₦airaland Forum

Drienzia:
The traders were the ones that protested, because selling local gin was their source of livelihood. Even at that, it doesn't justify ur claim...

dynamix101:
On top ordinary 2 odds you still wan chop 50%?? Fear God na!!! Btw if I put 10k and ur infallible 2 odds cast, wetin U go share gimme??

ANAMBRA11:
What about 7k appearance fee

diggz:
Inter team of 2010 under mou

Cordoba,toldo,ceaser,zanetti,stankovic,lucio, Samuel, milito, materazzi, Eto , chivu etc.

raumdeuter:
Can you post your combined first 11 for Arsenal-City and lets see

raumdeuter:
Regardless of where Bravo came from Cech is a better keeper or is anyone from Barcelona automatically better than everyone elsewhere?
So if Coman comes from Bayern, He is automatically better than Alexis?

2. Bellerin is younger and better than City's right backs. Full backs do a lot of running, and bellerin is younger and more dynamic than any of Sagna and Zabaleta.

3. Gibbs and Monreal vs Clichy/Kolarov. Citys LB are old and cant compete

Otamendi and Stones are very poor compared to Koscielny and Mustafi. Infact I will pick Arsenals entire defence line + keeper over City

Midfield. The only genuine world class player on top of the game in City midfield is Debruyne. Silva is older, Same with Yaya. Fernandidnho and Fernando are not any different from Coq and Xhaka

I will pick Walcott as a winger ahead of any of Sane, Navas and Sterling

Infact if you combine both teams my 11 as at today will be

-----------------Cech
-Bellerin---Koscielny--Mustafi---Gibbs
------Fernandinho--Cazorla
--Walcott-----KDB------Sanchez
-------------Aguero

Tell me anyone you disgree with

raumdeuter:
Spy360 come and defend your "City has the best squad" claim

Keeper Cech vs Bravo or Cabalero
Right Back Sagna/Zab vs Bellerin
Central defence Kos/Mustafi vs Otamendi/Stones
Left Back Gibbs/Monreal vs Clichy Kolarov
DM Coq/Xhaka vs Fernandinho/Fernando
CM Cazorla/Ramsey vs Yaya/Gundogan

etc

amo4christ:
I don't dispute the fact that Glo might be scam us with fake data,
There was a time I experience such where my data run out quickly. but after series of research I detect that somebody add himself to my data plan (share my data) with out my approval or without my consent.
you can confirm this by visiting this website ( http://hsi.glo.com/HSISelfCarePortal ) with your Glo sim using default browse and see how each of the people that share your data and how much they use.

My Lady subscribes to glo data plan of 2k5 for 10gb while I subscribe to the data plan of 1k for 3.2gb or 3.5gb...don't know which is which... 3.(something)gb sha data plan... I'm a mid data user on mobile compared to pc or laptop...

Last month... She complained to me that she used up her data in less than two weeks... I sided with glo thinking she must have used it up Instagram-ing and YouTube-ing so I had to use glo data-share service to share the remainder of my data with her and we used it up till the 11th of this month... Then I unsubscribe to the data-share service... And bought a new data plan... Yeah... The same 1k 3.(something)gb plan... That same day we exhausted it...

Yesterday 19/01/2016 I got a message that I've got 646mb left and my plan is ending next month... I was wowed... So I did a little digging and turns out glo has been selling 1gb for 1k disguised as 3.(something)gb ... The same way Airtel sold theirs one time...

Glo... No be by force to carry the title 'GRANDMASTER OF DATA' for head If you won't stick to the attributes of a true grandmaster...

Picture proof of DATA allocation since the 11th below...

I know say my data don go... Glo won't make amendments or reimburse me... But if I sub to the next data plan and it turns out the same... I'll quietly just go back to Etisalat... It's 1k for 1gb and their service is quality...

Across the four major network companies... If data is sold @ 1gb for 1k... We all know they'll eat Etisalat dust...

Lalasticlala...
Mynd44...
Seun...

I'm out

TRendlona:
It shouldn't be difficult to determine the better coach

Everyone knows Pep is better..

Eruditor:
Leicester won't have won the league had Pep been managing AFC. He won't have bottled the league in 2007/08 when AFC finished 3rd with 83 points compared to CFCs 85 and Uniteds 87. Pep would have repeated as champ in 05 after the unbeaten year. He would have done so 2003 and 99 as well. In all these years mentioned please go and look at AFCs points compared to the winners at certain points. Wenger bottled the league in those years.

Don't get emotional on me. I am just calling it as I can see it. City have floundered this year and I am not making excuses for him or them. But this season is not over- not even close. Let us (you and the hating crew) ridicule him after 38 games not 21. That's all I am saying.

Eruditor:
He won't. That's the appropriate response to "would he?" Not yes or no. Simple enough even for you.

Eruditor:
LOL. Wenger won a double in 98. 99-01 he watched United win 3 titles back to back to back because he couldn't galvanize a double-winning team to win again. 02 Wenger wins another double. 2003, he watches A subpar United snatch the title from him after leading by 12 points. 04, Wenger goes unbeaten. Then he watches CFC win 2 titles over that unbeaten team. So my question to you is, why can't Wenger just repeat as a league champion seeing that he evidently had the best teams following his league winning years?

It is not easy to win 3 titles on the trot in 2 separate leagues. If we claim he inherited a good Bayern team (which he did, but the argument about Barca is thrash) can we agree that that Bayern team of 2013 was not the one of 2015 before he left? The point is, he was able to tweak things here and there to maintain a good squad for someone else to inherit and he repeated as champ convincingly each time. He did same with Barca even when RM kept changing managers and buying players. For that alone, he is better than Wenger. Reason: even if Wenger was able to win a league title with those teams (LOL). Wenger would have not won a second or third with either teams in close succession because his history tells us so.

The season is not over, till then we can't assess his performance with a city squad that most recently finished 4th. As it stands, Conte is the man of the year because his team is punching above their weights. But Pellegrini's city team that finished as champs in 2013 were third after 27 games. That is, 6 games after 21 games which is where the league is at today. Calm your horses.

Eruditor:
Based on what you saw at a certain point this season Pochettino was not a good coach (UCL form); at another point Conte was not a good coach (LFC and AFC losses); At another point Mou was not a good coach either and now Pep is not.

The only problem with this is the hypotheticals. If X did not happen. If Y did not happen etc. Always wait for the league season to end then you can give your full assessment. In Pep's first league title we squandered a 12point lead to RM and where within 4 before we played them at Santiago. Bearing in mind, we had CFC away on the Tues (in a make or mar UCL semis).

What followed was a 6-2 thrashing of RM and a 1-1 draw at CFC. We ended up winning a treble and subsequently 6 trophies in a year span.

The message is: calm down, the season is not over. CFC look money for the title while the rest of the lot are scrambling for 2nd-4th. If it makes you happy, Wenger will not win the league with CFCs, City's, Tottenham or even Uniteds team. So how do you rate Wenger? If great, that's good because Pep is better than him.

raumdeuter:
Spy360 remember what I told you about the type of players that can play for Arsenal

Wenger is also unique, He needs players who are born losers, mental midgets, Players with no drive and desire in life aside to be mediocre. Not bottom of the class and not top either, players who will equalize against Bournemouth and spend the next week taking selfies. Players who on one day you will think they are absolutely world class and for the next 6 days be wondering how they became footballers. Players like Walcott, Giroud Ramsey