₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,344,805 members, 8,513,780 topics. Date: Thursday, 05 November 2026 at 01:57 PM

Toggle theme

Krismas's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Krismas's Profile › Krismas's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 (of 298 pages)

Christianity Etc › Re: CAC Members Join The Tiktok Challenge (Video) by Krismas(m): 1:42pm On Jan 07, 2024
Truths9ja:
nope.. trousers 👖 is men wears why skirts is women’s wears
grin Jesus never wore trousers yet he wore skirts and gowns grin
Foreign Affairs › Re: Putin Attends Christmas Service With Families Of Fallen Soldiers (Photos) by Krismas(m): 12:43pm On Jan 07, 2024
crossfm:
Hehehe.

All na wash.

After wasting the lives of their loved ones on a senseless war,you are here attending mass with their family.

Using religion to scam people since time immemorial. Will the mass wake up the dead. Stop the senseless war,and there will be no need for such type of occasion in the future.
grin Below is the 19th century map of the area. So dat Mumus can wiseUp! Did Russia really invade Ukraine? Or is Russia only tending to its territory?

Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 9:00pm On Jan 05, 2024
Botragelad:
Not you repeating the same rubbish you can't prove.

You are wrong on both counts.
The Atlantic Ocean is not joined to the Arctic Ocean through the English Channel. The English Channel is a narrow arm of the Atlantic Ocean that separates the southern coast of England from the northern coast of France.

The English Channel does not run into the Arctic Ocean, but into the North Sea, which is another part of the Atlantic Ocean. The North Sea is connected to the Norwegian Sea, which is also a part of the Atlantic Ocean, by several straits.The Norwegian Sea is connected to the Arctic Ocean by the Greenland Sea and the Barents Sea.

The English Channel does not connect the Atlantic Ocean to the Arctic Ocean directly, but through several other seas and straits.You can check a map and see for yourself.
Read here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Channel

You are also wrong about Turkey and the Bosporus. Turkey does not have the unchallengeable right to close the Bosporus. Turkey has the right to control and protect the strait, but not to block or charge it(Said that already). The strait is subject to the Montreux Convention, which is an international agreement that regulates the passage of ships through the Bosporus and the Dardanelles, the two straits that connect the Black Sea to the Mediterranean Sea. The Montreux Convention grants the right of passage to all civilian and military vessels, subject to some limitations and regulations.

Now, article 21 of the Montreux Convention states that "In time of war, Turkey being belligerent, the provisions of Articles 10 to 18 shall not be applicable; the passage of warships shall be left entirely to the discretion of the Turkish Government"

This means that Turkey can only close the straits to warships if Turkey is involved in the war, not if other countries are at war.
Read to understand mate!
grin What exactly have u said correctly now by way of improving on what I have said? Atlantic Ocean thru the English Channel lead to ARTIC ocean. You say am wrong, that it leads to the North Sea Which leads to Norwegian Sea Which leads to Greenland Sea Which lead to ARTIC ocean. What kind of blind argument is all of dat? U think I don’t know how to look at a map? If I exit the Atlantic Ocean into the English Channel, will I get to the Artic ocean? Dats the point. Atlantic Ocean thru English Channel lead to Artic Ocean. What’s false about dat?
The germane issue is should such a Channel not be international waters? The Red Sea itself doesn’t also lead directly to the Mediterranean! It leads to the Suez Canal, Which lead to the Mediterranean or wot kind of argument are u putting forward?
1.Why should Strait of Dover be owned by English and French while the Bab Al Mandeb not owned by Yemen and Djibouti? That’s wot u should answer and not beating about the bush on irrelevancies!
2. Turkey close the Bosporus in 2022. Was Turkey at war in 2022? Montreux gives Turkey the right to close the strait on security reasons. Turkey alone is who decides wot is security or not. Turkey has the power to shut down the strait bottom line. Why don’t Yemen have the right to close Bab al mended on security reason?
3. U have failed to answer my queries, u’ve only been going round and round the circle of exhausted western arguments that mean nothing but self-service to western interest at best. So thanks and no thanks. Let me look for someone else to enlighten me
4. Bye
Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 7:29pm On Jan 05, 2024
Botragelad:
Can you support all these assertions?
I can't repeat myself a thousand times
grin U can check a map or can’t u? The Atlantic Ocean is joined to the ARTIC ocean thru the English Channel
2. Article 21 of the Monteux convention gives Turkey the UNCHALLENGEABLE right to close the Bosporus
Can’t u verify these?
Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 7:13pm On Jan 05, 2024
Botragelad:
You are mistaken again about the English Channel and the Mediterranean Sea. The English Channel is not a conduit for the Atlantic Ocean to flow into the Mediterranean Sea. It's a slim stretch of the Atlantic Ocean that lies between the south coast of England and the north coast of France.

The Mediterranean Sea on the other hand is a vast sea that is enclosed by land and linked to the Atlantic Ocean by the Strait of Gibraltar, which is about 900 miles distant from the English Channel.
The English Channel is not an international waterway, but a segment of the territorial sea of Britain and France. The two countries have consented to split the strait into two zones, each extending 3 nautical miles from their respective shores, leaving a median line between them. Told ya just now.

The English Channel is not a favour to two influential countries, but a consequence of their historical and geographical situation. Lol
Your racial remark about the "white boys" is immaterial and insulting.

Turkey is not going to obstruct the Bosporus for British ships heading to Ukraine, but only did for two former British ships that were given to Ukraine and planned to cross the strait. These ships were categorised as warships, as they were armed and had military personnel on board. Turkey has the right to regulate the passage of warships through the strait, depending on their tonnage, type, and origin.etc

Not like it shuts the Bosporus at whim.
grin Like I said b4
1 The English Channel along with the Strait of DOVER belongs to two WHITE BOYS! Who dares call it international waters?
2. Indeed the English Channel DOES NOT run into the Mediterranean. But it runs into THE NORTH SEA which empties into the NORWEGIAN SEA and finally runs into the ARTIC OCEAN. So the English Channel connects THE ATLANTIC OCEAN to the ARTIC OCEAN invariably. I would have tot this sort of Channel should have been an international water? Giving that it flows thru multiple countries? England, France Belgium, Netherlands and Denmark?
3. Why will Bab al mandeb be international while Strait of Dover will belong to Britain and France.
4. According to the terms of the Montreux convention. Article 21 precisely. Turkey has the right to close the Bosporus ANYTIME it likes. All he has to say is dat he did it for security reasons.

Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 4:32pm On Jan 05, 2024
tishbite41:
Mr. Man, that fella is telling you with the truth garnished with facts.
In terms of geographic definition, the Strait of Dover, the Strait of Bosporus and the Bab al-Mandeb Strait are the same. So, why is the administration of the Yemeni strait different?!
grin Thanks ma man
Godbless.
Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 4:14pm On Jan 05, 2024
Botragelad:
You are making some false and misleading claims that need to be corrected.

1)The Houthis and Yemen are not the same thing. The Houthis are a rebel group that controls part of Yemen's territory, but they are not recognized as a legitimate government by the international community. Yemen is not officially at war with Israel, but the Houthis have declared their support for Hamas and have launched attacks on Israeli targets.

2)The Strait of Dover is not an international strait, but a part of the territorial sea of Britain and France. The two countries have agreed to divide the strait into two zones, each extending 3 nautical miles from their respective coasts, leaving a median line between them. They also grant the right of innocent passage to foreign ships in their zones, subject to some regulations .

The Bab al-Mandeb strait on the other hand is an international strait, as it connects two areas of the high seas or exclusive economic zones, and is used for international navigation.The coastal states of Yemen, Djibouti, and Eritrea have their own territorial sea and exclusive economic zone in the strait, but they also have to respect the right of transit passage of other states, as stipulated by the UNCLOS. Turkey does not close the Strait of Bosporus whenever it likes. They only have the right to control and protect the strait, but not to block it.

In all sincerity, your arguments are not valid or sound. You are confusing and conflating different legal regimes and political situations.
I'd suggest you do more research and learn more about the history and the geography of the region. Cheers!
grin 1. It’s so shameful reading u giving away a very important maritime way to two countries cos they are powerful! The English Channel empties the Atlantic Ocean into the Mediterranean Sea. How more important can a waterway be? Yet it belongs to two white boys? While a back-water sea that held no significance until 1869 or so wen Egypt linked it to the Mediterranean Sea is the one dat is SO IMPORTANT as to belong to the whole world? You consistent with all these NLders ALWAYS advancing the narrow, sickening position of the west in everything.

2. Thats the Yemen president in the picture. Al-Alimi is in full support of the Houthis clamping down on Israeli ships

3. Turkey is going to block the Bosporus against British ships going to Ukraine, yet Turkey can’t block the Bosporus? How intelligent is the one who, only a moment ago questioned my intelligence? I told you b4 Turkey closes the Bosporus at will. Maybe u need to google the number of times they’ve done so

Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 3:16pm On Jan 05, 2024
Botragelad:
Read mate!!!!
grin Like I point out the 20mile Dover strait. The implication of having national waters within the strait is obvious. It gives you the right to legally disrupt ships, should you wish to. All you have to say, is dat such vessel strayed into your waters!
You believe too much in letters of conventions which powerful nations follow only wen convenient and ignore without consequence wen dey deem!
Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 3:08pm On Jan 05, 2024
Botragelad:
It's obvious you aren't too smart or you outrightly refused to read what I wrote up there or you have a problem understanding what i wrote.

I did not admit that Turkey can close or open the Bosporus. I said that Turkey has the right to control and protect the strait, but not to block or charge it. That's because the strait is subject to the Montreux Convention.
Turkey has to respect this international agreement, or else it will face legal and diplomatic consequences.

The Houthis do not have the same right to close or open the Bab al-Mandeb. That's because the strait is subject to the UNCLOS, which grants the right of transit passage to all ships and aircraft, which shall not be impeded by the coastal states.

Plus, the Houthis are not a recognized state, but a rebel group that controls part of Yemen's territory. They have no legal authority or legitimacy to interfere with the international navigation in the strait. Their attacks on commercial shipping are illegal.

If you aren't well read or can't say anything factual then don't bother to respond. It's obvious!
grin U are naive. That’s the issue I have with you.
1. The Houthis and Yemen position on attacking ships heading to or fro Israel is identical. Yemen is officially at war with Israel.
2. Take a look at the Strait of Dover. It belongs to Britain and France. They have all the say so on matters concerning the English Channel passage. On the strait itself, both countries took 3miles each for themselves, leaving only 14miles as international waters.
Bab Al mandeb is same widths with Dover, yet Yemen and Djibouti has no national waters in the strait? Why?
3. I am well aware Turkey close the strait Bosporus wen it likes.

Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 2:39pm On Jan 05, 2024
Botragelad:
Deviating much, eh?
You didn't respond to the previous conversation about the international waters blah blah blah. Ran out of idea, or you straight clueless?
grin Nope
My point right from onset is dat
No one considers Yemen as having some right to open or close their strait
Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 2:35pm On Jan 05, 2024
Botragelad:
I'm afraid you missed the point. I did not merely reflect the position of the west, but the facts and the law. Lol

You see, the legal status of the Bab al-Mandeb strait is not based on the location or the power of the coastal states, but on the definition and the criteria of an international strait. I told you, an international strait is a waterway that connects two areas of the high seas or exclusive economic zones, and that is used for international navigation. The Bab al-Mandeb strait meets these conditions, as it links the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean, and is used by ships and aircraft from all over the world. In other words, it is an international strait, regardless of who controls the shores.

The same logic applies to the Strait of Bosporus, which is also an international strait, as it connects the Black Sea to the Mediterranean Sea, and is used for international navigation. The fact that Turkey is a powerful and influential country does not change the legal regime of the strait, which is governed by the Montreux Convention of 1936. The convention grants the right of passage to all civilian and military vessels, subject to some limitations and regulations. Turkey has the right to control and protect the strait, but not to block or charge it.

Your hypothetical scenarios are irrelevant and unrealistic. It does not matter if Britain, America, or France were located where Yemen is today, or if Yemen were located where Turkey is today. The Bab al-Mandeb strait and the Strait of Bosporus would still be international straits, and the coastal states would still have to respect the right of transit passage of other states. This is not a matter of opinion or preference, but a matter of principle and practice.

I hope this clarifies your confusion. Cheers!
grin Ok
I catch your meaning now grin
U yourself just admitted Turkey can close or open the Bosporus. The Houthis should be able to close or open the Bab Al mandeb too. I know, where Yemen very powerful nation, international law will be skewed to favor dem. I know u will disagree
Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 2:30pm On Jan 05, 2024
Botragelad:
Did you just chicken out of our previous conversation just to do this under this dude's comment? Lol
grin I don’t get wot u mean. I never ran from any contest. Israel fate is sealed. They may not be able to remain in that region for long. They are REJECTS from Europe.
Thank God they didn’t come to Africa as Europe initially intended. The west has no right to dump their waste on us. Israel should be returned back to sender as they don’t know how to co-exist with Arab neighbors and continue to exhibit the same toxic behavior that cause Hitler to slaughter 6Million of them
Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 1:30pm On Jan 05, 2024
Whatisurproblem:
are you guys watching Ajazira at all? Even Lebanon dey collect, you kids are just bablin.
grin The tactic is clear. To divert attention from Gaza by widening the war thereby forcing American to fight for Israel by duress. Israel can’t handle all the front it’s opening. That beggar nation, dat needs alms from America every year and cannot even make shells for its own tanks without donations and alms from America
Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 1:24pm On Jan 05, 2024
Whatisurproblem:
lol, bait to completely destroy everything Palestinian and Hamas fall for the bait 🪤, you are a child, you don't know anything. Currently in front of TV Aljazira. You are there blablin
grin Thank you for the word BAIT
Exactly what Al Jazera is doing right now. Baiting international sympathy for Gaza. Palestinians are ahead on media victories while IDF is dancing away their destiny on TikTok and Israel political leaders are roping themselves with genocidal rhetorics in the media
Btw me and u, Gaza is far from gone. In 2016 Israel bombing Lebanon killed 20,000 Lebanese equally and took the country back to the Stone Age according to IDF. But fast forward to today. Does Lebanon look like Stone Age? Dey whyn!
Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 1:09pm On Jan 05, 2024
Whatisurproblem:
you have been shouting thunder since you were born we never see thunder, now you are dragging with those manufacturing thunders in real time, you will keep dying oh it's a pity
grin What a poor observer! This is not the same Hamas Israel fought wit 2012, 2014, 2022!
Something has changed! In October 7, 2023 Hamas wiped-out two brigades of Israel’s finest soldiers called Golani brigade grin
They even took the commander’s dead body hostage into Gaza as proof they didn’t come for civilians as Israel has been lying about. In addition they took over two hundred hostages with them into Gaza! Who would EVER have believed Hamas could carry dis off 5yrs back?
Another 5yrs from now, maybe Hamas will be strong enough to take the entire Knesset hostages. That’s why I say again. Na thunder go fire Israel. Hamas rockets now, get to Tel Aviv. So is like am righting small small. Abi?
Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 12:53pm On Jan 05, 2024
Whatisurproblem:
why agueing with this Ode, small street fight, you go run hide, those Hamas fighters pretending to be doctors, Red cross, humanitarians aid, journalist, Civilians, . moment they noticed IDF is closing in on them, they will quickly change clothes. That's why IDF also target and kill them.
grin How many of them can Israel kill? 29,000 people out of 2.3 million people? Wot a waste of time! Why not advise your CURSED Israel to use the nuclear weapons they have now before it’s too late. Cos their payment is coming and the Thunder dat will fire dem, is only just gyming up grin
Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 12:47pm On Jan 05, 2024
Botragelad:
I think you are a bit confused about the legal status of the Bab al-Mandeb strait in Yemen. Let me clear it up for you.

The Bab al-Mandeb strait is a narrow passage that connects the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean. It is bordered by Yemen, Djibouti, and Eritrea. It is one of the route for international trade and security, because it links the Mediterranean Sea and the Suez Canal to the Indian Ocean and the Persian Gulf.

Now according to international law, the Bab al-Mandeb strait is not considered international waters, but rather an international strait. An international strait is a waterway that connects two areas of the high seas or exclusive economic zones, and that is used for international navigation.

There's what we call the UNCLOS,if you know what that is. They establish the legal regime of international straits, such as the Bab al-Mandeb strait. UNCLOS provides that in straits used for international navigation, all ships and aircraft enjoy the right of transit passage, which shall not be impeded by the coastal states. Transit passage means the exercise of the freedom of navigation and overflight solely for the purpose of continuous and expeditious transit of the strait.
The coastal states may adopt laws and regulations relating to transit passage, but only in conformity with UNCLOS and other rules of international law.

The Bab al-Mandeb strait is not international property, and the coastal states have some rights and obligations, but also have to respect the right of transit passage of other states. This is different from the Suez Canal and the Strait of Bosporus, which are not natural waterways, they are artificial canals that are subject to special agreements and conventions.

These coastal states of the Bab al-Mandeb strait cannot claim the whole waterway as their territorial sea or EEZ, nor can they take toll from ships using the place, that would violate the right of transit passage and the freedom of navigation of other states.
They can maybe benefit from the natural resources and the economic activities in their respective territorial sea and EEZ.

Do you understand now?
grin Thank you for the reply. Only u merely reflected the position of the west grin
U think if Britain or America or even France were located where Yemen is today, that all this your English will apply about Bab Al mandeb? You think if Yemen were to be located were Turkey is today, you think Bosphorus will not be named an INTERNATIONAL STRAIT?

Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 12:34pm On Jan 05, 2024
Whatisurproblem:
winning war is number of casualties and achieving target aim. Isreal stated it clearly on October 7 that he's on revenge mission, that Gaza will be in ruin that have never been seen before, that all hamas leaders are Legitimate target. Those are their mission cos they ve signed thier death warrant moment they decided to attack Isreal. Now tell wich of those agenda they never achieve? You are a mumu pushing Palestinians to slaughter.
grin Israel cannever bomb Gaza as much as American bomb North Vietnam. If bombing can give you victory, America would not have lost the Vietnam war!
Unfortunately for Israel, the so called revenge mission of destroying Gaza and it’s population is called GENOCIDE in legal terms and has brought Israel international condemnation to the extent dat the primary objective of Israel to take the entire Palestine from the indigenous Arab population CAN NOLONGER be achievable.
That’s why I say Israel is finished. It’s over!
Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 12:26pm On Jan 05, 2024
Whatisurproblem:
your foolishness is Legendary, those in control of Gaza were hidden in Baruit, yet Isreal still Locate and kill them in surgical strike, and those in control of Gaza can't stop isreali ground troops holding positions across Gaza, can't also stop isreali bombings everyday when Isreal are busting their hideout among school children, women and in hospitals. When they die finish, you supporters battling with hunger here will comit suicide
grin If Israel is in control of Gaza, how come they are pulling out 8 battalions of IDF? Why are dey running away? Hamas is over 30,000 thousand in Gaza. U kill a leader so? How has that affected Hamas operations in Gaza? After 3months and spending close to 60billion USD, Israel is not even close to defeating Hamas grin
Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 12:20pm On Jan 05, 2024
PARADIZEPRIEST:
ARABS FULL OF TROUBLE AND HATRED FOR OTHER RACE AND RELIGION angry
grin Israel is at the heart of all the trouble in the region. They are Europeans who came into Palestine in the 40s with no single historical or ancestral connection to the land. With the cruel motive to purge Palestinians from their God given lands, under the guise of Judaism. This is the beginning of all the trouble in the place
Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 12:15pm On Jan 05, 2024
Whatisurproblem:
you will die like fowl, you people are dying yet you are claiming victory, all hamas leaders were killed in a surgical strike in their hideout, yet you are still claiming Isreal will loose. Isreal drone need to visit terorist supporters in Nigeria
grin Over 30 Mossad operatives have been arrested in Turkey.
Mossad struck in Beruit few days ago, in Iran yesterday and in Syria also.
The plan is to shift attention from Gaza to other locations, to force these nations to come into the war so dat America will have no choice but get directly involved.
Those nations already know, so Israel is failed once more. They will not reply.
And only yesterday, the American warship in the Mediterranean has been removed. Signaling America will not fight Israel Stupid wars. You think Israel is winning? Winning what really? Israel is FINISHED! grin
Foreign Affairs › Re: Indian Navy Vigilant On Hijacked Ship With Indian Crew Near Somalia. by Krismas(m): 12:00pm On Jan 05, 2024
Botragelad:
Source:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.timesofindia.com/india/indian-navy-vigilant-on-hijacked-ship-with-indian-crew-near-somalia/amp_articleshow/106562196.cms
grin
The question am asking for which NO ONE is answering is that,
HOW IS THE BAB AL-MANDEB strait in Yemen INTERNATIONAL WATERS? How manage? If this strait were in Britain, will it have been considered International property? If the Suez Canal, the strait of Bosporus etc are all belonging to the nearby nations, then the gulf of Eden including the Bab Al mandeb should belong to both Yemen and Djibouti. They should be taking toll from ships using the place like Egypt wen you use the Suez canal

Celebrities › Re: Adedeji Aderemi 'Olofa Ina' Is Dead by Krismas(m): 10:53pm On Jan 04, 2024
Xwizard:
Lere Paiymo
grin Guy wetin dey do u na?
He is not Lare Paiymo! Abi?
I tot Paiymo is Eda? Ogbori elemosho?
Am trying to figure who dis olofa ina is.
Is he abija?
Foreign Affairs › Re: ISIS Claims Responsibility For Attack In Kerman, Iran by Krismas(m): 10:43pm On Jan 04, 2024
JuanDeDios:
Anyone with half a brain knew it was ISIS. Had their fingerprints all over it. Iranian leaders saying it the US or Israel were either brain-dead or being mischievous.
grin Who sponsored Abdumalek Rigi and his Terrorist Jandallah group in Iran? America and Israel! Who sponsored Alqaeda in Libya against Gaddafi? America! Who sponsored ISIS and salafists in Syria against Assad? America again! Infact it was in Syria, Obama tried to create GOOD TERRORIST concept. Meaning, no matter how atrocious your acts might be, provided it’s geared at removing Assad, then you are justified!
Who sponsored Salafists called northern alliance against Taliban in Afghanistan? America yet again! Who sponsor Neo nazis such as AZOV battalion against Putin in Ukraine? Who else?
It’s wot America always does. They are the GREATEST TERRORIST ALIVE
Foreign Affairs › Re: ISIS Claims Responsibility For Attack In Kerman, Iran by Krismas(m): 10:27pm On Jan 04, 2024
sslcrypt:
What a load of NONSENSE. YOU SOUND LIKE A BRAIN DEAD PERSON.
grin He is telling u the Truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Only u are too blind to see it. Remain in ur darkness therefore, worshipping false gods
Foreign Affairs › Re: ISIS Claims Responsibility For Attack In Kerman, Iran by Krismas(m): 10:17pm On Jan 04, 2024
BodyCount:
Isis or ISRAEL?

MAKE UNA DEY DECEIVE UNASEF.

I'M ABSOLUTELY SURE THAT THOSE TERRORIST ZIONÌST PIGS ARE RESPONSIBLE. TRUST IRAN, THEY'LL GET THEIR REVENGE...
grin Wisdom no go kill u
ISRAEL= ISIS + RA + EL
ISIS is also called IS
It’s not by mistake ISIS called Daesh is also called IS dats Islamic state.
It’s the first goddess in the name of Israel and as a group, it was founded by an Israeli called Ben Hadadi grin
Ofcourse dats an assumed name
Foreign Affairs › Re: Israel To Pull Some Troops From Gaza As War Enters New Phase by Krismas(m): 11:17am On Jan 04, 2024
mikeapollo:
Very simple!
More than a million civilians moved. IDF only attacked suspected Hamas targets/hideouts.
There is no war that does not produce unintended civilian casualties.
The mere fact that IDF distributed leaflets to inform civilians to move to relatively safer places is something that no other country in war has done. Did you see America or Russia do that in the wars they have been fighting?
This is war!
Did Hamas warn civilians and women in Israel before attacking them with rockets?
grin hamas rockets are not meant to kill people. they are too low in range and carry few explosive powers. they are cheaply made in gaza and are fired for two main reasons. 1. as physiological demoralization of the people and 2. to waste the money of isreal in intercepting them. the missiles hamas fire, are no more than 2,000USD in cost. but iron dome's missiles are atleast 2,000,000USD each to intercept them.
it is the british that started the act of distributing flyers from the air. a thing they still do up till today. its useless. it means nothing.
only thing is, it worked magick when they used it in palestine in the 40s! cos that made the othoman leave palestine, without firing a shot to defend the place. i think it is said by an ancient prophecy, that papers will rain from the sky to signal the end. its just a dump prophesy. but it worked for the british. but the dump israelis keep using a stupid useless strategy dat mean nothing nomore.
Foreign Affairs › Re: Israel To Pull Some Troops From Gaza As War Enters New Phase by Krismas(m): 11:00am On Jan 04, 2024
mikeapollo:
Where did your Hamas kill 7000 IDF solders? You must be hallucinating.
The same Hamas which is now asking/negotiating for 40 days ceasefire, which Israel has rejected!
Keep on believing in your lies.
grin ofcourse IDF casualties in gaza is a well guarded secret by the western media controlled by the israelis grin but if you want the truth, check the work of Haaretz newspaper on the subject. they visited every hospital in israel to check on IDF casualty. you can check to see how israel has been misleading you. if the casualty is not high, why did they pull out the Golani brigade from gaza? why are they considering an altogether pullout? has hamas been defeated? why are they running?
so hamas is negotiating ceasefire even after israel killed their second in command Al-Aroura? grin
dey whyn! its mossad in Qatar right now, against the wish of natanyahu, trying to BEG for ceasefire. and like the first time, hamas is saying it must only be on our terms. 1. not temporary but permanent ceasefire. 2. complete withdrawal of IDF from gaza. 3. the release of the current leader of PFLP Ahmad Sa'adat in any hostage negotiations. And i think israel should take if now, before hamas increase their demands grin
israel is the begger not hamas
Foreign Affairs › Re: Israel To Pull Some Troops From Gaza As War Enters New Phase by Krismas(m): 10:28am On Jan 04, 2024
mikeapollo:
I leave you in your ignorance.
A Jew is someone that believes to be descendant of Jacob/Israel and belong to the lineage of Abraham.
Not every Jew is a Judaist. Some Jews are Christians, even if in the minority.
There are Jews in Ethiopia, Europe, US, etc.
Similarly, there are Yoruba people born and bred in other parts of the world and they have the right to migrate and settle in Yoruba land if they are able to trace the ancestry and the local people accept them.
Only bastards and fools forget their ancestry and lineage because they were born abroad!
grin what an idiot! jew is a religion. there are nigerian jews! whats the meaning of christian jews? except you can equally say christian-muslims? jacob was no jew, abraham was certainly no jew. jew is a religion that started with moses. moses invented the priesthood and the forms of worship in the jew religion. yoruba on the other hand is a tribe and not a religion. jew is not a tribe. there is never any tribe called jew among the twelve tribes of israel. this current day people in israel are descendants of proselytes to judiasm in europe. they are Ashkenazi. why not research the word and the various types of jews for that matter? they have no single right to the land of palestine cos they are jews! just like saying any christian in the world has a right to Bethlehem cos thats where the saviour came from? crap! the real owners of the land are the palestinians. and their fore bearers were the jews of the bible. that they are no more jews does not mean they are no more the land owners.
Foreign Affairs › Re: Israel To Pull Some Troops From Gaza As War Enters New Phase by Krismas(m): 9:10am On Jan 04, 2024
mikeapollo:
Liar, liar, liar!!!
Hamas uses every place possible as their operational bases. They launch rockets from civilian houses, school compounds, close to hospitals, mosques, churches etc.
Who are your liars, and so called '' independent bodies"?
grin Mumu
Those rockets Hamas launch do not have a range exceeding 15km
Inorder for them to get to Israel, they need to be launched as close to the wall as possible. What’s the point launching a rocket that wouldn’t fly enough to leave Gaza? Here is where you and your smelly Israel is found a liar. Which schools, church are close to the Gaza fence?
Equally since the whole northern Gaza has been razed to the ground and Palestinians removed to the south, which day did Hamas not fire rockets into Israel? The last ones even got to Tel Aviv! From where are they now firing? Abi u be Mumu?
Foreign Affairs › Re: Israel To Pull Some Troops From Gaza As War Enters New Phase by Krismas(m): 7:10pm On Jan 03, 2024
chukxie:
Tunnel, you're right. Tunnels burrowed right inside the basements of people's homes, bedrooms, kitchens. Sadly, innocent children and civilians are caught in the cross fire because Hamas take pleasures in using them as human fodder. Innocent children and civilians do not deserve to die for the crimes of Hamas; the cowardice of Hamas has led to the deaths of thousands of Palestinians.
grin Be talking rubbish! Inspite the truth dat IDF only uses an AI called GOSPEL to determine where next to bomb in order to get the most civilian mortality, u still keep saying Hamas is using people to shield? How does bombing the people bring out the Hamas 10meters below the ground? There are no more civilians in north Gaza, so, how manage Hamas is still firing rockets every day from northern Gaza? Who are they using as human shield in northern Gaza? All d 7000 IDF Hamas killed is it not from close combat with IDF? So why pretend Hamas is hiding among people?
Foreign Affairs › Re: Israel To Pull Some Troops From Gaza As War Enters New Phase by Krismas(m): 7:00pm On Jan 03, 2024
chukxie:
Personally, I do not support the killing of innocent children and civilians in Gaza, Palestine. Nobody should die for the sins of another. Unfortunately Hamas keep launching rockets from residential places, and hospitals thereby leaving Israel with no other choice than to shell sites from where rockets where fired from. Regarding the holocaust, did you know Hitler also killed Gypsies, biracial, and anyone he deemed impure? May peace return to Palestine and Israel.
grin In Gaza there is no single prove Hamas use schools or hospitals as operational bases. This has been verified by many impartial independent bodies. Yet you keep resurrecting the exhausted lies of Israelis which is merely a weak excuse to justify their mass murder intentions in Gaza.
As regarding the holocaust, people don’t care to find out WHY Hitler actually turned against the Jews particularly. It is not enough to point out that Hitler equally turned against other people. These Ashkenazis always do more dan themselves!

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 (of 298 pages)