KingOfTheDamned's Posts
Nairaland Forum › KingOfTheDamned's Profile › KingOfTheDamned's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 (of 82 pages)
Omenka I have seen people saying you should speak up on what is going on in your state. I see your comments on all yam legger matters but why aren't you talking about this ![]() |
Magnoliaa:Such a cheap skank Kai |
Balling |
Officialgarri:100% correct |
Magnoliaa:Deranged minds are loose here... Pls any I'm house psychiatrist pls come and help these mental cases |
50k |
Bluntguy:
|
Cut your nails man, they look horrible comrade ![]() |
Chatflick:Your father is a bastard. Thief Human parts seller |
... |
... |
... |
I believe I have passed my message |
Abdulqareem:Hehehehee you haven't seen the face of evil ... You want my location bro DM.me your number if na woman born you.. after Deborah to handle some of Una dey hungry me |
Forget all this rubbish propaganda. The law in Nigeria is made to favour and protect Muslims only !! The law only works when persecuting Christians .. how many Muslims who kill Christians have you ever seen caught and jailed?!! We all saw the faces of Deborah's killers in the video show me on photo of them behind bars! Who is a fool!! This government favours protects and helps Muslims who kill us Christians. We don't want to read any stupid article when the reality on ground is any Muslim who kills any of us goes free ! Which Muslim has ever been jailed for killing one of.us.. ordiany herdsmen who has raped killed and kidnapped countless Christians they have not ever persecuted even one |
One unfortunate saide effect of the legendary bravery and skill of the Knights Templars is that whenever they are captured it is certain death. Templars’ reputation meant the prisoners of war were put to death because it didn’t make sense to let such skilled warriors live to fight another day. As an onlooker wrote, ‘Saladin ordered that they should be beheaded, choosing to have them dead rather than in prison.’ 1600 of then where beheaded that sad day. I have come to the end of my thread. I hope you enjoyed reading this .. This thread only serves to educated naive religious extremists who think only Islam has the monopoly of violence.. the church of Christ is used to violence so don't make us turn back to it or we will all loose.
|
naijainstinct:Very true |
The trouble was, the Templars’ bravery could sometimes be a liability. Take the Siege of Ascalon of 1153, when Crusaders tried to take down an Egyptian fortress. The Templars breached the defences alone after charging ahead. The knights were then massacred by the enemy soldiers who lay in wait within the fortress. The Templars rushed rashly through the breach in the wall without waiting for reinforcements, because… well, they were Templars, and going in first was what they did.
|
As long as the battle standard, or flag, of the Templars, was held aloft, the knights were expected to carry on fighting – even if they were hopelessly outnumbered or their brothers were slain all around them. Even if their standard fell, the Templars would still be expected to fight on if any other Christian standards, such as those belonging to the Knights Hospitaller, were visible. These were stringent, uncompromising requirements, underscoring how crucial their Christian faith was to their zeal on the battlefield. By today’s standards, the Templars could arguably be considered religious fundamentalists – holy warriors more than happy to die in the struggle against the unbelievers. One of their most celebrated victories came at the Battle of Montgisard in 1177, when they helped the army of King Baldwin IV of Jerusalem take on the far larger forces of the great Muslim leader, Saladin. As chronicler Ralph of Diss wrote: ‘Spurring all together, as one man, they made a charge, turning neither to the left nor to the right. Recognizing the battalion in which Saladin commanded many knights, they manfully approached it and immediately penetrated it, incessantly knocked down, scattered, struck and crushed. Saladin was smitten with admiration, seeing his men dispersed everywhere… everywhere given to the mouth of the sword.’ |
HOW GOOD WERE THE KNIGHTS TEMPLARS AS FIGHTERS? they were very good indeed. In the words of a famous 12th Century Christian pilgrim: They are the first to go and the last to return… As one person, they strongly seek out the units and wings of the battle, they never dare to give way, they either completely break up the enemy or die.’ The key phrase here is ‘as one person’, which highlights the Templars’ frighteningly effective tactic of attacking in rigid formations. Think walls of cavalry fighters, tightly packed side by side, bearing down on the enemy. Sitting astride their horses, clad in chainmail and padded leather jackets, wielding swords and lances, the knights formed the shock, attack troops of the Crusader armies, their job being to smash into the enemy ranks and leave them vulnerable to the other Christian fighters coming in their wake TEMPLARS CHARGE THEIR ADVERSARIES AS THOUGH THEY CONSIDER ENEMIES TO BE SHEEP Templars charge their adversaries as though they consider enemies to be sheep, not fearing a bit the savagery of the Barbarians or the size of their army,’ wrote St Bernard of Clairvaux. This fearlessness was literally part of the job description. In the Templar Rule, which lays out the obligations of the order, it states that no Templar can ‘leave the squadron because of cuts or wounds without permission; and if he is so badly hurt that he cannot obtain permission, he should send another brother to get it for him.’ The squadrons were arranged prior to the battle by the field commander, known as the Marshal. Once this Marshal divided the knights into their separate squadrons, they were under strict instructions never to break ranks during the battle itself. As mentioned above, even sustaining an injury was no excuse. The one and only allowable reason for leaving formation would be to help another Christian in peril. In this scenario, a knight was allowed to rush off to help, but was then expected to return ‘quietly and in silence’ to continue the original squadron charge. |
They refused to ever surrender During the Crusades, some Christian forces were ragtag armies with minimal training. Not the Knights Templar. They were highly trained, and became known as fierce fighters. They acted as the advance force in a number of battles of the Crusades, including the Battle of Montgisard, when they helped greatly outnumbered Christian forces defeat an army led by the great Muslim commander Saladin. A part of that fierceness probably came from religious devotion, which allowed them to see breaking their vows as a fate worse than death. The Rule of the Knights Templar called for them to never retreat, surrender, or charge without being ordered to do so—excellent features for any army that needs to remain disciplined. They were strategic thinkers as well as zealous fighters While they were known for their piety and their readiness to fight for the spread of Christianity, the Knights Templar sometimes counseled their fellow Crusaders against rash action. European Christians reaching Jerusalem for the first time often wanted to do battle with Muslims as quickly as possible. The Templars, who had been in the area for years and had some friendly relationships with local Arabs, sometimes had to explain that picking a particular fight wasn’t a great idea. “It would not be unlikely that the Templars at times seemed insufferably know-it-all to those who had just arrived from the West |
Reasons the Knights Templar Were History's Fiercest Fighters After Christian forces conquered Jerusalem in 1099, Europeans began making pilgrimages to the Holy Lands by the droves. On the way, they were often attacked by bandits, or even crusading knights. To protect travelers and help defend the new Christian states in the Middle East, a small group of fighters formed The Poor Knights of the Temple of King Solomon, otherwise known as the Knights Templar. Over the next two centuries, the Order became a powerful political and economic force across Europe, making history in such dramatic fashion that some people are still trying to emulate them today. Here are a few astonishing facts about these holy knights:. The Knights Templar created a different model in which members were monks, sworn to poverty, chastity, and obedience, and committed to fighting “infidels” in the Holy Land. Promising to serve the Christian cause, they received papal recognition at the council of Troyes in Champagne in 1129. Significantly, in stories about the Knights of the Round Table written in the thirteenth century, the most perfect holy knight, Sir Galahad, wears a white shield with a red cross, which was the symbol of the Knights Templar. They didn’t joke around when it came to discipline Under “The Rule of the Templars,” a detailed code governing everyday behavior, the knights were required to live austere lives. They could have meat only three times a week, except on special holidays, since eating flesh was understood to corrupt the body. Fur and fancy clothes were forbidden. So were pointed shoes and shoe-laces, since “these abominable things belong to pagans.” Of course, chastity was a must, and Templars were forbidden to kiss any woman, even their own mother. Breaking the rules could mean getting a beating, being banished from the brotherhood, or having to eat meals on the floor.
|
They reached Jerusalem in June 1099 Forces concentrated to the north and the south of the walled city and on July 15th, 1099 the troops of Godfrey of Bouillon managed to bring their siege towers close enough to the walls to get across. Their fellow Christians burst into the city and over the next few days the place was put to the sword in an outburst of religious cleansing and a release of tension after years on the march. A terrible massacre saw many of the Muslim defenders of the city slaughtered, 'wading up to their knees in blood. The crusaders gave emotional thanks for their success as they reached their goal, the tomb of Christ in the Holy Sepulchre. Their victory was not yet assured. The vizier of Egypt had viewed the crusaders' advance with a mixture of emotions. As the guardian of the Shi'ite caliphate in Cairo he did not want a new power to establish itself in the region. His forces confronted the crusaders near Ascalon in August 1099 and, in spite of their numerical inferiority 4000 crusaders Vs 55000 Egyptian warriors), the Christians triumphed and also secured a substantial amount of booty. By this time, having achieved their aims, the vast majority of the exhausted crusaders were only too keen to return to their homes and families. Some, of course, chose to remain in the Levant, resolved to guard Christ's patrimony and to set up lordships and holdings for themselves. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 (of 82 pages)


