₦airaland Forum

That's what he has. It is not indecent. His dressing is a million times better than those of the ladies exposing boobs at his back. Nothing makes his dressing unacceptable.

No constitutional or religious law says that a groom must wear a suit for his wedding.

ChristCee:
A pig will always roll in the mud🙌

Self description.

Darkandhandsom:
Target. It's a sales role

Banking?

Why were you sacked?

Billing is the other way round over there.

Madness!

The partners in crime should be punished.

ChristCee:
You are not as wise as I thought 🤣🤣🤣

If only you can prove that you are wiser than I...

ChristCee:
Do you have data/study to back up this claim?

Do you have data to show that natural food made by your mother is better than Shawarma?

Roots and herbs are more effective than most pharmaceutical products. The rejection of the former and the acceptance of the later contributes to the death rate.

Real 90GB or 60 out of the 90 will be taken in the name of YouTube night?

Pious101:
mind sharing text or audio when Oyedepo said so?

I made a mistake. I'm sorry. The statement was made by Ibiyeomie, not Oyedepo.

princepee:
and what exactly is your point?
Both men are write or wrong?

The bishop that disagrees with Adeboye because Adeboye's statement is not a biblical standard should equally disagree with David because David's statement is not a biblical standard. This is my point.

So, this bishop's daughters cannot cook or will not be willing to be cooking for their husbands? Let the bishop tell his sons-in-law that Adeboye is wrong in this case.

Insisting that a woman must cook for her husband may not be biblical. But a woman insisting on getting married and not cooking for her husband is also not biblical.

David Ibiyeomie said that it is poverty that makes a man to expect his wife to cook for him. No bishop disagreed with David despite the fact that that statement is not a biblical standard. This is simply because what David said is what many Gen z ladies want, and in most cases, church leaders are interested in what will bring more members and not what is biblical.

Adeboye has now said what many Gen z ladies do not want, a bishop disagrees with him.

As Adeboye's statement is not a biblical standard, is David's statement a biblical standard?

Your orientation is very bad. You need to work on your mindset. Otherwise, your children will be as disunited as you and your older siblings. Let me point out three things.

1.
Who told you that those who want to spiritually work against you will rely on hearing things about you?

2.
You want to cut your parents off because you are not united with your older siblings. Tomorrow, some of your children will cut you off once they feel disliked by their siblings.

3.
How did you get the first-hand information that you will not inherit any part of your parents' property?

Like say light dey before...

Thousands of candidates, tens of jobs. Yanki go hear am.

Borrowing is not the problem. The problem lies in how the loan is spent.

The first three paragraphs portray the woman as a loving one. The rest of the post gives the impression that she was against your success.

Oyindamolah:
I still remember the day I got admission into school like it was yesterday.

Instead of joy and celebration, my stepmom looked at my father and told him to empty the house just so I could go to school. She even asked him to sell her wrappers—her own clothes—so there would be enough money for my education.

At that moment, it felt like my dreams were a burden. It felt like my existence was too expensive. I watched my father struggle, torn between giving his child a future and keeping peace at home. Those were painful days—days filled with tears, silence, and sacrifices nobody saw.

Life has a way of testing people before blessing them.

Today, the same woman whose wrappers were considered too precious to sacrifice for my education has two daughters in school… and I am the one paying their fees.

Not because I forgot. Not because the pain never happened. But because I chose growth over bitterness.

I chose peace over revenge. I chose purpose over pride.

And I do it gladly.

Because life taught me something powerful: nobody truly knows tomorrow.

The person you look down on today may be the same person God will use to lift you tomorrow. The child you see as a burden today may become the helper of your tomorrow.

Life is funny. Time is powerful. Grace is real.

That is why we must be careful how we treat people—especially when they are struggling, especially when they are trying to rise.

Because the future has a way of changing roles.

Today, I help not because they were kind, but because I refused to let their actions make me bitter. I help because I know what it means to need help and not have it.

My story is proof that pain can produce purpose.

So never mock humble beginnings. Never despise small starts. And never assume you know how someone’s story will end.

Because sometimes, the person you almost broke… becomes the one God uses to bless you.

SpencerForbes:
Two wrongs do not, and can never, make a right. If the solution to insurgency is simply to rebrand terrorists as military personnel, one must ask: what would become of the average civilian under such a regime?

You misinterpret me.

My comment does not decide what should be done to terrorists. I am not the government. My point is that the government should treat all terrorists the same way. If killing is the decision, let it not be selective.

richmond500:
So he should be walking fee cos terrorists are rebranded?

Stop twisting my comment. If killing them is right, let the killing not be selective. If rebranding and recruiting them into the military is right, let it not be selective. I am not the one to choose whether criminals should live or die. My point is, let the treatment be the same for all the criminals.

This case is complicated.

SpencerForbes:
This is a textbook example of a double standard. Ironically, the same individuals who demand that the military employ 'shoot-on-sight' orders against terrorists are the very same people advocating for leniency toward this young man. It reveals a profound inconsistency in the Nigerian psyche; public opinion here seems more volatile and unpredictable than the national power grid.

You miss the point. Terrorists are rebranded and recruited into the military. Let the treatment be the same.

It is not a bad idea, as long as the tech companies do not transfer the tax to consumers.

Can the idea revive NTA?

missionmex:
Mtchw where you see billion there?

The post has been edited. It initially said 550 million Dollars.

You cannot use WiFi without electricity.

More than ₦700B?

The donation is not real.

ADDED:
The post has been edited. It initially said 550 million Dollars. The comment below mine is a proof. Seun, give us Edit History feature.

Hmmm!

This fight involves a big masquerade. May the gods intervene so that justice will be upheld.

This is not my headache.

I am surviving data subscription and call tariff.

The downfall of his company has nothing to do with God. His company did not collapse because he challenged God. His company collapsed because he lost a productive employee and could not find a productive replacement.

By the way, why was he against the worker leaving office at 6:00 p.m. for church service? Was it that the contract mandated the worker to work beyond 6:00 p.m.? If the contract mandated the worker to work beyond 6:00 p.m., the worker was actually being ungodly by going against the contract he signed. But if the contract did not mandate the worker to continue working after 6:00 p.m., the man was being ungodly by forcing the worker to go against the contract.

But business prosperity is not about holiness. It is about diligence and prudence. This is why some people that do not even believe in God prosper in their businesses while some people that believe in God fail in their own businesses.

UnknownQueen:
Atheism just means I don’t believe in gods. It doesn’t tell you where I get my morals, same way theism doesn’t tell me which morals you follow. Some atheists are relativists. I’m not. I think hurting people is wrong because people actually get hurt ,not because someone wrote it down.

If morality only comes from God, explain why atheist countries like Japan and Sweden aren’t lawless hellscapes, and why heavily religious societies still have crime. Seems like empathy and consequences do a lot of work in this regard.

Law is different from Mortality. Some things that are lawful are immoral. Example, death sentence. Some things that are moral are unlawful. Example, breaking into someone's apartment because you have not seen the person for days and you fear that something might have happened to the person inside the apartment. So, what exactly is your point?

Atheist's source of mortality is Relativism. That is why atheism can be very dangerous.

iamjavadem:
Just don't do what you don't want others to do to you....thats it, plain and simple. It covers all.

This is golden rule. Golden rule, if not guided, will manifest as subjectivism. For instance, some cultures permit wives to entertain visitors in bed. A man practicing such a culture will sleep with married women and allow his own wife to be laid by other men. He will do to others what he allows others to do to him. Do you now see the danger of unguided golden rule? So, your comment does not answer the question raised in the post.

Kobicove:
Every human being was created with a conscience, an inate ability to know right from wrong.

Conscience is not enough. Conscience uses remorse or gladness to react to what is known or experienced. What about things you don't know or understand? How can conscience be the solution? Conscience is not what revealed that abortion is immoral. Conscience does not condemn death penalty for criminals. The knowledge that premarital sex is immoral did not come from conscience. Conscience is reactive, morality (Objectivism) is proactive.

Hit the ground running. Renewed hopelessness.