₦airaland Forum

Janosky:
Is it only Jesus who received homage?
2 Chronicles 24:17
However, after Jehoiada died, the rulers of Judah came and paid homage to the king. Then the king listened to them,

Esther 3:2
The entire royal staff at the King’s Gate bowed down and paid homage to Haman, because the king had commanded this to be done for him. But Mordecai would not bow down or pay homage.

Esther 3:5
When Haman saw that Mordecai was not bowing down or paying him homage, he was filled with rage.

Janosky:
Matthew 4:4 and John 4:23-24, according to Jesus in your Bible, worship is EXCLUSIVE to whom?

Complete Jewish Bible says it's homage @Matthew 14:33 (example in the screenshot).
Bible truth dey pain you for brain.

22jumpstreet:
Over what?

An idol?
I know my creator and only him I serve and reverence...

He has the final say,so I am safe...

22jumpstreet:
Really? Why did he ask God to forgive those who murdered him?

And why did he need to die in the first place ?

haekymbahd:
where did Jesus approve it

King James Bible
Giving thanks always for all things unto God and the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. Ephesians 5:20

22jumpstreet:
Who is he ?
Listen to your creator, not somebody the romans created to deceive gullible people.

Worship your creator. He is one lord deuteronomy 6:4

Janosky:
Matthew 4:4 and John 4:23-24 , Jesus Christ himself refuted your Trinitarian TWIST of Matthew 14:33.
Matthew 14:33, homage was given to Jesus NOT worship.
Your Matthew 14:33 is in conflict with Jesus instructions @ Matthew 4:4 and John 4:23-24.
No two ways about it.

22jumpstreet:
It is idolatry...thats my point.

Worship your creator instead.

That they did does not mean they where right..

AntiChristian:
You still haven't left this your folly?

Where did your God create your spirit and soul from? Mention the Bible verses?

AntiChristian:
Soul= Spirit in Islam. Where did your God create soul and spirit separately for Adam?

You are the one spouting nonsense!

AntiChristian:
You quoted something you don't even understand! I am asking you to explain the term spirit and soul as used in the verse you brought.

Man has body and soul/spirit. It is two not three.

Stop using man to probe your defective trinity!

AntiChristian:
So from the above what's the difference between soul and spirit?

Was Adam's body only created from earth? Where does the spirit and soul come from?

22jumpstreet:
Why Jesus? Why not your creator instead......did God ever command anybody to worship anything else other than him?

AntiChristian:
I believe in body and soul only not body, soul and spirit!

AntiChristian:
No one refers to any spirit, body an soul. We use that expression in a majestic way!

The verse you quoted above even proves Allah has no wife, son, partners!

So where does your trinity come from?

AntiChristian:
I believe in body and soul only not body, soul and spirit!

AntiChristian:
Your gods are three not one.

"Us" as used above may mean your Gods couldn't create man himself. He needed help.

And at best it can just be a plural of majesty.

Where was trinity mentioned in the bible apart from the dubious John verse in KJV that doesn't exist in other versions?

sonmvayina:
There are clearly good reasons to doubt Jesus of Nazareth existence.

The first problem we encounter when trying to discover more about a man called Jesus of Nazareth is the lack of early sources. The earliest sources only reference to clearly fictional Christ of Faith. These early sources, compiled decades after the alleged events, all stem from Christian authors eager to promote Christianity – which gives us reason to question them. The authors of the Gospels fail to name themselves, describe their qualifications, or show any criticism with their foundational sources – which they also fail to identify. Filled with mythical and non-historical information, and heavily edited over time, the Gospels certainly should not convince critics to trust even the more mundane claims made therein.
Paul’s Epistles, written earlier than the Gospels, give us no reason to dogmatically declare Jesus must have existed. Avoiding Jesus’ earthly events and teachings, even when the latter could have bolstered his own claims, Paul only describes his “Heavenly Jesus.” Even when discussing what appear to be the resurrection and the last supper, his only stated sources are his direct revelations from the "Lord" and his indirect revelations from the Hebrew Bible. In fact, Paul actually rules out human sources (see Galatians 1:11-12).
There are no existing eyewitness or contemporary accounts of Jesus. All we have are later descriptions of Jesus’ life events by non-eyewitnesses, most of whom are obviously biased. Little can be gleaned from the few non-Biblical and non-Christian sources, with only Roman scholar Josephus and historian Tacitus having any reasonable claim to be writing about Jesus within 100 years of his life. And even those sparse accounts are shrouded in controversy, with disagreements over what parts have obviously been changed by Christian scribes (the manuscripts were preserved by Christians), the fact that both these authors were born after Jesus died (they would thus have probably received this information from Christians), and the oddity that centuries go by before Christian apologists start referencing them.
So what do the mainstream (and non-Christian) scholars say about all this? Surprisingly very little – of substance anyway. Only Bart Ehrman and Maurice Casey have thoroughly attempted to prove Jesus’ historical existence in recent times. Their most decisive point? The Gospels can generally be trusted – after we ignore the many, many bits that are untrustworthy – because of the hypothetical (i.e. non-existent) sources behind them. Who produced these hypothetical sources? When? What did they say? Were they reliable? Were they intended to be accurate historical portrayals, enlightening allegories, or entertaining fictions?
Ehrman and Casey can’t tell you – and neither can any New Testament scholar. In sum, there are clearly good reasons to doubt Jesus’ historical existence – if not to think it outright improbable.

AntiChristian:
So your soul can be in heaven while your spirit enter the womb of another person to be given birth to? While your body is somewhere else?

You must be confused!

AntiChristian:
Yeah Even more than the name YHWH.

Did the early church believed Jesus is

1. God the father and
2. God the son and
3. 100% God and 100% human?

Sonyboom765:
Was it your father that fought to install GEJ or were you the one that voted him after Yoruba saved him from the clutches of Turai or your papa head don damage so tey your brain collapsed join.

Sonyboom765:
We all know your n your father are bastards.

LegendHero:
Giants lol.

They are the people we used to add to the numbers. Even Ijaw people is more giant than the politically minority Ibos.

LegendHero:
Fulanis masterminded multiple massacres against Yeebos since the 1940s and also dealt them a heavy blow in the counter coup massacre. Yet, Ibos voted Shagari few years after and Ojuku campaigned openly for the same Fulani hegemony that killed millions of Ibos in the civil war.

Fulani were killing people in the SE, sent Python dance, disagree too give Ibo freedom to leave the country and yet Yeebos voted Atiku in 2019 election and still begging to suck his cum in 2023 election.

Probably Tinubu is also learning from the Ibos by associating with the Fulanis. Don’t you think so?