₦airaland Forum

Bigiway:
Location

Bigiway:
Whats the battery size

Bigiway:
Location. 13K

fredrickmyers:
15k

Built2last:
Divide Nigeria NOW.

There was a country called Union of South Africa. A country made up of South Africa, Lesotho, Swaziland, and Namibia. It was dissolved and Namibia and South Africa are two prospering economies.

There was country called British commonwealth of India. Today it is India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.

There was a country called the Soviet Union. Today, it is over 15 prospering countries.

The reason Nigeria is one country is so that we can be easier exploited. By keeping us all in the same animal cage, we spend all our energy fighting each other and instead of three strong bulls, we have 3 battered and bruised sheep. Nigerians wake up.

ijeebest:
How do you do the 3d wall? And eat is d cost implication?

kentosman:
Skills required: basic AIX/UNIX understanding

Oracle database 10-12g knowledge

Mssql server administration

WebSphere server Administration

Windows server administration

Office suite especially excel /powerpoint

Project management

If 80% of the above is in U, send cv to edunzeadi@gmail.com between now and Sunday the 1st of December 2019

Goodluck

kentosman:
Do you or by any chance knows someone struggling with any of the questions below..


Confused on decent arrangement of living room and others?

Not too sure but thinks the ceiling needs POP layering?


Thinking about 3d panels for your walls?

Needs standard Curtain hooks, rails, Blinds?

Looking for Quality Bedding sets and others?

Looking to give your house a general facelift?



Search no more friend... We are already here waiting for your command.

Let us know how we may be of help

We assure you of one thing. We will surpass your Expectations

Ring US On o8o98 four 99 zero68

Email us:
deadorableslooks@gmail.com
Website: https://www.deadorablelooks.com

kentosman:
The National Industrial Court, Adamawa Division, has struck down an Alternative Dispute Resolution clause in the United Bank for Africa Group’s Staff Handbook which barred an ex-employee from seeking legal remedies against the bank in court until a prescribed internal dispute resolution mechanism has been exhausted.

The court, in a judgment by Justice Nelson Ogbuanya, declared that the ADR clause was unconstitutional, holding that the bank could not lawfully barred an ex-employee from litigating a dispute in a court of law.



The judge made the pronouncement in the suit filed against UBA by one Yusuf Ayangbade, who was a former Manager with the bank.

The judge held, “A close review of the Paragraph 6.7 of Exhibit A (UBA Staff Handbook) would reveal that it tends to compel the ex-employee to first return to the employer with complaints and then exhaust an uncertain procedure of Alternative Dispute Resolution within and outside the employer’s setting before exercising his/her right to resort to court to litigate the dispute.

“I, however, take the view that a major hallmark of ADR is its voluntary posture and as a dispute resolution mechanism, an ADR clause should provide a clear and ascertainable roadmap to effective resolution of the matter between disputing parties.

“Where an ADR clause rather provides an uncertain procedure inhibiting effective dispute resolution, it has failed in its primary mission to provide alternative to litigation.

“It is, therefore, my humble but sustained view and I hold that such an uncertain and clumsy clause of ADR is certainly not an effective dispute resolution clause as envisaged by the promoters of ADR as a panacea for congested and often distasteful outcome of litigation.”

The judge described the UBA ADR clause as an instrument of doubtful efficacy, adding that it was not in tandem with best practice of labour relations “and can be akin to compelling divorced couple to return to their erstwhile matrimonial bed as a forum for resolution of alimony issue.”

Justice Ogbuanya held, “Accordingly, to insist that an ex-employee must submit to this kind of forum even fraught with an uncertain dispute resolution procedure, will unwittingly shackle the claimant’s constitutional right to gain access to court to ventilate his grievance against his ex-employer, the defendant.

“Such unwarranted restrictive provision is liable to be struck down. Accordingly, I find and hold that the provisions of Paragraph 6.7 of the UBA Group Staff Handbook Policy Document No: HRG: 001, dated June 2010, constitutes an improper obstacle in the way of the claimant, being an ex-employee of the defendant, to accessing the court to ventilate and litigate his dispute with the defendant, his ex-employer, before this court, and as such, I hereby affirm the competency of this suit and hasten to invoke the jurisdiction of the court to entertain same.”



Source
https://punchng.com/court-nullifies-adr-clause-in-uba-staff-handbook/

opinjo:
Pls send ur bulldog to dis number via whatsapp. 08050572806

INTROVERT:
Super cool...