₦airaland Forum

agarawu23:
Tabbaz, pls this guy should be re-investigated well and clear him if he is not guilty of any scam. It hurts when we accuse ppl of what they didn't do.

We shouldn't tag anyone a scammer with just seeing suspicions move by them until we see proof of his/her scam attempt or successful scam.

Seconded

Before and After...

shegz24:
Madrid and Barca pay Ronaldo and Messi's taxes seperately, so whatever they get paid is their 'take-home money'. they are the only two footballers that enjoy such priviledge

Bale is also enjoying the privilege..

july66:
He doesn't deserve this new contract. He is at the age when diminishing return begins to sets in. Not my money though.

No mind the OP, na still £365,000 he dey collect after tax though.. Who wan pay him 500k at this age.. Same amount as Messi.. Messi is also in a contract talk, he might be the most earner very soon..

ammyluv2002:
Great players

is Graziano Pelle a great footballer?.. Hulk to me is overrated..

With Gareth Bale securing an eye-watering new contract with Real madrid worth £346,000 per week. Yet the Welshman still does not top football's
rich list despite putting pen to paper on a deal
that will net him £108million over the next six
years.

Below are the list of top 10 best paid footballer

1= Cristiano Ronaldo (Real Madrid) £365,000 per
week £19m per year*

1= Lionel Messi (Barcelona) £365,000 per week
£19m per year*

3 Gareth Bale (Real Madrid) £346,000 per week
£18m per year*

4 Hulk (Shanghai SIPG) £317,000 per week
£16.5m per year

5 Paul Pogba (Manchester United) £290,000 per
week £15m per year

6 Neymar (Barcelona) £289,000 per week £15m
per year*

7= Graziano Pelle (Shandong Luneng) £260,000
per week £13.5m per year

7= Wayne Rooney (Manchester United) £260,000
per week £13.5m per year

9 Zlatan Ibrahimovic (Manchester United)
£250,000 per week £13m per year

10= Sergio Aguero (Manchester City) £240,000
per week £12.5m per year

10= Yaya Toure (Manchester City) £240,000 per
week £12.5m per year.

All estimated figures are pre-tax, except * where
figures are post-tax. Sums may vary according to
bonus payments


SOURCE:- Daily mail

stuff46:
welcome bro, happy weekend.

Thanks for having me man.. May I meet you?

allytinted:
Download mobdro app and save urself the stress of searching for links all the time.

seconded.

SANCHEZ!!!!!!!

Sunderland's Premier League record under David Moyes: LLDLLLDLL

pizzylee:
brand values or earning, Ronaldo z first

Brand value bro.

Arsenal XI vs. Sunderland: Cech; Bellerin, Mustafi, Koscielny, Gibbs; Elneny, Coquelin; Oxlade-Chamberlain, Özil, Iwobi; Sanchez.

Facebook’s ad capabilities wherein advertisers can include or exclude users from an ad campaign based on their ethnicity as reported by Pro publica has come to light & drawing a lot of criticism lately.



So what do you think? Is Facebook crossing the
line and breaking the law? Or, are they simply
making it easier for advertisers to reach their
desired target audiences?

haske7:
Am sure these babes made a 2.2...

Haba! This is wicked of you..

muyoge:
Their money worths(earnings) and brand values, na the same thing?

Their worth is their accumulated wealth from salaries, bonuses, businesses, endorsement... Etc.. While their brand value is simply their endorsement income..

Did i just read "glo drop wizkid"? How true is this?

thedarksider:
telegraph,telefax...smoke-signs,sms,drums.. ..

heyyyyyy!..they can hire the kenyans to run their messagies for them..old-school style..

i heard biafrans are very rich....kikikiki...

Honestly this is one of the signs of lost battle.

boyo123:
hmmmm

You really don't believe your eyes I guess.... Christiano is the highest earner of all athletes.

Oblang:
Good. Make those useless group go dey create whatsapp group. No place for them on fb..

whatsapp is still Mark's territory, I'll suggest Telegraph group or better still host a social network of there own.

The world looks at Messi and Ronaldo and believes that they are the biggest superstars in football and therefore the biggest athletes in the world but the following list of most valuable athletes describes which different sports they pertain to:

1.Roger Federer- Tennis, Brand value of 36 million $

2. Lebron James- Basketball, Brand value of 34 million $

3. Phil Mickelson- Golf, Brand value of 28 million $

4. Usain Bollt- Athletics, Brand value of 25 million $

5. Tiger Woods- Golf, Brand value of 23 million $

6. Cristiano Ronaldo- Football, Brand value of 19 million $

7. Kevin Durant- Basketball, Brand value of 16 million $

8. Lionel Messi- Football, Brand value of 15 million $

9. Rory McIlroy- Golf, Brand value of 13 million $

10. MS Dhoni- Cricket, Brand value of 11 million $

Good morning room. I'm Joshua, 24 I want to make intelligent Male and female friends of any age bracket.

Now, women are catching up, especially in more recent generations. Early on in the 20th century, men were more than twice as likely to drink than women, and more than three times as likely to develop alcohol-related problems. But today, the two genders are about equal -- men born since the 1980s are only 1.1 times more likely to drink than than their female counterparts, and 1.3 times more likely to consume alcohol in a way that is considered problematic.




The study did not test why the gap is closing between men and women when it comes to alcohol, but researchers noted that changing traditional gender roles for women could be one explanation.

Source: [url]cnn.com[/url]

[color=#000000]The Airtel 3gig blackBerry plan that last me 3weeks and some days, Now exhaust within 14days on the same usage.[/color] Corrupt network...

**ALL OF US GET BOLDER WITH DISHONESTY**




“The reduction in activity in the amygdala can
predict how much people increase dishonesty
subsequently,” adds Garret. Predicting future
behavior didn’t work accurately for everyone, but
the overall trend was there. (The researchers
didn’t track demographic trends of what kind of
person became more used to lying.)











There are some limitations. This study tested a
specific game, so we don’t know exactly what
would happen in other types of situations when
dishonesty is involved. And while the fact that
this was done in a lab meant that the
researchers could control things like who the
participants were working with and how the
game worked, the downside is always that it’s
less clear how much this will apply in the real
world. Brain scans also have to be taken with a
grain of salt, as sometimes they can be
misleading. (One fMRI test showed that a dead
fish had brain activity .) In the study, just
because a part of the brain was less active
doesn’t necessarily mean that people didn’t feel
as bad (and the researchers couldn’t ask
because then that would give away the
experiment).














But Garret says it’s pretty likely that there really
is a slippery slope situation happening. We feel
guilty the first time we cheat on a test, but by
the third time we’re used to it. Now we know
how the mechanism works — not just for people
like Madoff or serial plagiarists that become
more and more bold with their dishonesty, but for
all of us.

If you lie once, you’re probably more likely to lie
again. New research shows that the part of the
brain that is activated during dishonesty
responds less and less as we “get used” to
cheating — and that could make us lie even
more.



There are anecdotes about people cheating more
over time. But there hasn’t been research confirming this biologically until now, says study author Neil Garret , a psychologist at University College London. For a study published today in Nature ,
Garret’s team had participants play a game
where they would sometimes get more money
for lying to their partner. Brain scans of the
participants confirmed that lying can be a
slippery slope: people did lie more over time.
Their brains got desensitized to it, and how much
it was desensitized could predict how much
more someone would lie the next time.



When we deceive someone, the part of the brain
that regulates emotion — called the amygdala —
is activated, and we often feel shame or guilt.
The amygdala also reacts when we see cute
pictures of puppies or very sad photos. We
already knew that when our brains see these
cute or sad photos again and again, the
amygdala reacts less and less every time. Garret
and his team wanted to know if this was true for
lying, too.


The team recruited adults to work with another
person that they didn’t know. The participants
had to look at a picture of a glass jar and then
tell their partner — who was helping the
researchers — how many pennies were in it. At
the end, both would get paid, but sometimes the
participants would get more money if they lied.
(They could lie to help themselves, help their
partners, help both, and so on.) As the
participants played the game, the researchers did
brain scans of some of them. These scans,
called fMRIs, show which regions of the brain
used more oxygen; this is an indicator of brain
activity. The researchers saw that as the
participants continued to lie, the amygdala
reacted less.




Participants in the game also became more
dishonest more quickly when it would benefit just
them and not their partner. And the amygdala
really did activate less as people lied to help
themselves. The participants kept lying to help
themselves even if lying didn’t lead to more
money every single time. This means it’s likely
that people keep lying not because of rational
calculation, but because they become
desensitized..