₦airaland Forum

Available

Follow the link below

bonechamberlain:
this is Nigeria where appointments are made using sentiments, so expect the cjn to bulge to powerful people especially when he knows they can influence his removal.

Do you know what it takes to remove the Chief Justice of Nigeria from office

If you knew, I'm sure you won't be saying what you are saying. Please don't confuse the position of Chief Justice with that of the Attorney General.

bonechamberlain:
. let us be careful in this country, remember its the supreme Court we are talking about, if the cries of "eminent lawyers", can make the cjn to disband a legally constituted panel, then we are in trouble, cause any govt can come into power and get some "eminent lawyers" on its side asking them to cry out loud on any case that doesn't favour the govt, thereby putting pressure on the cjn to form another or reconstitute the panel. we should not be playing politics with the judiciary especially at the highest level " the supreme Court".

The CJN is not a small boy, both literally and professionaly that he will be bullies by cry of a few SANS. If what the SANS are saying is wrong, rubbish, holds no water, he wouldn't be bothered. He will just siddon and be looking at them.

I think you read the article and see the reasons the CJN stated for taking the action it is taking .

And it is exactly because it's the Supreme Court we are talking about, that the CJN cannot allow the ruling to subsist without upturning it. Don't you get that? Whatever the supreme court does is binding on every court of law in Nigeria and becomes part of the law of the land!!!

bonechamberlain:
so u are saying a "supreme Court" justice gave an illegal judgement

No, I'm not saying so; the Chief Justice of Nigeria is saying so, after several learned lawyers and SANS like Femi Falana etc. raised alarm over the issue and the danger it portends for our justice system if allowed to subsist.

Make no mistake about it, the goal of the CJN is to upturn the ruling. Why else would CJN be going through the trouble of reconstituting another panel?

It's not about Saraki, it's about safeguarding the entire justice system. If the ruling or grant is allowed to stay, by precedent it become part of law, which many future cases will continue exploiting. This is the Supreme Court and not and High court.



The decision to disband the panel, according to judiciary sources, is partly due to the outcry generated by the Supreme Court’s ruling and the imminent retirement of Justice Fabiyi from the bench on November 25.

Eminent lawyers, including Prof. Itse Sagay (SAN), Chief Folake Solanke (SAN), Chief Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), Mr. Femi Falana (SAN), Jiti Ogunye and Malachy Ugwummadu, had described the Supreme Court’s ruling as contravening provisions of sections 306 and 369 of the new Administration of Criminal Justice Act.

The ACJA prohibits granting of a stay of proceedings in criminal cases.

bonechamberlain:
why is the panel being reconstituted, in as much as I want corruption to be fought, the fg/judiciary should not make it so obvious that it is fighting saraki, why the rush to try him.

I think your question has already been answered. The panel is being reconstituted because it's judgement cannot be allowed to stand, because it is an illegality and it portends danger for our justice system. The New Administrative Law of stay of proceedings represents a great progress in our justice system, that is corrupt politicians will no longer be able to use that weakness to prolong their trial which runs into several years until the government gets tired. The case of Abachas son went for over ten years due to various interlocutory injunctions and all sorts.

This ruling by the supreme court takes all that away in one stride and take things backwards to like 10 to 15 years ago.

porka:
It's blackmail.

Punch should should show maturity.

What happens is the new panel does a similar thing?

Will they call for disband of the whole supreme court?

Media bully is inimical to good justice system.

They will probably not.

It is clearly established that the ruling is against the New Administrative Law on stay of proceedings. The CJN is not under the control of the executive like the Attorney General.

Then, disbanding the panel is not a decision that the CJN must have arrived at lightly. It's possible that he may be privy to some information you and I don't have the privilege of knowing.

Remember the Rivers State Election tribunal chairman that was changed by the CJN. Later it came out that there was evidence of him being compromised that was brought to the knowledge of the CJN. The man never came out to say it's a lie.

If a judgment inconsistent with the constitution is allowed to stay because of one person, then it becomes part of our laws, as it will always be sighted as precedence by any other politicians being brough before the Code of Conduct Tribunal.

Guess the CJN doesn't want to go down in history as the CJN under whose tenure the gains of Nigeria's Administrative Law on stay of proceedings was taken 10 years backwards.

kulikuli26:
Did you read the part they reported Justice fabiyi is retiring? So is CJN going to remove the other four justices who were part of the judgment? Some other SANs have also argued justice fabiyi was in order. Let's not always crucify the court when judgment doesn't favour us.

no

bonechamberlain:
may God help this country, buhari's govt is putting confusion into the judiciary, any judgement that doesn't favour apc would be decided again, even in the supreme Court. this is a bad precedence for this country.

The Chief Justice of Nigeria says the panel will be reconstituted; whether it's only one, or two that's removed, who knows/cares. But most likely, it will be a new set of judges.

By the way, CJN is not under the control of the President, I hope you guys know that.

Which SANS are you talking about? Hope you are not reffering to the cash and carry Lawyer, Ozakhome, who's been known to call white black and black white whenever it suits the purpose of his benefactors.

kulikuli26:
The judiciary has become a joke. So any judgement delivered against saraki is good but the contrary is bad? How did we come this low? Justice Fabiyi granted an order unanimously endorsed by other four justices in the panel, why is he been singled out for this criticism. Do what you like with saraki but remember people come and go, institutions must be protected.

Did you read the article. The judgement is glaring against the constitution, by being
against the New Administrative Law on the granting if stay of proceedings.

If it were not the Chief Justice wouldn't be disbanding and reconstituting the panel.

You must understand that supreme court judgement are very important and have weighty applications if not corrected because it becomes a precedent which will be cited by any other person going through a similar trial. The judgement if illegal and left to stay by the Chief Justice becomes part of the law, which would take Administration of Justice like 10 years backwards.

So the CJN is trying to do exactly that which you are crying about : protecting the institution of (Administrative) Justice in Nigeria.

It's obvious the judges have been compromised by someone acting for Saraki.

And as for Mike Ozekhome, I wish it was possible under special circumstances for SAN to be withdrawn from people. However, by now, I think everyone is beginning to get a fair idea of what he's all about.

Available

Can't blame the Japan times for coming to that conclusion. They do not believe, that in a properly run country, a national security adviser can never be able to usurp the function of the defence ministry and commit such gargantuan amounts of financial fraud/gatft without being supported by his boss, the President

Available

Vailable

Available

Available

quibaby:
Does it come with a charger if not to charge this is 1 week

Please rephrase your question. It is not clear enough.

And it does not come with charger. No Powerbank does.

This Powerbank is available again and cheaper this time around.


Here is a Powerbank that can charge your tablets and your phone, several times over.


This is a Powerbank with a Real Authentic value of 32,000 MAH; IT'S NOT FAKE 32,000 MAH for advert purpose. It's real; it's what it says it is. It is different from power bank a that quote fake values in other to sell. You can therefore see it in it's size. You can call it a Family Powerbank because it can be used by a whole family.

You can see it in the packaging. It's sealed tight; to be opened by the user.

Specifications :

Dimensions: width - 95mm * Length: 177 *Height: 23mm

Weight: 490 grammes

Input Voltage : 5V
Input Current:p 1000mah
USB output 1: 1 amps (1000mah)
USB Output 2: 2.1 amps (2100mah)

Powerful Led light to act as a lamp

Digital Screen that shows the extent of charge



Specifications :

Dimensions: width - 95mm * Length: 177 *Height: 23mm

Input Voltage : 5V
Input Current:p 1000mah
USB output 1: 1 amps (1000mah)
USB Output 2: 2.1 amps (2100mah)

Powerful Led light to act as a lamp

Digital Screen that shows the extent of charge

Price : N6, 500


Contact: 0815 171 4053 (call or Whatsapp)

This thread shows how dullard-ized many youths have become. I'm surprised that many could not decode, by simple reading and comprehension that we use to do in school that, the girl didn't die form from drinking any concontion, but she died from strangulation.

The man forcefully strangled her to death. There is nothing to proof that he went there with concontion; that was his story.

saharareporters.com/2015/09/19/akwa-ibom-tribunal-ends-hearing-crumbled-inec-defense



The Akwa Ibom State Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal on Thursday finally ended hearings for the petition brought by the governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) Mr. Umana Okon Umana and the APC against the election of Governor Udom Emmanuel of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).
When the case was called on Thursday, the lawyer to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Mr. Alex Ejesieme, informed the Tribunal that the Commission would not present more witnesses other than the four they have called in their defense. He formally announced that the 3rd and 4th Respondents, INEC and the Resident Electoral Commissioner for Akwa Ibom State, have closed their case.

INEC was expected to end its defense on Friday, September 18, 2015. The Commission had listed a total of 94 witnesses but abruptly closed its defense after calling just four witnesses. On Thursday, September 16 Mr. Ejesieme had told the Tribunal that the person he intended to call as their 5th witness had "suddenly developed health problems".

Lawyers to the PDP and Governor Udom Emmanuel, Messrs Tayo Oyetibo, and Mr. Paul Usoro, informed the Tribunal that they have pending applications before the Tribunal. However, the Tribunal by consent of all the parties ruled that all pending applications should be taken along with the final addresses.

After deliberations, the Justice Sadiq Umar-led judicial panel directed that the Respondents should file and serve their final written addresses on the Petitioners within 7 days beginning from Monday, September 21, 2015, while the Petitioners should file and serve their final written addresses on the Respondents within 4 days of being served by the Respondents. Also, the Respondents are to file their reply on point of law to the Petitioners addresses, if any, within 3 days of being served by the Petitioners.

Meanwhile, the Tribunal ordered the 3rd Respondent, the PDP, to evacuate the 7 big bags of Incident Forms allegedly used during the election from the Registry of the Tribunal since the PDP had failed and refused to tender them before the Tribunal. The Chairman and other members of the Tribunal stated further that the forms, not being exhibits, are of no relevance to the Tribunal and should be taken away so as to decongest the Registry.

The PDP averred in their defense that Card Reader was not the only means of accreditation. Some of the witnesses who testified before the Tribunal had equally said that Incident Forms were used.

However, the PDP abandoned the 7 bags of Incident Forms after causing a subpoena to be issued for INEC to bring the Incident Forms before the Tribunal. Several credible sources revealed that the forms said to have been fraudulently invented after the election was dumped by the Respondents when they realized that they did not sign the forms. Sources revealed that the Respondents had no choice but to abandon them to avoid worsening their case.

A legal expert who spoke on the condition of anonymity said that with this fraudulent development, the defense of manual accreditation put up by the Respondents has totally crumbled since one cannot talk about malfunctioning of the Card Readers without the Incident Forms.

The case has been adjourned to October 8, 2015 for the adoption of final written addresses.

I'll like to know about this road too... I stopped passing there several months ago due to what the OP described

Available

You for try place pictures now, especially if it's as clean as you describe

Very funny; this story is just a practical prank emerged from someone's vivid imagination.

It's a lie of course .

Do you know what happens inside the bonnet of a car when the car is travelling?

Have you opened a cars bonnet after a two hours journey, not to talk of a longer one?

Let's even assume the person did not die, how does he hope to get out of a locked bonnet. Not everyone opens the bonnet of their car everyday.

Well, if all these is indeed the truth, then I must say that the Oni of has a strange way of showing that support to Buhari.

Available

Available