying to validate rubbish..and expose the ignorance as part of your 30k stipend .
If you transmit 27 states and do the manual in the remaining, is there a problem.

See wise man ooo.
So the Senate should pass the law for manual to be an option? Una wan return us to pre-2015 abi and na una go first roast the government for trying to manipulate the election through manual method.
For record purpose, I earn wey more than 30k. Don't be ridiculous.

No Be Juju Be Dat?

Twob:
So are you saying no one is using cell phone there or what?. You only need Internet to transmit the results, and there's practically and almost no where in Nigeria states you cannot make call from. Meanwhile, I have also worked for Ikwo local between 2014 to 2018, I made video calls and the likes from there. Only used to come to Abakaliki for banking and for purchase of some other food stuff on weekly basis.

Guy, I am telling you that there are some places where there is no network service at all. When you step into those communities, network will vanish until you step out into another community that is connected. I am telling you fact. That thing almost ruin my relationship when I was in service. I could only call when I get to/near Abakaliki, she no fit just call me anyhow.
And I am sure that there are worse place than that in this country especially in the North.

No Be Juju Be Dat?

Zionmdde:
So you call 2023 election scenario, a little glitch?
See the kind of person am even arguing with. Waste of energy.

Swerve abeg

Was it a big glitch then?
Didn't all the uploaded results later reflected on the IREV portal 100% after some days?
When the results fully uploaded on the IREV, did it alter the announced results? Didn't the winner on IREV not the winner as announced by the INEC chairman? Didn't Peter Obi come third on the IREV? So, what is big about the glitch?

No Be Juju Be Dat?

brain54:
I don't know how technology works...

Are you serious right now. You made an outrageous claim you can't even defend. Now you are running away.

I don't have to know how technology works to use it. I don't have to know how my smart phone works. I only have to know how to operate it. What have you taken time to delve in so far?

Excuses and more excuses. You don't know what you are saying. Don't worry you are excused.

I thought I was even arguing with a sane person!

Oga...I no get ur time.
Na me collect school fees from u when you dey school. Go research abeg. I no get time for lecture.

No Be Juju Be Dat?

press9jatv:
we are in the digital age, network issues can be solved in 8 months. Stop displaying your hypocrisy here.

Go solve am na. No be even everywhere for America get network abi u no dey watch am for horror movies?
Maybe with you as minister or even president sef our electricity can be solve in two months. Even all our roads can be construction in three weeks, and insecurity can be solved in two days. Mr Rocket Science.

No Be Juju Be Dat?

amazingspiderma:
With your NYSC achievement, you forgot that Opay, Palmpay, Moniepoint has filled those gaps.


Update yourself please.

Lol...which gaps?
Opay get network?
If MTN, AIRTEL, OR GLO no work for your phone, how you wan take see the alert or transfer money from your Moniepoint?
You no think am? Go use Opay for where network no dey na.

No Be Juju Be Dat?

destinychildolu:
How is APC doing E- registration in those places?

Do u think APC uses polling unit by polling unit in the bush. Party members converge at a location and the registration is done.
Funny thing is that you didn't also ask how many days or weeks.
Election is one day, APC registration takes weeks. Now you know the difference.

No Be Juju Be Dat?