An autopsy that failed to ascertain the intactness, or its otherwise,vof physical organs like heart, lungs, neck, ( the deceased brother told newsmen that his brother's neck was not intact, when exhumed, suggesting slaughter), authoritatively declared his dying as a result of trauma.

How did the test detect trauma which is more abstract than a supposed partially decomposed organ. I can see some external influence manipulating this case.

My take is that the Adedoyin, his son and the staff of the hotel are culpable in this matter. They murdered the young man and buried him in a shallow grave around the precinct of their bedevilled hotel where the deceased lodged last. This is a very clear case.

The academic has forsaken its first love of research and training. It is now engrossed with the filthy lucre of money. They are now emergency contractors and general merchants.
The University, to the academic, today is one huge market, where profit is the motivation, as opposed to the traditional values of scholarship.
One may blame the poverty in the land. But for Christmas sake, the academic are not faring worse than most civil servants. The blame should be on the moral bankruptcy that has ravaged the land.
Re engineering and moral renewal and reorientation is panacea to the reclaim of the most glory in the academia.

It is a common place to see people inadvertently call religiosity, spirituality. There is a nexus, no doubt, between the two, but certainly they don't mean the same thing. Religion presumes knowledge of the answer to existential questions. Spirituality however is concerned with finding answers to knotty existential questions.

For instance, religions have ready answers to these questions about human existence: where did we come from? What is the purpose of being here? Wither do we go from here? But a rational being will not be at home with these religious answers, he will therefore progress in finding answers to these queries.

Moments come in the life of a mortal, when he feels the sensation to know what is true. At moments of dying or troubled sickness, time of great distress, man compulsorily asks questions as to why of his predicament or condition. These are the spiritual moments.

A spiritual person is essentially a seeker after the truth. A religious person is a believer. He operates from the angle of knowing. If you ask a believer if he knows God, he answers in the affirmative. A truly spiritual man, a seeker of the truth, will bluntly reply with a no, for an answer.

God, according to religious books, is a spirit, not seen. A believer we rather agree to know the unseen, but a spiritual fellow will not declare such knowledge.

Spirituality to a greater extent is devoid of religion. But erroneously a religious person is seen as a spiritual fellow. Whereas, a religious person claims to know, while the spiritual claims ignorant.

Having said this, it is easier for the ignorant to know than for the believer to actually get to know the truth.

In the theater of life, where there are so much to be known, a believer may not thrive as the ignorant is more likely to achieve more knowledge.

A believer can be likened to a blindfolded man who is crossing a ten lane expressway; only a miracle will prevent him from being knocked down by a moving vehicle. A spiritual person will rather open his eyes wide, and manouveur his way through the traffic, or avoid it altogether.

The academic has forsaken its first love of research and training. It is now engrossed with the filthy lucre of money. They are now emergency contractors and general merchants.
The University, to the academic, today is one huge market, where profit is the motivation, as opposed to the traditional values of scholarship.
One may blame the poverty in the land. But for Christmas sake, the academic are not faring worse than most civil servants. The blame should be on the moral bankruptcy that has ravaged the land.
Re engineering and moral renewal and reorientation is panacea to the reclaim of the most glory in the academia.