Do you all believe the "war on terror" rubbish?

It's all lies, and they are using peoples prejudices against black people to sell those lies.

Both of the alleged Woolwich attackers, Micheal Adebolajo and Micheal Adebowale, were of Nigerian descent, both were born and raised in England, and both were raised as Christians.

Former Det Ch Insp Peter Kirkham, in response to the Lee Rigby killing, is quoted as saying "For two suspects to carry out a brutal attack like this then stand around in plain sight waiting for the police is crazy”(1), but there is a lot more to this alleged attack that is "crazy" than just the fact that they stood around waiting for twenty minutes after the attack (See link below for evidence of all claims regarding this faked killing).

It is "crazy" that women on the scene chatted to the killers, it is also "crazy" that other women casually passed right next to one of the alleged killers as he was ranting to the cameras and holding a bloodied meat cleaver.



It is "crazy" that the car which supposed hit a relatively small signpost is severely damaged, yet the sign is completely undamaged. This is a strong indicator of a staged accident.

It is "crazy" that the armed police are photographed tending to one of the alleged killers wounds while the alleged killers arms are free. We are led to believe that the sole purpose of this mans life at this point is to kill police, yet his arms are clearly free while the officer is in easy reach. How did police know he did not pose any threat at this time? How did they know he did not have another concealed knife?

http://anywho.simplesite.com/201858949

The reason given for attacking the British soldier is also nonsensical, wanting Sharia law in Muslim countries is one reason we are given by Micheal Adebolajo, yet the British military supported the Islamists in Libya against the secular government, and in Syria the British government is an avid supporter of the largely Islamist opposition against the secular government of Dr Bashar Al Assad.

Islamists who want Sharia law in Muslim countries have no more powerful an ally than David Cameron, both seemingly want progressive Muslim countries destroyed and returned to the dark ages. How fitting that pretend enemies should have a pretend killing.

The Woolwich killing is not the only "crazy" terrorist attack supposedly carried out by a Nigerian Islamist against Western targets, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, also known as the "underwear bomber", is alleged to have tried to blow up flight 253 with 80 grams of a high explosive hidden in his underwear(2).

Attorney Kurt Haskell testifies that Umar was assisted onto the plane by a "sharp dressed man" who appeared to be trying to board Umar without a passport(3).

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab is the son of a billionaire banker, he went to to the exclusive "British School of Lome" in Togo(4) before continuing on to London where he earned a degree in mechanical engineering from University College London(5). This is a very wealthy, well educated, and well traveled young man, yet the attempted bombing was a bumbling nonsensical farce (were it to be believed)

Why would such a wealthy and well educated person take part in a suicide bombing? His worth to an organisation would be far greater alive than dead.

Why would he board an international flight without checking any luggage(6)? Umar is a well educated and well traveled individual, he would certainly know that checking no luggage on an international flight is a good way to stand out rather than blend in.

Why was, according to the above eyewitness testimony, a sharp dressed man trying to board Umar without a passport? Umar is reported to have had a passport on his person, perhaps if it was a poor counterfeit passport and the individual is not the real Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab but instead just a patsy, then it may be necessary to bypass normal check-in procedures.



Above is the passport the bomber was carrying, as can be seen the signature is just a very poorly printed first name, this signature is irreconcilable with a very wealthy, well traveled, and very well educated young man (educated in top British schools including university). That is the signature of someone who is at best semi-literate in the English written language, that is the signature of a patsy.

The alleged bombing plot is "crazy" from inception through to implementation, why would a suicide bomber smuggle a mere 80 grams of explosives onto a plane in his underwear when he could put 100 or 200 times that amount (8 or 16 kgs) into a suitcase and check it on to the plane? Checked luggage, whilst there are some random checks, comes under a fracton of the scrutiny that persons boarding the plane come under due to the threat of hijackings.

The attempted detonation of the 80 grams of PETN in Umar's underwear is as fishy as the rest of the story, usually, a shock wave from a blasting cap or an exploding wire detonator is needed to set off PETN(7), yet Umar tried using the somewhat dubious and ultimately unsuccessful method of trying to use a syringe to attempt detonation by a chemical reaction. This created smoke but no explosion.

This "underwear Bomber" ushered full body scanners into airports around the world, these intrusive machines would be nigh on a wet dream for perverts and peadophiles, the machines essentially strip passengers naked for the operator to view.

This complete exposure, even ignoring the possible health implications from radiation, are an affront to common decency. Many people would simply not like themselves or their children to be viewed naked, not to mention the many people wear incontinence or other sanitary products, all of whom have a right to complete privacy.

As noted earlier, these disgusting machines do nothing to make us safer from a genuine potential suicide bomber (should this threat actually exist), because they do nothing to stop a suicide bomber from checking a suitcase full of explosives onto a plane, and that is where any real attempt at blowing up a plane would be made.

What a boon this nonsensical, pathetic, attempt at a bombing was for security companies, they developed these machines and were just waiting for a catalyst to make their implementation acceptable when along came Umar the underwear bomber. A cynic might have thought the whole escapade a sham to keep the fake war on terror alive, and provide a catalyst for useless, yet very expensive, and very intrusive machines to be thrust upon airports worldwide.

"Crazy" is indeed a good choice of words.


(1) http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/woolwich-attack-video-watch-full-1908975

(2) http://www.examiner.com/article/exclusive-pictures-underwear-bomb-of-flight-253-christmas-terrorist

(3) http://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/index.ssf/2009/12/flight_253_passenger_says_at_l.html

(4) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/6896128/Detroit-terror-attack-profile-of-Umar-Farouk-Abdul-Mutallab.html

(5) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/6891348/Detroit-attack-Umar-Farouk-Abdulmutallab-from-London-student-to-jihadist.html

(6) http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1950280,00.html

(7) http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/28/us/28explosives.html

Every successful airline bombing has been a large bomb placed in the luggage compartments (lockerbie, Cubana flight455). If anyone really wanted to blow up a plane this is the way they would do it

I would like to correct myself on this point, after doing a bit of research I have found that there have been a few successful bombings of planes using hand luggage, although by far the vast majority of bombings have been through the loading of suitcase bombs.

Ironically, one of the main reasons for using hand luggage seemed to be so the bomb could be hidden on the plane to blow up on the following trip, of course a suicide bomber would have no reason for such tactics.

Also Cubana fl455 had a bomb planted on it before takeoff, so it was neither a suitcase or carry-on bomb.

Here in the USA, if you are asked to give your signature, you print your first name.

So your passport just has your first name printed on it? What a load of rubbish.

The only situation where I might print my name is if I am signing for goods, but for D/L, banking, passports, visas, that would be completely inappropriate.

but most people I have in my family have different signatures for cheques than for other docs. So your theory may be inaccurate. As for him checking in  the bomb with his luggage. Do you think that Al-Qaeda wouldn't have tried it if it were possible. The screening that is done on check-in baggage is quite thorough.

I honestly dont think anyone would consider a completly unstylised printing of their first name as a valid signature for an official document like a passport, unless that is the best they can do.  

Every successful airline bombing has been a large bomb placed in the luggage compartments (lockerbie, Cubana flight455). If anyone really wanted to blow up a plane this is the way they would do it, these pathetic attempts by the likes of Richard Reid or Umar(?) are false flag operations that are never meant to succeed.

Even if they managed to detonate the small amount of explosives they smuggle onboard it is unlikely they would bring the plane down (especially when Umar was virtually sitting on the explosives so he would absorb much of the blast, why didnt he remove the explosives from his crutch while he was in the toilet for 20min?)

Checked luggage comes under very little screening, and certainly nothing like the screening of hand luggage or personal screening as you enter a plane, very very little checked luggage gets opened. Think of all the large bottles of alcohol etc that are in checked luggage, it would be impossible to check all of them.

The main defence against someone putting a bomb in a suitcase and loading it onto a plane is that the person must fly with the luggage, this is of course no deterrent to a suicide bomber. Yet these two idiots (reid and umar) board international flights with no checked luggage at all which just makes them look more suspicious, either >Al-Qaeda< are complete idiots or we are for believing such nonsensical plots.

Okay, the more you try to make sense of our post, the more ridiculous you sound. . .
There's nothing wrong with that signature, his name is clearly spelled okay and his hand writing is okay too

Are you trying to tell me that there is nothing unusual about a signature where just the first name is poorly printed?

That signature might be understandable where the person has literacy problems and/or has never learnt to write (as opposed to print), and has never had good reason to develop a proper signature, but that signature from someone well educated and extremely wealthy?? Never.

What in the world has family background got to do with signature?

Wealthy people use signatures a lot more than someone who is dirt poor (for bank accounts, D/L, passport and visa applications, ), and they are more defensive of their signatures so they invariably develop somewhat complex signatures.

Im not wealthy but I have been advised at a bank that my signature is too simple and easily copied, and my signature is more complex than Umars.

That signature above is not only the signature of someone who is at best only semi-literate, but it is also the signature of someone who has never had a reason to develop a proper signature.

Here is his signature


Are we supposed to believe that signature is from someone who comes from one of the wealthiest families in Africa, and who was educated in top British schools. It looks like he can barely print his first name.

There are also conflicting photos of him. I reckon that this was a false flag operation and the poor patsie who is locked up in the US (probrably soon to be shipped to Gitmo) is not Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab at all.

Nobody would try to blow up a plane the way we are being told he attempted (Richard Reid was also a setup), they would just load a bomb in a suitcase and check it in. The bomb could be enormous compared to what pathetic amount could be smuggled on with carry-on luggage and he would look less suspicious because he had luggage for an international flight.

There are eyewitnesses that say Umar (or whoever it was) was assisted through security at Schipol airport, and that an agent was videoing the whole flight including Umars arrest.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-gZ5OR8XzQ

PETN usually requires a shockwave to detonate, this bomb was never supposed to explode.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/28/us/28explosives.html?_r=3